follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-29-2016, 12:27 PM   #113
Summerwolf
Panda Trueno
 
Summerwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: No twin now.
Location: North Indiana
Posts: 3,347
Thanks: 2,113
Thanked 2,407 Times in 1,332 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post


Correct, and mostly that comes from the T56 from what has been explained. The post I quoted was specifically disbelieving the LS motor weight in comparison to the FA20.


Oh well, 100-250 lbs is easy to overcome with nearly three times the available horsepower and torque on tap and better transmission gearing.
Summerwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2016, 12:32 PM   #114
Summerwolf
Panda Trueno
 
Summerwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: No twin now.
Location: North Indiana
Posts: 3,347
Thanks: 2,113
Thanked 2,407 Times in 1,332 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
I was super excited that I thought we had moved from 56% to 52% front weight bias with the V8 swap. But it was too good to be true. I screwed up and didn't read the picture correctly. Our guys had the scale readout to show corner bias, not front to rear bias, and I should have noticed this. So the mistake is 100% mine, I own it. A sharp eyed reader on one forum caught this mistake from my last post, and the front-to-rear bias actually didn't change at all - still 56% of the total weight on the nose. But considering what the car gained (134 pounds), with all of the added weight in the middle and front of the car, to manage to keep the same front-to-rear bias was still a good thing. Most AWD and FWD cars we've weighed are closer to 60F/40R, so this V8 FR-S is still ahead of many competitive cars out there. My apologies for posting bad info - mistakes like that drive me crazy - and I have already corrected this mistake on many forums where this thread is posted or re-posted.



Straight from the second link
Summerwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Summerwolf For This Useful Post:
humfrz (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 12:50 PM   #115
cf6mech
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: FRS Silver LS1 swapped.
Location: Texas
Posts: 752
Thanks: 621
Thanked 766 Times in 302 Posts
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
Yep. Dry engine weight is just part of it. Changed tranny, more oil, heavier mounts to handle HP and so on all add up.
If you read the Vorshlag blog,.....I gained a measly 100 LBS and kept the exact front to back bias......since then I have lost even more weight by removed A/C compressor and condenser.....removed all air bags and wiring....Stereo speakers and wiring etc.etc...(track car)..but a 100lbs gain with the same balance for a trade off of 372whp and 465ftlbs of torque on pump gas NA is all win to me.

* Vorshlog before correction on weight bias....but total weight gain is unchanged *
The initial car came to us at 2682 pounds (no back seat + 17x9" wheels + roll bar + race seats + front BBK) and with the LS1 + T56 it is now 2816 pounds, for a gain of 134 pounds. I'm a little surprised by that amount of gain, honestly, because my initial best-case estimate of a 50 pound gain wasn't that accurate. Some of this gain is added fuel weight; the car came to us with less than a gallon of E85 in the tank, and now has a 1/3rd of a tank of 93 octane - maybe 35 pounds more fuel than before. So the real gain from the LS1/T56 Magnum XL swap was about 100 pounds.
cf6mech is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cf6mech For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 01:17 PM   #116
Summerwolf
Panda Trueno
 
Summerwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: No twin now.
Location: North Indiana
Posts: 3,347
Thanks: 2,113
Thanked 2,407 Times in 1,332 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cf6mech View Post
372whp and 465ftlbs of torque on pump gas NA is all win to me.
.

What is your setup that you're running 100 ft lbs more torque than HP. WTF cam you have in that thing? lol.
Summerwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2016, 01:46 PM   #117
nikitopo
Senior Member
 
nikitopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cf6mech View Post
Well then you need to educate yourself,....dont take my word for it,.....listen to an expert............
http://www.vorshlag.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8275
I read the article. Nothing to educate myself. It contains known issues about the FI solutions on our cars and then makes a general critic on the boxer design. These guys don't know anything about the history of these engines. The boxer engines are well tested in racing for decades and they proved that can be very competitive comparing to other engine designs. Then they start discussing about weight savings and how to gain some weight from the exhaust, wheels, flywheel. These are solutions that can be used even in the stock car. What is the relationship to the engine swap? Of course, they never give the before and after overall weight of the car. I wouldn't even dare to question where is the new center of gravity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twinz View Post
I just skimmed through the two pages, but I did not see anything about how the V8-powerd car handled compared to stock, much less an "expert" opinion on said handling.

They added 134lbs, and the corner balance is over 52%.

Neither of those compromises are a train wreck, but they are compromises.

