follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack

Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack Specific topics relating to wheels and tires.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-05-2013, 03:06 AM   #1
cdo221
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S, 2015 RS 1.0
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 532
Thanks: 285
Thanked 174 Times in 110 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Lightweight Wheels - Does it really matter?

I was always under the impression that light weight wheels would make a significant difference in acceleration/braking/handling in general.. but I came across this post in the NSX forums that seems to prove otherwise:

http://www.nsxprime.com/forum/showth...-their-results

Long story short, there wasn't any significant difference between the heavy vs light wheels acceleration wise.... but of course that's just some guy on the internet. I didn't read the whole thread but braking/cornering wasn't tested I think...

Those of you who shaved off a lot of weight, say ~5 lbs at each corner with 17x7 RPF1s or something like that ... is there a measurable difference? Is it just 'feel'? Or just cuz you upgraded to stickier tires from the stock ones?
cdo221 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 03:22 AM   #2
Noob4Life
86 Noob
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Firestorm FR-S
Location: Yuba City, CA
Posts: 596
Thanks: 153
Thanked 189 Times in 97 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdo221 View Post
I was always under the impression that light weight wheels would make a significant difference in acceleration/braking/handling in general.. but I came across this post in the NSX forums that seems to prove otherwise:

http://www.nsxprime.com/forum/showth...-their-results

Long story short, there wasn't any significant difference between the heavy vs light wheels acceleration wise.... but of course that's just some guy on the internet. I didn't read the whole thread but braking/cornering wasn't tested I think...

Those of you who shaved off a lot of weight, say ~5 lbs at each corner with 17x7 RPF1s or something like that ... is there a measurable difference? Is it just 'feel'? Or just cuz you upgraded to stickier tires from the stock ones?

Lightweight wheels are meant to help lighten the car in general. It's like switching to racing seats, removing the backseat, or changing out the exhaust to a lighter one. That one part itself doesn't make a measurable difference, it's the weight saved altogether that will have the affect.

Say you buy lightweight wheels and save 5lbs a corner. 5x4 = 20. 20lbs aint much overall and you wont notice. Now say you add a lightweight full exhaust, there's maybe 10-15lbs. 20 from the wheels + 15 from the exhaust = 35lbs saved. Say you add a lightweight battery on top of that. There's another 11lbs. 35+11= 46lbs saved. Now remove the rear spare tire. 35ish pds? 46+35 = 81lbs saved. Now you're getting somewhere and you're going to feel the difference. It's not gonna be night and day, but you'll feel it.

You're going to feel the difference going from a 7" wide tire to a 9" wide tire more than you're going to feel the weight lost by adding lightweight rims. But shaving weight wherever possible does make a difference.

That NSX guy just added lightweight rims and expected a night and day difference in acceleration. That's not how it works.
__________________
Noob4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Noob4Life For This Useful Post:
20valvewynn83 (04-05-2013), cdo221 (04-05-2013), charged86 (02-07-2014), Chrisgalactic (02-21-2016), Freeman (04-05-2013), JS86JS (02-08-2014), MisterSheep (04-27-2016), R2RO (02-07-2014), ultra (04-06-2013)
Old 04-05-2013, 04:30 AM   #3
#87
I usually post drunk
 
#87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: BRZ
Location: NY
Posts: 1,487
Thanks: 15
Thanked 490 Times in 231 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Unless you are a seasoned track driver will you really notice the tenths or maybe second or 2 saved from weight reduction?

Also think, he said .05 was the result of the lightweight wheels? So if a track has 15 corners, can you multiply that difference by 15? If so then you are really getting somewhere.

In competitions where wins are decided by tenths, .0X is actually quite significant. But if you are just racing some guy on the highway 0.X is neck and neck...
#87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 04:54 AM   #4
coyote
Senior Member
 
coyote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: Slowly
Location: brisbane.qld.au
Posts: 1,064
Thanks: 212
Thanked 539 Times in 235 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Reducing mass is good.

Reducing unsprung mass is great.

Reducing rotational mass is brilliant.

Reducing rotational unsprung mass is golden.

Just because you have an NSX, doesn't mean you have a clue.


Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
coyote is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 47 Users Say Thank You to coyote For This Useful Post:
adprokid (04-08-2013), andrew20195 (04-05-2013), Apex Chase (04-06-2013), ATL BRZ (02-07-2014), Chad (04-07-2013), charged86 (02-07-2014), Chewie4299 (04-05-2013), cmspooner (04-06-2013), DAEMANO (02-07-2014), DriftEightSix (04-07-2013), Efferalgan (04-05-2013), exE36M3 (07-01-2014), Fly Guy (04-07-2013), Freeman (04-05-2013), helloimgil (04-07-2013), ImAwesome (04-07-2013), industrial (04-05-2013), jonnyozero3 (04-05-2013), King Tut (04-05-2013), kurbkilla (04-05-2013), mad_sb (04-05-2013), Manic (02-21-2014), matsayswhat (04-06-2013), meWant (04-08-2013), MisterSheep (04-27-2016), Mr.Jay (04-05-2013), Nah (10-31-2016), NWFRS (11-24-2023), Panman (04-05-2013), PoorMansRacing (02-07-2014), PowderfaceTr. (02-08-2014), R2RO (02-07-2014), racecaresuaceb (04-07-2013), raul (12-30-2014), RAWR BRZ (04-05-2013), Rosticles (12-12-2014), ShadowSeraph (02-07-2014), shaunsweeney (02-07-2014), suaveflooder (02-07-2014), SuperTom (10-15-2018), Tgionet (12-18-2013), Tomcat07 (02-02-2015), ultra (04-06-2013), whataboutbob (04-07-2013), wparsons (02-07-2014), wrxneffect (04-05-2013), Yoniyama (02-10-2015)
Old 04-05-2013, 05:47 AM   #5
RAWR BRZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2010 BMW M3, 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: Orange County
Posts: 376
Thanks: 32
Thanked 97 Times in 56 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyote View Post
Reducing mass is good.

Reducing unsprung mass is great.

Reducing rotational mass is brilliant.

Reducing rotational unsprung mass is golden.

Just because you have an NSX, doesn't mean you have a clue.


Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
+1 I believe every pound of rotational unsprung mass reduced is equal to 8 pounds of sprung mass. so 5 lb off per wheel would be more like 20x8=160. Prob isnt "8" though correct me if I am wrong.
RAWR BRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 10:10 AM   #6
jeebus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2015 Mustang GT (on order)
Location: San Diego
Posts: 904
Thanks: 114
Thanked 471 Times in 208 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
It might not always make a huge difference in acceleration, but it makes a GIGANTIC difference in feel. Adding unsprung weight forces the suspension to work harder. It has to control the up and down motions of the wheel going down the road. Imagine lifting a 5lb barbell up and down over and over. It's light enough that your arms don't have much issue. You can do this smoothly without shaking or trembling. Now, up that weight to 10lbs or 15lbs...you can still do it, but probably not as smoothly or easily. Your arms fatigue sooner. Now, your arms might get used to it and build muscle but your suspension doesn't have that ability to change.

Same goes for rotational mass. Spin a weighted flywheel with your hands. Now stop that flywheel. Add a bunch of weight to it and spin it. It takes more work to get it started but once it gets going it's not a huge issue. However, now you have to stop it...ahhh it's hard!!!
__________________
jeebus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jeebus For This Useful Post:
exE36M3 (07-01-2014), whataboutbob (04-07-2013)
Old 04-05-2013, 10:10 AM   #7
OrbitalEllipses
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,889 Times in 2,902 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #87 View Post
Unless you are a seasoned track driver will you really notice the tenths or maybe second or 2 saved from weight reduction?
You can feel it everytime you get on and off the throttle...it does not take a seasoned track driver to notice ~15lbs of rotating mass coming off the entire car (I saved ~4lbs/corner with my wheel/tire setup).
OrbitalEllipses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 10:13 AM   #8
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyote View Post
Reducing mass is good.

Reducing unsprung mass is great.

Reducing rotational mass is brilliant.

Reducing rotational unsprung mass is golden.

Just because you have an NSX, doesn't mean you have a clue.


Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Grassroots Motorsports tested and 100% of their tests the heavy wheels were FASTER on their test course than light weight wheels. The lighter wheels helped with braking and acceleration but they also flexed more which ended up hurting cornering.

Just sayin......

It does make a difference in feel though if you go far enough. My tires more or less offset the wheel weight savings for me...
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Dave-ROR For This Useful Post:
Fly Guy (04-07-2013), jonnyozero3 (04-05-2013), nikitopo (12-30-2014), OmarGC (04-06-2013), suaveflooder (02-07-2014), Superhatch (04-05-2013)
Old 04-05-2013, 10:33 AM   #9
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,794
Thanks: 2,164
Thanked 4,242 Times in 2,220 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
On my GTI, the stock "Detroit" wheels are 29 lbs. I switched to 19 lbs. aftermarket wheels and noticed some immediate differences.

- More road feel.
- More road noise (i.e., car was louder over rough pavement).
- Suspension reacted quicker to bumps and cracks (i.e., tires stayed in contact with the road better).
- Average fuel economy increased by a little over 1 mpg, as tracked by the onboard readout.

