follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-16-2009, 03:15 AM   #29
86Fan
2 yrs and counting...
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Audi & Toyota
Location: Cali
Posts: 117
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CptCaveman View Post
Well, they have the brand loyal people. But I believe that there are no other vehicles that could really compete with this car and have a brand name established. I only see the Genesis competing with this vehicle, and they are fairly new to the market with no proven name. Well as far as I know.
More car companies could also enter in this market and cause more competition. If Subaru only produces a 2.5NA with RWD and price it economically then sure they can probably do well. But if they plan to offer STI like performance in rwd then it could get expensive quickly. Plus, they still have to be sure that Toyota doesn't come with a higher hp version and basically stick to the 2L; otherwise both brands would be competing against each other on a project they both developed.
86Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 03:29 AM   #30
RadOnc
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 328i
Location: in a basement
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86Fan View Post
More car companies could also enter in this market and cause more competition. If Subaru only produces a 2.5NA with RWD and price it economically then sure they can probably do well. But if they plan to offer STI like performance in rwd then it could get expensive quickly. Plus, they still have to be sure that Toyota doesn't come with a higher hp version and basically stick to the 2L; otherwise both brands would be competing against each other on a project they both developed.
I hope they had the forsight to agree to market the two cars differently, with drivetrain options that were in different categories and not try to complete against each other. I cant imagine that would help anyone involved, including us!
RadOnc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 03:32 AM   #31
86Fan
2 yrs and counting...
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Audi & Toyota
Location: Cali
Posts: 117
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadOnc View Post
I hope they had the forsight to agree to market the two cars differently, with drivetrain options that were in different categories and not try to complete against each other. I cant imagine that would help anyone involved, including us!
That is why AWD coupe would make sense for Subaru. I'm just looking at this from a financial standpoint. This car is still a long ways from production ready but the future seems to be heading towards small efficient cars.
86Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 03:37 AM   #32
RadOnc
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 328i
Location: in a basement
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86Fan View Post
That is why AWD coupe would make sense for Subaru. I'm just looking at this from a financial standpoint. This car is still a long ways from production ready but the future seems to be heading towards small efficient cars.
I agree with you, they really should go with the AWD route and Toyota go with RWD. Thats what differentiates subarus from other competitors in every other market, why shouldn't they do it in this one. That way, everyone wins. Hopefully they take your advice, or already thought of this ahead of time...
RadOnc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 06:05 AM   #33
Jordo!
Enjoy it, destroy it.
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Datsun Racing Hen
Location: Blank Generation
Posts: 820
Thanks: 6
Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
AWD cars are for rally racing and off roading it. Sports cars for the road or track are pretty much always RWD not AWD.

Now that they are out of the WRC there is absolutely no reason for Subaru to create a AWD layout for a small, agile, 2-door sports car, except possibly as a limited run special edition for those who really think they need it (they don't).

The only reason Subaru ever had AWD cars in the line-up was because of their particpation in WRC, not because of some higher principal about the "beauty of AWD".

It will be much cheaper to produce and easier to sell the car as is.

I really think the model here is Firebird/Camaro -- those cars were, for the most part, only cosmetically different, and GM had no problem selling both to happy consumers who picked whichever one they liked best (I was a FB man, myself ).

They both existed (and died) at the same time. Odds are both would have been resurrected together as well had GM not nearly gone under.
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 06:44 AM   #34
86Fan
2 yrs and counting...
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Audi & Toyota
Location: Cali
Posts: 117
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordo! View Post
AWD cars are for rally racing and off roading it. Sports cars for the road or track are pretty much always RWD not AWD.

Now that they are out of the WRC there is absolutely no reason for Subaru to create a AWD layout for a small, agile, 2-door sports car, except possibly as a limited run special edition for those who really think they need it (they don't).

The only reason Subaru ever had AWD cars in the line-up was because of their particpation in WRC, not because of some higher principal about the "beauty of AWD".

It will be much cheaper to produce and easier to sell the car as is.

I really think the model here is Firebird/Camaro -- those cars were, for the most part, only cosmetically different, and GM had no problem selling both to happy consumers who picked whichever one they liked best (I was a FB man, myself ).

