follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine Swaps

Engine Swaps Discussion of engine swaps.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2019, 01:46 PM   #113
ka-t_240
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: BRZ
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 968
Thanks: 124
Thanked 327 Times in 236 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by venturaII View Post
For those of us who plan to stay NA, I think having the option to purchase an adapter to keep the 86 transmission would be well worth it, compared to the headache of modifying the S2000 shifter, on top of the purchase price for that transmission, plus the need to use a different adapter anyways to connect the K motor and S2K trans... I get that the S2000 trans is stronger, but not everyone necessarily needs that in the first place.
The other thing to consider is, how is the BRZ gearing going to work with a K series powerband/rpm.
ka-t_240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 01:55 PM   #114
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,819
Thanks: 874
Thanked 1,067 Times in 674 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ka-t_240 View Post
The other thing to consider is, how is the BRZ gearing going to work with a K series powerband/rpm.
I think it'd work splendidly, frankly. You're talking two 4 cylinder motors of similar displacement and states of tune, not going from the FA20 to an LS with 3x the displacement and torque. K24x motors all have factory redlines that are slightly lower than the FA20. Factor in a tune that allows slightly higher rpms, and you're back on par with the FA20 in terms of usable rpm span.

And even if you used a K20A or Z head on a K24 bottom end, the K20 has an 8000rpm redline which is only 600rpm higher than ours. Remember that the K20 head on the K24 block will drop the K20 head's effective power range a few hundred rpm, and you're back in the same ballpark as the FA20.
__________________
"To know a thing well, know it's limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will true nature be seen." Amtal Rule

Last edited by venturaII; 01-30-2019 at 02:23 PM.
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 02:04 PM   #115
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashikabi View Post
This guy makes a good point. What all is involved in an adapter anyways? I'm not familiar with adapting transmissions. Probably some kind of bracket for the bolts and then something for the driveshaft?
Unless I am mistaken, it is a custom bracket or a custom bell housing. Then it would be necessary to do a custom driveshaft and potentially a custom shifter. Even keeping the stock transmission may require all these components because the engine has been shifted closer to the firewall.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 02:09 PM   #116
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,819
Thanks: 874
Thanked 1,067 Times in 674 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
Unless I am mistaken, it is a custom bracket or a custom bell housing. Then it would be necessary to do a custom driveshaft and potentially a custom shifter. Even keeping the stock transmission may require all these components because the engine has been shifted closer to the firewall.


http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...&postcount=112
__________________
"To know a thing well, know it's limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will true nature be seen." Amtal Rule
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 02:13 PM   #117
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,819
Thanks: 874
Thanked 1,067 Times in 674 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Honestly, the value in keeping the factory driveshaft is a little pointless, especially considering one of the big appealing features of this swap is weight reduction. An aftermarket aluminum driveshaft is a relatively cheap way to lose static weight (not even bringing up the rotational argument). So since an aftermarket driveshaft is already going to be on the list of mods that would support this project, it's a pretty simple thing to have it made to length to suit this application.

There IS value in keeping the factory shifter location though, so that would need further investigation.
__________________
"To know a thing well, know it's limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will true nature be seen." Amtal Rule
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 02:23 PM   #118
Ashikabi
Senior Member
 
Ashikabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Northwest Iowa
Posts: 7,354
Thanks: 454
Thanked 4,542 Times in 2,947 Posts
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 5 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
Unless I am mistaken, it is a custom bracket or a custom bell housing. Then it would be necessary to do a custom driveshaft and potentially a custom shifter. Even keeping the stock transmission may require all these components because the engine has been shifted closer to the firewall.
If the motor is closer to the firewall then surely the input shaft will now be too long right? Might have to move the motor forward if you want to keep the transmission. Otherwise if you move the transmission, the shifter will be wrong. Then you have a bunch more issues like needing the new shifter and transmission mount
Ashikabi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashikabi For This Useful Post:
Irace86.2.0 (01-30-2019)
Old 01-30-2019, 02:35 PM   #119
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,819
Thanks: 874
Thanked 1,067 Times in 674 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashikabi View Post
If the motor is closer to the firewall then surely the input shaft will now be too long right? Might have to move the motor forward if you want to keep the transmission. Otherwise if you move the transmission, the shifter will be wrong. Then you have a bunch more issues like needing the new shifter and transmission mount
IF all that is necessary to make the K motor fit, then there's less value to using the 86 transmission. However, you've still got to contend with the basic cost of the S2K transmission in the first place, which seem to be somewhat higher than what our transmissions are valued at, if you're trying to recoup some of your costs..
__________________
"To know a thing well, know it's limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will true nature be seen." Amtal Rule
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 02:39 PM   #120
ka-t_240
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: BRZ
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 968
Thanks: 124
Thanked 327 Times in 236 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by venturaII View Post
I think it'd work splendidly, frankly. You're talking two 4 cylinder motors of similar displacement and states of tune, not going from the FA20 to an LS with 3x the displacement and torque. K24x motors all have factory redlines that are slightly lower than the FA20. Factor in a tune that allows slightly higher rpms, and you're back on par with the FA20 in terms of usable rpm span.

