follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-04-2018, 10:49 PM   #1
Rai-zero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: Legacy
Location: Maryland
Posts: 136
Thanks: 92
Thanked 88 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
S2000 to BRZ tS (long post)

I bought my AP1 S2000 sixteen years ago for $33,000 (no options) but I did add a hardtop for $2400. I am not going to include the cost of new wheels or mods but I adding the cost of the hardtop because to me that was a key option and I loved the hardtop almost as much as the convertible top and used the hardtop almost half the year. I am adding the cost of the hardtop into the purchase price $35,400 *this was in 2002 dollars. Now16 years ago become more value when you factor inflation and cost of living. Such that $35K is around the same as $47K in today's money. I am not saying straight across the board that all things cost more today than in years past, for instance at one time a calculator cost $2000 while today I can buy a calculator for $2 at Walmart. Computers as well have come down in price, TVs as well. The average car in 2002 was selling for $26K today the average selling price is $36K. So back in 2002 the S2000 was above the average price. I'm not saying it was totally out of wack, it was a nice car but a Boxster cost $42K+ back then while today a Boxster starts at $57K (that's $15K additional price for the same car although we'll agree the new Boxster is well more powerful.

This is my baseline when I was buying my new car. I wanted to get something in the spirit of a S2000 but I didn't want to get another S2000. I had a tight fit in the S2000. I did technically fit and drove the car 38K miles. I always regret selling my S2K but at the time having two cars to my self was not idea. So, I wanted to buy a spiritual successor to my S2K (yet not buy another S2K) and I didn't fit on the new MX5 (is smaller than my S2K and I'm 6-2). I figured all the cars, Cayman, Mustang, Corvette, M2 or any BMW. I ruled out the German cars because I wanted to keep the costs/repairs to a minimum (having owned 2 BMW in my life, I swore never to buy another one). The Cayman was great but again didn't want to spend $40K on a 2-3 year old one and didn't want to spend less on an older one still. I know there is value on depreciated cars like the Cayman, but I do like new cars and I also sometimes am less sure if an old car might be more in need of service and maintenance than a new car. I am aware that new cars depreciate and thus are worse money pits than a well cared for used car. But time is money and I didn't want to potentially be spending a lot of time at the service station also they all say P-car tax (meaning the cost of parts are higher like I found with my M3). Mustang (just too heavy) plus I don't want high power. I had high power in my M3 and while it's great, to me I find more fun on a small car where I can wail on it and not really be in go to jail speed that much. I'm not saying I wanted a 90hp Prius but I wanted something that was ok fast not something that was hella fast.

Corvette (same as Mustang in hella fast) plus costs more like a Cayman. Eventually, I decided on a BRZ. I know, have read a hundred reviews saying “it's too slow” or “it needs a turbo” or “it's got a torque dip” or “it's too slow”. Doug DeMuro who I usually like, did a hatchet job on the BRZ/FR-S when he compared it to his 25 year old Skyline. He claimed to be doing a drag test and when take off the Skyline takes off normally and the FR-S takes off like 0-60 in 40 seconds. I know it was supposed to be funny but really that's kind of silly when in reality the two cars are probably close enough in time. I mean the BRZ is tested on C&D like 6.4 seconds. Sure it's not blazing saddles but it's not a Prius with 4 people on board.

I thought the BRZ was nice, drove well, had decent room inside for my frame. It's not a SUV by any means but it's better than MX5 by a mile. Initially was going to get the Limited with Performance Package (wheels, Brembo brakes). But got to thinking of the tS. Initially I was hating on the wing said it was stupid, said I'd get the tS if it didn't have the stupid wing, said it was ricer wing. All that stuff. But then I looked at it and the side skirts and the front lip and the wing and the black wheels and the improved suspension and the interior accents and somewhat better material, it all added up to a good bit of kit for a not horrible $5000 extra. Particularly the tS comes with excellent Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (all other BRZ come with Primacy tires which do better at slipping than they do at gripping). I know tire swap is cheap but factoring in all the other kit with the tS and the fact that when I looked at it the whole package looked good to me even the wing. So I ended up buying a new Crystal white pearl tS with short throw shifter.

