follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-10-2019, 02:30 PM   #197
Joveen
Senior Member
 
Joveen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Drives: Bone stock
Location: Windsor, CT
Posts: 767
Thanks: 535
Thanked 232 Times in 162 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
We the people demand answers RacerX. Dyno sheets!! More data please. That article on the website is bull.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Joveen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2019, 05:10 PM   #198
PulsarBeeerz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: JRSC BRZ SOLD
Location: Ohio
Posts: 934
Thanks: 676
Thanked 739 Times in 396 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoHaveMSG View Post
If just turning up the boost was a solution then why do people go to bigger turbos and make more power on the same boost Surely it is not because they are efficiently moving more air

Big valve head from Element on boost makes a claimed +60whp. When forum member 86IT asked them about it NA, they told him don't bother, not worth it.

If you have data, then why not post it?

And why have none of the beta test dyno's for this manifold seen the light of day? It has only been since what, May, that they sent out emails about having people test the manifold.

You're right.
PulsarBeeerz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2019, 08:24 PM   #199
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,867 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Ok, so, $1000 USD is actually pretty reasonable. But I've yet to see anything that convinces me those claimed gains are real. Even worse though, those gains are said to be on a completely stock engine. I'm just one potential buyer but I don't think the target audience should be otherwise stock cars. The gains from an intake manifold - on this engine - are going to be small no matter what, the only people buying this will be those committed to staying NA and have enough cash to get to the point that this will be their next step. I'm at that point, but I'm not throwing ~$1800 CAD at a completely unknown product that even after beta testing hasn't had a single review. Especially when I don't have a decent tuner near me to properly dial it in.

Oh well, I was excited for this but apparently it's vaporware. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Calum For This Useful Post:
Joveen (11-10-2019), NoHaveMSG (11-10-2019)
Old 11-10-2019, 09:55 PM   #200
PulsarBeeerz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: JRSC BRZ SOLD
Location: Ohio
Posts: 934
Thanks: 676
Thanked 739 Times in 396 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
They posted a full bolt on E85 and a 93 Stage 1 OFT dyno. I even overled them and post them in this thread... It will most likely go on sale for Black Friday, likely for $700 USD.
PulsarBeeerz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PulsarBeeerz For This Useful Post:
Jeff@Racer X Fab (11-11-2019)
Old 11-10-2019, 10:37 PM   #201
StraightOuttaCanadaEh
Wes
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: Artisan Spirits '17 86
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,794
Thanks: 1,165
Thanked 1,674 Times in 994 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Are the gains measured on the pre-17 cars?
__________________
Instagram: @gt86ws
StraightOuttaCanadaEh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2019, 10:45 PM   #202
Lantanafrs2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2013 frs red
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,517
Thanks: 2,520
Thanked 3,088 Times in 1,654 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
None of the shit kickers here are gonna buy it anyways. Easy to yack on a forum. Racerx will probably never recoup their development costs
Lantanafrs2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lantanafrs2 For This Useful Post:
Jeff@Racer X Fab (11-11-2019), new2subaru (11-11-2019), PulsarBeeerz (11-11-2019)
Old 11-10-2019, 10:46 PM   #203
Lantanafrs2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2013 frs red
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,517
Thanks: 2,520
Thanked 3,088 Times in 1,654 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joveen View Post
We the people demand answers RacerX. Dyno sheets!! More data please. That article on the website is bull.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
There are dyno graphs on this thread. Wtf are you talking about?
Lantanafrs2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lantanafrs2 For This Useful Post:
Jeff@Racer X Fab (11-11-2019)
Old 11-11-2019, 10:13 AM   #204
Jeff@Racer X Fab
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Subaru BRZ, Toyota MR2 Turbo
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 321
Thanks: 92
Thanked 340 Times in 135 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Where to start… Well, when the project started we believed that the OEM intake manifold had a little more power in it. We started off with our first prototype manifold with what we thought would yield results. It did not, all of our testing has been completed in this thread. From there we built another 6 manifolds all of which have the dyno results again posted in this thread. Manifold #7 finally gave us the results we thought were possible between 5-10 percent total gain.

Once we found that manifold #7 produce positive results, we then purchased a full exhaust system to see the difference. We only picked up a few HP adding the exhaust system. We then used E85 and only picked up a few more HP. The best gains which are widely known on the forum are from adding a tune. This is still the case.

What happened to beta testing? We decided to cut our losses, it's that simple. We received around 75 emails with interest in beta testing the manifold, however in our previous experience only about 1 in 5 will actually follow through. We have about $10k in this project and we don't plan to do much more with it. Usually with positive results we get a few early adopters that use the component and spread the word of success or failure. In this case we have sold 2 manifolds since we released it.

