|
Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
02-09-2016, 09:47 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
ACE
__________________
|
02-11-2016, 11:56 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: 2015 Ultramarine FR-S AT
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 368
Thanks: 134
Thanked 133 Times in 78 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
|
02-11-2016, 04:16 PM | #17 |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
|
02-11-2016, 04:30 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: 2015 Ultramarine FR-S AT
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 368
Thanks: 134
Thanked 133 Times in 78 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
|
03-18-2016, 03:14 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
One problem so far is the lack of a decent front pipe setup that allows for complete freedom in choosing catless header w/ any exhaust of your choice. If you don't care about sound, that's fine, but many (young) people nowadays live in apartment or condo complexes that ban loud noises that a catless header may bring. I am trying to help find solutions. http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=103125 -alex |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mav1178 For This Useful Post: | Mr.Impreza (03-18-2016) |
03-18-2016, 03:21 PM | #20 | |
Not a troll
Join Date: Apr 2015
Drives: FR-S
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,104
Thanks: 8,237
Thanked 5,399 Times in 2,694 Posts
Mentioned: 266 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Good for you that you're trying to find out sound levels and shit. I don't really care to be honest. The way to go about that is get whatever you want from the header to FP, then get a quiet catback. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Cole For This Useful Post: | go_a_way1 (03-18-2016) |
03-18-2016, 03:22 PM | #21 |
Not Bаnned Anymore
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: Heavily Modified FRS
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 9,827
Thanks: 14,918
Thanked 8,274 Times in 4,797 Posts
Mentioned: 355 Post(s)
Tagged: 374 Thread(s)
|
^ this!
|
03-18-2016, 03:26 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
His original question was why there was so little information. The cost is one reason... but again, absolute power gains is not everything. As for your point on quiet catbacks, I'll be testing some combinations of quiet catbacks that would sound horrible w/ catless headers. Source: I used to have a quiet catback until I put the Berk front pipe on the car. With a stock header. -alex |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mav1178 For This Useful Post: | Mr.Impreza (03-18-2016) |
03-18-2016, 03:33 PM | #23 | |
Not a troll
Join Date: Apr 2015
Drives: FR-S
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,104
Thanks: 8,237
Thanked 5,399 Times in 2,694 Posts
Mentioned: 266 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
All I said was going with a known quantity is probably better than something unknown. Sure, we aren't building all out track cars, or chasing every last HP/Tq. But, if you're spending the same kind of money as the "best" header on the market, why the hell wouldn't you go with that? I truly do not give a flying fuck about the point you're making. Coming up with a "counter argument" about something that wasn't even mentioned in the first place. By all means, carry on with your sound testing. Myself, and many others will continue to buy the parts that we want to, and make sacrifices to have them. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Cole For This Useful Post: | go_a_way1 (03-18-2016) |
03-18-2016, 03:45 PM | #24 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
The entire header is certified as street legal in Japan. By that, I mean they have subjected both the ZC6 and ZN6 chassis for emissions testing. Each kit comes with the certificate as tested for both cars. Just spent 10 minutes carefully reading the instructions that it is supplied with... The kit comes with an O2 extension, so there is an O2 sensor before AND after the catalytic converter on the front pipe. A secondary wideband O2 bung is welded on the header and a plug is supplied. Obviously this does not apply to US market nor do most people that want to be unrestricted by header options, but it is definitely different. As for what is different about this vs Ace: this header is certified 100% for street use in Japan, bolt-on as-is without any need for ECU tune. The Ace header is not, primarily because there is no before/after catalytic placement for the O2 sensor and that will trigger an ECU fault code. To each their own. -alex |
||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mav1178 For This Useful Post: | Kestrel (03-19-2016), Mr.Impreza (03-18-2016) |
03-18-2016, 04:45 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
So there is chance for this header to be one that should never trigger CEL?
edit Hmm, from googled up pics and specs i somewhat doubt that single HF cat in frontpipe will be sufficient and won't confuse stock tune for CELs to never happen. So wondering what is included in that certification. Last edited by churchx; 03-18-2016 at 04:55 PM. |
03-18-2016, 05:05 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited CWP
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,561
Thanks: 34
Thanked 669 Times in 469 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
03-18-2016, 05:12 PM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The second O2 sensor is placed downstream after the cat, so it can still verify before/after. I should note that the second O2 sensor placement has a much smaller opening, similar to those O2 extension inserts that cheat ECU detection. I am assuming that this cat is less efficient than factory and there is still a possibility of ECU code being triggered. According to the copy of testing included with the header, the setup is about 2x as much emissions as factory at cold startup, and about 50% of factory emissions when warmed up. -alex |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mav1178 For This Useful Post: | Mr.Impreza (03-18-2016) |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Offical Gruppe-S UEL Header Install & Review Thread | continuecrushing | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 313 | 06-11-2023 03:54 PM |
Header & Overpipe compilation thread | ichitaka05 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 88 | 01-26-2021 09:33 AM |
ACE 4-2-1 Header open source tuning thread | Wayno | Software Tuning | 15 | 03-07-2016 04:57 PM |
Yes, another Borla header thread. | m.wood0213 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 36 | 10-03-2013 12:11 AM |