follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-12-2012, 02:23 PM   #29
Memphis
Senior Member
 
Memphis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Scion FantasticRoad-Sex
Location: Take a wild guess.
Posts: 517
Thanks: 31
Thanked 126 Times in 75 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering View Post
Nothing yet.

Koni will probably first. Bilstein will have something eventually.

- Andrew
Whats your view on the eibach sportlines or Teins that lower 1.4 inches? How do you feel they will do with a set of KONI adjustable shocks?
Memphis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2012, 02:26 PM   #30
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 3,421
Thanked 7,242 Times in 2,963 Posts
Mentioned: 303 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmookher View Post
sorry if its posted what are the rastes on the yellows?
250 lbs/in front and rear.
20mm drop front and rear.

Much firmer than everyone else up front. This was done because the front and rear of the car react differently to changes in spring rates and drops.

Instead of just increasing the spring rates by 10% front and rear, we did something different. The front needs an increase in roll resistance more than the rear does because the roll center of the front drops at a different rate than the rear when you lower the car AND the front has a different dynamic camber curve than the rear. A bigger increase up front meant better turn-in and things stay happy with the suspension loaded up in a corner with more grip. And it's easy to drive since you can put power down through the rears easily, especially with the stock rear diff. And with the mild drop plus our firmer front rates, you're not hitting our shortened bumpstops like the other companies soft fronts with bigger drops.

- Andrew
Racecomp Engineering is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post:
Phaedrus29 (09-14-2012), Spaceywilly (09-12-2012)
Old 09-12-2012, 02:30 PM   #31
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 3,421
Thanked 7,242 Times in 2,963 Posts
Mentioned: 303 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightfire View Post
How are the wear rates with the stock shocks? The extra compression from the lower springs would increase shock wear I assume? A lot of people on the forums seem to be just watching and waiting to see how long they last
Myles daily drove our springs for months with no change in the damping characteristics of the stock shocks. They have a lot of head room surprisingly. We could have gone firmer actually but there was no need to for the RCE Yellows. We were very happy with where we were at in terms of balance, grip, durability, and ride quality.

Bigger drop springs that ride the bumpstops will likely have issues. The spring rate of the bumpstops spikes very rapidly and many of the springs out there are very bumpstop active...

- Andrew
Racecomp Engineering is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post:
nightfire (09-12-2012)
Old 09-12-2012, 02:33 PM   #32
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 3,421
Thanked 7,242 Times in 2,963 Posts
Mentioned: 303 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
Whats your view on the eibach sportlines or Teins that lower 1.4 inches? How do you feel they will do with a set of KONI adjustable shocks?
1.4 inches is too much from a function point of view. EDIT: I mean with lowering springs.

It'll be better with Konis but still not enough travel left at that point. Doesn't matter how good the damping is if you cut your available bump travel down by more than half.

If form is what someone is after then they may do the trick but 1.4 inches is making sacrifices in terms of driving the car.

- Andrew

Last edited by Racecomp Engineering; 09-12-2012 at 04:01 PM.
Racecomp Engineering is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2012, 02:38 PM   #33
Memphis
Senior Member
 
Memphis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Scion FantasticRoad-Sex
Location: Take a wild guess.
Posts: 517
Thanks: 31
Thanked 126 Times in 75 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering View Post
1.4 inches is too much from a function point of view.

It'll be better with Konis but still not enough travel left at that point. Doesn't matter how good the damping is if you cut your available bump travel down by more than half.

If form is what someone is after then they may do the trick but 1.4 inches is making sacrifices in terms of driving the car.

- Andrew
That is what I thought.
Memphis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2012, 03:42 PM   #34
Touge Factory
 
Touge Factory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: ZN6
Location: Instagram: @TFWorks
Posts: 905
Thanks: 197
Thanked 511 Times in 287 Posts
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Touge Factory
Have you guys run the JRZ's on the shock dyno?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering View Post
1.4 inches is too much from a function point of view.

It'll be better with Konis but still not enough travel left at that point. Doesn't matter how good the damping is if you cut your available bump travel down by more than half.

If form is what someone is after then they may do the trick but 1.4 inches is making sacrifices in terms of driving the car.

