follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-18-2011, 12:57 AM   #1
tree fingers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '93 FD3S
Location: Indiana
Posts: 121
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
FR-S vs. Used Sports Car Market

So, I always read about people trying to find the FR-S's niche in the current sports car market, but, I was wondering, how will it fare against comparably priced second hand sports cars? Stay with me for a moment.

[[[WARNING: PURE SPECULATION INSIDE]]]

Now, I suspect the FR-S will fall in between, and this is a rather large margin, 19.9k-27k. The former being, of course, the standard model, and the latter being the fully equipped version. Now, for this money, there are a slew of other sports cars you could buy. So, how will the 86 successor compare?

So, again, let's practice some more speculation. Suppose the car weighs in between 2,400 and 2,700 pounds. Further, let's say the direct injected boxer motor will put out in between 200-240 BHP.

[Note: All of these margins are purposefully wide to encompass all probable] data]

For that money, you could also get second hand versions of these cars:

[Tentative list here, folks]
[Most data fetched from wikipedia]
[All used car prices are from KBB, besides the Lotus Elise, and are quoted, with the exception of the Mark IV Supra, for an average of 60,000 miles]

Evo 8 2,910–3,109 lb 276 BHP/ 273 LB/FT 16,295 ['03 Model]
Evo 9 2,888–3,285 lb 287 BHP/ 279 LB/FT 20,650 ['06 IX Model]
STi ~3,300 LB ~300 BHP / ~300LB/FT 23,540 ['07 Model]
MKIV Supra 3,417 lb 320 BHP/ 315 LB/FT 21, 340 ['94 Model. 100,xxx miles]
Lotus Elise 02-07 1,896 lb ~120BHP/~120LB/FT 22,xxx-29,xxx['05 Model][NADAGUIDE]
C5 Z06 3,115 lb 405BHP/400LB/FT 22,020 ['03 Model]
S2000 ~2800 LBS 240BHP/153LB/FT 15,345 ['03 Model]

Of course, there are other candidates, too. E46 M3, 350z, Mustang GT/Cobra, etc.

So, with all of that said, do you think it's viable to compare a new sports car to similarly priced second hand sports cars? If so, how do you think the FR-S stacks up?

Last edited by tree fingers; 08-18-2011 at 01:17 AM.
tree fingers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 01:00 AM   #2
Type[R]+
Senior Member
 
Type[R]+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: Lexus IS-F
Location: Australia
Posts: 529
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Well do you want second hand or new? That's the number one question.....
I won't settle for a second hand car, I know how I treat my cars, and wouldn't like to buy a high maintenance flogged out second hand sports car.
Type[R]+ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 01:07 AM   #3
tree fingers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '93 FD3S
Location: Indiana
Posts: 121
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think maybe you misunderstood the thread a little. EDIT: I guess I misunderstood a little. Haha.. I just saw your edit. I am not in the market to get another second hand sports car, and, while I might get a FR-S, it's a little beside the point. The point is, however, to discuss the decision of buying a new FR-S or looking at a comparatively priced used sports car. Why would you get one over another?

It seems like the typical market for the car, at least those on forums, are at least a little mechanically inclined. So, replacing parts and performing maintenance on a used car shouldn't be an issue.

Personally, I don't really mind buying a used sports car. I mean, I bought my STI used. It only had 27,000 miles, but I have no idea what the car was doing during that period. It could have been autoxing for 5000 of them for all I know. However, the compression checked out, the car hadn't been in an accident, and, overall, everything was exceptionally clean.

If you plan to modify a used car, you shouldn't have to worry about previous owners abusing certain components. I.E powertrain, suspension
tree fingers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 01:07 AM   #4
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,966
Thanks: 7,664
Thanked 19,052 Times in 8,327 Posts
Mentioned: 677 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
Light weight FR sports car that isn't convertible is something I'm looking for and that list you listed don't have it. Elise is light weight... but it's not FR. Love Supra... but haven't seen $22k, where I live.

Note:
S2k doesn't weight 2600 lbs, it weight 2809~2864 lbs
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 01:13 AM   #5
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,966
Thanks: 7,664
Thanked 19,052 Times in 8,327 Posts
Mentioned: 677 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tree fingers View Post
I think maybe you misunderstood the thread a little. I am not in the market to get another second hand sports car, and, while I might get a FR-S, it's a little beside the point. The point is, however, to discuss the decision of buying a new FR-S or looking at a comparatively priced used sports car. Why would you get one over another?

It seems like the typical market for the car, at least those on forums, are at least a little mechanically inclined. So, replacing parts and performing maintenance on a used car shouldn't be an issue.
Then you're missing: GC, Rx7, Rx8, 3000GT, GTO, Mustang, Camaro, G35, M3, Z3, Z4, 944, 911, Boxster and no end lists
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 01:16 AM   #6
tree fingers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '93 FD3S
Location: Indiana
Posts: 121
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
Light weight FR sports car that isn't convertible is something I'm looking for and that list you listed don't have it. Elise is light weight... but it's not FR. Love Supra... but haven't seen $22k, where I live.

