2019 Subaru Ascent - New 2.4 Turbo Flat-Four The Twins Will Never Get

[krayzie]

Originally Posted by TylerLieberman

The kids that complain about the same old 200hp in the FRS/BRZ are the same kids that cum in their skinny jeans when their friend buys a beat to shit 240sx with a stock 200hp SR swap.

Don't forget the gucci belt and wear them low, single and available while the automatic shifts for them.

[ermax]

Oh I get it. So this is why old people drive crown vics? Because only young people in skinny jeans like more HP. I guess I’m a young 41 years old then. Hahaha

[krayzie]

Originally Posted by ermax

Oh I get it. So this is why old people drive crown vics? Because only young people in skinny jeans like more HP. I guess I’m a young 41 years old then. Hahaha

Some of us don't complain on factory output, never even remember that being a thing before the interweb. There's nothing wrong to modify for more power, just do it.

[Irace86.2.0]

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoiFIBAIdZI"]Introducing the 2019 Subaru Ascent SUV | New Model Walkaround - YouTube[/ame]

[Snake]

Definitely an FA24 with 94mm bore and same stroke (see below link).

Seems like a bit of a waste considering it only makes 25nm more torque and 10 more hp at the same RPM as the Forester XT with the FA20.

Would theoretically mean you could rev it higher in NA form, assuming they plan on making a NA version.

https://www.subaru.co.jp/press/file/...17_1129_02.pdf

[Irace86.2.0]

Originally Posted by Snake

Definitely an FA24 with 94mm bore and same stroke (see below link).

Seems like a bit of a waste considering it only makes 25nm more torque and 10 more hp at the same RPM as the Forester XT with the FA20.

Would theoretically mean you could rev it higher in NA form, assuming they plan on making a NA version.

https://www.subaru.co.jp/press/file/...17_1129_02.pdf

At the same boost, same compression and same fuel too?

[Guff]

It is rated 260/277 at 87 octane. I think this motor can prove to be a great one.

[Ezio]

Jokes on OP?:

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/20...rts-car-model/

[Tcoat]

Originally Posted by Ezio

Jokes on OP?:

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/20...rts-car-model/

The joke may be on anybody that believes that article. They aren't even sure enough of their "sources" to say who they are. The "sources" they could be talking about may be this very thread.

[mazeroni]

Originally Posted by Ezio

Jokes on OP?:

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/20...rts-car-model/

Hmmm, I'm holding off accepting any mockery until the MY202~ car goes down the assembly line and a 2.4 goes into engine bay.

For now I'm quite pleased with my comments.

[Ezio]

Originally Posted by mazeroni

Hmmm, I'm holding off accepting any mockery until the MY202~ car goes down the assembly line and a 2.4 goes into engine bay.

Same.

[venturaII]

Originally Posted by Snake

Definitely an FA24 with 94mm bore and same stroke (see below link).

Seems like a bit of a waste considering it only makes 25nm more torque and 10 more hp at the same RPM as the Forester XT with the FA20.

Would theoretically mean you could rev it higher in NA form, assuming they plan on making a NA version.

https://www.subaru.co.jp/press/file/...17_1129_02.pdf

Only with a corresponding increase in valve area, otherwise you'll likely be making peak power/tq lower in the rpm range. Which wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, as long as overall power goes up.

[R_E_L]

How is this thing dimensionally compared to the FA20dit, is it just a bigger bore? Is it any more feasible as a future swap? What are the odds of the WRX's manual transmission mating to this thing? Or is it still a tight squeeze for our teeny weeny transmission tunnels?

[ermax]

Originally Posted by R_E_L

How is this thing dimensionally compared to the FA20dit, is it just a bigger bore? Is it any more feasible as a future swap? What are the odds of the WRX's manual transmission mating to this thing? Or is it still a tight squeeze for our teeny weeny transmission tunnels?

Bigger bore, same stroke. 94mmx86mm