follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2013, 09:09 PM   #435
Thorpedo
The SquadWhisperer
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: '13 Ultramarine FR-S (STX)
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 681
Thanks: 383
Thanked 477 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickFRS View Post
Since you don't show AFR's there is a chance the intake leaned out your ride resulting in more power. Also you should know parts don't stack on parts. One of the reasons you see these gains is because in fact your car is basically stock. Parts don't stack parts HP. If we went by those claims my car should be sitting around 230WHP... Chances are once you get a full exhaust and go get a tune if you took off the intake and put it back on you wouldn't see that 7Hp increase anymore. wouldn't that be awesome ahaha. Also did the graph change after 150 miles? The ECU will correct over a time after a flash. Chances are you saw gains by unplugging your battery and plugging it back in and the ECU was relearning everything.
If you read my post thoroughly, you would see that the ECU was reset for the "BEFORE" and "AFTER" runs. That throws half your argument out the window.

Following that up, if the car did in fact lean out, then the intake is IN FACT moving more air, which is EXACTLY what you want any performance intake to do.

Lastly, under full throttle/load conditions, a fatter mixture (to a certain point of course, which varies per specific engine and build) results in more power. Typically as you lighten up the mixture towards 14.7 you in fact make LESS power. That is why depending on the application tuners shoot towards 12 ish. Of course this helps prevent detonation as well.

As for your "Parts don't stack parts HP" point, save it for the high schoolers. I'm not new to this and this has already been covered in this thread. How you make power is by eliminating bottlenecks and increasing efficiencies. I could sit down and calculate how much air the engine actually requires, and cross that with the flow capabilities of the stock intake, but there isn't much point given that i know the engine had to take more air in to make the extra power. You can limit the gain from other modifications if the intake is the bottleneck. You could have the best flowing exhaust out there, but it is useless if the engine cannot pull enough air in.

I plan on doing many more modifications to the power plant on my rig, so now that I have an intake which flows better than stock, I can maximize the gain from other mods as well.
Thorpedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 09:12 PM   #436
HotLavaMann
First 86 member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: FRS, Tacoma, Honda CB1100
Location: WA State
Posts: 165
Thanks: 3
Thanked 92 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by torqdork View Post
I've read about every thread related to TRD intake filters but couldn't find the answer.

Does the $75 TRD drop-in filter also produce improved throttle response and low end pull? Butt dyno impressions are welcome.
Not that I noticed. I had the $75 TRD drop-in before I got this one and didn't notice any difference where as with this one I do tend to notice the difference. Mine is pure stock except for this intake. No dyno numbers, just butt in seat testing, and it could be that once you install a bunch of other stuff, this won't make much difference. In summary : your mileage may vary.
HotLavaMann is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HotLavaMann For This Useful Post:
torqdork (05-17-2013)
Old 05-17-2013, 09:26 PM   #437
NickFRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Gladstone
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 899
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorpedo View Post
If you read my post thoroughly, you would see that the ECU was reset for the "BEFORE" and "AFTER" runs. That throws half your argument out the window.

Following that up, if the car did in fact lean out, then the intake is IN FACT moving more air, which is EXACTLY what you want any performance intake to do.

Lastly, under full throttle/load conditions, a fatter mixture (to a certain point of course, which varies per specific engine and build) results in more power. Typically as you lighten up the mixture towards 14.7 you in fact make LESS power. That is why depending on the application tuners shoot towards 12 ish. Of course this helps prevent detonation as well.

As for your "Parts don't stack parts HP" point, save it for the high schoolers. I'm not new to this and this has already been covered in this thread. How you make power is by eliminating bottlenecks and increasing efficiencies. I could sit down and calculate how much air the engine actually requires, and cross that with the flow capabilities of the stock intake, but there isn't much point given that i know the engine had to take more air in to make the extra power. You can limit the gain from other modifications if the intake is the bottleneck. You could have the best flowing exhaust out there, but it is useless if the engine cannot pull enough air in.

I plan on doing many more modifications to the power plant on my rig, so now that I have an intake which flows better than stock, I can maximize the gain from other mods as well.
I hope you don't plan on supercharging or turboing your car because that intake wont work for those applications. As for leaning out making more power. That's my point. If you want to run your car lean to make more power go for it. Just don't expect your engine to last that long. I'll step away now though that you seem to know everything. Thx for educating me.
__________________
2013 Sion FRS
2014 Subaru WRX
2014 Subaru XV
NickFRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 10:45 PM   #438
Mikem53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: FR-S 6MT
Location: Somewhere in Space
Posts: 1,565
Thanks: 500
Thanked 882 Times in 433 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorpedo View Post
Following that up, if the car did in fact lean out, then the intake is IN FACT moving more air, which is EXACTLY what you want any performance intake to do.
Several things in your post are not quite right.. but this is just wrong.
I doubt you are moving any more air.. you are most likely not "reading"
it correctly and running lean from that. The stock fuel system can keep up with any extra air you can give it NA.. so it points back to mis-reading
incoming air.
Mikem53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 11:00 PM   #439
torqdork
Senior Member
 
