|
Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions Discuss all other cars and automotive news here. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-07-2019, 10:45 AM | #1 |
Senior Citizen Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: Then-1977 Celica GT Now-2017 860SE
Location: In A Galaxy Far Far Away
Posts: 393
Thanks: 145
Thanked 385 Times in 201 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Car & Driver: Is Premium Gas Worth It?
|
The Following User Says Thank You to LimitedSlip For This Useful Post: | Mic7796 (08-07-2019) |
08-07-2019, 11:01 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: 2014 BRZ Limited
Location: USA
Posts: 4,045
Thanks: 1,100
Thanked 5,618 Times in 2,266 Posts
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
The takeaway seems to be that it might be beneficial or it might not.
So this article basically tells us nothing at all. |
The Following User Says Thank You to extrashaky For This Useful Post: | YamahaR86 (08-07-2019) |
08-07-2019, 11:18 AM | #3 |
Country Boy 4 Life
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 19' & 06' Ridgelines, 13' FR-S
Location: EUGENE
Posts: 5,228
Thanks: 6,719
Thanked 5,291 Times in 2,720 Posts
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
All cars tested made more HP and were faster 0-to-100 with 93 octane vs 91 or 87octane . Not surprising to me...
__________________
I LIKE TIRES! |
The Following User Says Thank You to Leonardo For This Useful Post: | Tokay444 (08-07-2019) |
08-07-2019, 11:29 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Drives: 17 86
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,671
Thanks: 75
Thanked 1,133 Times in 647 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Not worth it. E95 is where the fun is.
|
08-07-2019, 11:43 AM | #5 |
Anti stance.
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,630
Thanks: 897
Thanked 958 Times in 547 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Article clearly written by layman.
|
08-07-2019, 11:52 AM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Drives: 2016 BRZ Hikari Edition
Location: Montreal
Posts: 25
Thanks: 87
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
So for these larger engines an average of 0.3 miles per 4 bucks of gas is NOT worth it money wise, what does it do for our Flat 4s, which would be more relevant ? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
08-07-2019, 02:28 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: 2013 Hot Lava FRS
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 518
Thanks: 183
Thanked 527 Times in 259 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
An article about premium vs regular gas that makes no mention of compression ratios? WTF?
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Slammillionaire For This Useful Post: | CBR600RR (08-09-2019), extrashaky (08-07-2019), NoHaveMSG (08-07-2019), ScoobsMcGee (08-07-2019), soundman98 (08-08-2019), Spuds (08-07-2019), strat61caster (08-07-2019), Yoshoobaroo (08-07-2019) |
08-07-2019, 02:41 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: 2014 BRZ Limited
Location: USA
Posts: 4,045
Thanks: 1,100
Thanked 5,618 Times in 2,266 Posts
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The BMW is a high compression engine, so you would expect to see a difference, and you do. But where they characterize the difference as a benefit of using 93, it's actually a detriment of using 91. It's hard to tell what's going on with the Ford and Dodge, but it's obvious that the increase with the Ford is specific to their engine management system and has no predictive value at all with regard to other vehicles. In other words, so what? It's a clickbait throwaway article aimed at dimwits. |
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to extrashaky For This Useful Post: | CBR600RR (08-09-2019), finch1750 (08-07-2019), Slammillionaire (08-07-2019), soundman98 (08-08-2019), Spuds (08-07-2019), strat61caster (08-07-2019), Tcoat (08-07-2019), why? (08-08-2019), winstonscifi (08-07-2019) |
08-07-2019, 03:13 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: NPR, Florida
Posts: 2,404
Thanks: 1,802
Thanked 2,903 Times in 1,282 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Not sure where all this is even going. Our cars are designed to run at 93. 91 can be used in a pinch. 87 is just not to be used. End of discussion.
