follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-29-2015, 04:35 PM   #15
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
I see two outcomes:

1) Mach V fixes it, either at your expense or theirs if it was service error.
2) You get it fixed somewhere else at your expense.

Again: it is an alignment issue. Your first sentence about how the front end wanders on its own tells me everything about what is wrong.

Visually everything may be fine, but a proper alignment shop can figure out why it is off, and what is the cause.

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 04:42 PM   #16
Adeel
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: Black Raven
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 70
Thanks: 7
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
I see two outcomes:

1) Mach V fixes it, either at your expense or theirs if it was service error.
2) You get it fixed somewhere else at your expense.

Again: it is an alignment issue. Your first sentence about how the front end wanders on its own tells me everything about what is wrong.

Visually everything may be fine, but a proper alignment shop can figure out why it is off, and what is the cause.

-alex
@Mach V Dan .. can you warranty your alignment?
Adeel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 10:22 AM   #17
Adeel
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: Black Raven
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 70
Thanks: 7
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
A previous Neighbor and a current tech at Mach V, Kevin reached out to me regarding this issue.

Hes worked with the shop management to get me in after hours for a realignment and allowing me to come in the shop to get it aligned to my spec. Thank you Kevin at Mach V.


Regarding the tech who tried to charge me (Deren), while failing to verify alignment on the rack...He looks to be a repeat offender with bad customer service at Mach V.

I hope the Mach V management can figure out a way to keep Deren's attitude from impacting customers like it did here.

Thanks again Kevin @ Mach V.
Adeel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 10:47 AM   #18
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,794
Thanks: 2,164
Thanked 4,242 Times in 2,220 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I had my alignment done at Mach V. They did a good job hitting my requested camber and toe specs. Strange that they would half-ass your alignment the way they did, but glad they seem to be taking care of it.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 10:54 AM   #19
Mach V Dan
FT86Club Official Vendor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ, 2015 WRX, 2000 RSTi
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 597
Thanks: 6
Thanked 408 Times in 192 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Okay, there's a lot here for me to address, so bear with me...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adeel View Post
Description: Front Passenger Wheel Pulls Straight when taking left turns, car feels unstable and traction control turns on. Same wheel pulls when changing lanes, left or right. Car feels erratic at high speeds and front end feels like its got its own direction.

At first glance of the images of the coilovers from the camber plats, i noted that the passenger side markings state a LOT of negative camber, whereas the the driver is more near zero. The Alignment sheet is not indicative of this. Thoughts on why?
The upper mounts don't have that much adjustment range, so the difference in position you see is probably accounting for the 0.32 degree difference in camber. When we did the initial alignment, you told us you were fine with the camber as is, but that the toe was your big concern. I promise you, 0.32 degrees of camber differential is not going to cause any kind of weird driving behavior.

That said, we've agreed to bring the car back in and get the camber more perfectly even, at no charge.

Quote:
At flat ground, the alignment looks to be inline with the alignment sheet, however, when the front suspension is compressed, such as parking in an incline, the passenger wheel has visible toe out.
If you compress the suspension on a lowered car, you are going to see the front wheel on the compressed side toe out. That's bump steer. It's a function of the suspension design. There's hardware to deal with this, like the Whiteline Roll Center Adjustment Kit. Or you can raise the car back up so the camber/toe curve is more like the design spec.

Quote:
Suspension: Fortune Auto V500 + Fortune Auto provided End Links + Cusco Sway Front 20mm
From the behavior you and our technician described, it sounds like the front/rear roll stiffness is not matched, and the front is stiffer than the back. Push it into a corner, and the front end plows. Stability control steps in to try to keep the car pointed in the intended direction. I think this is the key to the issue you are perceiving. Either stiffen up the rear with a beefier sway bar, or loosen up the front with a skinnier one. (If the bars are adjustable you could try adjusting the end link pickup points.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
Your alignment is off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fika84 View Post
^ sounds like the toe is out of wack.
Quote:
Originally Posted by swarb View Post
Or possibility they didn't know you had camber plates. Which means they were lazy to check.
We are professionals. We are not "to [sic] lazy to check," nor would we be unaware that a car had camber plates. As mentioned above, at the initial visit, Adeel told us he was fine with the camber as is, and that the severe toe was his biggest concern. (He was right. The toe was really off, front and back.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adeel View Post
I went back to Mach V for a realignment, but they said my alignment is in spec, and is aligned.
When you arrived you described a symptom of stability control coming on under hard cornering at speed. YOU felt the problem was caused by alignment. We did not agree, and I believe we are right. Your problem is not caused by the current alignment, which is fine.

Quote:
Additionally, they put the car through the diagnostics of checking the yaw, vehicel speed senor and other sensors, all checked out. They tried to charge me labor for the diagnostics without my approval, while never putting the car back on the aligngment rack.
Now here I have to admit we were wrong. We should have had a discussion with you first about what we were going to to, and how we would charge for it. Normally if we're going to perform diagnostic work, we're going to charge for that work. We did not expressly communicate this to you up front, and that was a mistake. I am sorry. I am also sorry that my technician became defensive and was not polite at the end of your visit. That is not acceptable behavior here, and I spoke to him about it.

The reason we checked the wheel speed sensors and their operation, as well as the other components of the stability control system, was that the symptoms you described (car pulling in turns, traction control light flashing) could be caused by a problem component in the stability control system. Wheel speed sensors are the most common issue.

Quote:
Im not sure if i would agree with mach V's good reviews - i found them to be a pain in the ass, attempting to charge me for something that should be warrantied.
I apologize for the miscommunication. I stand by my assertion that the alignment is not your problem.

