05-17-2013, 09:09 PM | #435 | |
The SquadWhisperer
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: '13 Ultramarine FR-S (STX)
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 681
Thanks: 383
Thanked 477 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Following that up, if the car did in fact lean out, then the intake is IN FACT moving more air, which is EXACTLY what you want any performance intake to do. Lastly, under full throttle/load conditions, a fatter mixture (to a certain point of course, which varies per specific engine and build) results in more power. Typically as you lighten up the mixture towards 14.7 you in fact make LESS power. That is why depending on the application tuners shoot towards 12 ish. Of course this helps prevent detonation as well. As for your "Parts don't stack parts HP" point, save it for the high schoolers. I'm not new to this and this has already been covered in this thread. How you make power is by eliminating bottlenecks and increasing efficiencies. I could sit down and calculate how much air the engine actually requires, and cross that with the flow capabilities of the stock intake, but there isn't much point given that i know the engine had to take more air in to make the extra power. You can limit the gain from other modifications if the intake is the bottleneck. You could have the best flowing exhaust out there, but it is useless if the engine cannot pull enough air in. I plan on doing many more modifications to the power plant on my rig, so now that I have an intake which flows better than stock, I can maximize the gain from other mods as well. |
|
05-17-2013, 09:12 PM | #436 |
First 86 member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: FRS, Tacoma, Honda CB1100
Location: WA State
Posts: 165
Thanks: 3
Thanked 92 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Not that I noticed. I had the $75 TRD drop-in before I got this one and didn't notice any difference where as with this one I do tend to notice the difference. Mine is pure stock except for this intake. No dyno numbers, just butt in seat testing, and it could be that once you install a bunch of other stuff, this won't make much difference. In summary : your mileage may vary.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to HotLavaMann For This Useful Post: | torqdork (05-17-2013) |
05-17-2013, 09:26 PM | #437 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Gladstone
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 899
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
2013 Sion FRS
2014 Subaru WRX 2014 Subaru XV |
|
05-17-2013, 10:45 PM | #438 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: FR-S 6MT
Location: Somewhere in Space
Posts: 1,565
Thanks: 500
Thanked 882 Times in 433 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I doubt you are moving any more air.. you are most likely not "reading" it correctly and running lean from that. The stock fuel system can keep up with any extra air you can give it NA.. so it points back to mis-reading incoming air. |
|
05-17-2013, 11:00 PM | #439 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: RV-7
Location: Out West
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 1,042
Thanked 893 Times in 562 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Why not? The TRD CAI for FJ Cruiser is fully compatible with the TRD S/C. I'll be installing a TRD S/C on my FR-S whenever they're available and hope to use the TRD CAI I'll be installing, but would be severely disappointed to find that they won't work together.
|
05-17-2013, 11:01 PM | #440 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Gladstone
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 899
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
2013 Sion FRS
2014 Subaru WRX 2014 Subaru XV |
|
05-17-2013, 11:08 PM | #441 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: RV-7
Location: Out West
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 1,042
Thanked 893 Times in 562 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
^ Not streetable, we have EPA tests here and of course there is an EPA compliant kit under development. Still doesn't answer my compatibility with TRD CAI question.
|
05-18-2013, 12:02 AM | #442 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Virginia
Posts: 477
Thanks: 80
Thanked 134 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
There is another dyno on here of a stock tune car with the same mods (trd intake, trd exhaust) that didn't have a baseline but had the a/f ratios. This car showed one of the flattest best looking a/f curves I've seen on a car with a stock tune. It also was running at a more optimal a/f ratio while not getting dangerously lean anywhere. Not a bad option for those such as myself that don't want a tune but get some of the benefits of one while maintaining great drivability unlike other intakes out there. Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2 |
|
05-18-2013, 12:13 AM | #443 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: RV-7
Location: Out West
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 1,042
Thanked 893 Times in 562 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I can't say for certain if it's the same kit, but it appears that the PWC TRD S/C car used some form of the TRD CAI.
http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1...debuts-at-sema http://www.garagefrs.com/2012-scion-...he-other-cars/ |
05-18-2013, 12:54 AM | #444 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS hot lava
Location: renton,wa
Posts: 201
Thanks: 169
Thanked 81 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Dsport magazine just had a good write up on all the cai systems for the frs with dyno hp gains and in some cases, hp losses. the trd system came in with a 2.52hp increase. with the stock ecu you can't expect to gain more than around a 5% increase in power without doing a reflash/tune to the ecu. The stock ecu will keep changing airflow/fuel mixture to stay as close to stock programing as possible.
|
05-18-2013, 01:01 AM | #445 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: RV-7
Location: Out West
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 1,042
Thanked 893 Times in 562 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Which system came out on top? And 5% = 10 hp without a tune, not too shabby...I think.
|
05-18-2013, 01:14 AM | #446 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS hot lava
Location: renton,wa
Posts: 201
Thanks: 169
Thanked 81 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Blitz came in at 6.69hp with fitment rating 3of5 and takeda came in at 6.36hp. With fitment rating of 4of5. Hks @ 1.52hp and weapon r @ -0.63hp were pretty bad. Trd was in the middle @ 2.52hp. K&n @ 4.34 but a lot of low end loss. Injen @ 5.61 and aem @ 5.83. There are drop in filters for the stock intake as well. Apexi @ 5.45, blitz @ 6.09 and k&n @ 5.68. Next month I think they are going to tune the ecu with the intakes to recheck performance gains/losses.
|
05-18-2013, 01:21 AM | #447 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: RV-7
Location: Out West
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 1,042
Thanked 893 Times in 562 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Thanks. Did they test the TRD drop in? I've read posts here that it's essentially a K&N.
|
05-18-2013, 01:24 AM | #448 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS hot lava
Location: renton,wa
Posts: 201
Thanks: 169
Thanked 81 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I didn't see anything about a trd drop in filter. Does trd make a drop in filter or do you have to get the whole cai system?
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
cold air intake vs short ram intake ? | tnt | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 5 | 02-02-2014 12:43 AM |
So cold air intake or air intake? | bcmakesiteasy | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 12 | 02-01-2014 08:06 PM |
HKS intake setup VS Injen intake,,,what are your thoughts? | JDMrolla | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 4 | 10-11-2012 01:31 PM |