follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-22-2017, 09:17 PM   #43
Bobster
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: GT86 GTS
Location: Sydney
Posts: 94
Thanks: 13
Thanked 24 Times in 18 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hags86 View Post
Sorry to re-post from another thread but I hoping to get an answer and move forward and order some headers.

Being RHD I can go for the 250 or the 400. Other than 'the 250 is better at high revs and less so at lower revs' versus 'the 400 is better at lower revs and less so at high revs' I can't find any qualitative assessment of the two. Am I sacrificing 10% power at 4000rpm to get 2% better at 7000rpm on the 250? If that is the case I'd probably go with the 400.

If anyone can help please shout out otherwise I'll have to flip a coin!

The main plan is to optimise for track days and hopefully get a good bump for DD and flatten the torque curve. I think the 400 is better for linear torque but at what expense at the top end?
Driven both and own CS400

With CS400, HKS FP and CB and injen evolution intake I had heaps better low end and mid range torque but holds up well but not as good as B250 up top.

I'm back to stock airbox with Greddy Scoop, K&N Panel and mishmoto intake pipe. This setup lost me some low eng and mid range torque but pulls strong to redline like B250

Last edited by Bobster; 06-22-2017 at 09:43 PM.
Bobster is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bobster For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (06-23-2017), lazyluka (06-22-2017)
Old 06-23-2017, 10:57 AM   #44
ThatAsianBradah
Member
 
ThatAsianBradah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Drives: Toyota 86 2017 TRD Modded
Location: Oahu - Hawaii - USA
Posts: 75
Thanks: 214
Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
You want the Edelbrock SC if you want low end power,not the Jackson Racing SC. The SC will amplify the header gains, and vice versa, with a good tune. If low end is what you want, get the Edelbrock + CS400.
That makes sense. With the EBSC the car is incredibly "torquey" at 1st/2nd gear 1k-3.5k. Assuming that the CS400 amplifies that even further would supposedly be an overkill to some, especially DDers, but for the freeway/highway spirited drives where 4th/5th gear will be utilized the most, the A-350 would benefit me the most.

The next question is whether or not I should get the H/OP/FP ceramic coated. I'm unsure of the with/without stance of such an add-on.

__________________
Life is like a car, you press the gas to go, steer around all the things blocking your way through Life, and park it when you reach your destination
ThatAsianBradah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2017, 04:53 PM   #45
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hags86 View Post
Sorry to re-post from another thread but I hoping to get an answer and move forward and order some headers.

Being RHD I can go for the 250 or the 400. Other than 'the 250 is better at high revs and less so at lower revs' versus 'the 400 is better at lower revs and less so at high revs' I can't find any qualitative assessment of the two. Am I sacrificing 10% power at 4000rpm to get 2% better at 7000rpm on the 250? If that is the case I'd probably go with the 400.

If anyone can help please shout out otherwise I'll have to flip a coin!

The main plan is to optimise for track days and hopefully get a good bump for DD and flatten the torque curve. I think the 400 is better for linear torque but at what expense at the top end?
Go for the 250.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2017, 04:55 PM   #46
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatAsianBradah View Post
That makes sense. With the EBSC the car is incredibly "torquey" at 1st/2nd gear 1k-3.5k. Assuming that the CS400 amplifies that even further would supposedly be an overkill to some, especially DDers, but for the freeway/highway spirited drives where 4th/5th gear will be utilized the most, the A-350 would benefit me the most.

The next question is whether or not I should get the H/OP/FP ceramic coated. I'm unsure of the with/without stance of such an add-on.

