FR-S/BRZ vs. Genesis Coupe

[Mr.Jay]

Originally Posted by cassidy0998

BACK ON TOPIC - if the new GC ends up having 270hp for the 2.0T, will anybody seriously consider it over the FR-S/BRZ?

maybe but after the next refresh cause I cant stand the new face

[SUB-FT86]

Originally Posted by cassidy0998

I agree, people get very up tight and strung out when it comes to this car. It's nice, and it's competitive. I think that shakes people up a bit.

I totally agree with this statement. And these guys make the FRS out to be some kind of beauty queen.

[SUB-FT86]

Originally Posted by Dragonitti

Since when did a GC run anything 13? Last I checked they are 14sec cars.

Since now.

http://www.motorweek.org/reviews/roa...s_coupe_r_spec


And this car is 27k

[Dark]

Originally Posted by cassidy0998

Of course there are other variables.

And out of many of those you listed above, the GC performs fairly well at. The true "value" of the car is up to the buyer, so whether I want a fancy interior or more hp is my decision. The price of what it's worth is up to the dealer.

Edit: You want Price-hp ratio? Mustang GT has more than 410hp starting at less than 30K. Not a fan of muscle car, but if Hp is all the matter.

[cassidy0998]

Originally Posted by [B

Dragonitti[/B]]
Since when did a GC run anything 13?Last I checked they are 14sec cars.

^ After checking out the link below...

Originally Posted by SUB-FT86

Since now.

http://www.motorweek.org/reviews/roa...s_coupe_r_spec


And this car is 27k

Yes, mid 13s.

Does that make it a little more desirable now?

[cassidy0998]

Originally Posted by Dark

Edit: You want Price-hp ratio? Mustang GT has more than 410hp starting at less than 30K. Not a fan of muscle car, but if Hp is all the matter.

I actually did consider it. I have a ton of respect for the new GT and V6 Mustang. But I don't want one. Everybody and their mom has one and I'm sick of seeing them. Plus they are still more expensive than the GC and have shorter warranties by 4 years/40k miles.

Price-hp ratio is important to me, and many other people who are looking for a fun car - but you're right, it isn't everything.

No car is perfect, but I don't believe that the GC is critically lacking in any department.

[Dark]

Originally Posted by cassidy0998

I actually did consider it. I have a ton of respect for the new GT and V6 Mustang. But I don't want one. Everybody and their mom has one and I'm sick of seeing them. Plus they are still more expensive than the GC and have shorter warranties by 4 years/40k miles.

Price-hp ratio is important to me, and many other people who are looking for a fun car - but you're right, it isn't everything.

No car is perfect, but I don't believe that the GC is critically lacking in any department.

Not really critically lack in anything, but it's just not best in anything. I just don't like how GC looks like everything else in Hyundai line(Hyundai design language doesn't age pretty well), and the tranny and interior material are not that good.

[Dragonitti]

Originally Posted by SUB-FT86

Since now.

http://www.motorweek.org/reviews/roa...s_coupe_r_spec


And this car is 27k

Cool. That's within acceptability (still wouldn't buy it, but at least it's worthy now). Now they need to address the 2.0T.

I've actually raced on Roebling Road. Took me 7hrs to get there.



PS...cassidy..I void my vehicles warranty within the first couple of months of having them, so it's not really a selling point for me.

[fernan2]

it's official, the new coupe to have 275Hp(2.0T) AND 350Hp(3.8N/A)...

[madfast]

wow the new front end actually looks pretty good in that pic. if the price doesnt jump, this car just got serious...

[Giccin]

Passssssssssss

[switchlanez]

There you go. A solution to silence all those complaining the FRS will be underpowered.
And influence the market price of the FRS [:

[Ryuu0u]

Originally Posted by Giccin

Passssssssssss

Yeah, I dont see how you step backwards in design like they did. Supercharger on the v6 or a v8 would have been fine.

[Neutral_Eyes]

3360 pounds

No thanks.