follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack

Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack Specific topics relating to wheels and tires.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-25-2015, 07:00 PM   #1
Natheria
Overlord
 
Natheria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: SWP 13 BRZ, 94 Miata
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 121
Thanks: 35
Thanked 71 Times in 33 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Sumitomo HTR Z III vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

Im trying to make up my mind between Sumitomo HTR Z III vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 and was wondering if anyone had experience with both or either of these tires.
Im looking for an inexpensive replacement for my OEM tires as they are getting close to worn out and id like an upgrade in grip for autox/daily driving without ruining the natural characteristics of the car. It appears the 2nd gen v12 evos generally have better grip but have a rather narrow traction limit that makes them more difficult to deal with at that limit. All the comparisons ive been finding between the sumitomo and the hankook are against the 1st gen v12 evo tire which was supposed to be worse off. Tire feel and response are very important to me.
__________________
"FR-S or BRZ, it doesn't really matter, they're the same to me. It's a matter of choice, like mass effect, but then the thought of boxer engines make my mass erect!" -The Roman
Natheria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2015, 08:03 PM   #2
BoxRZ_86
Senior Member
 
BoxRZ_86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited SWP
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 369
Thanks: 51
Thanked 221 Times in 118 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
i have Sumitomo HTR Z III in 245 wide on 17x9 wheels. they have good traction but they feel like they are soft in the sidewalls. there is give.
BoxRZ_86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2015, 11:02 PM   #3
DAEMANO
Time Traveller
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS - Raven
Location: So Cal - Orange County
Posts: 3,705
Thanks: 9,529
Thanked 3,416 Times in 1,677 Posts
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
I wouldn't buy either tire. Instead go with any of the 4 listed in this test. Especially if daily driving, wet traction with solid dry performance are your priorities.

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...y.jsp?ttid=192

If you want more dry performance, then step up one category to TW200 rated tires.
DAEMANO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2015, 11:47 PM   #4
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,794
Thanks: 2,164
Thanked 4,242 Times in 2,220 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
My spare track tires are Sumitomo HTR ZIII's. Compared to true EP summer tires, the sidewalls are soft. Also grip is down. Most EP tires like a bit of heat and start gripping around the temps where the Sumitomos become greasy and chunk. For example:



On the plus side, the Sumitomos are nice and progressive, and communicate (tire squeal) well before they let go. They also have a nice ride on the street.

Great value for the price, but probably won't last long if you're pushing your car pretty hard.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DarkSunrise For This Useful Post:
Natheria (05-26-2015)
Old 05-25-2015, 11:47 PM   #5
Black Tire
Senior Member
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Whiteout Scion FR-S
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 508
Thanks: 367
Thanked 209 Times in 129 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
I had the Sumitomo HTR ZIII and they were pretty good in the dry, but bad in the wet. I just instructed in an E36 M3 during a driving school that had the Hankook tires, and these seemed to be quite good in both dry and damp conditions. Generally, the newer design in a particular tire category is better, since each manufacturer tries to beat their competitors. The Sumitomo had been around a LONG time without any changes; I think the updated Hankooks would beat them on almost every measure.
__________________
My cars always dress formally. They all wear black tires.

Black Tire is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Black Tire For This Useful Post:
Natheria (05-26-2015)
Old 05-26-2015, 01:28 AM   #6
Natheria
Overlord
 
Natheria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: SWP 13 BRZ, 94 Miata
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 121
Thanks: 35
Thanked 71 Times in 33 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAEMANO View Post
I wouldn't buy either tire. Instead go with any of the 4 listed in this test. Especially if daily driving, wet traction with solid dry performance are your priorities.

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...y.jsp?ttid=192

If you want more dry performance, then step up one category to TW200 rated tires.
Sorry I'm not really all that interested in a tire category that compromises more for wet traction. I'm perfectly fine with and used to driving in the wet on more aggressive tires. I would also prefer something around the 300 mark due to my current situation. I can pay more if i want to but would simply rather spend a little less money and focus on other things for now (if you have a different suggestion you can let me know).

I'm definitely interested in a tire that is very communicative. which is what drew me to the sumitomos. That treadwear chunking is not that great but if it doesn't last as long i get what i pay for i guess which means a different better tire set in the future (yay!) Might anyone have any experience with the v12 evo 2s? possibly experience with both? I know it's a lot to ask.

