follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-09-2013, 07:29 PM   #15
SubieNate
Senior Member
 
SubieNate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Ultramarine
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 959
Thanks: 288
Thanked 560 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Chase, when you say solid, are you saying a solid bar or just solidly mounted (no hinges)

A completely solid bar seems like it would be obscenely heavy.
SubieNate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 07:52 PM   #16
GrimmSpeed
 
GrimmSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '13 BRZ, '12 WRX
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,676
Thanks: 271
Thanked 3,550 Times in 885 Posts
Mentioned: 218 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to GrimmSpeed Send a message via MSN to GrimmSpeed
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubieNate View Post
Chase, when you say solid, are you saying a solid bar or just solidly mounted (no hinges)

A completely solid bar seems like it would be obscenely heavy.
I just got home and settled in, hopped online and got so excited reading all these great responses so far. I'll be able to get back to everyone tomorrow, but I just wanted to clarify my poor wording quick:

My post says "welded solid," when I should have just said "welded." A solid bar WOULD be obscenely heavy, and none of us want to add any more weight to this car! And at a certain thickness the bar is no longer the limiting factor, the chassis will be. For the record the bar we used on the prototype to test deflection was 14ga, and we'll test more once we settle on brackets, etc.

Chase
GrimmSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to GrimmSpeed For This Useful Post:
Brzzee (04-10-2013), chanomatik (04-09-2013), civicdrivr (04-09-2013), tripjammer (04-09-2013)
Old 04-09-2013, 08:07 PM   #17
2point0
Senior Member
 
2point0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: '13 BRZ Ltd WRB
Location: Vista, CA
Posts: 1,351
Thanks: 508
Thanked 570 Times in 412 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I really like the simplicity of it. Definitely looks OEM but I could also see something with the triangulation bars integrated somehow. I'm not one who needs red/blue crap in the engine bay. But what about a "bare metal" or "primered" option so folks can go get them powdered whatever color they want? (Primered just to keep rust off...any PC'er will blast the parts anyway).

I'll let the more smarter people overrule me here, but I've heard a few times that if a strut bar isn't really beefy, it's almost useless. If it's going to function it needs to be strong, not a flat piece of aluminum.

Visually, I'm not sure about the mounts, only because I don't know how strong those mounting points are, like someone mentioned above, vs. the strut studs. Maybe it's fine and I'm just used to seeing a common mounting style.

Lastly, and this isn't an issue for me (at least not any time soon), but I'm sure some out there will want to make sure it fits with X/Y/Z turbo or SC kit or catch can, etc.

Great job so far, can't wait to see where this goes!
__________________
2013 BRZ Limited - SOLD
2008 Forester XT Sports
1967 Mustang Coupe - 289 V8
2point0 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 2point0 For This Useful Post:
chanomatik (04-09-2013)
Old 04-09-2013, 08:33 PM   #18
sierra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Skoda Yeti DSG diesel 4x4
Location: W. Australia
Posts: 1,203
Thanks: 336
Thanked 307 Times in 230 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I would hope it will be made from aluminium because I don't want to add any unnecessary weight to my car. Surely alloy construction can match steel in function with less weight?
If that's correct and the OEM bars are steel then a set of 3 in black alloy to look OEM would be my choice.
Perhaps an option to have them in polished alloy but with a bit more attention to form to go with the bling factor.
sierra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:50 PM   #19
Black Tire
Senior Member
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Whiteout Scion FR-S
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 508
Thanks: 367
Thanked 209 Times in 129 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustin View Post
Forgive the crappy MSPaint rendering but could you not have it mount something like this? Something about mounting it solely to that piece of metal that is tack welded onto the strut tower seems flimsy to me. Other than that, love the solid, no hinge design.