I have driven a couple miata's with V8 swaps. Maybe they were done wrong, but they no longer handled as well as a stock Miata.
Exactly!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Summerwolf View Post
Do a little research, the LSx (x being variant) is a well thought out, modern design as well. Aluminum block and cylinder heads in a compact design with large displacement.


Basically why the engine is swapped so much over offerings by other companies. It is compact, reliable, and lightweight.


FA20 dry supposedly weighs 377 lbs based off a thread I found on ft86club.
LS1, there are multiple quotes depending on where you look.... but fully dressed with oil around 430 according to hot rod magazine.

I already did my search and know some things about the LSx engines. I didn't want to mention this, because I preferred to ask a person who did the whole swap thing.

From my point of view, his car is not anymore a FR-S/BRZ. Not so much for the reason of the more power, but for the reason that it is not focusing any more on the handling aspect. Whoever reads my complete reply, he'll understand. At least this is my personal opinion.


I am not saying that it is not an interesting project, but it is something different.

Last edited by nikitopo; 07-29-2016 at 01:58 PM.
nikitopo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2016, 01:56 PM   #118
Summerwolf
Panda Trueno
 
Summerwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: No twin now.
Location: North Indiana
Posts: 3,347
Thanks: 2,113
Thanked 2,407 Times in 1,332 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
I read the article. Nothing to educate myself. It contains known issues about the FI solutions on our cars and then makes a general critic on the boxer design. These guys don't know anything about the history of these engines. The boxer engines are well tested in racing for decades and they proved that can be very competitive comparing to other engine designs. Then they start discussing about weight savings and how to gain some weight from the exhaust, wheels, flywheel. These are solutions that can be used even in the NA car. What is the relationship to the engine swap? Of course, they never give the before and after overall weight of the car. I wouldn't even dare to question where is the new center of gravity.



Exactly!




I already did my search and know some things about the LSx engines. I didn't want to mention this, because I preferred to ask a person who did the whole swap thing.

From my point of view, his car is not anymore a FR-S/BRZ. Not so much for the reason of the more power, but for the reason that it is not focusing any more on the handling aspect. Whoever reads my complete reply, he'll understand. At least this is my personal opinion.


They stated it made no change to the overall F/R balance, corner weighted well, and added around 134 lbs. Seems like it should handle mostly the same, but have a nice powerband on hand. With the gearing of the transmission and the overall more reliable V8 and T56 combo, the vehicle would do quite well on a road course.


Seems like that is the direction that vehicle is going in anyways with the responses in this thread @cf6mech
Summerwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Summerwolf For This Useful Post:
cf6mech (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 02:03 PM   #119
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
Yep. Dry engine weight is just part of it. Changed tranny, more oil, heavier mounts to handle HP and so on all add up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cf6mech View Post
If you read the Vorshlag blog,.....I gained a measly 100 LBS and kept the exact front to back bias......since then I have lost even more weight by removed A/C compressor and condenser.....removed all air bags and wiring....Stereo speakers and wiring etc.etc...(track car)..but a 100lbs gain with the same balance for a trade off of 372whp and 465ftlbs of torque on pump gas NA is all win to me.

* Vorshlog before correction on weight bias....but total weight gain is unchanged *
The initial car came to us at 2682 pounds (no back seat + 17x9" wheels + roll bar + race seats + front BBK) and with the LS1 + T56 it is now 2816 pounds, for a gain of 134 pounds. I'm a little surprised by that amount of gain, honestly, because my initial best-case estimate of a 50 pound gain wasn't that accurate. Some of this gain is added fuel weight; the car came to us with less than a gallon of E85 in the tank, and now has a 1/3rd of a tank of 93 octane - maybe 35 pounds more fuel than before. So the real gain from the LS1/T56 Magnum XL swap was about 100 pounds.

What are you debating with me on?
Strat - "car gains 100-250 pounds"
Me - "Yep"
You - "my car gained 100 pounds"


Once again I said nothing about it impacting handling or any other such thing that could be construed as negative.


You then go on to say "trade off of 372whp and 465ftlbs of torque on pump gas NA" which supports my original statement that your car is no longer a "FRS" when competing against a Camaro.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2016, 02:07 PM   #120
humfrz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, white, MT
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 29,867
Thanks: 28,790
Thanked 31,813 Times in 16,424 Posts
Mentioned: 708 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
................
From my point of view, his car is not anymore a FR-S/BRZ. Not so much for the reason of the more power, but for the reason that it is not focusing any more on the handling aspect. Whoever reads my complete reply, he'll understand. At least this is my personal opinion.


