follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List
steve99

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-11-2014, 08:42 AM   #141
Toyota John
Calle Atun
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 13 FRS, 93 Mr2, 85 ae86
Location: CT
Posts: 158
Thanks: 12
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I was able to get my trims down to + or - 5% which is way better then what it was stock. Seems to have fixed my driveablity problems with the lean spot transitioning from closed loop to open loop after shifting. I have more work on my MAF scale to get the trims lower but at least now I don't have to use my custom F'ed up fuel map I made to minimized the transition area. I found the IAT compensation map that you said to disable for logging. What are the other compensation maps I should disable while MAF logging? Also what is the best way to blend closed loop and open loop MAF scales together?
Toyota John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2014, 11:07 AM   #142
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyota John View Post
I was able to get my trims down to + or - 5% which is way better then what it was stock. Seems to have fixed my driveablity problems with the lean spot transitioning from closed loop to open loop after shifting. I have more work on my MAF scale to get the trims lower but at least now I don't have to use my custom F'ed up fuel map I made to minimized the transition area. I found the IAT compensation map that you said to disable for logging. What are the other compensation maps I should disable while MAF logging? Also what is the best way to blend closed loop and open loop MAF scales together?
Other table worth doing is the Engine Load Compensation table.

The easy way to do the OL and CL scale is to do the OL part 1st and then use the new scale from that and put it as the CL original MAF scale. If you use the cut off voltage option to ensure that there's no cross over then it works fine. You can also use the spreadsheet I posted a while back: MAF Smoothing Spreadsheet.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2014, 11:59 AM   #143
phrosty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Seattle
Posts: 806
Thanks: 202
Thanked 320 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
Discount any data that has a low count, I would look for at least 15-25 minimum for reliable data.
What I do is count the number of seconds spent in that MAF bin. Also, because I lerp the correction between two bins (I believe vgi's tool does this too), if 90% of the correction goes in bin A, 10% in bin B, the bins will also get the same proportion of time associated with them, so A would get 90% of 0.1 seconds and B would get 10% of 0.1 seconds, etc.
__________________
2013 Whiteout 6AT FR-S | Perrin Inlet Tube + 2.75" CAI | OpenFlash Header | P&L Catback | 4.88 Final Drive | Dialed in OFT 2.0x Stage 2 E85 | 18x8 Enkei Raijin + 225/40 Michelin Pilot Super Sport | 17x7 Stock + 215/45 Michelin X-Ice Xi-2
phrosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2014, 04:04 PM   #144
Toyota John
Calle Atun
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 13 FRS, 93 Mr2, 85 ae86
Location: CT
Posts: 158
Thanks: 12
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
Other table worth doing is the Engine Load Compensation table.

The easy way to do the OL and CL scale is to do the OL part 1st and then use the new scale from that and put it as the CL original MAF scale. If you use the cut off voltage option to ensure that there's no cross over then it works fine. You can also use the spreadsheet I posted a while back: MAF Smoothing Spreadsheet.
Ok so I would run the closed loop first, than open loop and then with the finished open loop add that to the closed loop scale and run closed loop again? Would there be any benefit to disabling the accel enrichment for the logging as well?
Toyota John is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Toyota John For This Useful Post:
Kodename47 (06-11-2014)
Old 06-12-2014, 02:18 AM   #145
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyota John View Post
Ok so I would run the closed loop first, than open loop and then with the finished open loop add that to the closed loop scale and run closed loop again? Would there be any benefit to disabling the accel enrichment for the logging as well?

Go and do one log and collect all the data you need for both OL and CL. Do your OL scaling 1st, then paste the corrected MAF scale from that into the current MAF scale for the CL screen. Just make sure the areas that are being corrected don't overlap by using the MAF Voltage Maximum parameter.


I've not diabled the accel enrichment, the idea is to be smooth with the pedal for the CL and you filter out excessive trims in OL which means that there is no need to.


Feel free to upload a log and I'll put it through to see how it compares with your result. Sometime the key is to not use too many filters to check over your data, use the range of graphs to visualise it and then re-run the log and reduce the filters to suit.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post:
kodyo (02-14-2015), Toyota John (06-16-2014)
Old 06-16-2014, 10:22 AM   #146
Toyota John
Calle Atun
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 13 FRS, 93 Mr2, 85 ae86
Location: CT
Posts: 158
Thanks: 12
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
Go and do one log and collect all the data you need for both OL and CL. Do your OL scaling 1st, then paste the corrected MAF scale from that into the current MAF scale for the CL screen. Just make sure the areas that are being corrected don't overlap by using the MAF Voltage Maximum parameter.