If anything maybe a "this is how you increase 87 octane to 93" article would be more relevant. Anybody adding anything crazy like xylene to do this? I know I can get it for $50-60 a 5 gallon bucket so at roughly $10-12 a gallon I wonder what that will take and at what cost to create 93 from 87? Not that I am recommending to do so but I am sure somebody in here has experimented with adding some stuff to do this. Using the Race brand race gas additive it looks like it would be about 30 ounces to raise a 10 gallons from 87 to 93, so almost two 16 oz. cans at $20 a pop($40 total). Xylene seems the stuff people try the most or I've read Acetone and Toluene also have been used too. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Impureclient For This Useful Post: | extrashaky (08-07-2019) |
08-07-2019, 03:28 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: Crapcan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11,174
Thanks: 18,186
Thanked 16,336 Times in 7,387 Posts
Mentioned: 108 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I don't even have access to regular 93. Most of the time it is 91. I have logged my car a lot. With 91 it is a bit knocky around 2500-3000 unless I am super gentle with it. Above 4k it is completely fine and IAM holds at 1, if it is really hot it will drop down into the .9's. If they put 87 in it by mistake the IAM drops to about .4 Car feels like a dog, even in neutral it revs really slow. We used to use the Acetone trick on our dirtbikes when we couldn't get race fuel. |
|
08-07-2019, 05:52 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: 2014 BRZ Limited
Location: USA
Posts: 4,045
Thanks: 1,100
Thanked 5,618 Times in 2,266 Posts
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
There are many people who waste money on premium gasoline in cars that don't need it. Since many high performance engines have high compression, and high compression engines require higher octane, these people get the causal relationship backwards and think that the higher octane causes the higher performance. They apply this incorrect cause and effect to their own vehicles and conclude that using higher octane gasoline will give them better performance. Since they don't want to be wrong, they imagine they're right and perceive higher performance that isn't really there. That's confirmation bias. If you show them actual dyno runs that dispute their belief in magic, cognitive dissonance will kick in, and suddenly they'll be talking about "improved throttle response" or "smoother idle," which conveniently can't be measured except by feel. Or they'll claim better fuel economy, measured in nonsense like "miles per tank." Usually these articles fall into one of two types. First is where somebody who has no idea what he's talking about tells people that they should run premium in their cars for the "better detergents" to keep the fuel system clean and clear out deposits. I always suspect these are oil company shills. The other is where compression ratios are discussed, then the fuel is tested through actual dyno runs and fuel economy tracking. Those almost always conclude that premium is a waste of money in lower compression engines. This article tries to be both and fails miserably. The results are inconclusive, and the writer has no idea why. I suspect some of it is just sloppy data gathering that can't be duplicated, but I'd be really interested in an explanation for the difference with that Ford because it runs counter to what you'd normally expect from a real scientific test. But none of this has anything to do with us. |
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to extrashaky For This Useful Post: |
08-07-2019, 06:17 PM | #12 |
Pavement Grey
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2020 Toyota 86 GT, 2017 BMW X1
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,087
Thanks: 109
Thanked 2,223 Times in 1,205 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
IT should be simple....
Whatever the car's minimum requirement is, you use that. You can use higher than minimum if you want but you probably wont get much if anything out of it. But don't go lower just to 'save a few bucks'. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Sasquachulator For This Useful Post: | OwlDance (08-07-2019) |
08-07-2019, 09:28 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Xylene and toluene would be great if you could get them at industrial prices, but there's no such thing as a xylene or toluene fuel pump, so the distribution cost goes through the roof. If you need better than E85 though they're probably the only choice. Theoretically, you could run a turbo car or really fast high compression NA car on 87 if you air temps are cold and you're careful to never press the gas too hard. E.g. cruising from SF to LA with 87 or 89 in the tank instead of 91. Then as you go into the city where you need acceleration again, you could dump a jug of E85 in the tank and you'd be okay. Kind of not worth the 2 dollars though lol. I actually never saw any knock with my FR-S running 91 (the only choice in CA) while I was logging it, but I only ever logged it on cold days. With more aggressive timing I'm sure you could easily see the benefit of 93 everyday though. |
|
08-07-2019, 11:31 PM | #14 |
Anti stance.
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,630
Thanks: 897
Thanked 958 Times in 547 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Methyl hydrate (methanol) is a great octane booster.
In DI applications, it alone carries an effective octane of 180. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Subaru Premium BRZ 86 & Premium Proud of Boxer Catalog & Broshure | keioffice | Miscellaneous | 0 | 03-14-2014 08:10 AM |
Premium owners-Do you find the extra goodies are not worth it? | BRZfan | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics | 102 | 02-22-2014 06:53 PM |
Is it worth to have limited than premium? | 8987846 | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics | 54 | 05-03-2012 10:57 PM |
Is it worth to have limited than premium? | 8987846 | FR-S / BRZ vs.... | 0 | 05-03-2012 12:41 AM |
May 2010 Car&Driver issue FT-86 article - "25 Cars Worth Waiting For" | JDMinc | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 76 | 04-17-2010 03:58 AM |