follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2015, 04:10 PM   #1
GreaseBall
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS Liquid Silver
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Need Help getting power without Forced Induction

Hello,

Was wondering what I can do to get the most power out of my scion without getting a Turbo or supercharger. Please let me know what you guys think.

Thank you,
-GreaseBall
GreaseBall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2015, 04:16 PM   #2
alanhung85
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ Sport-tech Pkg
Location: Toronto
Posts: 151
Thanks: 2
Thanked 33 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
What is your budget?

Headers
Tune
E85
Crawford BPB
Drop In Filter
Exhaust
Lightweight Crank Pulley
Lightweight Drive Shaft
Lightweight Wheels
alanhung85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2015, 04:22 PM   #3
Pkush
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: 2015 BRZ Series.Blue CWP
Location: Chicago Northwest Suburbs
Posts: 474
Thanks: 358
Thanked 218 Times in 130 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=81493

All described here.
Pkush is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pkush For This Useful Post:
eddiev116 (02-06-2015)
Old 01-28-2015, 06:06 PM   #4
kodyo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 686
Thanks: 597
Thanked 256 Times in 173 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
4.56 final drive swap if you have a manual makes a world of difference.
kodyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2015, 06:57 PM   #5
Teseo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: frs
Location: Gunsai
Posts: 4,877
Thanks: 7,152
Thanked 2,922 Times in 1,769 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Engine swap, maybe
Teseo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Teseo For This Useful Post:
Freeman (01-29-2015)
Old 01-28-2015, 07:01 PM   #6
Shiv@Openflash
Senior Member
 
Shiv@Openflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 2,629
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 5,469 Times in 1,494 Posts
Mentioned: 605 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by alanhung85 View Post
What is your budget?

Headers
Tune
E85
Crawford BPB
Drop In Filter
Exhaust
Lightweight Crank Pulley
Lightweight Drive Shaft
Lightweight Wheels
I wouldn't run the BPB with E85. It truncates power above 6500rpm where E85 maps keep building power. But I agree with everything else (maybe not the crank pulley)
Shiv@Openflash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2015, 07:05 PM   #7
2much
I wanna go fast
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S 6MT
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 701
Thanks: 252
Thanked 342 Times in 189 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiv@Openflash View Post
I wouldn't run the BPB with E85. It truncates power above 6500rpm where E85 maps keep building power. But I agree with everything else (maybe not the crank pulley)
I have read about some of the dangers of the lightweight crank pulley regarding balance on both sides of the crank... why wouldnt a light driveshaft be an issue also?
2much is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2015, 07:11 PM   #8
Shiv@Openflash
Senior Member
 
Shiv@Openflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 2,629
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 5,469 Times in 1,494 Posts
Mentioned: 605 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2much View Post
I have read about some of the dangers of the lightweight crank pulley regarding balance on both sides of the crank... why wouldnt a light driveshaft be an issue also?
Because with the factory pulley, there is a rubber isolated harmonic damper. Since LW pulleys don't have them, you are eliminating this very important component that is there to move the major crankshaft harmonics (which result in crankshaft twisting) to occur at revs higher than your operational engine speed range (800-7500rpm)
Shiv@Openflash is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Shiv@Openflash For This Useful Post:
2much (01-28-2015), DAEMANO (01-28-2015), mad_sb (01-28-2015), tato.valverde (04-16-2015)
Old 01-28-2015, 07:13 PM   #9
2much
I wanna go fast
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S 6MT
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 701
Thanks: 252
Thanked 342 Times in 189 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiv@Openflash View Post
Because with the factory pulley, there is a rubber isolated harmonic damper. Since LW pulleys don't have them, you are eliminating this very important component that is there to move the major crankshaft harmonics (which result in crankshaft twisting) to occur at revs higher than your operational engine speed range (800-7500rpm)
so... is it not possible for someone to make a lightweight pulley with the harmonic balancer?
2much is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2015, 07:27 PM   #10
Shiv@Openflash
Senior Member
 
Shiv@Openflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 2,629
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 5,469 Times in 1,494 Posts
Mentioned: 605 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2much View Post
so... is it not possible for someone to make a lightweight pulley with the harmonic balancer?
I've seen some with them in domestic car markets. It's not an easy thing for a normal tuning company to do since it involves measuring angular crankshaft deflection at a wide range of engine speeds and then designing the correct damper. OEMs have entire NVH teams that do this for a living. It's not something you can eyeball