They both existed (and died) at the same time. Odds are both would have been resurrected together as well had GM not nearly gone under.
Just looking at it from a business perspective mainly. But I'll say this about RWD and AWD. AWD can be good track cars... GTR, STI, EVO's are great track cars. My favorite is going to be the Audi RS5 which will launch within this year and you're going to be surprised at it's performance once it's released. It really depends on what the customer is looking for; both have their benefits.
86Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 07:25 AM   #35
86Fan
2 yrs and counting...
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Audi & Toyota
Location: Cali
Posts: 117
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think most car companies are suffering from the economic downturn and subaru is definetly not immuned. Their awd platform is a niche product no doubt but entering the rwd market could result in even more competition. I mean they could keep their core customers happy, but getting new customers might be difficult since there will be other alternatives due to the fact that more car companies are seemingly introducing small sports car's.

Subie needs to release some specs about the car.

Last edited by 86Fan; 10-16-2009 at 07:43 AM.
86Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 01:16 PM   #36
MR2fan
Member
 
MR2fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: 91 MR2
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 83
Thanks: 0
Thanked 59 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Before reading the last few points I woulda bet the farm that the Subaru 086a would be AWD but you guys are making some good points as to why it might not be AWD afterall.

I can now see how this could be a Camaro/Firebird distinction, or like an Eclipse/Talon DSM joint project car. If I remember correctly Those cars were basically the same right.
__________________
// 1991 Toyota MR2 \\
-- 3sgte | HKS adjustable cams | TO-4E turbo | HKS 272 cams | H&R springs --
MR2fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 03:20 PM   #37
86Fan
2 yrs and counting...
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Audi & Toyota
Location: Cali
Posts: 117
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The market didn't have big v8 coupes back then. Besides the Firebird and Camaro both were pulled back in 2002 due to slow sales.

Last edited by 86Fan; 10-16-2009 at 03:45 PM.
86Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 08:59 PM   #38
Jordo!
Enjoy it, destroy it.
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Datsun Racing Hen
Location: Blank Generation
Posts: 820
Thanks: 6
Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MR2fan View Post
Before reading the last few points I woulda bet the farm that the Subaru 086a would be AWD but you guys are making some good points as to why it might not be AWD afterall.

I can now see how this could be a Camaro/Firebird distinction, or like an Eclipse/Talon DSM joint project car. If I remember correctly Those cars were basically the same right.
Yep.

But the best evidence for no AWD option is that nothing has been announced.

I'd say there's maybe a 10% a Sti version will get it, but I wouldn't expect it to be regular option for the base car.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 86Fan View Post
The market didn't have big v8 coupes back then. Besides the Firebird and Camaro both were pulled back in 2002 due to slow sales.
Correct -- that's why I said they lived and died on the same timeline. In other words, though essentially the same car, they coexisted in the market, and both were popular ponycars. One didn't kill the other -- both were on the road.

If GM wasn't still pretty much in the toilet, there'd probably be a new Firebird to go with the new Camaro too. I wouldn't be shocked if one gets released in the near future, assuming the Camaro sells well.
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 09:05 PM   #39
86Fan
2 yrs and counting...
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Audi & Toyota
Location: Cali
Posts: 117
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Right. What i'm saying though is the market for v8 coupes was smaller back then. Subaru could face some tough competition in the future when they enter the rwd market, especially if they decide to go and build 300hp coupes.
86Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2009, 12:09 AM   #40
Jordo!
Enjoy it, destroy it.
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Datsun Racing Hen
Location: Blank Generation
Posts: 820
Thanks: 6
Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Well... rather than rely on my amazing psychic powers, I'll just say this: If the Subaru version comes with AWD, I'll recant and apologize. I've got no problem admitting when I'm wrong
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jordo! For This Useful Post:
Ryan P (03-01-2014)
Old 10-17-2009, 12:12 AM   #41
86Fan
2 yrs and counting...
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Audi & Toyota
Location: Cali
Posts: 117
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordo! View Post
Well... rather than rely on my amazing psychic powers, I'll just say this: If the Subaru version comes with AWD, I'll recant and apologize. I've got no problem admitting when I'm wrong
Heh no need to apologize, it's just speculation anyways. But man... such a long wait. Lucky my solara is still holding up.
86Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2009, 03:26 AM   #42
White Comet
Resident Skeptic
 
White Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Axel View Post
They shouldn't have much competition from Nissan's Z, which Top Gear calls a "Fat Bastard"...
They also didn't like the 350Z much, and that car only went on to rejuvenate the affordable sports car market singlehandedly. The 370Z is better in every way compared to the 350Z.

Don't take the Z car lightly. It's probably the best bang for the buck sports car this side of a 'vette.
White Comet is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.