06-16-2015, 01:25 PM | #141 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: GT86 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 63
Thanks: 191
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Thank you all for your answers.
Quote:
You can say I'm above the average track day driver. Forgot to add CUSCO engine mount.
__________________
...
|
|
06-16-2015, 02:01 PM | #142 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
http://counterspacegarage.com/ace-mu...-frs-gt86.html |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | Valentino (06-16-2015) |
06-16-2015, 02:59 PM | #143 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: GT86 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 63
Thanks: 191
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
But why the 4-2-1 Type A? and what would you recommand for a dedicated race car? and why?
__________________
...
|
|
06-16-2015, 03:32 PM | #144 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
It's like having a Honda engine without the non-vtec cam. |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | RJasonKlein (06-16-2015), Valentino (06-16-2015) |
06-16-2015, 04:16 PM | #145 |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: GT86 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 63
Thanks: 191
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Do you have a dynosheet shows the difference between them?
__________________
...
|
06-17-2015, 03:05 AM | #147 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Ace needs to have proper ecu tuning specific to each of these two header types for proper comparison. Differences with stock ecu or with unfit tunes might make that difference way bigger or way smaller then it may be relatively to with individual ecu tunes. If with later you were first, imho you may get results for testing Type C first aswell, if you ever decide on that ..
Actually imho it's worth doing, because if difference will be negligible of just 1-2whp, then it makes sense of getting 200$ cheaper Type C, which in turn may result in much more headers sold, no? |
06-17-2015, 01:53 PM | #148 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I believe CSG's testing of this header has been more extensive than the dyno testing performed by any header manufacturer on this board. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | sw20kosh (06-17-2015) |
06-17-2015, 05:29 PM | #149 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Mike: problem being not time/work spent on it (hats off to Ace for doing that, i never wanted to belittle his efforts), but how useful results were for actual customer purchase decision / product evaluation / comparison between alternatives. Those runs simply didn't show true potential of header making it look worse then other alternatives, that had full tune with full gains, thus seemingly besting it. Good thing that specific tune such as done by you guys (which most probably poeple will run header with) shown true capabilities.
As for why imho worth to do testing of Type C with similar proper tune too - if Ace does tests for it with similar not well-fit OTS tune, in just the same way it will be hard to truly evaluate/compare true differences between Type A & C for customers. For example if Type A had +5whp, and difference with same non-fit OTS tune of Type C will be 1whp less - will that mean that it will produce just 1-2whp less with full tune too and it's negligible enough to give up for $200 less and RHD/LHD universality sake? Or that it will mean "-20% of Type A performance" with full tune (most will run it with) too, and hence if possible by all means Type A should be chosen despite higher cost. |
06-17-2015, 06:51 PM | #150 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Relax. These headers are being built on established engineering principals and are being flowbenched. It's not some random guy randomly putting pipes together, and calling it a header. At some point, you have to call the evidence posted "good enough" and decide for yourself which header is right for you. If you want maximum power, order a Type A now. |
|
06-17-2015, 06:55 PM | #151 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: GT86 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 63
Thanks: 191
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
So (if possible) before I decide which headers I should get. I want a dynosheet comparison ,layover between the 4-2-1 TYPE A ,and the 4-1 (hp,and torque) @AceHeader-MT
__________________
...
|
|
06-17-2015, 07:20 PM | #152 | ||
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,867 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
something something use the search blah blah blah |
||
The Following User Says Thank You to Calum For This Useful Post: | CSG Mike (06-17-2015) |
06-17-2015, 08:08 PM | #153 |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: GT86 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 63
Thanks: 191
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I've seen this before (I read the other ACE header post).
Probably you didn't understand what I want. But none of these dyno tests answers my question. They are all for the 4-2-1 but with different fuels and with different brand headers. If what I'm asking is too much I'm sorry. ACE company can just ignore my post.
__________________
...
|
06-17-2015, 08:19 PM | #154 | |
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,867 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Who has Open Flash Header (or aftermarket UEL header) in the GTA with stock exhaust? | alanhung85 | CANADA | 6 | 10-21-2014 10:41 PM |
RevWorks UEL Header + Nameless Catted Front Pipe VS Stock Gutted Header + FP | NickFRS | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 44 | 04-19-2014 05:42 PM |
Top Gear Solutions| HKS Header |Borla EL & UEL Headers| Agency Power Header| + MORE! | TopGearSolutions | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 82 | 04-14-2014 08:16 PM |
Gutted cat stock header vs aftermarket catless header NA application | stevo585 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 8 | 04-04-2014 04:12 PM |
Wanted: UEL header with Perrin header back and tune. | skye67 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 7 | 12-21-2013 10:34 PM |