|
Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86 |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-09-2012, 09:36 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Hot Lava A/T
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 123
Thanks: 13
Thanked 209 Times in 56 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
gas mileage: actual vs reported...
Some posters say that the fuel mileages readings on our cars are optimistic by 1.5 - 2 MPG.
I don't understand how the onboard fuel mileage calculator can be so incorrect. Onboard readout: The computer can measure EXACTLY how much fuel the engine is consuming through injector pulse times(s) while at the same time, monitoring the distance traveled. The amount of fuel in the tank, the octane, the weather is all moot - what matters is the amount of fuel that has passed through the injectors compared to the distance traveled. It's basic math but is COMPUTER MONITORED. Should be dead on accurate. Driver calculations: It seems to me that recording the distance traveled and how much fuel used would have more variables and chances for errors such as the accuracy of the gas pump and what volume you are actually getting compared to what it tells you it is dispensing as well as the accuracy of your odometer which can be in error by wrong sized tires, rear end gear changes, etc. and also, math errors. I was going to call BULLSHIT on the people that say that the MPG readout in our cars was incorrect by 1.5 - 2 MPG, then I read this... http://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/...s-fibbing.html It would appear (to me at least) that the car manufacturers are scamming us. There is NO reason that the readout should be incorrect. All the excuses given in the article are nonsense. Thoughts? |
08-09-2012, 09:42 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Firestorm FR-S
Location: VA
Posts: 188
Thanks: 83
Thanked 72 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
From article:
"I can't imagine any reason that any automaker would want to make drivers think they can get better fuel economy than they were getting," Williamsen adds. I don't know to sell cars maybe? |
08-09-2012, 09:48 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: White 86 GTS AT
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 235
Thanks: 61
Thanked 72 Times in 33 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I don't doubt the inaccuracies across the board but can report that my dash readout and fuelly currently match identically at 7.9L/100km (US 29.9mpg) after 2730km.
http://www.fuelly.com/driver/86gtsat/86
__________________
|
The Following User Says Thank You to LeftFootBrake For This Useful Post: | SuperDave (09-04-2012) |
08-09-2012, 09:54 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2008 STi
Location: Texas
Posts: 101
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Your on board computer doesn't calculate by how much fuel it uses voltage readings from the air sensor, throttle body, and O2 sensor and it spits out a number no math involved it's all programmed on a table, however it does give you a ball park idea of what you are getting. My 08 STi was always 2-4 MPG higher then what I calculated. |
|
08-10-2012, 11:54 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '13 Argento MT FR-S
Location: White Hall, AR
Posts: 215
Thanks: 112
Thanked 97 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I've always found that onboard mpg calculators are kind of on the high side... if you don't believe it... go driving @ 1am on a desolate stretch of interstate with your low fuel light on... bet you'll worry if you're really getting 31.5mpg then! lol. I do the math based on miles driven/fuel added. I always try to top off my tank as well. No doubt in my mind I'm over 30mpg because I go a lot further than my SRT4 or SRT8 did on the same amount of fuel. I can get 350+mi of out a tank on the interstate without much trouble or dramatics and it'll only be like 11gal of gas.
__________________
|
08-10-2012, 12:16 PM | #6 |
Country Boy 4 Life
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 19' & 06' Ridgelines, 13' FR-S
Location: EUGENE
Posts: 5,228
Thanks: 6,719
Thanked 5,291 Times in 2,720 Posts
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I just got back from a 2700 mile road trip. I averaged 34 -40 mpg. I would fill up, reset trip A, and then drive till i was about at half a tank. Then fill up again and do the math. My dash says my avg is 34.5mpg. I believe it. It said 29mpg before the trip. I would avg 55-80mph in traffic. (4-5 over what is posted) I do have an auto, which is geared different. I have almost 5000 miles now.