Total price was $33,600 which is the same as I paid for my S2000 back in the day, actually less when I got the hardtop. I know it's not as powerful as the S2000 was 240hp (BRZ 205hp) with TQ around the same and weight around the same. I can't say which car weighed more. But they are likely within 50 pounds of each other. But in fact are probably the same weight (when I factor in the hardtop which was not all that heavy but probably 50 pounds I estimate). The S2000 has just 3 less torques but revs 1500 higher which is how it makes more horsepower. Both at 2.0L naturally aspirated engine. I will say the S2000 was faultless (no issues in almost 6 years of ownership). S2000 was great fun, was quick as heck (if you rev it). I am just breaking in the BRZ can't say anything yet.

I did test drive three other BRZ that were broken in. Twice with a passenger once solo. I can say unequivocally the S2000 was faster, felt faster, but it's not like night and day. I mean the S2000 would out drag a BRZ (I don't doubt that) but it's a close race and given several tries the BRZ could probably get the edge sometimes. Neither one is a 414hp M3 or 430hp Mustang or Corvette. But if I go back in magazine times, the 2002 Mustang GT (V8 automatic) put up same exact time as 6MT BRZ. I could compare it to some early Cayman cars. Basically the BRZ would have been somewhat fast 20 years ago. Today it's kind of buried in the crush of Hellcats and Tesla's and Civic Type R and any number of quicker cars. But daily driving it's more than fine. I am just breaking it in so keeping the revs under 4000 (try) but most likely keeping the revs under 5K. So I'm not feeling 205hp anyway, but it's fine. I don't want high power car, had that in the M3 and it was great but half the time felt like I was just driving a normal 3 series because I needed to keep slow for traffic as well as speed laws. So I said it was like a killer whale in a 2 million gallon swimming pool. It's just too much more than I need, and truth is that I enjoy less powerful cars just as much as high power cars.

-Interior, I think BRZ is better than S2000. Better seats, better steering wheel reach (tilt and telescope) has real push button start (S2K needed to turn the key then push button). Has better radio (although neither is going to win any awards). BRZ has heated seats, Bluetooth, Apple Car Play, navigation, home link, remote entry, LED headlights, more storage, USB outlets.

-Power the S2000 has a better engine no questions asked 120hp/L is amazing and 8500 reline. 6MT I'm calling that a tie. Technically the S2000 is better (haven't driven one in 10 years but it was a dream like the MX5 that I drove), but the BRZ is just about as good. I have the short throw shifter and that's still not as short as the S2000 but I love it just as much. If I had to say (yes) the S2000 is slightly better.

-Feeling of weight I'm calling that a tie as well. I think the S2000 might have felt a pinch less but that may have been my imagination and the S2000 has a much shorter wheelbase (7 inches shorter) so that might lend the impression for me of being lighter. Also S2000 had 16” wheels and my tS had 18” wheels. But not sure if that was any effect on unsprung weight plus I did replace my wheels on the S2000 to larger (but still lightweight forged wheels).

-Steering both are electric but I feel like the BRZ is a lot better. The tS particularly was set up extra special suspension and the tires and that is one of the big take thing that some people have said was improved with the tS in particular.

-Road handling. I have not really pushed the BRZ but to me it's a lot nicer. It feels planted, I believe the longer wheelbase helps, it has a lot of stability control that S2000 doesn't but to me the stability control is well judged. I never feel like it's reining me in. Plus there is a track mode and you can disable it completely but overall the BRZ just handles great. I am not saying S2000 was poor but to me it's clear the BRZ is better (maybe it's the tS suspension). Again take this with a grain of salt because I have not pushed the BRZ hard at all. Also on the highway the BRZ is very stable the wing is functional with down force once you get past 70 mph (I believe). When you hit 90 mph in the S2000 you are fully aware of it, I touched 90 in the BRZ and you can take your hand off the wheel and it's just stable. Again can't say yet as the BRZ has just one week old. But I have a strong feeling the BRZ will be better IMO.

-Usability the BRZ has fold down rear seats so you can fit 4 wheels/tires. I think the S2000 can fit one tire in the trunk (not sure) but much more usable room with the BRZ.

-Looks. This is hard, the S2000 has aged well, but to my eyes the BRZ (especially the tS) looks better. I mean to my eyes the BRZ looks better.