Edit: sorry Black Tire, didn't see your full comment before. How did the hankooks feel at the limit? I was at first leaning towards the hankooks since it is true what you say that newer tires are going to be generally better all around which is shown in the tirerack reviews and survey stats as well and the sumitomos look to have been around for QUITE a while but i was a little nervous about when they mentioned that the limit of grip on the hankooks was guite narrow at the peak and harder to deal with. It just makes it difficult because i don't know for certain how bad it really is and whether it's something i could deal with/overcome or whether it really interferes a lot. I know it certainly has better performance, but a bit worried on how refined it is.
__________________
"FR-S or BRZ, it doesn't really matter, they're the same to me. It's a matter of choice, like mass effect, but then the thought of boxer engines make my mass erect!" -The Roman

Last edited by Natheria; 05-26-2015 at 01:44 AM.
Natheria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2015, 03:00 AM   #7
DAEMANO
Time Traveller
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS - Raven
Location: So Cal - Orange County
Posts: 3,705
Thanks: 9,529
Thanked 3,416 Times in 1,677 Posts
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natheria View Post
Sorry I'm not really all that interested in a tire category that compromises more for wet traction. I'm perfectly fine with and used to driving in the wet on more aggressive tires. I would also prefer something around the 300 mark due to my current situation. I can pay more if i want to but would simply rather spend a little less money and focus on other things for now (if you have a different suggestion you can let me know)..
If your constraints are Max Performance Summer for $300, you're not going to have many options. Gently used tires might be your best bet.
DAEMANO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2015, 12:46 PM   #8
frslee
Just drive it
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 13' FR-S
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,122
Thanks: 97
Thanked 321 Times in 218 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
+1 on the soft sidewall as I can feel the tire flexing during corners. I think it's a good tire for the price though. Apparently Sumitomo was my first summer tires haha, but the grip is much much better than performance all season tire. If it'll be your daily/occasional autox, then I think Sumitomo will do fine. It's cheap too!
frslee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2015, 12:51 PM   #9
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 874
Thanked 1,067 Times in 674 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Had the Sumitomos in 255/40-17 on 9" wheels on a different rwd car (much heavier). The Sumis were a good value, considering price, but they didn't age well. I replaced them with Continental Extreme DW in the same size and found the dry grip easily as good, better breakaway, quieter on the road, and night-and-day in the wet as a nice bonus.
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2015, 04:53 PM   #10
yomny
Senior Member
 
yomny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 FRS Whiteout
Location: MIA
Posts: 1,545
Thanks: 557
Thanked 469 Times in 340 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 5 Thread(s)
Just recently somewhat decided on the Continental extreme, similar in price and higher ratings(low noise too) Check it out.
__________________
GTX2867R, moto-tuned , tomei op , motiv fp , Invidia Q300 ti , Rota titan 17x9 +42 , nt555 255/40 , ST coilovers w/cascam , Hotchkis sways
yomny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2015, 05:31 PM   #11
Gavmen
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: dmg brz 2012
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I recently got the Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 here in Australia, and immediately after installing them, on the weekend I was beating on them hard on some A & B (mostly mountainous) roads for 1000km in my boosted 86 (300rwhp), and from my experiences they are an excellent tyre.


They are a slightly noisy tyre (about a 7/10 for noise, 10 being quiet, and 0 being super noisy), but have excellent dry grip, and excellent damp grip (I haven't driven them in the full rain, but have driven them on cold (10c) and damp roads). Braking distances are also good. I would probably rate the side wall flex to be medium (not the firmest nor the softest I've come across). In terms of what I've experienced in them the only thing I can't give review on its what its treadlife is going to be.


For the price (here in Australia), they are an excellent tyre.


Cheers


Gav

Last edited by Gavmen; 09-21-2015 at 05:15 AM.
Gavmen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Gavmen For This Useful Post:
BRZ86_ (08-12-2015)
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: XXR 527 17x8.25 +35 with 245/40 Hankook Evo2's manualmotive Wheels and Tires 11 06-30-2015 01:57 AM
(2) Hankook Ventus v12 Evo tumbla.jr Wheels and Tires 1 04-02-2015 01:48 PM
FS: Hankook Ventus v12 evo - 225/45/17 mikep Canada Classifieds 12 04-05-2014 03:11 PM
FREE-LABOR (MOUNT+BALANCE) HOLIDAY SPECIAL!! ON ALL SUMITOMO, HANKOOK & MORE TIRES MIKE@MRTIRESOLUTIONS Wheels and Tires 1 12-20-2012 01:40 PM
Hankook Ventus V12 EVO Laika Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 10 06-15-2012 06:56 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.