I've not diabled the accel enrichment, the idea is to be smooth with the pedal for the CL and you filter out excessive trims in OL which means that there is no need to.


Feel free to upload a log and I'll put it through to see how it compares with your result. Sometime the key is to not use too many filters to check over your data, use the range of graphs to visualise it and then re-run the log and reduce the filters to suit.
Ok seems to be good now. Trims are under 3%+or-. Most are +or-1%. The +or- 3% seems to show up under throttle changes which I think is normal? Thank you for your help this fixed my lean spot transitioning from closed loop to open loop and the after shifting stumble is gone. Good work on the MAF scaling program @vgi. Thank you for your hard work.
Toyota John is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Toyota John For This Useful Post:
vgi (06-16-2014)
Old 06-25-2014, 01:51 AM   #147
troek
Senior Member
 
troek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2012 Toyota 86
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,294
Thanks: 333
Thanked 396 Times in 285 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
i noticed my LTFT is -7 to -10 at idle, so im gona give this a try. very useful thread.
troek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 03:12 AM   #148
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by troek View Post
i noticed my LTFT is -7 to -10 at idle, so im gona give this a try. very useful thread.
Note which injectors are at use at idle. It changes depending on the coolant temperatures which may impact the results.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post:
solidONE (06-28-2014), troek (06-25-2014)
Old 06-25-2014, 03:14 AM   #149
troek
Senior Member
 
troek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2012 Toyota 86
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,294
Thanks: 333
Thanked 396 Times in 285 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
hmm i didnt have that channel selected to data log. this is at idle while fully warmed up(190 coolant temp).
troek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 03:32 AM   #150
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Here's an idle log I did a while back:





FYI:
1 - PI
2 - DI
3 - Both
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post:
troek (06-25-2014)
Old 06-25-2014, 03:58 AM   #151
troek
Senior Member
 
troek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2012 Toyota 86
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,294
Thanks: 333
Thanked 396 Times in 285 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
cool, thanks. so after 62 degrees it stayed at DI?
when i try to load a datalog with VGIs program, i get this error "Error parsing number at line 2: java.lang.NumerFormatException: For input string: "OpenFlash Data File 1"

i logged all the channels quoted in the OP. is my log the wrong file format?
troek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 04:01 AM   #152
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by troek View Post
cool, thanks. so after 62 degrees it stayed at DI?
when i try to load a datalog with VGIs program, i get this error "Error parsing number at line 2: java.lang.NumerFormatException: For input string: "OpenFlash Data File 1"

i logged all the channels quoted in the OP. is my log the wrong file format?

The first 2 or 3 lines of the log file contain some rubbish just delete them just leave the headers for the data like ol/cl rpm mafv

ect

Vgi program does no like it :-)
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
troek (06-25-2014)
Old 06-25-2014, 04:02 AM   #153
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by troek View Post
cool, thanks. so after 62 degrees it stayed at DI?
when i try to load a datalog with VGIs program, i get this error "Error parsing number at line 2: java.lang.NumerFormatException: For input string: "OpenFlash Data File 1"

i logged all the channels quoted in the OP. is my log the wrong file format?
Try removing the rows above the column headers.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post:
troek (06-25-2014)
Old 06-25-2014, 04:36 AM   #154
troek
Senior Member
 
troek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2012 Toyota 86
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,294
Thanks: 333
Thanked 396 Times in 285 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
Try removing the rows above the column headers.
i read that on the usage tab, and for some reason it didnt register until you mentioned it. thanks!
troek is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AFR in Closed Loop Toyota John Software Tuning 39 07-07-2019 08:26 AM
BRZedit Fuel Trims, Closed to Open loop transiton mad_sb Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 32 08-06-2015 03:14 AM
Notes on injector / maf scalining using full time open loop mad_sb Software Tuning 40 03-03-2014 05:49 PM
Screencast: closed loop boost control with RaceRom jamesm Software Tuning 2 02-10-2014 02:23 PM
Screencast: experimenting with full-time closed loop fueling jamesm Software Tuning 2 12-27-2013 10:19 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.