|
Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
01-22-2014, 12:31 PM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,889 Times in 2,902 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
|
^ Subaru engines don't have particularly high VE like the F20C.
@Sportsguy83 we're not talking about replacing a bendy, shitty, stock exhaust with 2 cats. We're talking about the difference between two high performance exhausts where one includes a high flow cat and the other has the same diameter/routing, but lacks the cat. It's NOT a big deal. It won't make significantly more power. Will it pick up 10-15whp? Probably. And yes, I haz degree. Listen to me, peasants! |
The Following User Says Thank You to OrbitalEllipses For This Useful Post: | CSG Mike (01-22-2014) |
01-22-2014, 01:35 PM | #16 | |
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,608
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Ok, that might be a little extreme but at what point do you say having a high flow catalytic converter will work? It is definitely air flow defendant and below a certain threshold it will work fine, but once you hit that threshold you will definitely be limited. What is that limit? Well that is up to the professional tuner who might have a degree or two themselves and what they have experienced from tuning easily 1000+ Subaru engines over say a 15+ years or longer. Cheers, William Knose |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DeliciousTuning For This Useful Post: | Sportsguy83 (01-22-2014) |
01-22-2014, 01:37 PM | #17 |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,533
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,178 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
I like this post.
Less restriction is less restriction, period. |
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | Sportsguy83 (01-22-2014) |
01-22-2014, 01:45 PM | #18 |
NASA SpecE30 Racer
|
Listen to this guy. He haz a couple degrees.
__________________
- King Tut
Street/Track Car: 2006 Honda S2000 TT3 || Race Car: 1987 BMW 325is SpecE30 || Tow Vehicle: 2014 RAM 1500 EcoDiesel Sold Cars: 2012 BMW M3 || 2013 Subaru BRZ || 2012 Porsche Cayman R || 2009 Chevrolet Z06 || 2009 BMW M3 || 2004 BMW M3 || 2004 Nissan 350Z |
01-22-2014, 01:50 PM | #19 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,533
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,178 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I've seen cats that are 10+ feet wide in diameter in testing cells, and these engines were making 750+ whp. Those cats were a 600 cell too |
|
01-22-2014, 01:50 PM | #20 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,889 Times in 2,902 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
My opinion is that a street car should have at least one cat and the pursuit of power in a street car shouldn't eliminate every cat, that's all. Let's just amicably agree to disagree; it's the OP's and tuner's choice anyhow. But is he superior??? |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to OrbitalEllipses For This Useful Post: | Jesse@JDLAutodesign (01-22-2014) |
01-22-2014, 01:57 PM | #21 |
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 Raven Black FRS
Location: Phx AZ
Posts: 601
Thanks: 56
Thanked 680 Times in 258 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
What effect does the cats positioning to the turbo effect things? Being in the front pipe its quite a distance from the turbine outlet on most setups. I think this helps compared to some cars that place a cat directly after the turbo.
|
01-22-2014, 08:11 PM | #22 | |
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,608
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Cheers, William Knose |
|
01-22-2014, 08:19 PM | #23 | |
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,608
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Also the further the catalytic converter is placed away from heat, the better it will flow. Because as air cools, the molecules slow and can flow a lot easier through small holes. Cheers, William Knose |
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to DeliciousTuning For This Useful Post: | CSG Mike (01-22-2014), Jesse@JDLAutodesign (01-24-2014), shaunsweeney (01-23-2014), Sportsguy83 (01-24-2014) |
01-24-2014, 12:02 AM | #24 | ||
Boosted
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: Not a supra....yet
Location: Riverside,CA/ Abu Dhabi,UAE
Posts: 2,925
Thanks: 487
Thanked 1,203 Times in 812 Posts
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Did some research and realized something with the 2 cars @PrimeMotoring
Quote:
Quote:
Because the only difference i realize is the exhaust system with the two cars ! Is it all from the HFC ? or was the driver of the second car asking for less power ? |
||
The Following User Says Thank You to SmsAlSuwaidi For This Useful Post: | Sportsguy83 (01-24-2014) |
01-24-2014, 09:09 AM | #25 | |
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: FRS with 2jz, 2015 STI 9.68@147
Location: East Rutherford, NJ
Posts: 673
Thanks: 374
Thanked 710 Times in 283 Posts
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
01-25-2014, 10:42 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 79
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I own the second Prime turbo FRS posted above (424whp). The first turbo one that made 480whp was running e66 fuel last I checked and he was catless. I was running e55 fuel and have a high flow cat (Ultimate Racing Exhaust). I could not afford to go catless being as in the town I live in and the surrounding towns, you simply cannot get away with catless anymore. They have "sniffer vans" that do on-spot inspections and it's a $5,000 fine PER CAT that is missing, but that fine is only issued if the vehicle is COMPLETELY catless, so my car is still legal. I'm going to ask my next set of questions to help you figure out if it worth it or not to actually put the time into removing that cat in your exhaust...
What are your power goals? What kit are you running? Is this a street driven car? Can you easily get away with catless where you live? I can tell you right now, my tuner told me that if I were able to have dumped actual e80~ series content in the tank, I could've broke over 500whp, same goes for the other car too, e66 still is not ideal for making a ton of power. Both of our cars were stock motor, stock trans builds, so neither of us wanted to go over 500whp because you're gonna risk blowing it to pieces. At the end of the day, a cat will rob you of horsepower, no argument there. What I'm trying to get at is, are you shooting for a mild 400whp street build? If so, then a cat really isn't going to affect you. Are you trying to build a 700whp+ build? Then you may want to go catless just to squeeze out the extra available horsepower. - Mike
__________________
Here's my build thread...
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...06#post1470606 |
01-25-2014, 01:12 PM | #27 | |
Boosted
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: Not a supra....yet
Location: Riverside,CA/ Abu Dhabi,UAE
Posts: 2,925
Thanks: 487
Thanked 1,203 Times in 812 Posts
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Thank you very much for the reply mike ! Power goals are sub 500whp for sure i will be very very happy with 450whp I will be running @MAPerformance 's new kit with a gtx3076 Yes/no, i dont drive it every single day even though its my only car i sometimes ride a bike to school I no, California laws are strict as hell and could get me screwed over if i get caught but hey what ever Sent from my IBrick
__________________
|
|
01-25-2014, 01:46 PM | #28 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 79
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
For your goals then, I would just leave the cat in there, you'll be completely fine, also keep in mind the dyno numbers posted above are Mustang Dyno numbers, reads a lot lower than Dynojet. You're gonna love the gtx3076 by the way, that thing punches HARD and you'll easily clear 450whp with that thing catted or not lol. Also being as you're in Cali, I would stay catless as they have the same sniffer vans and even more severe punishment if you violate the smog laws. To me the $10,000 total fine wasn't worth another few horsepower, that I couldn't use anyways because I'm on a stock motor. Enjoy the car though and make sure you post up a build thread for it, I'd love to see the outcome!
__________________
Here's my build thread...
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...06#post1470606 |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: OEM downpipe / Secondary catalytic converter | cb7tuner | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 2 | 06-07-2016 01:17 PM |
Nameless Axleback and Downpipe FS | stoneman155 | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 15 | 08-30-2013 09:44 AM |
NAMELESS DOWNPIPE (no-cat) -AUSTRALIA ?? | JimmyCrez | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 1 | 05-23-2013 08:43 AM |
Will nameless downpipe w/highflow cat fit with... | Pandle | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 2 | 02-17-2013 07:13 PM |
Nameless axleback and downpipe FS | 117 | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 8 | 02-01-2013 10:06 AM |