- Andrew
Touge Factory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2012, 04:03 PM   #35
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 3,421
Thanked 7,242 Times in 2,963 Posts
Mentioned: 303 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Yes.

To clarify, I meant 1.4 inches is too much with lowering springs. It's still a lot with coilovers but you can make it work.

- Andrew
Racecomp Engineering is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2012, 09:32 PM   #36
nightfire
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 SWP BRZ Limited manual
Location: North Jersey, USA
Posts: 38
Thanks: 29
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Question

What is the maximum amount that can be lowered with springs on stock shocks before you start running into trouble? Around 1"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering View Post
Yes.

To clarify, I meant 1.4 inches is too much with lowering springs. It's still a lot with coilovers but you can make it work.

- Andrew
nightfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2012, 01:23 AM   #37
Phaedrus29
Senior Member
 
Phaedrus29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: PA
Posts: 683
Thanks: 106
Thanked 248 Times in 133 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering View Post
250 lbs/in front and rear.
20mm drop front and rear.

Much firmer than everyone else up front. This was done because the front and rear of the car react differently to changes in spring rates and drops.

Instead of just increasing the spring rates by 10% front and rear, we did something different. The front needs an increase in roll resistance more than the rear does because the roll center of the front drops at a different rate than the rear when you lower the car AND the front has a different dynamic camber curve than the rear. A bigger increase up front meant better turn-in and things stay happy with the suspension loaded up in a corner with more grip. And it's easy to drive since you can put power down through the rears easily, especially with the stock rear diff. And with the mild drop plus our firmer front rates, you're not hitting our shortened bumpstops like the other companies soft fronts with bigger drops.

- Andrew
Thanks for this explanation, although I can't say I fully understand it all! But I was a bit confused why other springs such as the Eibach Prokit ones seem to maintain roughly the same front-to-rear spring rate ratio as stock, but your Yellow springs have a very different ratio (1 to 1) from stock.

It kinda SEEMS like with the Yellow springs you just said "Bah, let's just make the front and rear rates the same...it'll be simpler", but I'm sure that's not what it is, and it's good to see some of the reasoning behind the decision.

So in your view, springs like the Eibach ones that drop around 1" and maintain a similar front-to-rear rate ratio as stock aren't getting things right? They aren't appreciating that the roll centers drop at different rates, the dynamic camber curves are different, etc.?
Phaedrus29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2012, 09:30 AM   #38
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 3,421
Thanked 7,242 Times in 2,963 Posts
Mentioned: 303 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightfire View Post
What is the maximum amount that can be lowered with springs on stock shocks before you start running into trouble? Around 1"?
It depends on the spring rates too...if they're soft like a lot of the springs out there than 1 inch would be my cut off point. That's my opinion.

- Andrew
Racecomp Engineering is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post:
nightfire (09-14-2012)
Old 09-14-2012, 09:33 AM   #39
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 3,421
Thanked 7,242 Times in 2,963 Posts
Mentioned: 303 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaedrus29 View Post
Thanks for this explanation, although I can't say I fully understand it all! But I was a bit confused why other springs such as the Eibach Prokit ones seem to maintain roughly the same front-to-rear spring rate ratio as stock, but your Yellow springs have a very different ratio (1 to 1) from stock.

It kinda SEEMS like with the Yellow springs you just said "Bah, let's just make the front and rear rates the same...it'll be simpler", but I'm sure that's not what it is, and it's good to see some of the reasoning behind the decision.

So in your view, springs like the Eibach ones that drop around 1" and maintain a similar front-to-rear rate ratio as stock aren't getting things right? They aren't appreciating that the roll centers drop at different rates, the dynamic camber curves are different, etc.?
Noooo not at all. We actually started with a softer front with our initial prototypes and while it felt pretty good, the car just got better and better with more front rate. We tried multiple configurations and did a lot of nerdy stuff too.

I'm not going to say that springs that keep a similar ratio to stock are "doing it wrong" but the way we did things matches our tuning philosophy and hits our design goals. There is more than one way to do things and this is just the way we like best for a sport lowering spring on the standard shocks with good handling, good ride quality, and good looks.