The real issues in retrospect:

1) For the last 7 years the forum has stated that the best intake manifold is OEM, nothing can beat it. There were a handful of companies that gave it a shot and either did not post results or publicly said that it did not work.

2) The red intake manifold comes out in 2017 and is then assumed that changing from the OEM plastic manifold to the cast red intake manifold will net you 10 whp. This is simply not the case. In reality it has a real gain of roughly 1 whp. However, we have major retailers claiming that it gains 10 whp and sells for $300 to $400. Why would an enthusiast purchase the Racer X manifold for $979 when he can have the red manifold for half the price for the same "claim in whp”?

3) Expectations. Several times there were unrealistic numbers thrown around. 20 or 30 whp gains. From the beginning we thought a 5-10 percent gain would be reasonable. The best math I ever learned was
(expectations + results = disappoint)
Jeff@Racer X Fab is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Jeff@Racer X Fab For This Useful Post:
BatStig (11-13-2019), Carlitoz3 (11-16-2019), churchx (11-12-2019), Drifter X (11-13-2019), Dzmitry (11-11-2019), fika84 (11-13-2019), Griever423 (02-02-2020), Joveen (11-13-2019), Lantanafrs2 (11-13-2019), MCTeeJ (11-13-2019), meWant (11-13-2019), new2subaru (11-12-2019), PulsarBeeerz (11-12-2019), RedReplicant (11-26-2022), rennlistuser3 (12-30-2020), ThatCarGuyClayton (07-04-2020), Tristor (11-12-2019)
Old 11-13-2019, 11:34 AM   #205
Lantanafrs2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2013 frs red
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,517
Thanks: 2,520
Thanked 3,088 Times in 1,654 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
They'll find treasure on oak island before we see any significant na numbers from the fa20.
Lantanafrs2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lantanafrs2 For This Useful Post:
Drifter X (11-13-2019), NoHaveMSG (11-13-2019)
Old 11-13-2019, 12:35 PM   #206
PulsarBeeerz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: JRSC BRZ SOLD
Location: Ohio
Posts: 934
Thanks: 676
Thanked 739 Times in 396 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2 View Post
They'll find treasure on oak island before we see any significant na numbers from the fa20.

Eh, there are gains to be still made on this motors stock block. Nothing huge of course as they can already make 30-50hp over stock. But as RacerX said in the nicest way, the owners are close minded, cheap and too lazy to even look through a thread that has the answers they feel entitled to demand.
PulsarBeeerz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PulsarBeeerz For This Useful Post:
Lantanafrs2 (11-13-2019)
Old 11-13-2019, 12:46 PM   #207
NoHaveMSG
Senior Member
 
NoHaveMSG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: Crapcan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11,145
Thanks: 18,142
Thanked 16,305 Times in 7,369 Posts
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by PulsarBeeerz View Post
Eh, there are gains to be still made on this motors stock block. Nothing huge of course as they can already make 30-50hp over stock. But as RacerX said in the nicest way, the owners are close minded, cheap and too lazy to even look through a thread that has the answers they feel entitled to demand.
If you want to believe MFG dyno claims cold air intakes make 10whp

Where is your data on your mods you said you had again?

And no offense to RacerX. I really have hopes for this, i'd just like independent verification on claims. Even if this made half of what was claimed I would be happy. A grand is what a catback is going to cost me anyway. It is hard not to be skeptical when this platform has been out for 7+ years and all the sudden an intake manifold is the ticket for a decent NA gain.
NoHaveMSG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NoHaveMSG For This Useful Post:
Jeff@Racer X Fab (11-13-2019)
Old 11-13-2019, 01:34 PM   #208
Joveen
Senior Member
 
Joveen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Drives: Bone stock
Location: Windsor, CT
Posts: 767
Thanks: 535
Thanked 232 Times in 162 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff@Racer X Fab View Post
Where to start… Well, when the project started we believed that the OEM intake manifold had a little more power in it. We started off with our first prototype manifold with what we thought would yield results. It did not, all of our testing has been completed in this thread. From there we built another 6 manifolds all of which have the dyno results again posted in this thread. Manifold #7 finally gave us the results we thought were possible between 5-10 percent total gain.



Once we found that manifold #7 produce positive results, we then purchased a full exhaust system to see the difference. We only picked up a few HP adding the exhaust system. We then used E85 and only picked up a few more HP. The best gains which are widely known on the forum are from adding a tune. This is still the case.