With boost, I would recommend ceramic coating. It keeps your engine bay temps lower, and simultaneously better preserves exhaust gas energy for better scavenging. It's a win-win.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
ThatAsianBradah (06-25-2017)
Old 06-24-2017, 08:55 PM   #47
Hags86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Toyota GTS 86
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 243
Thanks: 21
Thanked 118 Times in 65 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
Go for the 250.
Thanks Mike. The guys at Delicious suggested the 400. Maybe there is no right answer but can you please elaborate on your recommendation so I can make an more informed decision?
Hags86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2017, 04:32 AM   #48
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hags86 View Post
Thanks Mike. The guys at Delicious suggested the 400. Maybe there is no right answer but can you please elaborate on your recommendation so I can make an more informed decision?
Your posts, subjectively, make me believe you like the power to be there when you wind out the engine to the higher RPMs.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
Hags86 (06-29-2017)
Old 06-25-2017, 06:17 AM   #49
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
I would agree with @CSG Mike that a PD blower would suit a manifold that works better at higher RPM.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2017, 05:50 AM   #50
Mark@Abbey m/s
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: GT86 in Orange
Location: UK
Posts: 30
Thanks: 1
Thanked 32 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDM4E View Post
Funny how the curve is different od Dynapack vs roller dyno. Or is it tuned ""not as good"?
do you mean the way a roller dyno smooths the curves out?
Mark@Abbey m/s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2017, 01:38 PM   #51
JDM4E
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Drives: Honda Accord Euro
Location: Europe
Posts: 204
Thanks: 251
Thanked 54 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark@Abbey m/s View Post
do you mean the way a roller dyno smooths the curves out?
yep
JDM4E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2018, 05:20 AM   #52
ImportPer4mance_
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post


CS400 and high flow cat, otherwise stock exhaust. Tuned by Mark at Abbey Motorsport. Lower line is stock car.
I thought the CS400 was meant to get rid of the dreaded torque dip? The dip here is still quite prominent I'm debating between the ACE CS400 and the PSR UEL. Had my eyes set on the CS400 before I saw some of the dyno's on here. CS400 is 1.1k more than the PSR and I'm really struggling to see why..

Anyone else who's NA have dyno's of the CS400? There really aren't many around.

Sadly we don't even have CSG or Delicious tuning here in Melbourne to help out haha
ImportPer4mance_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2018, 05:23 PM   #53
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImportPer4mance_ View Post
I thought the CS400 was meant to get rid of the dreaded torque dip? The dip here is still quite prominent I'm debating between the ACE CS400 and the PSR UEL. Had my eyes set on the CS400 before I saw some of the dyno's on here. CS400 is 1.1k more than the PSR and I'm really struggling to see why..

Anyone else who's NA have dyno's of the CS400? There really aren't many around.

Sadly we don't even have CSG or Delicious tuning here in Melbourne to help out haha
It does get rid of the torque dip, provided your tune is able to do so.

CSG and DT offer international support and tuning.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2018, 05:40 PM   #54
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImportPer4mance_ View Post
I thought the CS400 was meant to get rid of the dreaded torque dip? The dip here is still quite prominent
This is a more recent tune from the same guy:
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2018, 04:47 AM   #55
ImportPer4mance_
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
It does get rid of the torque dip, provided your tune is able to do so.

CSG and DT offer international support and tuning.
Oh, awesome! I think the only vendor that sells them in Melbourne are HARROP, so if I go for them, will it be possible to just contact you guys in regards with the tuning process etc. I don't have an OFT or anything haha, so I'm guessing I'll need to get one if I'm getting an overseas tune from you guys?

Also, how does the cs400 compare to the PSR/TOMEI UEL? As someone who has only run stock headers & is pretty much relying on info available online, I'm quite inexperienced with this kinda stuff
ImportPer4mance_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2018, 04:50 AM   #56
ImportPer4mance_
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
This is a more recent tune from the same guy:
Oh, that's much better! Is that with a full exhaust or just the cs400 bolted on with the rest of the exhaust stock?

Thanks!!
ImportPer4mance_ is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ace Header 4-2-1 CS400 Custom BRZEdit Tune Dyno Results JDM-dono Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 24 05-05-2016 04:54 PM
Shiv dyno day 2 in lewisville, OFT users custom dyno tunes malubawla Southwest 14 11-21-2015 01:53 PM
Dyno numbers list from Evasive Motorsports Meet/Dyno Fish Southern California 29 02-24-2013 03:16 AM
Dyno Compilation - dyno testing results and recommendations Illusive Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 82 02-08-2013 07:00 PM
Base line dyno figure (dynapak Hub dyno) gtauto AUSTRALIA 16 10-08-2012 08:06 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.