OpenFlash Tablet: OTS v2.0 Beta (132 new maps, 12 new XMLs) Available for Download

[Shiv@Openflash]

Originally Posted by nunonuna

Just reflashed 2.0 stage 1. 93 oct.
After I reflashed my CAL ID changed to B01C on OFT. OFM still shows A01C as it used to be.
Is that normal?? I did use correct file to flash it which is stg 1 A01C.bin
And all labels of data logging are gone also.

After flashing your ecu, disconnect it and plug it in again before going to realtime data display. The text will re-appear. Just a small bug with the 1.27 firmware that will be fixed in the next fw update.

[lucid215]

Originally Posted by edeekeos

@Shiv@Openflash

Re-downloaded and re-flashed the new 2.0 tune, and now everything is GOLDEN, really not sure what was going on before. The tune feels great, FT's and AFR are beautiful. This tune feels MUCH smoother than the 1.59. Also, LC is really nice, glad to finally have that available, now to get to the next test and tune at the track. Overall, very happy with this rendition, great work, as always!

I wonder if you accidentally uploaded the stage 2 esc rom. I know shiv accidentally uploaded those to the site but was fixed the next day

[Andrew025]

What fuel is recommended for the roms in the folders that don't have an octane number?

[Shiv@Openflash]

Originally Posted by lucid215

I wonder if you accidentally uploaded the stage 2 esc rom. I know shiv accidentally uploaded those to the site but was fixed the next day

The ESC maps will work just fine on a non-ESC'd car so I don't think that was the problem.

[Readytoxplod]

@Shiv@Openflash
Completely new to this and I don't know how to get the new OFT 2.0 files downloaded into my car.
I want to upgrade to stage 1 93, can someone help? I opened Open Flash Manager 1.10 and went to "Upload," and under components "Original File" says "not present" along with the other "Modified #1-5."
-I then tried to select a file for modified #1 and went in my downloads "stage 1 93 oct" folder and selected "Stg1 B01C.bin" from the folder to upload. I then received an error message stating "The file selected is not compliant"
Can anyone help?

[Shiv@Openflash]

Originally Posted by Readytoxplod

@Shiv@Openflash
Completely new to this and I don't know how to get the new OFT 2.0 files downloaded into my car.
I want to upgrade to stage 1 93, can someone help? I opened Open Flash Manager 1.10 and went to "Upload," and under components "Original File" says "not present" along with the other "Modified #1-5."
-I then tried to select a file for modified #1 and went in my downloads "stage 1 93 oct" folder and selected "Stg1 B01C.bin" from the folder to upload. I then received an error message stating "The file selected is not compliant"
Can anyone help?

If your original file is "not present" then it looks like you never installed the OFT properly. It needs to read your ECU before you can do anything else. There is a video on the front page of www.openflashtablet.com showing this process in detail.

[Readytoxplod]

ahh it says "error 0x69 while communicating with device"
I reconnected my tablet and the error is gone.

I also checked my ROM and it includes "A00C," I then uploaded the stage 1 93 A00c.bin file. Thanks shiv!

[Shiv@Openflash]

Originally Posted by Readytoxplod

ahh it says "error 0x69 while communicating with device"
I reconnected my tablet and the error is gone.

I also checked my ROM and it includes "A00C," I then uploaded the stage 1 93 A00c.bin file. Thanks shiv!

Now go for a nice Sunday drive!

[tonystewart]

Good evening Shiv
I sent you an email about my custom tune, will I be able to gain the benefit of this new 2.01 tune?
Thank you

[FingR-S]

Shiv, I loaded the 2.0 Stage 1 91 Oct tune and everything is working great - as reported by others: smoother acceleration = I would say more linear response than the 1.59 tune. I still have to give another 40 miles or so to get the full effect.

Question: (I've only done this once before)
The files all look the same in their respective folders for example:
In the OTS v2.0 Beta folder/stage 1/Stg 1 700C, the "Stg 1 700C" file looks the same as the "Stage 91oct" folder file called the same "Stg 1 700C"
I want to make sure that I'm viewing the files correctly.
All the maps I uploaded to the OFT look the same "Stg 1 700C".
I went by (remembered) what slot I uploaded them too - 1.59 is in the first slot, 2.0 in the second, and 93oct tune in the third slot - all have the same file name - is this normal?

Since I don't have to reload the 2.01 maps, is there a link to loading the correct XML files - never done it - to get launch control to work etc?
Thank you for all the great work on these tunes!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[FrsDuke]

You can rename the files on your pc before loading them to make it more clear.

Originally Posted by FingR-S

Shiv, I loaded the 2.0 Stage 1 91 Oct tune and everything is working great - as reported by others: smoother acceleration = I would say more linear response than the 1.59 tune. I still have to give another 40 miles or so to get the full effect.

Question: (I've only done this once before)
The files all look the same in their respective folders for example:
In the OTS v2.0 Beta folder/stage 1/Stg 1 700C, the "Stg 1 700C" file looks the same as the "Stage 91oct" folder file called the same "Stg 1 700C"
I want to make sure that I'm viewing the files correctly.
All the maps I uploaded to the OFT look the same "Stg 1 700C".
I went by (remembered) what slot I uploaded them too - 1.59 is in the first slot, 2.0 in the second, and 93oct tune in the third slot - all have the same file name - is this normal?

Since I don't have to reload the 2.01 maps, is there a link to loading the correct XML files - never done it - to get launch control to work etc?
Thank you for all the great work on these tunes!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[FingR-S]

That's easy - wasn't sure that was ok. Thanks FrsDuke!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[wparsons]

^^ This, I rename all mine so it's clear as well.

Put some km's on the stage 1 93 octane tune, noticed something unexpected... even though I filled up with 1/4 tank of 91 left (so not a full tank of 94 octane), I'm getting WAY less mid range knock under load (I always get enough knock when stuck in traffic on the 91 octane tune running 91 octane to drop the IAM down to like 0.5 all the time), with the 93 octane tune the IAM stayed at 1.0 even stuck in traffic with the AC on.

Beyond that, it definitely feels a few hp stronger across the rpm range.

[xxBrun0xx]

Does the 93 stage 1 change anything other than another HP/tq curves? Eg idle speed, Rev limit, pedal position map, etc? Just curious if some of the changes people are noticing are plecebo?