|
08-10-2012, 12:46 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Drives: Scion FRS Ht Lva(AT)
Location: Alberta
Posts: 409
Thanks: 30
Thanked 81 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Some food for thought
You can also reset the average fuel consumption readout by press and hold. This will allow you to get an average for whatever interval you want, like a single tank. If you don't reset for each tank, then you are looking at a lifetime average since the last reset. This is seperate from and odometer reset. Thinking about the math of averaging and rounding might also help. When using the computer I look at the average over each tank by reseting the average indicator after each fill. If you do the average over say 10 tanks, individual variations have less impact on the average even if it is computer calculated. Also think about the instaneous fuel consumption readout. I have seen readouts in 1rst gear that approach 50L/100km. but the average is effected by not only that number but how long I am generating that fuel consumption. So while high if you upshift earlier to 2nd, the impact on the average is less. Yes the computer should capture this, but there is still math and it still reports in this case of L/100 Km. to one decimal place. So on a recent tank I averaged 5.7L/100km based on the fuel pump fill/odometer. The meter showed 5.6 until just before I pulled into the station when it went back to 5.7. so even when you consider that you are recording to one decimal (0.1L/100km) being on one side or the other of 0.1 L/100km represents an error of 1.75% in this case. If in miles/gallon, rounding represents only about 0.3% for 0.1mpg variation on 33mpg. Does that mean the computer is more accurate in measuring mpg vs. L/100km. No, but the readout is still only accurate to its reporting capability and rounding criteria. Now it is also pretty much common practice for fuel to be priced based on a standard density at 15 degrees C. so as to minimize the impact of fuel temperature. At least in some places! So that will also influence dispensing pump accuracy. As someone else eluded to fuel pump accuracy is regulated and subject to inspection, so they are usually going be as accurate as the regulations require. Fuel economy competitions and Formula One as examples, measures fuel consumption by mass to minimize volume temperature issues, but that is a bit more complex. Plus as someone else suggested there is no guarantee regarding how these instantaneous and average fuel consumptions are actually generated. I agree there are many other variables that contribute to differences as well. The important part should be to use a consistent method for measurement/calculation since comparison relative to how you drive and use your vehicle is what I think you are trying to capture rather than absolute values comparing one car to another. The fill/odometer method still appears to have the greater opportunity for accuracy as long as you ensure you use the same procedure to decide when the tank is full! |
08-12-2012, 08:38 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Scion FantasticRoad-Sex
Location: Take a wild guess.
Posts: 517
Thanks: 31
Thanked 126 Times in 75 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I just got back from a trip to Nashville from Memphis and got 40.8 MPG. Auto FTW.
|
08-15-2012, 08:28 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Skoda Yeti DSG diesel 4x4
Location: W. Australia
Posts: 1,203
Thanks: 336
Thanked 307 Times in 230 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
08-15-2012, 10:12 AM | #10 |
Deleted
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: FR-S
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 242
Thanks: 106
Thanked 117 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
With 1800 miles I decided to drive my AT in snow mode replicating the Prius economy methods. What I got was 250 miles at 43.3 MPG, almost all city streets. During this time on the roads I maintained normal traffic flow and speeds, but did modulate throttle at minimum for conditions. Amazing for the car I will be taking to autocross this weekend, and I can't think of any other choice as versatile: Can you?
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ToxicSneakers For This Useful Post: | Dadhawk (09-04-2012) |
08-15-2012, 10:48 AM | #11 | |
I don't lie.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: AE86 Successor
Location: Canada
Posts: 380
Thanks: 290
Thanked 44 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
08-15-2012, 11:28 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Scion FantasticRoad-Sex
Location: Take a wild guess.
Posts: 517
Thanks: 31
Thanked 126 Times in 75 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
08-15-2012, 12:29 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 13 FR-S, 00 Spyder&Celica, 08 Tundr
Location: Sealy, Texas
Posts: 362
Thanks: 2
Thanked 176 Times in 78 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
08-15-2012, 12:32 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 13 FR-S, 00 Spyder&Celica, 08 Tundr
Location: Sealy, Texas
Posts: 362
Thanks: 2
Thanked 176 Times in 78 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Actual experienced real world fuel mileage MPG? | R8 | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 88 | 07-24-2012 07:50 AM |
Actual alignment specs from BRZ | taosracer | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 50 | 06-29-2012 09:33 AM |
actual release date. WHEN? | Ad8707 | CANADA | 12 | 05-02-2012 01:11 AM |
Actual Weight For FRS??? | DanPO | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 3 | 03-22-2012 05:07 PM |
What are the Actual Curb Weights? | DanPO | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics | 9 | 12-22-2011 12:01 PM |