follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting

Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting What these cars were built for!


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-22-2017, 08:19 PM   #43
nico_rsx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: BRZ 2017 Pure Red, MT
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 309
Thanks: 122
Thanked 121 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark_Bait88 View Post
Really, I'd be perfectly happy with an oil cooler allowance for DS, to alleviate worry for track day participation.
X2
nico_rsx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2017, 11:46 AM   #44
Kuro86
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Skimming the thread here, it sounds like folks just want STX...

I think a realistic spec class would be Street Class rules, but just a class of only FRS/BRZ/GT86 with its own PAX. The only exception I would add is you can use any parts from any other twin, so people don't cry about TRD Parts, Gearing, etc...

This would make it so no other car could show up and ruin the class, such as the ND Miata.
Kuro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kuro86 For This Useful Post:
strat61caster (08-23-2017), Twinz (08-23-2017)
Old 08-23-2017, 12:58 PM   #45
Twinz
Senior Member
 
Twinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Drives: 2016 FR-S MT, 2015 Scion FR-S AT,
Location: SW Fl
Posts: 487
Thanks: 271
Thanked 307 Times in 180 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuro86 View Post
Skimming the thread here, it sounds like folks just want STX...

I think a realistic spec class would be Street Class rules, but just a class of only FRS/BRZ/GT86 with its own PAX. The only exception I would add is you can use any parts from any other twin, so people don't cry about TRD Parts, Gearing, etc...
This is what I am hoping for.
Twinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2017, 04:29 PM   #46
justinco
btr.life
 
justinco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 2022 GR86
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 662
Thanked 1,094 Times in 491 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuro86 View Post
....
This would make it so no other car could show up and ruin the class, such as the ND Miata.
I have nothing against the idea. But, this happens in (almost) every street class. Does the SCCA then make a spec class for the ND, once its reign is over? I don't know the answer...but, this is one reason I stopped running street/stock classes 3-4 years ago.
__________________
justinco is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to justinco For This Useful Post:
DaWorstPlaya (08-24-2017), strat61caster (08-23-2017)
Old 08-23-2017, 06:49 PM   #47
Kuro86
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by justinco View Post
I have nothing against the idea. But, this happens in (almost) every street class. Does the SCCA then make a spec class for the ND, once its reign is over? I don't know the answer...but, this is one reason I stopped running street/stock classes 3-4 years ago.
This is why I went to STX. It was fun being in a class where if I didn't like something I could fix it.

As for spec classing, I think if there is enough of a following for a car I would. That way you don't alienate drivers, since not everyone wants to jump into Street Touring. BUT I would put a contingency if participation is low 2 years in a row, then eliminate the class (Much like SSR).

That way SCCA isn't maintaining dozens of spec classes that no one races in.
Kuro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2017, 10:55 PM   #48
Locust
Custom User Title
 
Locust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Drives: 2015 Scion FR-S, 2012 OB Evo X MR
Location: Seattle
Posts: 807
Thanks: 13
Thanked 424 Times in 272 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Locust
The logistics of this sound way too complicated. I think it would be better for them to just create a new street class, move D-H down a letter, and pull some of the current C and D cars into the new D.

If you look at class participation at nationals they have several street classes that are overly represented vs. the others.
__________________
LOCUST
2015 FR-S (STX) and 2012 Evo X MR

Instagram:
LocustAutoX
Sponsors:
DSGPerformance Drift Office Evil Apex Racing

Locust is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Locust For This Useful Post:
DaWorstPlaya (08-24-2017)
Old 08-24-2017, 12:35 AM   #49
ApexEight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ Limited 6MT SSM
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 195
Thanked 68 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Personally, I think a Spec class between DS and STX would be great.

DS really only gets expensive when you go with high-end shocks like MCSs. For STX, when you factor in popular mods like the AP Racing BBK, wider wheels and tires, etc. the cost gap is clear. Not only that, but for many who dual duty their twins, you lose a fair amount of practicality by making the jump to STX, but at the same time, you miss out on a lot of good shit staying in DS.

If I had any say in a Spec class or a new class between Street and Street Touring, I would propose something like the following:

- 8" wide wheels max (+/- Xmm from stock offset)
- 200TW tires minimum
- Spec dampers (OTS Yellows or something similar)
- Spec lowering spring
- Spec camber plate (or like anything aside from the Raceseng Cascam plate)
- Open camber bolt
- Open rear LCA
- Open sway bars front and rear
- Whiteline poly diff inserts
- Whiteline poly subframe inserts
- Whiteline poly transmission mount insert
- Open intake
- Open catback exhaust
- Spec tune
- Open brake pads

In my mind, the biggest issue with STX is cost, and the biggest issue with DS is camber limitation. The Spec class could slot right in between with much more lenient camber mods and also the ability to run the Whiteline bushings that are affordable and serve as a solid foundational basis for a dual duty twin.
ApexEight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2017, 12:49 AM   #50
justinco
btr.life
 
justinco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 2022 GR86
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 662
Thanked 1,094 Times in 491 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
To me, the word "open" does not belong anywhere in a spec class. Change all your opens to spec *something* and sounds good. One of the goals (I think) behind a spec class, is to take away all the guess work.

Whatever comes of it, I'll be staying in STX
__________________
justinco is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to justinco For This Useful Post:
Shark_Bait88 (08-24-2017), strat61caster (08-24-2017)
Old 08-24-2017, 10:08 AM   #51
Shark_Bait88
Senior Member
 
Shark_Bait88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: 2013 Firestorm FR-S
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,348
Thanks: 1,669
Thanked 862 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApexEight View Post
Personally, I think a Spec class between DS and STX would be great.