I am not saying that it is not an interesting project, but it is something different.
This pretty much reflects my sentiment..........


humfrz
humfrz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to humfrz For This Useful Post:
nikitopo (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 02:09 PM   #121
nikitopo
Senior Member
 
nikitopo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cf6mech View Post
If you read the Vorshlag blog,.....I gained a measly 100 LBS and kept the exact front to back bias......since then I have lost even more weight by removed A/C compressor and condenser.....removed all air bags and wiring....Stereo speakers and wiring etc.etc...(track car)..but a 100lbs gain with the same balance for a trade off of 372whp and 465ftlbs of torque on pump gas NA is all win to me.

* Vorshlog before correction on weight bias....but total weight gain is unchanged *
The initial car came to us at 2682 pounds (no back seat + 17x9" wheels + roll bar + race seats + front BBK) and with the LS1 + T56 it is now 2816 pounds, for a gain of 134 pounds. I'm a little surprised by that amount of gain, honestly, because my initial best-case estimate of a 50 pound gain wasn't that accurate. Some of this gain is added fuel weight; the car came to us with less than a gallon of E85 in the tank, and now has a 1/3rd of a tank of 93 octane - maybe 35 pounds more fuel than before. So the real gain from the LS1/T56 Magnum XL swap was about 100 pounds.
It is not important the weight per se. It is more important where you gain or lose weight. Is it in the low end of the car or is it on the high end? Have you seen the 14R60 project? The engineers were struggling to gain a few lbs. from the roof of the car. Is it so important to lose a few lbs? Answer is yes if you lose this weight from the highest part of the car.

Anyway, I stop the discussion here. I am not saying that you don't have a nice car and a fast car. Your car should be even faster than the 14R60 project car. I am all saying that it is different car.
nikitopo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nikitopo For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 02:19 PM   #122
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo View Post
Anyway, I stop the discussion here. I am not saying that you don't have a nice car and a fast car. Your car should be even faster than the 14R60 project car. I am all saying that it is different car.
My points all along!
And I always thought that the overly defensive, attempt to justify what nobody is hating on, finding insults where there were none, call people that like the car the way it is "fanboi" attitude was the exclusive realm of the hellaflush crowd. Guess I was wrong.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
nikitopo (07-30-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 02:23 PM   #123
FX86
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: on the wrongside of the road
Location: rear floor mats
Posts: 2,240
Thanks: 1,084
Thanked 2,087 Times in 1,015 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
can we close this thread because this is getting seriously out of hand?

FX86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FX86 For This Useful Post:
cf6mech (07-29-2016), Tcoat (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 02:26 PM   #124
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FX86 View Post
can we close this thread because this is getting seriously out of hand?

But nobody has even referenced my number of posts as part of their argument yet!
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2016, 02:28 PM   #125
humfrz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, white, MT
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 29,867
Thanks: 28,790
Thanked 31,813 Times in 16,424 Posts
Mentioned: 708 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FX86 View Post
can we close this thread because this is getting seriously out of hand?

NO! ...... to soon ...... we haven't seen "the other side" of @Tcoat yet ......


humfrz
humfrz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to humfrz For This Useful Post:
FX86 (07-29-2016), Tcoat (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 02:30 PM   #126
Summerwolf
Panda Trueno
 
Summerwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: No twin now.
Location: North Indiana
Posts: 3,347
Thanks: 2,113
Thanked 2,407 Times in 1,332 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
My points all along!
And I always thought that the overly defensive, attempt to justify what nobody is hating on, finding insults where there were none, call people that like the car the way it is "fanboi" attitude was the exclusive realm of the hellaflush crowd. Guess I was wrong.


Eh, fanboi was around way before herrafrush
Summerwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Summerwolf For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (07-29-2016)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some goals to reach for my FRS in 2016 yzhang Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 15 01-20-2016 07:29 PM
Can I get help with my goals? Sulee417 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 16 05-03-2014 09:12 PM
What are people's car goals? darkonion Northern California 31 04-17-2014 08:06 AM
What is your motivation? Why do you track/autox/etc.? What are your motorsport goals? CSG Mike Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 22 02-20-2013 09:18 PM
Forum owner should change the top left image of the forum Hanzo Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 68 01-27-2012 10:33 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.