|
Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-12-2012, 02:23 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Scion FantasticRoad-Sex
Location: Take a wild guess.
Posts: 517
Thanks: 31
Thanked 126 Times in 75 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
09-12-2012, 02:26 PM | #30 |
250 lbs/in front and rear.
20mm drop front and rear. Much firmer than everyone else up front. This was done because the front and rear of the car react differently to changes in spring rates and drops. Instead of just increasing the spring rates by 10% front and rear, we did something different. The front needs an increase in roll resistance more than the rear does because the roll center of the front drops at a different rate than the rear when you lower the car AND the front has a different dynamic camber curve than the rear. A bigger increase up front meant better turn-in and things stay happy with the suspension loaded up in a corner with more grip. And it's easy to drive since you can put power down through the rears easily, especially with the stock rear diff. And with the mild drop plus our firmer front rates, you're not hitting our shortened bumpstops like the other companies soft fronts with bigger drops. - Andrew |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post: | Phaedrus29 (09-14-2012), Spaceywilly (09-12-2012) |
09-12-2012, 02:30 PM | #31 | |
Quote:
Bigger drop springs that ride the bumpstops will likely have issues. The spring rate of the bumpstops spikes very rapidly and many of the springs out there are very bumpstop active... - Andrew |
||
The Following User Says Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post: | nightfire (09-12-2012) |
09-12-2012, 02:33 PM | #32 | |
Quote:
It'll be better with Konis but still not enough travel left at that point. Doesn't matter how good the damping is if you cut your available bump travel down by more than half. If form is what someone is after then they may do the trick but 1.4 inches is making sacrifices in terms of driving the car. - Andrew Last edited by Racecomp Engineering; 09-12-2012 at 04:01 PM. |
||
09-12-2012, 02:38 PM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Scion FantasticRoad-Sex
Location: Take a wild guess.
Posts: 517
Thanks: 31
Thanked 126 Times in 75 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
09-12-2012, 03:42 PM | #34 | |
Have you guys run the JRZ's on the shock dyno?
Quote:
|
||
09-12-2012, 04:03 PM | #35 |
Yes.
To clarify, I meant 1.4 inches is too much with lowering springs. It's still a lot with coilovers but you can make it work. - Andrew |
|
09-12-2012, 09:32 PM | #36 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 SWP BRZ Limited manual
Location: North Jersey, USA
Posts: 38
Thanks: 29
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
What is the maximum amount that can be lowered with springs on stock shocks before you start running into trouble? Around 1"?
|
09-14-2012, 01:23 AM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: PA
Posts: 683
Thanks: 106
Thanked 248 Times in 133 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
It kinda SEEMS like with the Yellow springs you just said "Bah, let's just make the front and rear rates the same...it'll be simpler", but I'm sure that's not what it is, and it's good to see some of the reasoning behind the decision. So in your view, springs like the Eibach ones that drop around 1" and maintain a similar front-to-rear rate ratio as stock aren't getting things right? They aren't appreciating that the roll centers drop at different rates, the dynamic camber curves are different, etc.? |
|
09-14-2012, 09:30 AM | #38 | |
Quote:
- Andrew |
||
The Following User Says Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post: | nightfire (09-14-2012) |
09-14-2012, 09:33 AM | #39 | |
Quote:
I'm not going to say that springs that keep a similar ratio to stock are "doing it wrong" but the way we did things matches our tuning philosophy and hits our design goals. There is more than one way to do things and this is just the way we like best for a sport lowering spring on the standard shocks with good handling, good ride quality, and good looks. - Andrew Last edited by Racecomp Engineering; 09-14-2012 at 12:16 PM. |
||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post: | Phaedrus29 (09-14-2012), Tanstin (05-19-2020) |
09-15-2012, 11:34 AM | #40 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Raven FR-S
Location: U.S
Posts: 28
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to azburnin For This Useful Post: | Racecomp Engineering (01-06-2013) |
01-05-2013, 12:50 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: gti, nsx, integra type r,porsche911
Location: garage
Posts: 536
Thanks: 1
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
For those of us that do not have the skill to properly adjust correct Rebound or compression....i think it would ruin handling more so than improve on the stock setup.
There isn't alot of choices as far as a good aftermarket damper that is non adjustable. A quick google search shows Bilstein Sport dampers. There is also the B14 Bistein which is like the B16 except it is non adjustable. There is also the KW v1, but that is probably considered a not so good coilover considering it is <$1500. Strangely, the european website of KW shows that KW do make springs and sport shocks, but they do not sell them here in the USA. I feel the DDC system is a good thing from KW because of the ease of adjustment from the IPHONE. The driver can really adjust on the spot and feel what that adjustment has done, rather than drive for awhile then stop the car and adjust, and repeat which can be time consuming and labor intensive depending on where the adjustments are. Unfortunately, i can't find this system on any other cars besides European cars.
__________________
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CyberFormula For This Useful Post: | JoeBoxer (01-05-2013) |
01-05-2013, 02:58 AM | #42 | |
Just the tip
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2013 Lightning Red Subaru BRZ Mt Lt
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 2,716
Thanks: 636
Thanked 1,004 Times in 665 Posts
Mentioned: 176 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2013 Lightning Red Subaru BRZ Limited
Past (sold): Click here to see previous cars and bikes |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Coilovers? | trueno86power | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 32 | 05-29-2012 05:20 PM |
adjustable sway bars!!! | carbonBLUE | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 9 | 05-04-2012 08:42 AM |
BRZ Shocks dynoplot! | OrbitalEllipses | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 13 | 04-24-2012 01:16 PM |
is the alignment on the FRS/BRZ adjustable? | neveronlinefrs | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 26 | 04-05-2012 03:58 PM |
coilovers or springs? | koyv90 | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 45 | 04-01-2012 08:49 PM |