Take that for what it's worth. Also shedding 10 lbs/wheel is pretty extreme, so your results may vary.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAWR BRZ View Post
+1 I believe every pound of rotational unsprung mass reduced is equal to 8 pounds of sprung mass. so 5 lb off per wheel would be more like 20x8=160. Prob isnt "8" though correct me if I am wrong.
Someone crunched the math once and the number was more like 1.7x for acceleration. Empirical test data seems to corroborate that as well.

So saving 5 lbs/wheel is more like 20 lbs x 1.7 = 34 lbs IMO.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DarkSunrise For This Useful Post:
RAWR BRZ (04-05-2013), Trettiosjuan (12-30-2014)
Old 04-05-2013, 11:53 AM   #10
Ro_Ja
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: TOYOTA
Location: CA
Posts: 401
Thanks: 191
Thanked 225 Times in 134 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
Grassroots Motorsports tested and 100% of their tests the heavy wheels were FASTER on their test course than light weight wheels. The lighter wheels helped with braking and acceleration but they also flexed more which ended up hurting cornering.

Just sayin......

It does make a difference in feel though if you go far enough. My tires more or less offset the wheel weight savings for me...
Reminded me of this article:

http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=479110
Ro_Ja is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ro_Ja For This Useful Post:
Weasel Soup (02-15-2015)
Old 04-05-2013, 11:54 AM   #11
mad_sb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,639
Thanks: 632
Thanked 981 Times in 537 Posts
Mentioned: 100 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
We were always able to measure whp gains on dynodymanics from going to lighter wheel tire combo. Usually between 5 and 10 whp on evos.
__________________

Last edited by mad_sb; 04-05-2013 at 12:58 PM.
mad_sb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 12:51 PM   #12
u/Josh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: GBS Limited 6MT
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 200
Thanks: 186
Thanked 69 Times in 42 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkSunrise View Post
Someone crunched the math once and the number was more like 1.7x for acceleration. Empirical test data seems to corroborate that as well.

So saving 5 lbs/wheel is more like 20 lbs x 1.7 = 34 lbs IMO.
I have done the math and got a multiplier of about 1.25x (or 5x if you are talking single wheel weight change) for acceleration. Of course the math is not exact, you have to make some assumptions about the moment of inertia of each wheel and the multipliers are only valid for a given tire/wheel diameter.

So if you save 5 lbs per wheel that is ~ equivalent for acceleration to saving 25 lbs of overall vehicle weight.

On the other hand, adding a pound of tire per corner is ~ equivalent to adding 7 pounds to the overall vehicle weight.

These numbers only consider the effect on acceleration, and not that lower unsprung mass allows your suspension to work better.

Here is my math
u/Josh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to u/Josh For This Useful Post:
cdo221 (04-05-2013), DarkSunrise (04-05-2013), Flow (04-05-2013), RAWR BRZ (04-05-2013), whataboutbob (04-07-2013)
Old 04-05-2013, 07:16 PM   #13
coyote
Senior Member
 
coyote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: Slowly
Location: brisbane.qld.au
Posts: 1,064
Thanks: 212
Thanked 539 Times in 235 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
The lighter wheels helped with braking and acceleration but they also flexed more which ended up hurting cornering.
So what they should have said is that lighter wheels are faster, but shit wheels that flex are slower.

Light, strong wheels FTW.
coyote is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to coyote For This Useful Post:
exE36M3 (07-01-2014), racecaresuaceb (04-07-2013), Trettiosjuan (12-30-2014)
Old 04-05-2013, 07:52 PM   #14
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyote View Post
So what they should have said is that lighter wheels are faster, but shit wheels that flex are slower.

Light, strong wheels FTW.
GRM wasn't testing no name crap wheels.... Light = less material, there's no way around that given the same manufacturing process. Less material will mean less strength given similar designs.

So the real question is which design is the strongest for a lightweight wheel?
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dave-ROR For This Useful Post:
nikitopo (12-30-2014), racecaresuaceb (04-07-2013), Trettiosjuan (12-30-2014), wparsons (02-07-2014)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BUDDY CLUB Lightweight Racing Wheels - JDM, lightweight, low pricetag | 18x8.5" GuerillaRacing Wheels and Tires 116 01-20-2015 06:32 PM
>> TSW Nurburgring | Panorama | Interlagos lightweight forged wheels - ready to ship speed depot Wheels and Tires 24 11-26-2012 08:25 AM
need suggestions for lightweight forged 17x7 wheels hankster Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 34 11-15-2012 01:40 PM
Recommendation for lightweight wheels without breaking the bank ayau Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 6 11-08-2012 02:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.