-Value this is hard, the S2000 was expensive but it was also built like a block of metal. It was 100% bulletproof and had a great engine maybe the best four cylinder NA engine ever. The BRZ (to me) is a great value. As I said it costs $33K when the average car/truck/suv is $36K. I know Trucks and SUVs and Minivans all push the cost of vehicles up and more SUVs sold today than 16 years ago. But to me just $33K for the limited edition tS seems like a good deal. Plus it's got so many features that the S2K doesn't have (many were not even out 16 years ago).

Sum up, the BRZ is not the S2000 but it's pretty darn close and to me it's a great car. Maybe it's not a great value if you look at Mustang with 2x the power for not too much more. But taking the small power away, and just looking as a fun little car it's really not bad. Plus I like Subaru cars still drive my 2007 Legacy Wagon and we have a 2018 Outback as well.

PS side note, the BRZ is 4 inches longer than the S2000 and 6 inches shorter than the new Cayman but has a longer wheelbase than both. All three are close to the same wight but the new Cayman is actually 100+ pounds heavier.
Rai-zero is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Rai-zero For This Useful Post:
22R (04-06-2018), botbs (04-06-2018), Dok Henz (04-06-2018), Geese1 (04-05-2018), JMon85 (04-21-2018), joro2 (04-05-2018), klondike (04-07-2018), OfficeWorker (04-05-2018), rvoll (04-06-2018), SkyeHack (04-05-2018), Veloist (04-05-2018), Vic4uf (08-03-2018), weederr33 (04-06-2018)
Old 04-05-2018, 12:02 AM   #2
NCtoBRZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ PP WRB
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 383
Thanks: 71
Thanked 206 Times in 128 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Congrats on your BRZ! I miss my S2000 (several cars ago) but the BRZ has the best, most precise handling of any car I’ve owned to date.
NCtoBRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 04:17 AM   #3
dhuang
Cannonball Record Guy
 
dhuang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Series.Yellow, 4C, Fit
Location: Houston / Atlanta
Posts: 493
Thanks: 480
Thanked 429 Times in 223 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I had a 2013 FR-S and now a 2017 Series.Yellow BRZ. My roommate has a 2004 Rio Yellow S2000.

I've spent some time with his car and was very close to getting an identical spec S2000 six years ago (when S2000 values were much cheaper), so I can echo some of your thoughts when comparing the S2K to the 86/BRZ:
  • They are very similar cars chasing the same adage.
  • The S2000 was Honda at their best and the craftsmanship reflects it.
  • The S2000's F20/22C is a far superior engine to the FA20 and the stock exhaust is perfect. The stock exhaust on the BRZ is too quiet and conservative.
  • The S2000 shifter is still one my favorites to shift, the BRZ isn't too far behind.
  • The S2000 can be twitchy (including the AP2) and you need to be prepared to catch it (unless you have an 06+ with VSA).
  • The S2000 is a more capable car as far as limits go -- Very rewarding on the track.
  • The BRZ is a far more practical car yet extremely fun, it is fine as an only car, which is one of the compelling reasons why I have it.
__________________
2017 Series.Yellow
2013 Whiteout

VINwiki - Changing Automotive History
dhuang is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dhuang For This Useful Post:
Adam_L (04-08-2018), SkyeHack (04-05-2018)
Old 04-05-2018, 04:37 AM   #4
switchlanez
Glorious BRZ Master Race
 
switchlanez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,718 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Ah, were you the one who posted about BRZ vs Cayman? Glad to see you've reach clarity in your decision. Enjoy it and if you think about selling it in a few years, just add boost instead then... BAM! Whole new car for several more years of enjoyment.
__________________
switchlanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 07:48 AM   #5
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I still see this car as a better value than a Mustang even though it's close in pricing. I keep telling people it's easier to build a car with a powerful engine than it is to build a dynamically well designed sports car. I would rather add a turbo or supercharger to a 86/BRZ than have a bigger, heavier and taller car that is 1000 lbs heavier. I want the best of both worlds which is why I love my turbo. It's my favorite mod.
SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 10:11 AM   #6
Rai-zero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: Legacy
Location: Maryland
Posts: 136
Thanks: 92
Thanked 88 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by switchlanez View Post
Ah, were you the one who posted about BRZ vs Cayman? Glad to see you've reach clarity in your decision. Enjoy it and if you think about selling it in a few years, just add boost instead then... BAM! Whole new car for several more years of enjoyment.
Yes. I'm sure the Cayman is a great car and better than the BRZ. but I didn't want to get too old used car and the newer ones are a lot more expensive to buy and I'm sure upkeep.

