10-30-2014, 03:31 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: car
Location: cold
Posts: 599
Thanks: 72
Thanked 607 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
^ Ford ran a bunch of experiments with just such a setup. You're basically injecting ethanol as a type of octane booster or racing fuel. If you just want to make power in a simple way (don't care about minimizing E85 consumption) I don't see much advantage to such a complex system.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to arghx7 For This Useful Post: | P@ul (12-03-2014) |
11-13-2014, 09:36 PM | #30 | |
The Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Civic Turbo,FR-S
Location: NJ
Posts: 928
Thanks: 130
Thanked 171 Times in 119 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
11-14-2014, 02:09 AM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Change the axes
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post: | Grip Ronin (11-14-2014) |
11-14-2014, 09:14 AM | #32 |
The Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Civic Turbo,FR-S
Location: NJ
Posts: 928
Thanks: 130
Thanked 171 Times in 119 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
genius, i always forget you can do that on romraider lol. might you know when do the "warm" and "hot" tables take effect?
__________________
|
11-16-2014, 03:55 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
It's best just to do them all the same. They're the same from the OEM.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
12-02-2014, 06:46 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 311
Thanks: 44
Thanked 358 Times in 142 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Port injector time
I've had a look at port injector duty cycle calculation.
Will post MatLab script later on the MatLab thread. Calculation: Cycle time ms/cycle = 1000 ms/s * 60 s/min * 2 rev/cycle / RPM rev/min = 120000 / RPM ms/cycle Injector duty cycle % = 100 % * Port_IPW ms / Cycle_time ms = Port_IPW * RPM /1200 % With stock port injectors and stock PI : DI ratio map I am up to about 23% duty cycle at redline and 1.2g/rev load. |
12-02-2014, 07:07 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 311
Thanks: 44
Thanked 358 Times in 142 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Direct injector time
This one is interesting and not much info available. I have made quite a few assumptions here in the absence of hard data on Toyota's DI system. Do your own verification before using these to tune your engine...
Since DI only has one rev to work with for fuelling rather than a whole cycle: at an 8000 RPM redline, there are 7.5ms per rev rather than 15ms/cycle that the port injectors have to work with. I looked at a number of relationships betweek DI_IPW and load in log lines with Port_IPW=0 and found the most linear relationship with the commanded fuel vs DI_IPW*FuelPress: Commanded Fuel fuel g/rev = Load air g/rev / Commanded_AFR air/fuel From what I understand, most DI injectors have up to a 5ms pulse width time. Flow is also proportional to fuel pressure. Luckily for us, the peak DI IPW is 5ms and peak DI fuel pressure on the GDI flow table is 20MPa. Multiplying the peak DI (5ms) and peak fuel pressure (20MPa) essentially gives us a 100 % value that we can use directly. Scripts will be posted in the MatLab thread. Figures: 1. Relationship between DI_IPW*FuelPress vs Commanded fuel 2. DI Duty using stock DI system and PI : DI map Last edited by ztan; 12-02-2014 at 08:01 PM. |
12-03-2014, 03:31 AM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Interested on the DI cycle. I run far more DI than the stock setup, my S/C runs about 5.8ms on the ECUtek logs at the higher RPM, compared to ~3.5ms for stock. Is there any way to calculate this at all?
You can log the PI duty on ECUtek although I currently don't....
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
12-03-2014, 12:23 PM | #37 | |
Apostle
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: JesusMobile
Location: SoCal
Posts: 282
Thanks: 276
Thanked 83 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2009...-20090426.html http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2009/06...el-engine.html There's some MIT spinout that was working on it, but their webpage is pretty sparse: http://www.ethanolboost.com/ |
|
12-03-2014, 04:21 PM | #38 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: car
Location: cold
Posts: 599
Thanks: 72
Thanked 607 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
For DI it's different. In one sense, pulsewidth doesn't matter as much assuming a fixed rail pressure. You're limited by your injection timing window. For max injector flow you can't spray when the exhaust valve is open, or rather you can but it will go right out of the cylinder and be useless. You've got from the start of injection time until a maximum of when the spark plug fires. So if my SOI is 320 BTDC, and my spark is 20 BTDC, I've got 300 degrees window (oversimplifying a bit). The number of corresponding milliseconds varies with the engine speed. For DI: log your SOI, log your milliseconds duration, calculate your crank angle duration from that, and then calculate your end of injection. The closer your SOI gets to 360 BTDC (top dead center Intake), the more you are hosing down the piston and/or cylinder wall, getting oil dilution, smoke, and other kinds of problems. The same applies to the EOI: the closer your EOI gets to 0 degrees (top dead center Firing), the more you are hitting the piston and/or diluting the oil. But even if you don't give a crap about hosing down the cylinder and the piston, you still can't throw fuel out the exhaust valve. So your DI will never get anywhere close to 100% duty, because my exhaust valve is open for 200+ crank angle degrees. From what I've seen typical stock tunes don't run more than 200 degrees injection duration on DI due to concerns about smoke and oil dilution, but as I said that can be stretched. Quote:
|
||
12-03-2014, 05:48 PM | #39 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 311
Thanks: 44
Thanked 358 Times in 142 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Does anyone have the RAM address for SOI? Kodename47 has had up to 5.8ms on the DI injector - anyone else gone higher? |
|
12-03-2014, 08:17 PM | #40 | |
Apostle
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: JesusMobile
Location: SoCal
Posts: 282
Thanks: 276
Thanked 83 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
....Then again, we have sub $2 gas, OPEC in shambles, ME in flux, and will have a new administration in 2 years, etc. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to P@ul For This Useful Post: | Koa (02-25-2015) |
02-25-2015, 11:48 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I decided to throw together a little calculation tool for DI angles etc. Let me know what you guys think, it's obviously based on assumptions of the exhaust cam angle and DI SOI so I can't guarantee it's accuracy.
Download Link - Kodename47's Direct Injection Calculator
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post: | DocWalt (11-02-2015) |
11-02-2015, 03:30 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MI
Posts: 229
Thanks: 140
Thanked 78 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Have you guys tried going 100% DI at the lower speeds? It looks like Toyota went 100% DI at the peak scavenging areas closer to 2K rpm to avoid fuel short circuiting during scavenging (HC emissions) caused by PI but in the speeds before that it should be possible to go 100% DI as well and take advantage of the knock relief. I am not sure why they did not do it unless they thought the fuel mixing with 100% DI would be poor causing Soot.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FR-S Gear Ratio Comparison | SpeedR | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 36 | 02-25-2016 09:34 AM |
Best pistons to use and Comp ratio? | Fabron757 | Forced Induction | 36 | 02-05-2014 03:21 PM |
Rear End Ratio | White64Goat | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 6 | 07-07-2012 11:37 PM |
FR-S to BRZ Ratio | MannyO | New England | 11 | 03-08-2012 02:23 AM |
86,BRZ MT gear ratio | Yobiwan | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 1 | 01-26-2012 02:40 AM |