follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Off-Topic Discussions > Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions

Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions Discuss all other cars and automotive news here.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-09-2012, 06:19 PM   #1
knoxviue
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: Toyota Celica GTi
Location: Paços de Ferreira - Portugal
Posts: 54
Thanks: 28
Thanked 68 Times in 13 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Talking next SUPERCAR - FAHRRADI FARFALLA FFX

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISEGDWpKAeY"]next SUPERCAR - FAHRRADI FARFALLA FFX - YouTube[/ame]
knoxviue is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to knoxviue For This Useful Post:
Lowellrenzo (05-10-2012)
Old 05-09-2012, 07:28 PM   #2
Bristecom
Senior Member
 
Bristecom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ PP
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,525
Thanks: 1,702
Thanked 646 Times in 317 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
At this rate, with all the global emission regulations, that's what future supercars will be like.
__________________
Toyota + Subaru =
Bristecom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2012, 11:23 PM   #3
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bristecom View Post
At this rate, with all the global emission regulations, that's what future supercars will be like.
Funny thing to say given how gigantic and MASSIVE vehicles in the U.S. have gotten over the past 15 years or so!

I wish they'd have continued to increase CAFE every year instead of holding pat at 1987 levels for years. As engine/drivetrain efficiencies improved, automakers just made the cars bigger and heavier

Looking forward to increased CAFE/CO2 regs as that will force cars to become smaller and lighter-weight.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 01:13 AM   #4
Bristecom
Senior Member
 
Bristecom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ PP
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,525
Thanks: 1,702
Thanked 646 Times in 317 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Funny thing to say given how gigantic and MASSIVE vehicles in the U.S. have gotten over the past 15 years or so!

I wish they'd have continued to increase CAFE every year instead of holding pat at 1987 levels for years. As engine/drivetrain efficiencies improved, automakers just made the cars bigger and heavier

Looking forward to increased CAFE/CO2 regs as that will force cars to become smaller and lighter-weight.
They made cars bigger because that's what people wanted. If people want to pay for more gas and more expensive vehicles, they should be allowed to. As long as they aren't puffing out smoke or making directly harmful amounts of fumes, it should be fine.
__________________
Toyota + Subaru =
Bristecom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 08:48 PM   #5
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Everybody driving tanks is not reasonable for a number of reasons.
1. overconsumption of fossil fuels bad for "national security"
2. bad for the economy (higher consumption = higher fuel prices for everyone)
3. bad for roads (3000- lb. is easier on infrastructure than 4000+ lb.)
3. roullette with the environment (CO2 up over 25% since industrial revolution began)
4. And it sucks that my choice in cars is largely limited to oversized/overweight behemoths.

Believe me, I never would have thought I'd be all for increasing CAFE, but IMO it is totally warranted and appropriate, and will only increase real standard of living in the U.S.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 09:23 PM   #6
Dark
Elite Padawan
 
Dark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: '15 WRX, 15 GLA250, and 2 feet
Location: Shoreline, WA
Posts: 3,498
Thanks: 197
Thanked 250 Times in 159 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Everybody driving tanks is not reasonable for a number of reasons.
1. overconsumption of fossil fuels bad for "national security"
2. bad for the economy (higher consumption = higher fuel prices for everyone)
3. bad for roads (3000- lb. is easier on infrastructure than 4000+ lb.)
3. roullette with the environment (CO2 up over 25% since industrial revolution began)
4. And it sucks that my choice in cars is largely limited to oversized/overweight behemoths.

Believe me, I never would have thought I'd be all for increasing CAFE, but IMO it is totally warranted and appropriate, and will only increase real standard of living in the U.S.
I don't care who you are, cruising around in a behemoth alone is just nonsense.

I still think 4000lb+ car should exist in up scale luxury brands. Light weight cars don't have that feel heavier cars have. Same goes to heavier cars.

CAFE is just how government push automakers to innovate, which is good for consumers.
__________________
Dark
Dark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 01:04 AM   #7
M-17
Ninja Cat Mod
 
M-17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: BRZ
Location: MASSACHUSETTS
Posts: 5,529
Thanks: 11,956
Thanked 6,254 Times in 2,673 Posts
Mentioned: 149 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Funny thing to say given how gigantic and MASSIVE vehicles in the U.S. have gotten over the past 15 years or so!

I wish they'd have continued to increase CAFE every year instead of holding pat at 1987 levels for years. As engine/drivetrain efficiencies improved, automakers just made the cars bigger and heavier

Looking forward to increased CAFE/CO2 regs as that will force cars to become smaller and lighter-weight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Everybody driving tanks is not reasonable for a number of reasons.
1. overconsumption of fossil fuels bad for "national security"
2. bad for the economy (higher consumption = higher fuel prices for everyone)
3. bad for roads (3000- lb. is easier on infrastructure than 4000+ lb.)
3. roullette with the environment (CO2 up over 25% since industrial revolution began)
4. And it sucks that my choice in cars is largely limited to oversized/overweight behemoths.

Believe me, I never would have thought I'd be all for increasing CAFE, but IMO it is totally warranted and appropriate, and will only increase real standard of living in the U.S.

I don't neccesarily disagree and would support it almost, but I don't want to see any regulations to make people drive smaller light weight cars. It should still be up to us to make that decision and most are changing or taking upon themselves to switch to more efficient vehicles. And hopefully there's not laws on the size of engines, which I believe, if I'm incorrect though, they have over in Europe.
__________________


Education is Important, but Race Cars are more Importanter
M-17 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3.5 Million dollar Supercar Crash + a Prius WingsofWar Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 17 12-05-2011 05:27 PM
Looks like a supercar.... Dean Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 18 05-04-2011 08:37 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.