This is also why I went with the tS. I know the regular Limited BRZ with PP is a great car and looks great. I was not in love with the wing on the tS. But now that I've seen it in person I love it as well as all the front lip and side skirt and the wheels and the interior touches and the tires and the suspension tuning.

I drove several BRZ (not tS) and I know some people like lose (slip) of the rear with the stock tires. But to me I just prefer the grip and planted feel that the tS with the Pilot Sport tires provide.

The cost difference is not really anything to me. I mean of course the tS costs a lot more but in the scheme of things $90 more a month payment is not much.
Rai-zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 10:42 AM   #7
Rai-zero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: Legacy
Location: Maryland
Posts: 136
Thanks: 92
Thanked 88 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCtoBRZ View Post
Congrats on your BRZ! I miss my S2000 (several cars ago) but the BRZ has the best, most precise handling of any car I’ve owned to date.
I also think the BRZ handles better. May be the longer wheelbase or some other mojo (low center of gravity etc.) but the tS especially feels more secure. I have not really pushed it hard so can't say for certain but so far I like what I feel.

I think my e90 M3 handled just as well but only with a bit more mass to move around didn't feel as light, but it did handle probably as good as the tS.
Rai-zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 12:55 PM   #8
Rai-zero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: Legacy
Location: Maryland
Posts: 136
Thanks: 92
Thanked 88 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhuang View Post
[*]The S2000 is a more capable car as far as limits go -- Very rewarding on the track.
I agree with all your post except this. I am no expert and can't say for sure if you are correct or not. But seat of my pants, it seems like the BRZ tS is on par with the S2000 (should be better than non tS car with it's functional spoiler and better suspension).
Rai-zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 01:06 PM   #9
LOLS2K
/scion
 
LOLS2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Drives: '13 86 M/T
Location: PHX-LAX
Posts: 1,490
Thanks: 1,031
Thanked 1,402 Times in 786 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rai-zero View Post
I agree with all your post except this. I am no expert and can't say for sure if you are correct or not. But seat of my pants, it seems like the BRZ tS is on par with the S2000 (should be better than non tS car with it's functional spoiler and better suspension).
You would have to compare the BRZ ts to the S2000 CR. I'd say CR > tS, base 2000 > base BRZ. With that said, I went from an AP1 to FRS, and can't think of a better jump from a practicality/fun package perspective. Best cars I've even had.
__________________
"Practice makes better. Only Senna is perfect." - CSG Mike

LOLS2K is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to LOLS2K For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (04-05-2018)
Old 04-05-2018, 07:03 PM   #10
Krokodil
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Drives: Blue BRZ
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 54
Thanks: 47
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Very nice read. Thank you.
And congrats with getting a beautiful car.
Krokodil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 10:47 PM   #11
Rai-zero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: Legacy
Location: Maryland
Posts: 136
Thanks: 92
Thanked 88 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krokodil View Post
Very nice read. Thank you.
And congrats with getting a beautiful car.
I’m content. I was thinking if I had a Cayman or Corvette (fill in the blank) I wouldn’t have any nicer looking car (imo). I’m having a blast and (engine aside) I believe the BRZ is every bit as good as the S2000 in every way. Also anyone who needs a ton of power can pass on this car, but I like the lower power in a way because I like to work up rather than having power all over the place.

I like the things absent on the S2000 such as stability control, backup camera, navigation, Bluetooth, plus I like the tS specific parts including the wing. The jury is still out if the wing looks ridiculous (it’s not a GT3) but to me I’m rather liking that as well as the tS specific suspension, tires, side skirt. It’s a bit over the top looking but it’s not hideous like the Civic type R.

I’m no Senna, so maybe the suspension and all is wasted on my skills but I can feel it working. I take a 10 mph corner today at 25-30 and it feels so hooked up and this on a mildly cold day.

