Nameless Performance Equal Length Stepped Header

[tennisfreak]

Nice. If I'm reading right looks like you picked up around 10 torque and 7 horsepower without a tune.

[raul]

Originally Posted by tennisfreak

Nice. If I'm reading right looks like you picked up around 10 torque and 7 horsepower without a tune.

On a Mustang dyno, and that's only peak, which has small gains compared to the rest of the midrange really.

[regal]

As far as supercharger vs nameless header, I honestly plead to supercharger owner to install a catless header. It is just asking for trouble running a supercharger without a free-flowing header, just think about it.

[350matt]

are we all done talking about this header now its here then?

[Brahsbrah]

Originally Posted by 350matt

are we all done talking about this header now its here then?

Looks that way!

My order is being processed right now. Hoping to have it on a month or so.

[FrsDuke]

Originally Posted by 350matt

are we all done talking about this header now its here then?

I'm still happy with mine and have no leaks since doubling my overpipe gasket. I just think the gasket I got with the header was too soft for the task, (stock op is tiny) but adding a grimmspeed gasket on the op side resolved it.

Sadly I never baselined my car and don't plan to dyno until I get a few more goodies and have the money for custom tuning, so I can't say more than I'm very satisfied.

[Dustin]

Anyone else who is untuned having issues with the CEL even with the O2 sensor spacer? I guess it won't matter for me because I'm gonna reflash my car tomorrow but my car always had the CEL even with the spacer.

[FrsDuke]

Originally Posted by Dustin

Anyone else who is untuned having issues with the CEL even with the O2 sensor spacer? I guess it won't matter for me because I'm gonna reflash my car tomorrow but my car always had the CEL even with the spacer.

Mine threw p2096 with or without the spacer so I turned it off in my tune. It threw the code on stock tune and my stage2 oft tune. Kinda blows, but life goes on.

[StormTrooper]

Hhhhmmm I've put a couple thousand miles on mine with the OFT EL stg2 map and no codes or issues... Just the dumb civic noise.

[FrsDuke]

It's the reason I found my initial exhaust leak, but even after fixing it (and checking it to verify it was fixed on several consecutive weekends) the code continued to crop up every few drive cycles.

[verts]

Done about 2000km and no CEL here. OFT should be here next week anyways if it does pop up.

[FR-S Matt]

This is why a tune should be a requirement with any header. Spacers don't always work and everyone's ECU isn't the same.

I had P0420 disabled on mine which is the rear O2 sensor fault when it reads the same as the front during closed loop mode. You'll normally see it when cruising down the highway with cruise control on. Sometimes I could go 40 miles, other times 200 miles before seeing it and clearing it till I finally just said, time to disable this.

[BRZ68]

I used the my OEM Axleback Gasket to seal this header to my OEM overpipe and leaks went away completely

[Mars2]

Originally Posted by Shneegle

Finally got all the files from my tuner and have the dyno below. All runs were done on the same day and same car. I included 3 pull in the dyno graph and they are as follows:

Blue - Stock FRS
Red - Nameless 4-2-1 Header + 3" Nameless Header-back Exhaust
Green- Header + Exhaust + Tune



Tuned By Aaron at ATSRacing in Denton, TX

Wondering if it's only me that find out that it look like FT 86 Speedfactory UEL is superior after ploting both on same file. specialy considering it has a 166 whp base line vs 170 whp for the nameless.
Look to me that their is only in the range of 4200rpm to 6200 rpm where the nameless make a couple more whp.
In the deep the Nameless just get killed by the other uel one at top end also.

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...postcount=1644