06-17-2010, 12:36 AM | #127 | ||
Site Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: Supra
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 1,155
Thanked 2,181 Times in 964 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Some old articles I ran across
REPORT: Toyota's hybrid Supra successor on track for 2011
Toyota FT-HS Concept - Click above for a high-res image gallery Quote:
Toyota's Hybrid Supra Successor to Launch in 2011 Could boast more than 400 hp Quote:
|
||
06-17-2010, 12:48 AM | #128 | |||
Site Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: Supra
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 1,155
Thanked 2,181 Times in 964 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
2011 Toyota Supra to get 400-hp via 3.5L V6 mated to a hybrid system
Quote:
Toyota exec says FT-HS could be ‘Supra of the future’ Quote:
Toyota hints FT-HS concept could inspire next Supra Quote:
|
|||
06-17-2010, 12:58 AM | #129 |
Kuruma Otaku
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Haven't I been seeing this concept for the last 10 years? This will be Toyota's failure number 2, after the LFA.
Hybrid Supra? Seriously Toyota... Go take a tour of the Texas Mile, or anywhere fast imports are drag-raced to re-learn what Supra means. King of the hill! No one is going to buy a car to brag to GT-R owners that "My Supra gets better mileage!" This car should be raping ZR1s!!! Anyone see the old South Park episode about the hybrid cars? People who love the smell of their own farts are designing the new Toyota sports cars! Aaaaaaaaaaaaargh!!! |
06-17-2010, 12:59 AM | #130 |
Site Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: Supra
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 1,155
Thanked 2,181 Times in 964 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
|
06-17-2010, 01:02 AM | #131 |
Kuruma Otaku
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
|
06-17-2010, 01:03 AM | #132 |
Site Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: Supra
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 1,155
Thanked 2,181 Times in 964 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Its more like $375k
Also, the Supra name is dead. Toyota said it has no plans to bring back the nameplate. FT-HS if it does make it into production it will probably be called something else. I hope it does make it into production. It looks great, does 0-60 in under 4 seconds, 400hp, rwd, good gas mileage, and pricing said to be $35k to $40k. Last edited by vh_supra26; 06-17-2010 at 01:16 AM. |
06-17-2010, 01:25 AM | #133 |
Kuruma Otaku
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
In that run your extra $300k gets you a 0.2sec and 3mph trap?
Should I have used the 1/3 of the LFA's price ZR1 as my example instead? Add a few grand to the GTR and it kills the Toyota. What can you do with the carbon-shell, computer-controlled sequential transmission, rev-happy V10 for $5000? Have the dealer change the spark plugs? It only sold out due to its low volume and speculation. Compare it to something it would be competitive with from a price and purpose standpoint like the $320k Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano F1 and you're looking at 11.2@129.3. The Ferrari is faster, better looking (subjective, but whatever...) and cheaper than the Toyota. It's a novelty car. Here are a couple 'slow' drag Supras (Mk3s). White car is a street car (full interior but running on slicks here) with a 7MGTE, big turbo, etc... Blue car is 2JZGTE swapped, big turbo etc... also on slicks. The same blue car earlier on a better track: Both were built for less than the cost of a new GTR. |
06-17-2010, 01:33 AM | #134 |
Site Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: Supra
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 1,155
Thanked 2,181 Times in 964 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Tons of people think the LFA looks great. Toyota made a good looking car. They used their styling, anyone can make a "Ferrari design''. Nothing else looks like it.
People that brought the LFA doesn't give a crap about $$$ If you knew Toyota's goal when producing the LFA, you would know that speed was just a small factor. They wanted to show the world that they can build a super car, and I think they did a good job. |
06-17-2010, 01:52 AM | #135 | |
Site Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,966
Thanks: 7,664
Thanked 19,052 Times in 8,327 Posts
Mentioned: 677 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
06-17-2010, 02:01 AM | #136 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: '00 GC6
Location: 530/850
Posts: 257
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
06-17-2010, 02:10 AM | #137 | |
Kuruma Otaku
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Now there was a bit of hype about how the LFA is a 'driver's' car. And how it's about feel and soul, blah, blah not just raw speed. But given how it was immediately compared against the GTR a lot of that could be viewed at pro-active criticism defense. In the same article I quoted above there were two areas where the ridiculously expensive LFA didn't meet expectations. Engine characteristics (they liked the free-revving motor but it has lousy low-end torque "That's where the real dilemma of the Lexus lies: too many revs for not quite enough grunt, 6800rpm for 354 lb-ft of torque.") and clutch/gearbox action ("would occasionally slip, respond slowly, or even refuse to act.") Both are pretty important, wouldn't you say? Yes it's a supercar. Is it the best Toyota could do? Nope. A look into its history shows that they were unsure of what they were making from when they started NINE years ago. (Their decision to go with a V-10 was likely made when it looked like their F1 fortunes were improving and people were predicting wins. This is not how you choose an engine for your car design.) Is it the best supercar out there? Nope. Is it what I would expect spending over a third of a million dollars and having 9 years of development? Not even close. Now if Toyota takes this ridiculous hybrid 'Supra' path, they better hope they under-produce it too so they can sell them all. These things aren't going to be sold on their performance anyways, more so on the environmental gimmick. If you want to get better mileage than a GTR, get a Prius. If you want world-dominating performance you should want Toyota to build a proper Supra. |
|
06-17-2010, 02:30 AM | #138 |
Site Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: Supra
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 1,155
Thanked 2,181 Times in 964 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Lets go over this one more time. "Supra" is dead, Toyota has no plans on bring the name back. FT-HS is the closest that we are going to get to a Supra. Honestly, I don't see anything wrong with a hybrid sport cars. Performance + good gas milage = win in my book
There are tons of hybrid sport cars. Cant forget about this guy Toyota Supra HV-R GT hybrid |
06-17-2010, 02:50 AM | #139 |
Kuruma Otaku
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
There are tons of hybrid sports car CONCEPTS. And race cars built to take advantage of rules favouring new technologies. (Take away the restrictor differences in LeMans and you take away diesel's advantage.)
Part of my point is that the GTR demonstrated that people still want world-beating performance. The Supra represented this in its day. Calling whatever alphanumeric Lexus or Toyota (or God forbid Scion) the spiritual successor to the Supra and then making it some so-so, good-mileage, sporty-coupe is ridiculous. They're trying to have their cake and eat it too. Supra name is gone yet and every press release it pops up all over the place? C'mon... No they won't use it, but they're trying to harvest its heritage. It's an emperor's new clothes thing, marketing trickery. As for a good-mileage sports car that's what this FR-S is supposed to be. But again it probably won't be all it could be (overweight and soft is my prediction). The Lotus Exige/Elise are what a good-mileage sports car means to me. But like I said about world-beating performance. People still want it. I want it to come from Toyota. I would prefer it be named Supra. (But much like this FR-S, I could tolerate some alphanumeric nonsense if everything else were good.) PS: What kind of Supra do you drive? Last edited by Dimman; 06-17-2010 at 02:51 AM. Reason: Forgot something... See PS |
06-17-2010, 03:01 AM | #140 |
Site Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: Supra
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 1,155
Thanked 2,181 Times in 964 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I believe two of those concepts have the geenlight. Anyways, hate it or love it. Toyota is working on a hybrid sport car. So when it comes down to it, FT-HS or MR-2 hybrid.
I have a MK4. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SUPRA Musings... | Axel | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 8 | 12-30-2009 12:56 AM |