follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-09-2017, 01:26 PM   #1
8RZ
The Gunshine State
 
8RZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: '14 BRZ Limited
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,463
Thanks: 631
Thanked 1,163 Times in 587 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Need alignment spec recommendations

So I just installed Megan coilovers and will be doing the first alignment on it. The suspension does not have front adj. camber plates but I did buy front camber bolts (rear is all stock).

I mainly do spirited city driving with occasional autox (only 3 times last year and none this year yet).

I have heard some negative camber would be beneficial but how much in the front and rear exactly should I tell the shop? I plan on 0 toe, is castor adjustable on our cars?

Thanks.
__________________

Current DD: M235i
8RZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2017, 02:30 PM   #2
zc06_kisstherain
 
zc06_kisstherain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: SWP BRZ
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,177
Thanks: 723
Thanked 667 Times in 507 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
what is your goal? just street? track? it really depends on what you want.
go from -1.5 all around and see how you like it
zc06_kisstherain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2017, 07:22 PM   #3
8RZ
The Gunshine State
 
8RZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: '14 BRZ Limited
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,463
Thanks: 631
Thanked 1,163 Times in 587 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by zc06_kisstherain View Post
what is your goal? just street? track? it really depends on what you want.
go from -1.5 all around and see how you like it


Like I stated, mostly daily driving on the street with occasional autox.

-1.5-2 all around sounds like a good start.
__________________

Current DD: M235i
8RZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2017, 08:24 PM   #4
Gforce
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: Alberta
Posts: 519
Thanks: 39
Thanked 161 Times in 109 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
You can get nearly 2.0 degrees rear camber with Subaru crash bolts. Subaru sells these to correct rear alignment problems.
Gforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2017, 10:51 PM   #5
Captain Snooze
Because compromise ®
 
Captain Snooze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Red Herring
Location: australia
Posts: 7,723
Thanks: 3,993
Thanked 9,346 Times in 4,127 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
It has been suggested rear camber should be initially setup with 0.5 less negative camber than front given the different wheel geometries (Mac strut vs upper/lower control arm). E.g. Front camber -3.2, rear camber -2.7.
__________________
My car is completely stock except for all the mods.

Captain Snooze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2017, 03:39 AM   #6
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
"You can get nearly 2.0 degrees rear camber with Subaru crash bolts. Subaru sells these to correct rear alignment problems"
Rear camber with crash bolts? Not eccentric bushings? And it's Subaru, not Whiteline? rear alignment problems?
My conviction that he is trolling just grows stronger by each post.
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to churchx For This Useful Post:
sugoi (05-10-2017)
Old 05-10-2017, 08:13 AM   #7
8RZ
The Gunshine State
 
8RZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: '14 BRZ Limited
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,463
Thanks: 631
Thanked 1,163 Times in 587 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Snooze View Post
It has been suggested rear camber should be initially setup with 0.5 less negative camber than front given the different wheel geometries (Mac strut vs upper/lower control arm). E.g. Front camber -3.2, rear camber -2.7.
I have a staggered setup, would this still hold true for me?
__________________

Current DD: M235i
8RZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2017, 08:19 AM   #8
Captain Snooze
Because compromise ®
 
Captain Snooze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Red Herring
Location: australia
Posts: 7,723
Thanks: 3,993
Thanked 9,346 Times in 4,127 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8RZ View Post
I have a staggered setup, would this still hold true for me?
I do not know but I am thinking that given the differing roll rates front and rear (I am suggesting the more grip at the rear will cause more roll at the rear) you may want a different delta f/r camber.
Let me emphasise this is just conjecture on my part.

The proper way to set camber is with a pyrometer.
__________________
My car is completely stock except for all the mods.

Captain Snooze is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Captain Snooze For This Useful Post:
8RZ (05-10-2017)
Old 05-10-2017, 08:22 AM   #9
cjd
Senior Member
 
cjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,285
Thanks: 1,256
Thanked 2,928 Times in 1,714 Posts
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8RZ View Post
I have a staggered setup, would this still hold true for me?
Just get something "in the green". It's clear performance isn't your intent.
cjd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cjd For This Useful Post:
Captain Snooze (05-10-2017), Lynxis (05-10-2017)
Old 05-10-2017, 08:26 AM   #10
8RZ
The Gunshine State
 
8RZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: '14 BRZ Limited
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,463
Thanks: 631
Thanked 1,163 Times in 587 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjd View Post
Just get something "in the green". It's clear performance isn't your intent.
I never claimed it was, majority city/hwy driving.
__________________

Current DD: M235i
8RZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2017, 10:58 AM   #11
Lynxis
Senior Member
 
Lynxis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ 6MT
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,020
Thanks: 917
Thanked 604 Times in 387 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjd View Post
Just get something "in the green". It's clear performance isn't your intent.
Seconding this.

Note that rear camber isn't adjustable on the stock hardware, you need either adjustable rear lower control arms or eccentric bushings so you are going to get what you get in the rear without one of those.

The suggestions for a bit less camber in the rear than the front is because the front is macpherson strut and the rear is multilink. As a result, the rear gets more camber under compression than the front does. To adjust for this, most people aim for around 0.5 degrees more in the front than the rear to even it out.
Lynxis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lynxis For This Useful Post:
8RZ (05-10-2017)
Old 05-10-2017, 11:05 AM   #12
8RZ
The Gunshine State
 
8RZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: '14 BRZ Limited
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,463
Thanks: 631
Thanked 1,163 Times in 587 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Sounds good, thanks fellas.
__________________

Current DD: M235i
8RZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2017, 05:45 PM   #13
cjd
Senior Member
 
cjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,285
Thanks: 1,256
Thanked 2,928 Times in 1,714 Posts
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8RZ View Post
I never claimed it was, majority city/hwy driving.
Yeah, that was me keeping it short not criticizing. I'm a proponent of more front camber than is green, but it's not required.
cjd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2017, 09:53 PM   #14
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8RZ View Post
I have a staggered setup, would this still hold true for me?
That sounds to me like much more grip needs to be added in front relative to rear. Be it in way of extra camber, lesser swaybar or whatever. Of course my real choice would be to not get staggered wheel/tire setup in first place, to not have to workaround it. Even selling staggered set of used wheels is much harder as there are way less potential buyers who would want such.
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alignment recommendations for my setup? sqd Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 5 05-19-2016 01:33 PM
Need Insight on Shop Recommendations - Alignment Ammunition Northwest 19 04-29-2016 02:04 AM
Alignment shop recommendations? (SEA) Koa Northwest 7 02-16-2015 07:18 PM
Alignment Shop Recommendations (San Diego) RMP Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 3 07-25-2014 04:14 AM
Recommendations for alignment in Socal anewprelusion Southern California 18 01-13-2014 02:36 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.