Note:
S2k doesn't weight 2600 lbs, it weight 2809~2864 lbs
Ehh, I sort of got lazy and guessed on the s2k's weight. Hahah.. I'll make sure to edit the original post.

I was wary of the S2000 being a convertible, too, until I drove one. They're really exceptional cars. The revised 2.2 litre motor makes up for the torqueless F20C.

Is engine orientation [F/R/M] really that important to you? I guess I've never really thought of it that way, but I have a slight bias towards mid/rear engine cars.
tree fingers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 01:22 AM   #7
tranzformer
Delights in pure handling
 
tranzformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
This is a strange thread.
tranzformer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 01:23 AM   #8
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,966
Thanks: 7,664
Thanked 19,052 Times in 8,327 Posts
Mentioned: 677 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tree fingers View Post
Ehh, I sort of got lazy and guessed on the s2k's weight. Hahah.. I'll make sure to edit the original post.

I was wary of the S2000 being a convertible, too, until I drove one. They're really exceptional cars. The revised 2.2 litre motor makes up for the torqueless F20C.
That's depends on were you live. S2k owner in Japan really hating F22 due to loosing that 9k rev.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tree fingers View Post
Is engine orientation [F/R/M] really that important to you? I guess I've never really thought of it that way, but I have a slight bias towards mid/rear engine cars.
Yes, it is important. It's like saying 2.5i & STI are same thing
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 01:29 AM   #9
Type[R]+
Senior Member
 
Type[R]+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: Lexus IS-F
Location: Australia
Posts: 529
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Ok, looking at it from your point of view, I think it will fair good. Toyota does not have a sports car available. This is it. There is no drift cars available on the showroom floor. I think second hand direct competitor is the 240sx in your country, all the others indirectly (same cost performance cars).

I think the biggest competitor on the showroom floor right now is the 370Z. I'm sure there's going to be heaps of comparisons between these two!
Type[R]+ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 01:34 AM   #10
Zeero
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: Toyota MR2 AW11
Location: California
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I would get the FR-S. It's a completely new car, not to mention Toyota's first sports car in a while.

As long as the production version doesn't turn out to be a complete disaster regarding weight and price, I think it will be a better buy than a used car from that list.
__________________
Zeero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 01:41 AM   #11
tree fingers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '93 FD3S
Location: Indiana
Posts: 121
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
Then you're missing: GC, Rx7, Rx8, 3000GT, GTO, Mustang, Camaro, G35, M3, Z3, Z4, 944, 911, Boxster and no end lists
Well, actually, the list isn't all encompassing, but I think the concept can be conveyed without creating a list of ALL used sports cars. : /

Quote:
Originally Posted by tree fingers View Post
Of course, there are other candidates, too. E46 M3, 350z, Mustang GT/Cobra, etc.



Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
Yes, it is important. It's like saying 2.5i & STI are same thing"
You've misunderstood me. I'm asking about the driving experience of FR vs. MR/RR, and why you prefer FR to MR or RR.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
That's depends on were you live. S2k owner in Japan really hating F22 due to loosing that 9k rev.
I can understand variance in opinion. I don't want this thread to turn into an AP1 v AP2 debate, so I won't say anymore. Hahah

Quote:
Originally Posted by tranzformer View Post
This is a strange thread.
Why? Because it doesn't propagate "insider information" that's actually just copy/pasted from a motor-trend article? Hahah...
tree fingers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 01:55 AM   #12
1660
On the Rise
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Toyota
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 289
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Why are you here? Are you a troll??? Don't feed the troll!!!
1660 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 02:02 AM   #13
tree fingers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '93 FD3S
Location: Indiana
Posts: 121
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1660 View Post
Why are you here? Are you a troll??? Don't feed the troll!!!
You've got the be kidding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeero
I would get the FR-S. It's a completely new car, not to mention Toyota's first sports car in a while.

As long as the production version doesn't turn out to be a complete disaster regarding weight and price, I think it will be a better buy than a used car from that list.
This is the kind of discussion I was looking for!

As long as they keep the weight down, this car has the potential to be a proper sports car. : ] If I was in the market to get a used sports car vs. new FR-S, it would certainly be a difficult decision.
tree fingers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2011, 02:07 AM   #14
ryun84
Senior Member
 
ryun84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: 04 PSM WRX Wagon
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 385
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think he's posting a legitimate topic for discussion. It's not like we have much more to talk about. I, personally, would prefer the new Scion/Subaru to a used sports car. The only way I'd go the comparable used car route would be if it were a car I absolutely loved, I personally knew the previous owner babied the car, and the price/condition of the car was too good to pass up. Tough standards, which is why I think I'll most probably end up going new.

Edit: Of course, this is all based on the hopes that the FR-S remains lightweight, cheap, and fun.
ryun84 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Toyota Celica name possible for European/Asian market madaadda Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 109 11-02-2011 01:46 PM
after market parts serchmarc Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 90 05-31-2011 08:18 PM
What do you look for when buying a sports car? Diar Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 43 09-28-2010 08:50 AM
President/COO Toyota Motor Sales USA confirms FT-86 coming to North America market! Hachiroku Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 20 02-10-2010 08:15 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.