What happened to beta testing? We decided to cut our losses, it's that simple. We received around 75 emails with interest in beta testing the manifold, however in our previous experience only about 1 in 5 will actually follow through. We have about $10k in this project and we don't plan to do much more with it. Usually with positive results we get a few early adopters that use the component and spread the word of success or failure. In this case we have sold 2 manifolds since we released it.



The real issues in retrospect:



1) For the last 7 years the forum has stated that the best intake manifold is OEM, nothing can beat it. There were a handful of companies that gave it a shot and either did not post results or publicly said that it did not work.



2) The red intake manifold comes out in 2017 and is then assumed that changing from the OEM plastic manifold to the cast red intake manifold will net you 10 whp. This is simply not the case. In reality it has a real gain of roughly 1 whp. However, we have major retailers claiming that it gains 10 whp and sells for $300 to $400. Why would an enthusiast purchase the Racer X manifold for $979 when he can have the red manifold for half the price for the same "claim in whp”?



3) Expectations. Several times there were unrealistic numbers thrown around. 20 or 30 whp gains. From the beginning we thought a 5-10 percent gain would be reasonable. The best math I ever learned was

(expectations + results = disappoint)
I'll purchase it when the time comes. Hopefully sooner than later.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Joveen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joveen For This Useful Post:
Jeff@Racer X Fab (11-13-2019)
Old 11-13-2019, 03:00 PM   #209
Drifter X
Senior Member
 
Drifter X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Drives: 2019 Toyota 86 TRD SE
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 235
Thanks: 160
Thanked 86 Times in 71 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2 View Post
They'll find treasure on oak island before we see any significant na numbers from the fa20.


I laughed so hard at this. Well played sir.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Drifter X is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Drifter X For This Useful Post:
Lantanafrs2 (11-13-2019)
Old 11-13-2019, 03:05 PM   #210
Drifter X
Senior Member
 
Drifter X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Drives: 2019 Toyota 86 TRD SE
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 235
Thanks: 160
Thanked 86 Times in 71 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff@Racer X Fab View Post
Where to start… Well, when the project started we believed that the OEM intake manifold had a little more power in it. We started off with our first prototype manifold with what we thought would yield results. It did not, all of our testing has been completed in this thread. From there we built another 6 manifolds all of which have the dyno results again posted in this thread. Manifold #7 finally gave us the results we thought were possible between 5-10 percent total gain.



Once we found that manifold #7 produce positive results, we then purchased a full exhaust system to see the difference. We only picked up a few HP adding the exhaust system. We then used E85 and only picked up a few more HP. The best gains which are widely known on the forum are from adding a tune. This is still the case.



What happened to beta testing? We decided to cut our losses, it's that simple. We received around 75 emails with interest in beta testing the manifold, however in our previous experience only about 1 in 5 will actually follow through. We have about $10k in this project and we don't plan to do much more with it. Usually with positive results we get a few early adopters that use the component and spread the word of success or failure. In this case we have sold 2 manifolds since we released it.



The real issues in retrospect:



1) For the last 7 years the forum has stated that the best intake manifold is OEM, nothing can beat it. There were a handful of companies that gave it a shot and either did not post results or publicly said that it did not work.



2) The red intake manifold comes out in 2017 and is then assumed that changing from the OEM plastic manifold to the cast red intake manifold will net you 10 whp. This is simply not the case. In reality it has a real gain of roughly 1 whp. However, we have major retailers claiming that it gains 10 whp and sells for $300 to $400. Why would an enthusiast purchase the Racer X manifold for $979 when he can have the red manifold for half the price for the same "claim in whp”?



3) Expectations. Several times there were unrealistic numbers thrown around. 20 or 30 whp gains. From the beginning we thought a 5-10 percent gain would be reasonable. The best math I ever learned was

(expectations + results = disappoint)


We really appreciate your feedback and I understand the amount of time, effort and money you guys spent on developing this. Quite honestly I really like the look of the manifold.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Drifter X is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drifter X For This Useful Post:
Jeff@Racer X Fab (11-13-2019), Joveen (11-13-2019)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Racer X Fabrication air intake design and development! Jeff@Racer X Fab Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 45 08-01-2019 12:29 PM
FRS / BRZ Intake Manifold - Development Thread - FT-86SpeedFactory by Velox FT-86 SpeedFactory Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 733 12-11-2018 10:13 PM
2013 intake manifold vs 2017 Aluminium intake manifold Bobster Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 29 12-19-2016 10:40 AM
Project BRZ Intake Manifold Development TurboBRZ Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 27 08-05-2015 07:44 PM
Racer X Fabrication oil pan design and development! Jeff@Racer X Fab Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 87 06-03-2015 11:10 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.