I agree, the attachment needs to be more robust. The thickness of the steel on the end of the bar is not enough. Also, I think a flat rectangular solid bar would do more than a hollow round one. Weight is really not much of an issue for what this part does. If you make slots for the attachment points, you can get a preload adjustment by jacking the car and then tightening the mounting bolts. Here is a picture of my favorite strut tower brace design (from StrongStrut.com). Also, read the "Strut Brace Facts" at http://www.strongstrut.com for their designers strong opinions.
Attached Images
 
__________________
My cars always dress formally. They all wear black tires.


Last edited by Black Tire; 04-09-2013 at 09:02 PM.
Black Tire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:59 PM   #20
sierra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Skoda Yeti DSG diesel 4x4
Location: W. Australia
Posts: 1,203
Thanks: 336
Thanked 307 Times in 230 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Tire View Post
Also, I think a flat rectangular solid bar would do more than a hollow round one. Weight is really not much of an issue for what this part does. Here is a picture of my favorite strut tower brace design (from StrongStrut.com):
I think you will find that a straight hollow round tube will be much more rigid than a curved solid bar of the same weight.
sierra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sierra For This Useful Post:
Freeman (05-06-2013), tripjammer (04-10-2013)
Old 04-09-2013, 11:17 PM   #21
GrimmSpeed
 
GrimmSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '13 BRZ, '12 WRX
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,676
Thanks: 271
Thanked 3,550 Times in 885 Posts
Mentioned: 218 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to GrimmSpeed Send a message via MSN to GrimmSpeed
I'm sure Chase will address a lot of the comments in more detail tomorrow, but I wanted to chime in to thank you all again for your input so far! Without you guys, we would have a tough time molding these into such successful products!

Regarding the engineering side of things, we've adopted a methodology for this particular product and it's to keep the brace as clean, simple and affordable as possible without sacrificing performance. We've got the tools and the knowledge to collect and analyze real, robust data and react accordingly. If a bracket is too thin to be rigid enough, or if a lighter bar will do the job as well as a heavier bar, you can bet that our engineering and design process will bring those details to the surface so that we can all benefit from them.

So, with that said, keep the ideas flowing! Hopefully you guys can teach us a thing or two and maybe we can do the same. In the end, we'll all end up with a killer strut bar (and maybe triangulation bars, if we can prove that there's improvement to be made, sorry Chase )!

Matt
Engineering
GrimmSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GrimmSpeed For This Useful Post:
Hawk77FT (04-29-2013), tripjammer (04-10-2013)
Old 04-09-2013, 11:21 PM   #22
Shankenstein
Frosty Carrot
 
Shankenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: The Atomic Carrot
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 513
Thanks: 272
Thanked 428 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Summarizing: For a given amount of chassis flex (however much there is), your simulations suggest that the two factory bars decrease strut tower deflection by ~50%. Adding the Grimmspeed bar would decrease tower deflection by ~90%.

Questions:
1) Tell us about your model. FEA can be a mixed bag, and it all depends on how you set things up. Be proud of your hard work, and show it off!

2) How much strut tower deflection have you guys seen during testing?

RCE recorded 4-5 mm of deflection on the 2004 STI in a 1g skidpad session, per this discussion: LINK

The FEA results are directly proportional to the chassis stiffness you chose, so that's why I'm curious about it.

Alot of methods have been discussed over the years, without enough actual results.
Deflection: RCE's draw a mark method (kinda ghetto). Linear potentiometer (can be noisy).
Stress: Shear pins in a strut brace (only tells max compression force). Strain gages on a strut brace (can be noisy).

While I appreciate the "stiffer is always better" argument, if we can identify a legitimate deficiency and address it properly... your products will fly off the shelf.
__________________
If you think you're nerd enough, join in the discussions about Suspension and Aerodynamic modelling!
Wall of Fame - JDL Auto Design, Raceseng, Vishnu Tuning, Penske Shocks, Nameless, Perrin, RaceComp Engineering, Essex/AP Racing, Verus, RacerX
Wall of Shame - aFe Takeda, Wilwood, FA20Club
Shankenstein is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Shankenstein For This Useful Post:
chanomatik (04-10-2013), fuddbutter (06-03-2013), u/Josh (04-10-2013)
Old 04-09-2013, 11:38 PM   #23
FRSGT86
Senior Member
 
FRSGT86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Raven FR-S, 2005 Dodge Ram
Location: California - Bay Area
Posts: 379
Thanks: 60
Thanked 97 Times in 76 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Certainly interested in this. I'm no expert in this arena, so I'll leave that to you guys and those who can provide meaniful input. I will say I do like the simplistic approach that will lead to a product that works rather than just looks good!

