follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2018, 02:07 AM   #1737
kuno
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: BRZ
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayno View Post
ACE headers fit are fairly experimental for stupid price they demand.

The first thing i'd do is take the skid plate off and see if it's been rubbing and if any audible noise goes away.

I can tell you it's fucking shit when your $300 ceramic coat goes down the toilet because the fit of your $1600 header sucks worse than one half the price.

I wouldn't run Caltex either, but if you want to, then just take timing out of the problem cells.
Yeah the header was rubbing before, all sorted now. I think We got the earlier versions of the header?

No more caltex for me. Will try BP and reduce the timing if it still

Thanks Wayno
kuno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 10:38 PM   #1738
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
https://datazap.me/u/jirace/wot-pull?log=0&data=29

Tuning with DT. He said I might be running into fuel supply issues so I’m running lean. I’m guessing it isn’t correctable through tuning so that is why he is saying it is on my end. I just wanted a second opinion. I’m running an 85mm pulley which is like 11.5psi on a Harrop supercharger. Most hit about 275whp which I thought the stock fuel system could handle.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2018, 11:35 PM   #1739
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Seems like the fuel rail is getting consistent pressure so the fuel pump n regulator must be good but the direct injectors seem to be taking over and the ports are flatening out, and that is most apparent with the “fuel injection pi ratio”, if i am understanding it correctly. This is the ratio of port to direct injectors, right?
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 03:40 PM   #1740
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
Seems like the fuel rail is getting consistent pressure so the fuel pump n regulator must be good but the direct injectors seem to be taking over and the ports are flatening out, and that is most apparent with the “fuel injection pi ratio”, if i am understanding it correctly. This is the ratio of port to direct injectors, right?
The fuel pressure is for the DI after the HPFP. That's not dropping off but doesn't indicate much for the PI system. It looks odd that the AFR seems to sort itself out at the top of the RPM bad and that would hint at it not being fuel delivery as you'd expect it to get worse as the RPMs increase.

PI ratio is the % of PI.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post:
Irace86.2.0 (06-25-2018)
Old 06-26-2018, 12:36 AM   #1741
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Check you DI computer under bonnet is securely grounded via all monuting bolts


Why does fuel ethanol % log/ read 0 if your on E85 ??




Check low pressure fuel pump pressure should be around 45psi you will need to Tee into low pressure fuel line. Although some delicious flex kits do measure low pressure fuel pressure.


Remove fuel filter and check its not blocked (in tank filter), had an NA guy with similar issues had blocked fuel filter, he used some weird fuel additive and it turned to jelly in tank blocking fuel filter, don't use additives with E85
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
Irace86.2.0 (06-26-2018)
Old 06-26-2018, 01:59 AM   #1742
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
Check you DI computer under bonnet is securely grounded via all monuting bolts


Why does fuel ethanol % log/ read 0 if your on E85 ??




Check low pressure fuel pump pressure should be around 45psi you will need to Tee into low pressure fuel line. Although some delicious flex kits do measure low pressure fuel pressure.


Remove fuel filter and check its not blocked (in tank filter), had an NA guy with similar issues had blocked fuel filter, he used some weird fuel additive and it turned to jelly in tank blocking fuel filter, don't use additives with E85
If you are referring to my post then no, I am not on E85.

I was considering the fuel filter being clogged. I think I am at 66k miles, which isn't a lot. I usually use Chevron or Shell, but I don't know about the previous owner, but I am willing to consider it could be the fuel delivery. I feel like if it was the injectors then the engine would throw a code or idle rough. It could be the fuel pressure regulator. I don't have a fuel pressure gauge, so I'll have to look into something to test these things.

Here is another log. This time with the 95mm pulley (7.5 psi). It felt smoother and the pulls in any gear at any rpm feel smoother, yet the best response, whether with the 85mm or 95mm pulley, seems to be for just a second or two when I am cruising, but higher in the revs and gun it. But it quickly loses its power and pulls less like it got rich or lean or something. I dunno.

Repeat WOT 85mm pulley
https://datazap.me/u/jirace/repeat-w...?log=0&data=29

WOT 95mm pulley
https://datazap.me/u/jirace/3rd-gear...og=0&data=8-29
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 02:21 AM   #1743
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,067 Times in 775 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
maybe PI too high? it seems to max out at 26ms.. that seems too high, and DI seems to have still room to augment it.. try to reduce PI ratio maybe?
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 03:43 AM   #1744
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
If you are referring to my post then no, I am not on E85.

I was considering the fuel filter being clogged. I think I am at 66k miles, which isn't a lot. I usually use Chevron or Shell, but I don't know about the previous owner, but I am willing to consider it could be the fuel delivery. I feel like if it was the injectors then the engine would throw a code or idle rough. It could be the fuel pressure regulator. I don't have a fuel pressure gauge, so I'll have to look into something to test these things.