Back in the late 90s we released a lightweight underdrive pulley for the EJ25 in the Impreza 2.5RS. I was lucky enough to have a customer who works in the NVH department at Rousch. He tested the engine for harmonics with the stock pulley and our pulley (no harmonic damper) only to find that the stock pulley moved the major harmonics above 7500rpm where it would otherwise be at 7000rpm. It wasn't a big deal for us since we rev limited that engine to 6900rpm.
Shiv@Openflash is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Shiv@Openflash For This Useful Post:
DAEMANO (01-29-2015), kodyo (01-28-2015), stugray (01-28-2015), Turdinator (01-29-2015)
Old 01-28-2015, 09:27 PM   #11
Poodles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2015 Series.Blue
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,781
Thanks: 88
Thanked 781 Times in 481 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by alanhung85 View Post
What is your budget?

Headers
Tune
E85
Crawford BPB
Drop In Filter
Exhaust
Lightweight Crank Pulley
Lightweight Drive Shaft
Lightweight Wheels


Crank pulley, drive shaft, and wheels won't make any more power.


Tune, header, E85 will be the biggest power adders.


Still, if you want real power, you're going FI...
Poodles is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Poodles For This Useful Post:
SirBrass (03-28-2015), stugray (01-28-2015)
Old 01-28-2015, 09:31 PM   #12
mad_sb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,639
Thanks: 632
Thanked 981 Times in 537 Posts
Mentioned: 100 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poodles View Post
Crank pulley, drive shaft, and wheels won't make any more power.
...
No but they do reduce rotational mass resulting in more power at the contact patch and better acceleration. Dynodynamics can actually measure the power gain from lighter wheels and tires, saw it many times when i used to tune on one.
__________________
mad_sb is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mad_sb For This Useful Post:
DAEMANO (01-29-2015), Shiv@Openflash (01-28-2015), Turdinator (01-29-2015)
Old 01-28-2015, 10:10 PM   #13
Poodles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2015 Series.Blue
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,781
Thanks: 88
Thanked 781 Times in 481 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mad_sb View Post
No but they do reduce rotational mass resulting in more power at the contact patch and better acceleration. Dynodynamics can actually measure the power gain from lighter wheels and tires, saw it many times when i used to tune on one.


That is about the only one that will really be felt as well. Removing unsprung weight is great, and lighter wheels/tires will allow you to accelerate faster and brake shorter.


But you're STILL not really making more power, it's just not as much drivetrain loss.


Crank pulley: As already stated, not a great idea, plus it's a very minor weight loss close to the axis of rotation.


Driveshaft: Same as crank pulley as it's all close to the axis of rotation. Also, I have yet to see a lightweight 2 piece driveshaft (yes they can be made). Keep in mind that a single piece would be far cheaper for them to make, and in a car with very little sound insulation, NVH is not the driving force behind their decision to use a 2-piece. The other obvious reason is driveshaft critical speed...


Flywheel: Now we're talking. Lots of weight and it's far away from the axis of rotation. Downside is that it's harder to replace, makes the car a bit of a pain to daily, and if the car is drag raced, the clutch can weld itself to the steel inserts (on an aluminum flywheel, this is not so much an issue on lightweight steel or cromoly flywheels).
Poodles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2015, 10:49 PM   #14
2016 Camaro SS
Senior Member
 
2016 Camaro SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: Fast
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 790
Thanks: 114
Thanked 407 Times in 241 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Here we go again with the lightweight crank pulley nonsense.

I've been running one for two years with 0 issues. The engine is already balanced. If anything, it revs slightly more freely with it. Not a major change, but looks nicer than the heavy stock pulley.
2016 Camaro SS is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to 2016 Camaro SS For This Useful Post:
Apoc (01-29-2015), Captain Snooze (01-29-2015), industrial (01-30-2015), phobos512 (01-30-2015), tennisfreak (01-29-2015)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
going forced induction ft86me Forced Induction 14 02-05-2014 08:23 AM
Forced induction for ATs? Lokutus Forced Induction 10 02-26-2013 03:42 PM
Forced Induction *chat* cause we know this girl needs more power Jeff86 Forced Induction 44 01-10-2013 12:53 AM
NOS or Forced Induction? v3rgil AFRICA 1 11-08-2012 07:17 AM
Forced Induction Primo86 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 11 05-29-2012 07:50 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.