DS really only gets expensive when you go with high-end shocks like MCSs. For STX, when you factor in popular mods like the AP Racing BBK, wider wheels and tires, etc. the cost gap is clear. Not only that, but for many who dual duty their twins, you lose a fair amount of practicality by making the jump to STX, but at the same time, you miss out on a lot of good shit staying in DS.

If I had any say in a Spec class or a new class between Street and Street Touring, I would propose something like the following:

- 8" wide wheels max (+/- Xmm from stock offset)
- 200TW tires minimum
- Spec dampers (OTS Yellows or something similar)
- Spec lowering spring
- Spec camber plate (or like anything aside from the Raceseng Cascam plate)
- Open camber bolt
- Open rear LCA
- Open sway bars front and rear
- Whiteline poly diff inserts
- Whiteline poly subframe inserts
- Whiteline poly transmission mount insert
- Open intake
- Open catback exhaust
- Spec tune
- Open brake pads

In my mind, the biggest issue with STX is cost, and the biggest issue with DS is camber limitation. The Spec class could slot right in between with much more lenient camber mods and also the ability to run the Whiteline bushings that are affordable and serve as a solid foundational basis for a dual duty twin.
This is mostly what I want, but I'd eliminate both camber plates and intake/tune.

If they went with a spec aftermarket camber bolt (like Whiteline) you can still get a good amount of camber. I had -2.5 with just Whiteline bolts. It's not ideal to where the car should be with camber, but it's not bad either.

Intake is pretty much a cosmetic mod, I see very little reason to allow it as it will just add to costs. Same with a tune if you aren't allowing a header as well, which I wouldn't want either because then you're getting way too close to STX.

I would like the bushings, hadn't thought of that before. I'd also say to make rear LCAs spec. Catback and sway bars stay open, since that's pretty common in every class.
__________________
"Shark_Bait88, the man who’s spent the most money modding his stock FR-S and it’s still stock." -@jdnguyen
Shark_Bait88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2017, 11:20 AM   #52
M0nk3y
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Drives: 2016 Scion FRS / Chevy Colorado
Location: Ohio
Posts: 636
Thanks: 51
Thanked 535 Times in 298 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by justinco View Post
To me, the word "open" does not belong anywhere in a spec class. Change all your opens to spec *something* and sounds good. One of the goals (I think) behind a spec class, is to take away all the guess work.

Whatever comes of it, I'll be staying in STX


This.

Also, the more you add for stupid stuff like Bushings and such, the more complex it becomes and the more you will have people questioning it.

No need for subframe bushing inserts.

K.I.S.S.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Kyle H. - #89 STX
M0nk3y is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to M0nk3y For This Useful Post:
Biggins (08-24-2017), Shark_Bait88 (08-24-2017), TrqlessWonder (08-24-2017)
Old 08-24-2017, 11:46 AM   #53
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,364
Thanks: 13,731
Thanked 9,474 Times in 4,995 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by M0nk3y View Post
No need for subframe bushing inserts.
Have you tried them? They're kind of fantastic on this car. The only reason I'm not putting my car in DS right now is that I don't want to take out those inserts.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to strat61caster For This Useful Post:
ApexEight (08-24-2017)
Old 08-24-2017, 12:13 PM   #54
Twinz
Senior Member
 
Twinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Drives: 2016 FR-S MT, 2015 Scion FR-S AT,
Location: SW Fl
Posts: 487
Thanks: 271
Thanked 307 Times in 180 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The only reason I could see them making a class for the twins is to create a street class where the twins would be competitive. I doubt they are going to make an STX-lite class to create a "cool setup" class just for us.

If it's a street class for the twins, then allowing the best "street" parts from all 86's makes sense and won't require new structures for policing.

I also think it would be fair to have a participation requirement to keep the class. The fact that there are so many people that want to run street in the twins is really the only justification for carving out a spot just for our car.
Twinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2017, 12:16 PM   #55
ApexEight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ Limited 6MT SSM
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 195
Thanked 68 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
It was just a rough outline lol.

I don't think most are able to achieve -2.5 with just crash and camber bolts, which is why I would want plates.

I don't care for intakes either. The DS rules of a drop-in filter and silicone tube are good enough for me, just thought I'd include it.

As for the tune, I would want it not because of power, but for the softer rev limiter and slightly sharper throttle sensitivity.

And @M0nk3y, those bushings aren't "stupid stuff", nor do they add much complexity. They're affordable and easy to install while increasing bushing life and increasing performance, but hey, to each his own. Like I said, what I laid out was just a rough outline.
ApexEight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2017, 12:33 PM   #56
M0nk3y
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Drives: 2016 Scion FRS / Chevy Colorado
Location: Ohio
Posts: 636
Thanks: 51
Thanked 535 Times in 298 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
Have you tried them? They're kind of fantastic on this car. The only reason I'm not putting my car in DS right now is that I don't want to take out those inserts.


Yes I have them.

Doesn't matter in Spec. Everyone has to play on the same platform. You know, the whole idea of spec


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Kyle H. - #89 STX
M0nk3y is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to M0nk3y For This Useful Post:
strat61caster (08-24-2017)
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Upgrading brakes on the lower spec GT86 (the standard spec outside of US market) OnionTou Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 55 07-01-2016 01:36 AM
what's the difference between twin screw, centrifugal, single turbo and twin turbo? warplane95 Forced Induction 86 04-17-2014 02:36 PM
my twin RWDGUY Mid-Atlantic 2 04-08-2013 09:23 PM
JDM Spec-C V9 Twin Scroll VF36 complete Nico TURBO Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 0 12-05-2012 11:20 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.