Anyway just trying to get past the first 900 miles so I can really drive it, kills me to shift at 4000 rpm (5000 rpm) sometimes I cheat a little.

Last edited by Rai-zero; 04-05-2018 at 10:58 PM.
Rai-zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2018, 01:55 AM   #12
RallySport
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Drives: FRS
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 89
Thanks: 263
Thanked 33 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Great post.

I had a 2001 AP1 years ago and now have a 2013 FRS. To me the the FRS is a much better sports car. It's strange because on paper the S2000 has all the right ingredients - better gearbox, better engine, and feels more special (very much from the same Honda that created the NSX and ITR). But to me at least the 86 cars are just more fun to drive.

Maybe I'm just not good enough of a driver, but I could never fully trust pushing the S2000's handling on a back road, which was made worse by the nature of the engine - you have to BEAT ON IT to get into the power. Higher stakes in a tricky car might be fine for the track but puts a damper on spirited back road driving.

The FRS in comparison makes better power down low (still not great #torquedip) but better and crutially, as we all know, these cars are very forgiving and confidence inspiring. If you end up in a hedge in an 86 car, it was probably your own fault. The gearbox is good enough and IMO the rest of the package - looks and practicality - more than make up the difference of the S2000's advantages.

The FRS is not perfect but it offers almost everything I loved about the S and with fewer tradeoffs.
RallySport is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RallySport For This Useful Post:
Adam_L (04-08-2018)
Old 04-06-2018, 04:32 AM   #13
Xxyion
Lowly Cartuber
 
Xxyion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2005 Honda S2000
Location: California
Posts: 904
Thanks: 41
Thanked 422 Times in 281 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Congrats on the new car! I (as well as a lot of people who ahve posted) also used to own an S2000. However mine was the 2.4L AP2 with the lower redline.

Overall i definetly agree with a lot of what you are saying. The S2000 is definetly the faster car, but they both handle incredibly well.

I think the point you made about the BRZ handeling better might be attributed to the fact that the S2000 is incredibly prone to snap oversteer. As such the S2000 (to my knowledge) came with a staggered wheel setup to help induce some understeer and help with that issue. The AP1's (which you had) were particularly touchy. My friend who owns a 2001 AP1 experienced this first hand on an on-ramp and spun out. Luckily he just spun and stopped so no crash.

The S2000 i believe is also a even 50/50 weight distribution where the BRZ is more 54/46 (not accurate numbers). Also we run squared setup from the factory and these cars tend to slide rather than spin when pushed a little too hard. That might be what you are feeling.

I've always stated that the S2000 was the serious adult who was a no bullshit "you take that corner as perfect and as fast as you can" wherase the BRZ was the happy teen who "takes the corner sideways because it looks cool".

Either way i'd agree the BRZ is a fantastic throwback. I had the fortune to own both cars at the same time and choosing which one to drive everyday was always tough. Eventually when i can afford it i will own another S2000.
__________________
2016 Limited MT WR Blue BRZ | Delicious Flash n Go Tune | Delicious Flex Fuel Kit | Nameless 2.5" with 5" Mufflers | JDL UEL Headers | Bayson R Diffuser/Side Skirts | APR Front Splitter | VIS Racing GT Wing | ST Suspension Coilovers | Grammlights Rays 57CR 17x9 +38 | Sumitomo HTR Z iii 235/45/17 |
Xxyion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2018, 09:50 AM   #14
Rai-zero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: Legacy
Location: Maryland
Posts: 136
Thanks: 92
Thanked 88 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Just took my Legacy wagon to work today after a week driving only the BRZ. The Legacy felt like I was driving a school bus. Especially rolling up to a stop sign had to get used to leasurly stopping.
Rai-zero is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Long time lurker making his first post. JNthe86 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 24 02-05-2017 11:41 PM
First Post: Long road to ruin (well not really) Grivo Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 23 05-08-2015 09:25 AM
Leasing questions (Kinda long post) BiscuitFern Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 11 07-31-2014 04:14 PM
[RESOLVED] Hamza at Get Detailed - An Honest Review (Warning: Long Post) mrdanyo CANADA 90 07-13-2014 05:40 PM
New 10 Series FR-S Owner (long post) Dustin2JZ Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 5 07-17-2013 09:01 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.