And even if you used a K20A or Z head on a K24 bottom end, the K20 has an 8000rpm redline which is only 600rpm higher than ours. Remember that the K20 head on the K24 block will drop the K20 head's effective power range a few hundred rpm, and you're back in the same ballpark as the FA20.
My friends K24 civic revs to 8500rpm. Makes way more torque and HP than my car on the same dyno. Its a stock K24 bottom, stockish head, cams, e85, bolt ons. IIRC it made 245/200 with a great powerband im comparison to the brz. Makes me want a K so much.
ka-t_240 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ka-t_240 For This Useful Post:
Icecreamtruk (01-31-2019), Teseo (02-01-2019), wparsons (02-08-2019)
Old 01-30-2019, 02:40 PM   #121
Ashikabi
Senior Member
 
Ashikabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Northwest Iowa
Posts: 7,354
Thanks: 454
Thanked 4,542 Times in 2,947 Posts
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 5 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by venturaII View Post
IF all that is necessary to make the K motor fit, then there's less value to using the 86 transmission. However, you've still got to contend with the basic cost of the S2K transmission in the first place, which seem to be somewhat higher than what our transmissions are valued at, if you're trying to recoup some of your costs..
I agree that it would be considered. It certainly sounds both convenient and tempting for presumed cost savings. I'm not sold on it but I couldn't rule it out either
Ashikabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 02:41 PM   #122
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,819
Thanks: 874
Thanked 1,067 Times in 674 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Also, some really quick Googling shows the K24 motor is about 20" long, whereas the FA20 is 18". Not a lot of difference, which additionally lends itself to easier placement. Just food for thought.
__________________
"To know a thing well, know it's limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will true nature be seen." Amtal Rule
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 02:44 PM   #123
Ashikabi
Senior Member
 
Ashikabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Northwest Iowa
Posts: 7,354
Thanks: 454
Thanked 4,542 Times in 2,947 Posts
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 5 Thread(s)
Nevermind. Dumb idea

Last edited by Ashikabi; 01-30-2019 at 03:02 PM.
Ashikabi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 03:29 PM   #124
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by venturaII View Post
Also, some really quick Googling shows the K24 motor is about 20" long, whereas the FA20 is 18". Not a lot of difference, which additionally lends itself to easier placement. Just food for thought.
Just food for thought. Wouldn’t work with their current mounts as the input shaft is too long like Ashikabi said.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 03:49 PM   #125
spitfire481
Senior Member
 
spitfire481's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2JZ FRS
Location: Pure Automotive Performance
Posts: 1,378
Thanks: 97
Thanked 1,354 Times in 621 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
for what a custom adapter, flywheel/clutch assembly, etc would cost to mate the fa20 transmission to the k block, you could buy one of the multiple k to s2000 trans adapter kits already out there and a used s2000 trans. the time it would take to develop that whole setup, test, revise, test again, etc would not be worth it for the number of sales you could count on one hand.
__________________
Pure Automotive Performance
MoTeC
Build Thread
@spitfire481
spitfire481 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to spitfire481 For This Useful Post:
BertoFT (01-30-2019), Draco_PR23 (02-19-2019), Icecreamtruk (01-31-2019), Irace86.2.0 (01-30-2019), PuslarBrrrz (01-31-2019), Sportsguy83 (01-31-2019), venturaII (01-30-2019), wparsons (02-08-2019)
Old 02-02-2019, 12:34 AM   #126
PolishFrs13
building life
 
PolishFrs13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Raven Black, 6MT
Location: Litchfield Park
Posts: 265
Thanks: 27
Thanked 31 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I looked through your other K swap thread on here, i noticed the DBW TB.. is it the grams honda one ?
PolishFrs13 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pure Auto's Swap Compilation Thread - 2JZ and LSX ! Pure Automotive Engine Swaps 29 01-10-2018 01:20 AM
SwapYour86.Com Pure Automotive 2JZGTE Billet Intake Manifold For 2JZ FT86 Swap Pure Automotive Engine Swap 0 12-01-2017 11:57 AM
SwapYour86.Com Pure 2JZ MoTeC Plug & Play Wiring For FT86 !! Pure Automotive Engine Swap 0 12-01-2017 11:49 AM
SwapYour86.Com Pure LSX MoTeC Plug & Play Wiring For FT86 !! Pure Automotive Engine Swap 0 12-01-2017 11:23 AM
Pure Auto's 2JZ Swap Thread - The DRAGFRS Pure Automotive Engine Swaps 153 06-20-2016 06:33 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.