follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > FT86CLUB Shared Forum > FR-S / BRZ vs....

FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING]


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-20-2014, 07:02 PM   #1
dreroc-z
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 1989 Camaro IROC Z28
Location: Illinois
Posts: 49
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
89 Camaro IROC Z vs FR-S

Hey guys I currently do not own an FRS but I plan to around this time next year. Currently I am DDing a 89 Camaro with a tired 5.7 L98 rated at about 220 HP and and some where about 330 ft lb of torque, weighing in at about 3330 lbs without a driver. This engine in there has seen its days and is going to need a rebuild most likely before the year is over. I plan on rebuilding the engine to nearly stock specs..either way I want to only have the Camaro for summer driving only. Obviously the power has faced a few loses but what is provided is just the right amount for me. I'm curious how well the FRS would do in a straight line in comparison to what I'm currently driving...in terms of 0-60 and more. Im sure the FRS will handle much better. By the way the Camaro is stock aside from an exhaust and back in the day the 5.7 only came in automatic but I plan to grab a manual FRS.

What do you guys think? I really like the FRS and it feels so similar in the cockpit which is a feel that I've come very accustomed to but being one of my favorite cars I don't want my Camaro to see any more of these Chicago winters.
dreroc-z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 07:41 PM   #2
Griever423
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2020 BRZ PP
Location: DFW
Posts: 215
Thanks: 146
Thanked 54 Times in 45 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreroc-z View Post
Hey guys I currently do not own an FRS but I plan to around this time next year. Currently I am DDing a 89 Camaro with a tired 5.7 L98 rated at about 220 HP and and some where about 330 ft lb of torque, weighing in at about 3330 lbs without a driver. This engine in there has seen its days and is going to need a rebuild most likely before the year is over. I plan on rebuilding the engine to nearly stock specs..either way I want to only have the Camaro for summer driving only. Obviously the power has faced a few loses but what is provided is just the right amount for me. I'm curious how well the FRS would do in a straight line in comparison to what I'm currently driving...in terms of 0-60 and more. Im sure the FRS will handle much better. By the way the Camaro is stock aside from an exhaust and back in the day the 5.7 only came in automatic but I plan to grab a manual FRS.

What do you guys think? I really like the FRS and it feels so similar in the cockpit which is a feel that I've come very accustomed to but being one of my favorite cars I don't want my Camaro to see any more of these Chicago winters.
In terms of driving around town and straight line performance you will find the BRZ lacking compared to the Camaro. Even when considering the weight difference, the Camaro is going to FEEL faster simply because of the 180 ft/lb difference in torque.

MPG will be much better in the BRZ. Handling isn't even a comparison.
Griever423 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 08:03 PM   #3
Rampage
Senior Member/Old Fanboi
 
Rampage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2000 2ZZ-GE MR2 Spyder HT
Location: Back home in Ohio now
Posts: 2,446
Thanks: 1,931
Thanked 2,014 Times in 915 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The Camaro may feel faster due to torque but it is not. In stock configuration both cars have almost identical 0-60 and 1/4 mile times according to online sources and automotive publications. With the extra torque you can lug the Camaro around town but as long as you are not afraid to stir the shifter the FR-S/BRZ will more than keep up. Once you get to the twisties it is no contest...FR-S all the way.
__________________
So many modders have more cents than sense!
Rampage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 09:34 PM   #4
dreroc-z
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 1989 Camaro IROC Z28
Location: Illinois
Posts: 49
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Yeah thats what I figured with the higher torque number it'll feel like more of a "launch" off the line. Im really interested in the FRS for this reason...more 'finesse' and of course better mpg. Being just slightly aggressive on the roads gives me sub 17 mpg. Its awesome but the car deserves to not see this horrible weather. T tops are only awesome in the warmer months anyway.

Thanks for the opnions guys. I know the handling would no match for the FRS but thats expected. Ive very happy to hear this because I know with a few small upgrades the FRS if needed will easily be able to surpass my current car even though im sure it'll be perfect just how it is.
dreroc-z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 09:40 PM   #5
Burrcold
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Drives: Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,624
Thanks: 763
Thanked 1,586 Times in 776 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The Camaro also feels like a barge when you stomp on the accelerator.
__________________
Burrcold is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Burrcold For This Useful Post:
Gilwith1l (04-21-2014)
Old 04-20-2014, 09:56 PM   #6
dreroc-z
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 1989 Camaro IROC Z28
Location: Illinois
Posts: 49
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burrcold View Post
The Camaro also feels like a barge when you stomp on the accelerator.
Haha it sure does. It sounds great but for all that commotion its not really going any where at lightspeed. Its fast enough for my needs though. I had originally opted to have the engine rebuilt (or swapped ...lt-1 possibly) with performance in mind but I want to keep the car in close to as stock and original as possible. Besides the FRS is great looking car so Im not losing anything in that department.
dreroc-z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 11:21 PM   #7
n2oinferno
Praise Helix!
 
n2oinferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: Accord 2.0T, Silverado
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,859
Thanks: 428
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,072 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
The awesome news is you can get these for the FR-S and then you don't even need to chop off the mullet!




I kid, I kid. The old pony cars of the 80's certainly have a ton of potential, but bone stock they aren't all that quick. Man that Camaro is just begging to be boosted or LS swapped or something though.
n2oinferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 11:42 PM   #8
dreroc-z
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 1989 Camaro IROC Z28
Location: Illinois
Posts: 49
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Haha okay okay with the mullet/redneck jokes. Yeah I know an ls1 would be sweet but I'm not really trying to make a racecar out of it or anything...it is what it is and I'm happy with it. Besides I wouldn't want an automatic after putting all that work into swapping an engine and transmission in so I've decided to just be content with what it is. I always had a thing for the shape and stuff when I was a kid for some reason and I always said I'd own one when I was younger so I when I had the cash I bought one, its actually my first car.