Quote:
I did not pay as I came there for an realignment
What you came for was a remedy to your problem, which is not necessarily an alignment. Once again, though, better communication between our staff and yourself would have made us all happier, I think. For this I take responsibility.

Quote:
It seems like the toe goes out under compression of the front suspension only.
Bump steer again. Normal behavior if the car is lowered. Worse if it's lowered a lot.

Quote:
Does the .3 difference in camber between Passenger and Driver front make a huge difference?
No.

Quote:
Originally Posted by swarb View Post
It's not in spec. Show them the paper. It would be all darkened. Sounds like an excuse to get you out.
The only thing not in factory spec is the front camber and the rear right camber. We usually run a little more front camber than stock spec, for better front end cornering grip. And to reiterate, Adeel told us this was fine at the initial alignment visit. Rear camber is not factory-adjustable, so that's just changing from the toe adjustment. Without installing additional hardware, we cannot change it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzleSAURUS View Post
@Mach V Dan Any idea what's going on here?
I think the roll stiffness is too high in the front, and bump steer is causing unpleasant dynamic toe behavior.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wparsons View Post
Don't go back there then. Any performance shop that tells you an alignment is good enough because it's "in spec" doesn't know what they're doing (IMO).
Ouch. That's kind of judgey. Come by and talk suspension with me, then declare whether we know what we're doing.

Quote:
As for the difference 0.3* makes, it's not a huge deal on a street car... but I would bet that something slipped and it's no longer aligned like what the sheet shows.
We don't have any evidence for that. Adeel has had this perceived issue since before the first alignment. I think it has been this way since he installed the current coilovers/sway bar setup.

Quote:
Again: it is an alignment issue.
I don't think so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adeel View Post
@Mach V Dan .. can you warranty your alignment?
Sure, we warranty our alignment. But doing an alignment on a car does not make us responsible for the whole car, nor for fixing the pre-existing suspension we did not install. To say this once more, the alignment is not the problem. Adeel, I think you told me you'd had this car to something like five shops, trying to correct the problem by aligning it? Logic would point to some other root cause.

Here's what I suggest: Loosen (if it's adjustable) or replace (with a smaller one) the front sway bar to reduce front end roll stiffness. Either install the Roll Center Adjustment Kit or raise the ride height to remedy the bump steer. Then evaluate and see how the car drives.

--Dan
Mach V
Mach V Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mach V Dan For This Useful Post:
fika84 (10-01-2015), strat61caster (10-01-2015), swarb (10-01-2015)
Old 10-01-2015, 02:12 PM   #20
swarb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: BRZ
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,053
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 2,451 Times in 1,271 Posts
Mentioned: 79 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Miscommunication? Were you clear on what settings you wanted?
"I promise you, 0.32 degrees of camber differential is not going to cause any kind of weird driving behavior." It won't be weird, but it wont be ideal. Although he did not request specific settings the first time around... performance alignment(if requested), from a performance shop, on a performance car, with performance parts, should be near perfect. But that is just my opinion.
How many times did you have to go back? How much time spent? Why was the camber not even on the first try?

In the end, the customer is happy and Mach V has resolved the issue.

I would like to see the alignment sheet now that it has been fixed.
swarb is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to swarb For This Useful Post:
strat61caster (10-01-2015)
Old 10-02-2015, 12:08 PM   #21
Adeel
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: Black Raven
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 70
Thanks: 7
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Update...

Kevin at Mach V contacted me, apologized and recognized that there the previous tech should have handled things better. He walked me through different alignment techniques, use cases of when you need more toe, camber. He also aligned the car to my spec. Thank you very much Kevin.

He recognized the tech should have verified the alignment using the alignment rack, and not tried to charge me for it.

Kevin @ Mach V took the time to realign all 4 corners the same day, and stayed at the shop until 10pm yesterday to make sure the car was aligned, handled well and there was no erratic steering issues.

During the alignment, we talked about the type of typical driving conditions, roads, and styles to meet my wheel alignment balance. He also dropped some knowledge on me about cross-cambering, and other alignment techniques i was unaware of.

He was extremely thorough, equalized tire pressure across all corners, verified multiple times steering was dead center and verified all corners were exactly what i wanted.

Since yesterday's alignment, the tires have more traction than before, does not erraticly pull or understeer, and drives balanced again.

Bad experiences happen, but what matters is that the stakeholders recognize the experience, and work together to correct them. Mach V, and in particular, Kevin at Mach V took the steps required to show excellent customer service.

Thank you Mach V for correcting my alignment issues, and Thank you Kevin for following through.

Edit:
- I will post the alignment sheet some time tonight
- Thank you to everyone on the forums for helping me drive this issue to its resolution
Adeel is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Adeel For This Useful Post:
JazzleSAURUS (10-05-2015), strat61caster (10-02-2015)
 
Reply

Tags
cusco, fortune auto, front suspension

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2013 BRZ gremlins. Marc DDS BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 10 01-26-2016 11:31 PM
WTB front LCA (passenger side) Rinzler_ft86 Want-To-Buy Requests 0 08-02-2015 04:58 AM
Buzzing from rear passenger wheel Mattybro410 Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 1 11-04-2014 09:25 AM
WTB: Raven front bumper plus front underpanel and passenger side front fender liner THEmailman Want-To-Buy Requests 1 04-20-2014 12:05 AM
Wheel + Suspension Question 18x9 +40 225/40/18 Front 235/40/18 Rear Asphalt~86 Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 1 06-10-2013 07:34 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.