- Andrew

Last edited by Racecomp Engineering; 09-14-2012 at 12:16 PM.
Racecomp Engineering is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post:
Phaedrus29 (09-14-2012), Tanstin (05-19-2020)
Old 09-15-2012, 11:34 AM   #40
azburnin
Member
 
azburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Raven FR-S
Location: U.S
Posts: 28
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering View Post
Noooo not at all. We actually started with a softer front with our initial prototypes and while it felt pretty good, the car just got better and better with more front rate. We tried multiple configurations and did a lot of nerdy stuff too.

I'm not going to say that springs that keep a similar ratio to stock are "doing it wrong" but the way we did things matches our tuning philosophy and hits our design goals. There is more than one way to do things and this is just the way we like best for a sport lowering spring on the standard shocks with good handling, good ride quality, and good looks.

- Andrew
I like the way you do business!
azburnin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to azburnin For This Useful Post:
Racecomp Engineering (01-06-2013)
Old 01-05-2013, 12:50 AM   #41
CyberFormula
Senior Member
 
CyberFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: gti, nsx, integra type r,porsche911
Location: garage
Posts: 536
Thanks: 1
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
For those of us that do not have the skill to properly adjust correct Rebound or compression....i think it would ruin handling more so than improve on the stock setup.

There isn't alot of choices as far as a good aftermarket damper that is non adjustable. A quick google search shows Bilstein Sport dampers.

There is also the B14 Bistein which is like the B16 except it is non adjustable.

There is also the KW v1, but that is probably considered a not so good coilover considering it is <$1500. Strangely, the european website of KW shows that KW do make springs and sport shocks, but they do not sell them here in the USA. I feel the DDC system is a good thing from KW because of the ease of adjustment from the IPHONE. The driver can really adjust on the spot and feel what that adjustment has done, rather than drive for awhile then stop the car and adjust, and repeat which can be time consuming and labor intensive depending on where the adjustments are. Unfortunately, i can't find this system on any other cars besides European cars.
__________________
CyberFormula is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CyberFormula For This Useful Post:
JoeBoxer (01-05-2013)
Old 01-05-2013, 02:58 AM   #42
stockysnail
Just the tip
 
stockysnail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2013 Lightning Red Subaru BRZ Mt Lt
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 2,716
Thanks: 636
Thanked 1,004 Times in 665 Posts
Mentioned: 176 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberFormula View Post
For those of us that do not have the skill to properly adjust correct Rebound or compression....i think it would ruin handling more so than improve on the stock setup.

There isn't alot of choices as far as a good aftermarket damper that is non adjustable. A quick google search shows Bilstein Sport dampers.

There is also the B14 Bistein which is like the B16 except it is non adjustable.

There is also the KW v1, but that is probably considered a not so good coilover considering it is <$1500. Strangely, the european website of KW shows that KW do make springs and sport shocks, but they do not sell them here in the USA. I feel the DDC system is a good thing from KW because of the ease of adjustment from the IPHONE. The driver can really adjust on the spot and feel what that adjustment has done, rather than drive for awhile then stop the car and adjust, and repeat which can be time consuming and labor intensive depending on where the adjustments are. Unfortunately, i can't find this system on any other cars besides European cars.
I had the Billstein sports on both my Lotus Elise and VW R32. They were amazing in my opinion. Comfortable to daily drive and provided much better handling, even in a non-adjustable shock/strut. This will be what I look for if I upgrade my BRZs shocks. Coilovers are just too expensive and I don't need to adjust anything as I'm perfectly happy with a fixed ride height (I have Eibach ProKit on stock shocks) and damper/rebound rates.
stockysnail is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coilovers? trueno86power Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 32 05-29-2012 05:20 PM
adjustable sway bars!!! carbonBLUE Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 9 05-04-2012 08:42 AM
BRZ Shocks dynoplot! OrbitalEllipses Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 13 04-24-2012 01:16 PM
is the alignment on the FRS/BRZ adjustable? neveronlinefrs Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 26 04-05-2012 03:58 PM
coilovers or springs? koyv90 Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 45 04-01-2012 08:49 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.