|
FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING] |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
01-07-2019, 01:25 PM | #29 |
Dismember
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Red Scion FR-S
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 5,557
Thanks: 2,152
Thanked 3,999 Times in 2,155 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
If I were in the market for an ICE-powered FWD sports car, I'd hold out for a Type-R. The FR-S has the grins per dollar, RWD dynamic, yet still daily drivable and practical market. The Miata is even more tossable but totally impractical and, for anyone tall, uncomfortable. Plus it's loud as hell unless you get the hard top, and the sporty versions ride rough. Civic Si is a totally reasonable car to get, but it's a bit dull. 370Z and G37 are just fat cars, like the Genesis Coupe. Porches are not expensive to maintain if you get a good one without the fancy suspension. You have lots of options. I do know that, despite me barely driving it, I'm still keeping the FR-S. After driving other cars, it's so refreshing to be low, direct, and nimble.
__________________
|
The Following User Says Thank You to EAGLE5 For This Useful Post: | AnalogMan (01-12-2019) |
01-07-2019, 01:53 PM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, white, MT
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 29,868
Thanks: 28,790
Thanked 31,816 Times in 16,425 Posts
Mentioned: 708 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
humfrz |
|
01-07-2019, 02:34 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: '13 Whiteout
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 1,491
Thanks: 496
Thanked 1,242 Times in 673 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Upgraded suspension, tires and one of these and you're all racecar.
https://driver61.com/product/omp-sup...teering-wheel/ |
01-07-2019, 02:49 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Drives: 2019 BRZ Limited 6 speed Red
Location: New England
Posts: 498
Thanks: 740
Thanked 1,012 Times in 338 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
We're all victims of our own past experiences. I love air cooled Porsches. Way back when I used to own a 1992 911. The 964 series wasn't the most appreciated by Porschephiles, but I loved it. It's one of the cars I most regret selling. Should have kept it forever. Now pretty much all air cooled Porsches have become obscenely expensive 'collectors items' and are likely forever out of reach (at least for me).
A few years later, when I couldn't find another nice 911, and wanting a convertible back then and feeling flush with cash, I bought a 2006 Boxster S. Being old-school, I didn't like the fact that it didn't have an oil dipstick. It was solely an electronic oil level display. But I talked myself into thinking it's the future, it's a modern car, etc. etc. About 6 months later, the electronic oil level display was showing that the oil level was increasing. I was perplexed, and concerned. But sure enough, over the course of a couple of weeks, the digital display showed the oil level increasing, first 1 qt, then 2 qts above full. If the car had a plain old dipstick, I could have answered the question in seconds. Just pull it out and look at it, see the actual level, and any contamination. But on that car I couldn't. The only way I thought the oil level could be increasing was if some other fluid - gasoline or coolant - was getting into it. Neither possibility was good. So, without a dipstick, the only solution was to take it to the Porsche dealer - who charged me $250 (in 2006) to drain the oil, measure it, and look at it to see if there was any contamination. There wasn't, and the problem turned out to be a faulty sensor. They replaced the sensor under warranty, but charged me $250 for the drain and refill. Ever since then I've sworn I would never own another car without a dipstick (which rules out post-2005 water-cooled Porsches). I've looked into potential retrofits, but haven't found one. It seems like a small and peculiar thing, but, like I said, we're all victims of our own past experiences. The styling of the Civic Si Coupe, eh, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I think the side profile is fine, maybe not exactly attractive but at least interesting. The front and back, with those asteroid impact craters in the bumpers, not so much. But, the view from inside is good. The BRZ certainly has it all over the Civic Si in the styling department. Now if only the BRZ had 50 ft-lb more torque or 50 more hp, it would be a no-brainer... |
01-07-2019, 03:53 PM | #33 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Drives: '17 BRZ PP - '17 FoRS
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 34 Times in 21 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I dig Si's. I owned an EP3 Si, kept it mainly stock and beat the hell out of it with no issues. It kind of started my love for hot hatches. It was NA, high revving, lightweight and fun.....the new Si is not NA, not particularly high revving, fairly light (100-150 lb more than the BRZ) and pretty fun. But being FWD and a bit "softer", it doesn't provide the same experience. The BRZ is more analog, more driver-centric, simpler and is an actual sports car. The Si is not.
Make your decision and show us what you got! If you haven't yet, go test drive a 17+ BRZ with Performance Package. |
01-07-2019, 03:59 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2015 FRS - FFR GTM
Location: Key Largo, FL
Posts: 785
Thanks: 240
Thanked 817 Times in 378 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
As an older guy myself (60) and having owned a TR6 and driven 240Z's,, you've hit the nail on the head here. The FRS is a fabulous simple little car just a bit down on power. I don't think you'd be disappointed driving one,,, I've put 56K on mine and enjoyed it all. BTW it's down now for a motor swap. LOL
__________________
2015 FR-S - One Day I'll Finish The Swap |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gtpvette For This Useful Post: | AnalogMan (01-12-2019) |
01-07-2019, 04:11 PM | #35 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 2010 Lexus ES 350, 2011 BMW 128i
Location: MA
Posts: 39
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
You've already got a practical car in the form of your wife's crosstrek. A Civic SI sounds kind of redundant, unless you go for an 8th or possibly 9th gen. Get a BRZ.