So it seems pretty evident that the FRS/BRZ would be able to match or take my current car no problem.
dreroc-z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2014, 12:12 AM   #9
Odd
#
 
Odd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: DGM BRZ
Location: ATX
Posts: 150
Thanks: 117
Thanked 73 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Camaro
230hp
330 lb-ft
15 sec 1/4 mile?

FT86
200 hp
330 lb-f

Iroc
Dimensions
Gas Tank Size 15.5 gallons
Wheelbase 101.0
Length 192.0 inches
Height 50.0 inches

BRZ/FRS
WIDTH5 ft. 9.9 in. (69.9 in.) HEIGHT 4 ft. 2.6 in. (50.6 in.)
LENGTH13 ft. 10.7 in. (166.7 in.) GROUND CLEARANCE0 ft. 4.9 in. (4.9 in.)
FRONT TRACK4 ft. 11.8 in. (59.8 in.) REAR TRACK5 ft. 0.6 in. (60.6 in.)
WHEEL BASE8 ft. 5.2 in. (101.2 in.)
Odd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2014, 09:19 AM   #10
shiro
Senior Member
 
shiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S, 2014 Lexus IS350
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 372
Thanks: 337
Thanked 122 Times in 91 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
They are both great cars and fun to drive. Really, it depends on your preferences. Like the other's have stated, the two cars are quite comparable, yet they will feel slightly different due to weight and drivetrain design. Also, keep in mind that you are comparing two cars that are two decades apart.

The bonus part of getting a new sports car [FR-S/BRZ] is a warranty & free services for two years. Plus, if you wanted to you could possibly buy a used FR-S or BRZ for under $20k since they've become pretty popular. Overall, if you are looking for something new and fun, why not trade up?
shiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2014, 09:23 AM   #11
Rayme
The Answer
 
Rayme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: Mazda 2
Location: Moncton, NB
Posts: 1,233
Thanks: 488
Thanked 661 Times in 315 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Coming from that tired car, the FR-S will feel like an exotic!
__________________
Rayme is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rayme For This Useful Post:
Gilwith1l (04-21-2014)
Old 04-21-2014, 10:03 AM   #12
thill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2020 SS1LE (previous 13 BRZ owner)
Location: North Pole
Posts: 2,753
Thanks: 328
Thanked 1,463 Times in 802 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Odd View Post
Camaro
230hp
330 lb-ft
15 sec 1/4 mile?

FT86
200 hp
330 lb-f

Iroc
Dimensions
Gas Tank Size 15.5 gallons
Wheelbase 101.0
Length 192.0 inches
Height 50.0 inches

BRZ/FRS
WIDTH5 ft. 9.9 in. (69.9 in.) HEIGHT 4 ft. 2.6 in. (50.6 in.)
LENGTH13 ft. 10.7 in. (166.7 in.) GROUND CLEARANCE0 ft. 4.9 in. (4.9 in.)
FRONT TRACK4 ft. 11.8 in. (59.8 in.) REAR TRACK5 ft. 0.6 in. (60.6 in.)
WHEEL BASE8 ft. 5.2 in. (101.2 in.)
I really wish the FT86 had 330ft lbs of torque from an NA 2.0 liter gas engine
thill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2014, 10:32 AM   #13
Optimus Prime
Senior Member
 
Optimus Prime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Whiteout 2013 FR-S
Location: NEPA
Posts: 172
Thanks: 69
Thanked 41 Times in 33 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
So my brother is a huge F-body fan. Previously owned a '91(I think) firebird, '88 GTA with a LT1, and currently owns an '89 turbo TA. I'll be reiterating what everyone else has said, but from a power delivery standpoint, overall time to 60 is pretty close. Your Z will feel faster as mentioned due to the torque.

Again, reiterating what has been stated, but the handling isn't even close. Having ridden in and driven the above, none of the F bodies can even come close to the precision or the connection to the road. If you haven't yet, go test drive one. While the performance #s are the same, the delivery couldn't be any different. And the connection you form with the car and the road is entirely different.

Both vehicles will be enjoyable for completely different reasons. BTW, I love me some T Tops(or Targas).
Optimus Prime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2014, 04:38 PM   #14
OrbitalEllipses
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,889 Times in 2,902 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by n2oinferno View Post
The awesome news is you can get these for the FR-S and then you don't even need to chop off the mullet!
[terribad 80s rear louvers]



I kid, I kid. The old pony cars of the 80's certainly have a ton of potential, but bone stock they aren't all that quick. Man that Camaro is just begging to be boosted or LS swapped or something though.
This is an exemplary post people, take notice.
OrbitalEllipses is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
camaro, irocz, racecar, thirdgen, z28


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
frs or camaro failingpig FR-S / BRZ vs.... 77 02-22-2014 12:58 PM
FS- Camaro SS .. Buy mine I'll buy yours... Liltuffgirl Cars for Sale/Trade 14 12-05-2013 10:57 PM
2014 Camaro LIKEABOSS Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 27 03-27-2013 09:28 PM
FR-S vs 312 hp Camaro? Gill FR-S / BRZ vs.... 32 03-31-2012 07:56 AM
Camaro ZL1 laps the ring in 7:41.27 Sea1monkey2 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 7 10-07-2011 09:07 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.