Here is another log. This time with the 95mm pulley (7.5 psi). It felt smoother and the pulls in any gear at any rpm feel smoother, yet the best response, whether with the 85mm or 95mm pulley, seems to be for just a second or two when I am cruising, but higher in the revs and gun it. But it quickly loses its power and pulls less like it got rich or lean or something. I dunno.

Repeat WOT 85mm pulley
https://datazap.me/u/jirace/repeat-w...?log=0&data=29

WOT 95mm pulley
https://datazap.me/u/jirace/3rd-gear...og=0&data=8-29

yeah same deal port injector pulse width way high , something weird going on shouldn't need that much pulse width to deliver fueling on petrol you don't want to go ober about 15ms port and about 6ms direct
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 05:44 AM   #1745
Tor
Senior Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 554 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
If you are referring to my post then no, I am not on E85.

I was considering the fuel filter being clogged. I think I am at 66k miles, which isn't a lot. I usually use Chevron or Shell, but I don't know about the previous owner, but I am willing to consider it could be the fuel delivery. I feel like if it was the injectors then the engine would throw a code or idle rough. It could be the fuel pressure regulator. I don't have a fuel pressure gauge, so I'll have to look into something to test these things.

Here is another log. This time with the 95mm pulley (7.5 psi). It felt smoother and the pulls in any gear at any rpm feel smoother, yet the best response, whether with the 85mm or 95mm pulley, seems to be for just a second or two when I am cruising, but higher in the revs and gun it. But it quickly loses its power and pulls less like it got rich or lean or something. I dunno.

Repeat WOT 85mm pulley
https://datazap.me/u/jirace/repeat-w...?log=0&data=29

WOT 95mm pulley
https://datazap.me/u/jirace/3rd-gear...og=0&data=8-29
Try and log all custom maps and maybe look if the pattern in AFR is mirrored there.
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tor For This Useful Post:
Irace86.2.0 (06-26-2018)
Old 06-26-2018, 08:27 AM   #1746
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,067 Times in 775 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I had a similar afr behaviour when i was trying scaling my port injection, and tried 100% PI. I m NA so obviously i have lower values of everything but when my port injection went over 18ms of opening, afr got weird


Since your DI isnt maxed out i would just try to just add more DI, and then maybe it s time to buy bigger port injectors?
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tomm.brz For This Useful Post:
Irace86.2.0 (06-26-2018)
Old 06-26-2018, 03:45 PM   #1747
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tor View Post
Try and log all custom maps and maybe look if the pattern in AFR is mirrored there.
I should clarify that DT is doing all the tuning, so I was posting here to see if anyone else has had a similar log and disgnosed the mexhanical problem because that is what my tuner believes is the case. The evidence seems to support that position. I’m leaning towards it being an issue with the fuel filter. I’m under the impression that the whole fuel pump assembly would need replacing, and that it is a bitch to do, nor is it cheap, so hopefully I can survive on the large pulley for now.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 04:25 PM   #1748
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,067 Times in 775 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Ok but.. 26ms of port injection is extremely high and dangerous, you can t keep it like that
The other logs you posted where port injection ms opening is lower than 20ms have no afr issue
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tomm.brz For This Useful Post:
Irace86.2.0 (06-27-2018)
Old 06-27-2018, 07:49 AM   #1749
Tor
Senior Member
 
Tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 554 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
I should clarify that DT is doing all the tuning...
Yes, I got that part. Hence the suggestion to log the custom maps as the PI ratio is variable:
https://datazap.me/u/jirace/repeat-w...5&mark=519-541

That's not the case in the stock tune, so the only way that can happen is through custom tables. In the stock tune the PI ratios are fixed.

Maybe it's a hardware issue, but as KN47 said AFR is correcting itself (somewhat) above 7000 rpm. If it was a lack of fuel, it would be to expect that it would get worse with higher rpm.

Logging the custom maps might help DT to diagnose if there is an issue with the tune.

Looking in the Ecutek manual, they recommend max DI injection of 5.5 ms and not less than 1 ms from injection end of DI to spark. You have 4.8ish ms and over 4 ms from end of injection to start of spark. Maybe the DI is capable of delivering a higher percentage of the total fuel.

Last edited by Tor; 06-27-2018 at 08:03 AM.
Tor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tor For This Useful Post:
Irace86.2.0 (06-27-2018)
Old 06-27-2018, 10:29 AM   #1750
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
My tuner said on the low boost pulley there has been no fuel problems so that is good but it doesn’t answer what the cause was. Im thinking fuel delivery from an old fuel filter. I am at 63k.

I appreciate the advice. Unfortunately the tuning part of things is out of my hands. Only the mechanical stuff can I improve.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RGM Supercharged 86 performance data TheGooseman AFRICA 14 12-13-2014 01:15 AM
Interpreting Ecutek Data Logs? cuddefred Software Tuning 3 09-02-2013 12:55 PM
VIR - Impressions/Pics/Logs/Video (Track Daze) swift996 Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 39 08-30-2013 09:21 AM
Noise tube delete air/fuel logs? jm1681 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 13 10-17-2012 04:57 PM
ECU Data Logger Motordyne Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 5 07-18-2012 09:27 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.