Sub'd to follow along and watch the updates!
__________________


2013 FRS 6AT in Raven!
FRSGT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:41 PM   #24
GrimmSpeed
 
GrimmSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '13 BRZ, '12 WRX
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,676
Thanks: 271
Thanked 3,550 Times in 885 Posts
Mentioned: 218 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to GrimmSpeed Send a message via MSN to GrimmSpeed
Awesome insight! I'll save some of these details for the morning, since it's getting late and I'm not at a workstation, but I should mention that we haven't shared any FEA yet. The model shown in the second figure is actual, recorded data from a stationary vehicle. FEA and simulations are great, and you'll definitely see a decent amount of it, but we really value good, hard data collection when possible. Hopefully we can stop just short of making me dust off my WinGeo discs.

We will definitely be refining our test methods as the project progresses and we can justify the investment. We just wanted something, even if it's rough, to justify starting the project. Between the two of us, we have a good deal of experience with FSAE, SAE Baja, racing and vehicle dynamics testing/evaluation, so if we can justify the time/resources, you can bet we'll get way too far into the data/analysis. Stick around, you're obviously a sharp dude!

Hopefully once this 8-12in of snow they're predicting for tomorrow passes, we can get back to warm, dry roads and the, uh, testing.

Matt
Engineering
GrimmSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GrimmSpeed For This Useful Post:
chanomatik (04-10-2013), tripjammer (04-10-2013), Wepeel (04-10-2013)
Old 04-10-2013, 12:12 AM   #25
peteralfonso
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 85
Thanks: 1
Thanked 35 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustin View Post
Forgive the crappy MSPaint rendering but could you not have it mount something like this? Something about mounting it solely to that piece of metal that is tack welded onto the strut tower seems flimsy to me. Other than that, love the solid, no hinge design.

Make it like this and I'll buy it without question.
peteralfonso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 12:17 AM   #26
Vino
3stars & a sun
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: FRS
Location: Cali
Posts: 280
Thanks: 26
Thanked 49 Times in 41 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
It looks like the trd strut bar

I liked
Vino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 08:31 AM   #27
GrimmSpeed
 
GrimmSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '13 BRZ, '12 WRX
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,676
Thanks: 271
Thanked 3,550 Times in 885 Posts
Mentioned: 218 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to GrimmSpeed Send a message via MSN to GrimmSpeed
Quote:
Originally Posted by peteralfonso View Post
Make it like this and I'll buy it without question.
Even if our testing shows that the extra two mounting points don't add any performance, just cost? I'm not saying that's the case, just trying to get a feel for everyone's priorities! Appreciate the input/support! Keep it coming!

Matt
Engineering
GrimmSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GrimmSpeed For This Useful Post:
tripjammer (04-10-2013)
Old 04-10-2013, 08:56 AM   #28
bakerr6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 raven black fr-s
Location: cincinnati, oh
Posts: 1,447
Thanks: 503
Thanked 443 Times in 305 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I like the original. I doubt I would be buying one though, just for the simple fact that I don't think I can modify these in order to stay in my current autoX class.
bakerr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone using the STi Flexible Strut Tower Brace? ngabdala Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 45 08-15-2019 01:59 AM
F/S Beatrush Strut Tower Brace Type-2 $175 Dan-in-Japan Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 2 02-24-2013 01:38 PM
FT-86 SpeedFactory Strut Tower Brace Review F1point4 Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 35 01-07-2013 04:31 AM
DIY - Strut Tower Brace - FT-86 SpeedFactory F1point4 DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Guides 4 10-28-2012 04:30 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.