torqdork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: RV-7
Location: Out West
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 1,042
Thanked 893 Times in 562 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickFRS View Post
I hope you don't plan on supercharging or turboing your car because that intake wont work for those applications.
Why not? The TRD CAI for FJ Cruiser is fully compatible with the TRD S/C. I'll be installing a TRD S/C on my FR-S whenever they're available and hope to use the TRD CAI I'll be installing, but would be severely disappointed to find that they won't work together.
torqdork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 11:01 PM   #440
NickFRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Gladstone
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 899
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by torqdork View Post
Why not? The TRD CAI for FJ Cruiser is fully compatible with the TRD S/C. I'll be installing a TRD S/C on my FR-S whenever they're available and hope to use the TRD CAI I'll be installing, but would be severely disappointed to find that they won't work together.
You can already buy a TRD super charger.



__________________
2013 Sion FRS
2014 Subaru WRX
2014 Subaru XV
NickFRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 11:08 PM   #441
torqdork
Senior Member
 
torqdork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: RV-7
Location: Out West
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 1,042
Thanked 893 Times in 562 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
^ Not streetable, we have EPA tests here and of course there is an EPA compliant kit under development. Still doesn't answer my compatibility with TRD CAI question.
torqdork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 12:02 AM   #442
vtmike
Senior Member
 
vtmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Virginia
Posts: 477
Thanks: 80
Thanked 134 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickFRS View Post
I hope you don't plan on supercharging or turboing your car because that intake wont work for those applications. As for leaning out making more power. That's my point. If you want to run your car lean to make more power go for it. Just don't expect your engine to last that long. I'll step away now though that you seem to know everything. Thx for educating me.
The stock tune for most people runs rich especially in the upper rpms. The available tunes make most of their power by running at a consistent and more optimal a/f ratio.

There is another dyno on here of a stock tune car with the same mods (trd intake, trd exhaust) that didn't have a baseline but had the a/f ratios. This car showed one of the flattest best looking a/f curves I've seen on a car with a stock tune. It also was running at a more optimal a/f ratio while not getting dangerously lean anywhere. Not a bad option for those such as myself that don't want a tune but get some of the benefits of one while maintaining great drivability unlike other intakes out there.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
vtmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 12:13 AM   #443
torqdork
Senior Member
 
torqdork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: RV-7
Location: Out West
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 1,042
Thanked 893 Times in 562 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
I can't say for certain if it's the same kit, but it appears that the PWC TRD S/C car used some form of the TRD CAI.

http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1...debuts-at-sema

http://www.garagefrs.com/2012-scion-...he-other-cars/
torqdork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 12:54 AM   #444
beaver_scott
Senior Member
 
beaver_scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS hot lava
Location: renton,wa
Posts: 201
Thanks: 169
Thanked 81 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Dsport magazine just had a good write up on all the cai systems for the frs with dyno hp gains and in some cases, hp losses. the trd system came in with a 2.52hp increase. with the stock ecu you can't expect to gain more than around a 5% increase in power without doing a reflash/tune to the ecu. The stock ecu will keep changing airflow/fuel mixture to stay as close to stock programing as possible.
beaver_scott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 01:01 AM   #445
torqdork
Senior Member
 
torqdork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: RV-7
Location: Out West
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 1,042
Thanked 893 Times in 562 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Which system came out on top? And 5% = 10 hp without a tune, not too shabby...I think.
torqdork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 01:14 AM   #446
beaver_scott
Senior Member
 
beaver_scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS hot lava
Location: renton,wa
Posts: 201
Thanks: 169
Thanked 81 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Blitz came in at 6.69hp with fitment rating 3of5 and takeda came in at 6.36hp. With fitment rating of 4of5. Hks @ 1.52hp and weapon r @ -0.63hp were pretty bad. Trd was in the middle @ 2.52hp. K&n @ 4.34 but a lot of low end loss. Injen @ 5.61 and aem @ 5.83. There are drop in filters for the stock intake as well. Apexi @ 5.45, blitz @ 6.09 and k&n @ 5.68. Next month I think they are going to tune the ecu with the intakes to recheck performance gains/losses.
beaver_scott is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to beaver_scott For This Useful Post:
Lonewolf (05-18-2013), torqdork (05-18-2013)
Old 05-18-2013, 01:21 AM   #447
torqdork
Senior Member
 
torqdork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: RV-7
Location: Out West
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 1,042
Thanked 893 Times in 562 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Thanks. Did they test the TRD drop in? I've read posts here that it's essentially a K&N.
torqdork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 01:24 AM   #448
beaver_scott
Senior Member
 
beaver_scott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS hot lava
Location: renton,wa
Posts: 201
Thanks: 169
Thanked 81 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I didn't see anything about a trd drop in filter. Does trd make a drop in filter or do you have to get the whole cai system?
beaver_scott is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cold air intake vs short ram intake ? tnt Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 5 02-02-2014 12:43 AM
So cold air intake or air intake? bcmakesiteasy Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 12 02-01-2014 08:06 PM
HKS intake setup VS Injen intake,,,what are your thoughts? JDMrolla Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 4 10-11-2012 01:31 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.