follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-10-2015, 04:08 PM   #29
fika84
Senior Member
 
fika84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: BRZ
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 845
Thanks: 677
Thanked 396 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Let's just say that his Engineers do all of his work and they are the ones that deserve the recognition, Claude is just a really good salesman. He goes out and sells dreams and then comes back to the office and asks if it can be done. Very backwards way of managing a company. I met some really cool people working there and learned a lot about vehicle dynamics and VB.net programming though!!
fika84 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to fika84 For This Useful Post:
drewbot (08-11-2015), Gunman (08-10-2015), Racecomp Engineering (08-10-2015), Ultramaroon (08-10-2015)
Old 08-11-2015, 11:55 AM   #30
Hoosier Daddy
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: '13 Denali, '15 Volt, soon a BRZ?
Location: CLT
Posts: 61
Thanks: 3
Thanked 55 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fika84 View Post
He is despised by the professional world.
He isn't taken seriously. For good reason. Although his software products are pretty good (cheap!).

Total weight transfer has only to do with mass, cg height, and track width and/or wheelbase! How it's impacted by springs, bars, geometry and dampers results in changes to things like response time, distribution, roll, and pitch angles.
Hoosier Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 12:29 PM   #31
fika84
Senior Member
 
fika84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: BRZ
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 845
Thanks: 677
Thanked 396 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Daddy View Post
He isn't taken seriously. For good reason. Although his software products are pretty good (cheap!).

Total weight transfer has only to do with mass, cg height, and track width and/or wheelbase! How it's impacted by springs, bars, geometry and dampers results in changes to things like response time, distribution, roll, and pitch angles.
"his" software products. So you don't believe in splitting up the weight transfer by geometric and elastic? Where geometric is the amount of weight transfer that doesn't cause suspension compression/rebound.
fika84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 02:16 PM   #32
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,442 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Lots of interesting "facts" being thrown around here
__________________
Drive upgrades. Don't buy them.
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 03:17 PM   #33
Shankenstein
Frosty Carrot
 
Shankenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: The Atomic Carrot
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 513
Thanks: 272
Thanked 428 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad_W View Post
Awesome data! Thanks for all the input.

Is it fair to say that not all roll is bad? Going completely flat around corners my be a desirable trait, but does that mean it offers the ultimate amount of grip? Can a suspension with a little bit of roll be grippier (like the new Miata for example)?
Roll by itself isn't inherently evil. The side effects of roll can lead to reduced handling.

Redistributing weight (tire loading) can reduce the available grip. Flex in the bushings and chassis can lead to poor geometry.

Dampers:
If roll allows for more travel and better control from your existing shocks... that can be a good thing.

If you run high-rate springs without ARBs (like @Captain_Snooze ), your travel will be small. Some dampers are designed to react quickly and strongly... and that type of setup is the holy grail (excellent grip, ride, and handling).
__________________
If you think you're nerd enough, join in the discussions about Suspension and Aerodynamic modelling!
Wall of Fame - JDL Auto Design, Raceseng, Vishnu Tuning, Penske Shocks, Nameless, Perrin, RaceComp Engineering, Essex/AP Racing, Verus, RacerX
Wall of Shame - aFe Takeda, Wilwood, FA20Club
Shankenstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 05:06 PM   #34
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 790 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I remember reading about a couple of guys that are getting very good results deleting the rear sway bar. Although they also have stiffer spring rates on all 4 corners. Robispec and ElementTuning.

I've also experimented with this myself with good results, but had too little rear roll resistance causing the rear end to bounce off the bumpstops on the longer turns. I could stomp the throttle at the corner exit and it would just rotate and grip. Felt very good until it started to hit the bumpstops.
__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.

Last edited by solidONE; 08-11-2015 at 05:55 PM. Reason: typo
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2015, 09:02 AM   #35
GSpeed
 
GSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Drives: 2015 BRZ
Location: Motorsport Ranch, TX
Posts: 619
Thanks: 227
Thanked 1,181 Times in 362 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fika84 View Post
I used to work for Claude Rouelle. For 2 years. The only people that look up to him, are FSAE students. He is despised by the professional world.

It all depends on the tires and what they want.
I have heard things like that before. His seminars are good, but it's surprising how many people take his word as gospel. The fsae.com forums were always good to see different opinions.
GSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2015, 09:22 AM   #36
fika84
Senior Member
 
fika84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: BRZ
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 845
Thanks: 677
Thanked 396 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by PST View Post
I have heard things like that before. His seminars are good, but it's surprising how many people take his word as gospel. The fsae.com forums were always good to see different opinions.
EXACTLY!
fika84 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fika84 For This Useful Post:
zuldajin (12-12-2018)
Old 08-12-2015, 11:30 AM   #37
KoolBRZ
Senior Member
 
KoolBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: Silver 2013 BRZ Ltd Auto 45,000 mi
Location: Vancouver, WA.USA
Posts: 965
Thanks: 86
Thanked 450 Times in 277 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
I've removed the front swaybar while leaving the rear, and removed the rear swaybar while leaving the front. From experience I can say the car can't handle speed without swaybars if you have oem or similarly soft suspension. I bought the front and rear "soft" sway bars from Cusco. The front bar is a hollow 16mm instead of a stock solid 18mm, and the rear is a hollow 14mm instead of a solid 14mm. The front is 79% as hard as stock, and the rear is 73% as hard as stock. Then I stiffened up my coilover's preload to compensate. Now I'm definitely feeling slop in the subframe chassis mounts, so I'll be installing "Spoon Ridgid Collar" sleeves on all the affected mounts to firm up the chassis. But if you want a really good ride, you'll have to add springs to the seat itself. It's got all the suspension and shock-absorbing ability of a futon.
KoolBRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KoolBRZ For This Useful Post:
Chad_W (08-13-2015)
Old 08-12-2015, 02:53 PM   #38
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,818
Thanks: 874
Thanked 1,067 Times in 674 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoolBRZ View Post
The front is 79% as hard as stock, and the rear is 73% as hard as stock. Then I stiffened up my coilover's preload to compensate.

I have a feeling this will fall on deaf ears, but increasing the spring preload is not going to compensate for the softer swaybars. Preload does not change the rate or curve of a spring; it just changes where it starts. Your total roll resistance will remain the same as if you left the preload alone.


Your perception of 'compensation' is the slightly higher threshold of initial spring movement from the additional preload. Basically you've made the car harsher without gaining any additional benefit in the handling department. The perception that increased preload improves handling simply means your spring rates are too soft. Or your swaybars are too small.

Last edited by venturaII; 08-12-2015 at 03:47 PM.
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to venturaII For This Useful Post:
e1_griego (08-12-2015), fika84 (08-12-2015), GSpeed (08-12-2015), Hyper4mance2k (08-16-2015), Racecomp Engineering (08-12-2015), solidONE (08-12-2015), Ultramaroon (08-12-2015), wparsons (08-13-2015)
Old 08-12-2015, 08:15 PM   #39
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 790 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by venturaII View Post
I have a feeling this will fall on deaf ears, but increasing the spring preload is not going to compensate for the softer swaybars. Preload does not change the rate or curve of a spring; it just changes where it starts. Your total roll resistance will remain the same as if you left the preload alone.


Your perception of 'compensation' is the slightly higher threshold of initial spring movement from the additional preload. Basically you've made the car harsher without gaining any additional benefit in the handling department. The perception that increased preload improves handling simply means your spring rates are too soft. Or your swaybars are too small.
Nobody has anything to add about the increased rear traction on our cars equipped with Torsen diffs from deleting the rear sway bar? lol

I've also found (butt dyno) that increasing and decreasing spring preload had an noticeable effect on handling. Jacking up my rear spring preload from 3mm to 8mm helped the rear rotate a bit better. (again, butt dyno. I have no graphs to show)
__________________
Intent > Content

cowardice is the mother of cruelty.

Last edited by solidONE; 08-12-2015 at 11:02 PM.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2015, 08:40 PM   #40
Hoosier Daddy
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: '13 Denali, '15 Volt, soon a BRZ?
Location: CLT
Posts: 61
Thanks: 3
Thanked 55 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fika84 View Post
"his" software products. So you don't believe in splitting up the weight transfer by geometric and elastic? Where geometric is the amount of weight transfer that doesn't cause suspension compression/rebound.
Well, poor Bill Mitchell is dead!

I inferred geometric and elastic WT in the second part of my comment. But it doesn't matter what your 'setup' is you will only have so much total weight transfer for a given cg height, track/wb and vehicle acceleration. But you know that...
Hoosier Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hoosier Daddy For This Useful Post:
Racecomp Engineering (08-13-2015)
Old 08-12-2015, 09:36 PM   #41
fika84
Senior Member
 
fika84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: BRZ
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 845
Thanks: 677
Thanked 396 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Daddy View Post
Well, poor Bill Mitchell is dead!

I inferred geometric and elastic WT in the second part of my comment. But it doesn't matter what your 'setup' is you will only have so much total weight transfer for a given cg height, track/wb and vehicle acceleration. But you know that...
Agreed.
fika84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2015, 10:56 PM   #42
EAGLE5
Dismember
 
EAGLE5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Red Scion FR-S
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 5,557
Thanks: 2,152
Thanked 3,999 Times in 2,155 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Any thoughts on bump stop spacers to change the front/rear balance?
EAGLE5 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reducing Drone Suggestions? JohnAyySays Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 7 04-08-2014 12:20 AM
Reducing squeel after HPDE transition Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 29 03-16-2014 01:20 PM
Reducing Rasp Admired Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 28 01-25-2014 01:40 PM
Reducing engine compartment temps mike_ekim1024 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 1 12-11-2013 02:57 AM
Reducing Insurance for hardly used car? ZionsWrath Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 6 08-31-2013 06:35 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.