follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-04-2018, 11:31 PM   #1
SorryTires
Member
 
SorryTires's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 15
Thanks: 10
Thanked 9 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
What can you learn from a damping ratio plot?

Hopefully some of the suspension gurus can help me out here. I made a plot of front end damping ratio vs shock velocity for the stock set up and some aftermarket coilovers hoping to make a comparison but i now realize i have no idea what to make of it.

What does having a less over-damped low speed rebound shock do to the cars behaviour?

Having more low speed compression should mean the car will transition quicker and be more responsive right?

What else can you tell from this plot?
Attached Images
 
SorryTires is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2018, 12:49 AM   #2
RJasonKlein
Senior Member
 
RJasonKlein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S 10 Series
Location: Clarendon Hills, IL
Posts: 617
Thanks: 441
Thanked 356 Times in 202 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Good questions, and I’m looking forward to seeing the responses you get.
RJasonKlein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2018, 11:34 AM   #3
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 3,420
Thanked 7,242 Times in 2,963 Posts
Mentioned: 303 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
The "internet numbers" (which aren't perfect) you often see are a 60-70% critically damped, or a 0.6-0.7 damping ratio. If you dig in a little bit, this refers to the low speed piston velocity, or up to about 2 inches per second. After that, a slightly lower damping ratio is often preferred for higher piston speeds (maybe 30%). The idea being that a higher damping ratio is good at lower piston speeds (body roll), while less is preferred for bigger bumps and higher piston speeds. All of this refers to rebound damping, with some recommending maybe 2/3 as much compression damping.

So in a plot like you posted, you'd want to see that particular idea represented by a line that starts out around 0.65 and then smoothly dip to around 0.30. That would indicate a digressive damper.

There are MANY other things to think about. Swaybars matter too, and damping ratio in ride vs bump are separate considerations that require compromise since you only have 4 dampers. You might want different ratios at the rear vs. front of the car. A front engine, rear wheel drive car might perform better with a different set up than a front wheel drive car or all wheel drive car.

Most of the time you'll see numbers higher than that 65% critically damped. Sometimes less, even on a racecar. Different companies have different "philosophies"....maybe lots more compression than rebound, maybe tons of rebound. Some of them are IMO more correct than others.

- Andrew
Racecomp Engineering is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post:
SorryTires (07-05-2018), wparsons (07-05-2018)
Old 07-05-2018, 01:05 PM   #4
jamal
Senior Member
 
jamal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Legacy GT
Location: compton
Posts: 534
Thanks: 9
Thanked 365 Times in 204 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SorryTires View Post
Having more low speed compression should mean the car will transition quicker and be more responsive right?
Actually, the opposite. When loaded, an undamped spring will compress the fastest, and the damper is slowing that down. Too much low speed compression will cause the car to take longer to settle into steady state cornering.

From most of the plots I've seen you kind of need a 3-way to go too far on the low speed comp. Lot of the more inexpensive and 1-way shocks don't have much going on down there.
jamal is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jamal For This Useful Post:
SorryTires (07-05-2018)
Old 07-05-2018, 05:52 PM   #5
SorryTires
Member
 
SorryTires's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 15
Thanks: 10
Thanked 9 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racecomp Engineering View Post
There are MANY other things to think about. Swaybars matter too, and damping ratio in ride vs bump are separate considerations
- Andrew
This is one thing that always bothers me, no one ever sais if their talking about things in roll or bump and you get pretty different numbers depending which you look at. So would you theoretically want a ~0.6 damping ratio for both or does that apply to one more than the other? I know this is a pretty simplistic view of things and im sure the real answer is "it depends"

Edit: just realized i didnt even say which im refering too the plot i posted does not include the sway bar

Last edited by SorryTires; 07-05-2018 at 06:18 PM.
SorryTires is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2018, 11:51 AM   #6
jamal
Senior Member
 
jamal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Legacy GT
Location: compton
Posts: 534
Thanks: 9
Thanked 365 Times in 204 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SorryTires View Post
This is one thing that always bothers me, no one ever sais if their talking about things in roll or bump and you get pretty different numbers depending which you look at. So would you theoretically want a ~0.6 damping ratio for both or does that apply to one more than the other? I know this is a pretty simplistic view of things and im sure the real answer is "it depends"

Edit: just realized i didnt even say which im refering too the plot i posted does not include the sway bar
For ride, a lower damping ratio is more comfortable. So you would want the "0.6 ratio" to apply mostly in roll when you are actually cornering.

But swaybars of course will cause the opposite to happen. Just having swaybars means the ratio will always be higher in ride vs roll.

Probably why the fancy cars have active dampers and hydraulic roll control and whatnot.

Last edited by jamal; 07-06-2018 at 03:55 PM.
jamal is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jamal For This Useful Post:
SorryTires (08-03-2018)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If you post a dyno plot, please, include what the fuel was used. Calum Forced Induction 1 10-12-2015 06:59 PM
Tein active damping? Ludacrits Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 1 11-18-2014 03:13 AM
Plot your oil pressure vs temperature Gords_zenith Mechanical Maintenance (Oil, Fluids, Break-In, Servicing) 1 04-22-2014 06:09 PM
Damping vs Dampening CSG Mike Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 50 02-08-2014 12:02 PM
Sound damping dabocx Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 5 04-01-2013 08:03 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.