If the BRZ had 50 more HP, it'd be in a different price bracket and I'm not sure how many people would actually cough up the $$$ for it. Power is not cheap, light-weight is not cheap, having both is extremely not cheap. The S2000 had almost 250hp with light weight and that thing was pretty expensive. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to spralwers For This Useful Post: |
01-07-2019, 04:47 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: '13 Whiteout
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 1,491
Thanks: 496
Thanked 1,242 Times in 673 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Light Cheap Powerful Pick 2 |
|
01-07-2019, 05:42 PM | #37 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: NY
Posts: 87
Thanks: 22
Thanked 37 Times in 28 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I just came out of a 2018 Civic Si Coupe and I would not recommend it if you are looking for a "sports" car experience. Yes, it does have more torque, especially in the mid-range, due to the turbo, but you also have turbo lag and rev hang. The BRZ feels quicker from 2-3K RPM. The steering feel and handling is very good in the Civic, but the rev hang is what really killed the driving experience for me, along with the super light clutch and plastic feeling shifter. The BRZ just feels more raw and your inputs require a little more effort (aside from the steering), if that makes any sense.
If you are looking for a "softer" vehicle that is more daily driver friendly, with excellent fuel economy, then the civic might be a better option. But if you are looking for that sports car experience, then the twins is the way to go. |
The Following User Says Thank You to JR For This Useful Post: | AnalogMan (01-12-2019) |
01-07-2019, 10:13 PM | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2020 SS1LE (previous 13 BRZ owner)
Location: North Pole
Posts: 2,753
Thanks: 328
Thanked 1,463 Times in 802 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I know you own a Mustang but if you have not driven a Camaro SS 1LE you really should. The visibility sucks but I think you van adjust but the car is an absolute blast. I preferred it to my C7 Z51 on the track. The 6th gen feels smaller when you are driving it and it punches way above its price point. C7's are actually very reliable as long as you dont buy the 8 speed auto which has had issues. There are also tons of low mileage used ones. I bought mine in Mass and it only had 2800 miles and basically the full warranty, but was 30% off MSRP. Extended warranties (GM) through an online GM dealer are also very cheap. If you have not driven one give it a spin, but I thought the SS1LE was the better car. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to thill For This Useful Post: | AnalogMan (01-12-2019) |
01-07-2019, 11:42 PM | #39 | |
Dismember
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Red Scion FR-S
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 5,557
Thanks: 2,152
Thanked 3,999 Times in 2,155 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The Civic is plain ugly, as is the Type-R, but at least the TR is fast as hell. Torque is awesome for daily driving, but when you want to have fun, there's a lot of joy out of wringing the shit out of a manual NA engine. We have a Jaguar I-Pace. As an EV, it has mounds of torque. You can accelerate into any gap, no problem. However, it's much more fun to get to 80 in the FRS.
__________________
|
|
01-08-2019, 01:23 AM | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,794
Thanks: 2,164
Thanked 4,242 Times in 2,220 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."
2022 BRZ Build 2013 FR-S Build |
|
01-08-2019, 11:45 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2018 BMW M240i
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,768
Thanks: 692
Thanked 917 Times in 538 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I vote BRZ if you have to buy brand new.
Dont get a Z, friend just bought one. Its horribly outdated with crap interior and electronics. Dealer support (in my area at least) is shady at best. (I could go into the fiasco my friend had with their lying cheating dealership but its a long story). Miata is nice but so dang small. If you are willing to buy used my vote is a Porsche Cayman S 09-12. It will handily be a better drivers experience than anything else. |
01-08-2019, 12:29 PM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '12 C63 P31, '23 GRC
Location: NC
Posts: 3,200
Thanks: 2,935
Thanked 2,072 Times in 1,185 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
They without a doubt COULD sell it with a manual steering rack. But people are too soft these days, and that car is already in a small niche.
__________________
Current: 2023 GRC Circuit Edition, 2012 C63 AMG P31
Past: (2) 2000 MR2 Spyder, 2017 GTI Sport, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, Supercharged 2013 BRZ-L, 2007 Honda S2000, 1992 Integra GS-R |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shopping for sway bar in the GTA?? | Skurj | CANADA | 0 | 04-30-2016 06:05 PM |
Shopping for Supercharger | KonTheory | Forced Induction | 39 | 09-27-2014 03:55 PM |
Car Shopping... | Mr. Banana | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 25 | 09-23-2014 03:35 PM |
Those who are still shopping for a BRZ | HapaHaole | Northern California | 1 | 12-21-2013 02:40 PM |
Subaru BRZ Direct Test vs Nissan 370z and Mazda MX-5 Miata | Hachiroku | FR-S / BRZ vs.... | 45 | 04-28-2012 07:34 AM |