10-29-2015, 12:09 AM | #85 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 790 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I have a feeling the cam timing has more to say about that spike in the afr than the maf scale or load limits, so I'll be looking at that more closely.
__________________
Intent > Content
cowardice is the mother of cruelty. |
|
11-01-2015, 10:12 PM | #86 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MI
Posts: 229
Thanks: 140
Thanked 78 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
@Wayno First of all a big thank you for assembling all this information in one place. If DI gives better knock resistance over PFI why did no one adjust the ratio at low speeds to 100% DI? Isn't it at the lower speeds where engine is more knock limited and where the spark efficiency is already bad?
|
11-02-2015, 01:16 AM | #87 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
MAF scale spreadsheet updated with improved scales. Few other minor changes in the roms attached in the sister thread.
__________________
Last edited by Wayno; 12-19-2015 at 04:53 AM. |
12-18-2015, 07:12 PM | #88 |
AutoX Nut
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2022 BRZ
Location: Harrisburg, NC
Posts: 265
Thanks: 75
Thanked 74 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I've been experimenting with load limits to fix that pesky 3000 - 3800 RPM range that always wants to go rich. Has anyone run into an issue where it seems like the load limits you set are ignored? For instance, I know that the load limit I set in the tune is 1.00 at 3800 RPMs, but when I review WOT logs after the fact, I see readings around 1.08 - 1.10 at that RPM point and I'm still a full point too rich.
I know you're probably thinking: "Did you flash the right tune?" And I'm certain that I did because I made changes to the KCA table in my tune and can see that change in my logs. I know that the actual load limit values get extrapolated between the RPM points, but when I have it set to 1.00 at 3800 RPMs, shouldn't I be getting much closer to 1.00 than the 1.08 to 1.10 I'm seeing? Anything else I could be missing? |
12-18-2015, 08:32 PM | #89 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post: | jprice130 (12-19-2015) |
12-18-2015, 08:47 PM | #90 |
AutoX Nut
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2022 BRZ
Location: Harrisburg, NC
Posts: 265
Thanks: 75
Thanked 74 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Thanks Steve. I do understand that the actual load limit values extrapolate/interpolate between the values setup in the tables, but if my load limit table has a specific value of 1.00 at 3800 RPMs (just like one of Wayno's Stg2 UEL tables above), shouldn't I see a value close to that at 3800 RPMs in one of my logs? Instead, my logs are showing a calculated load of almost 1.10 in the 3700 to 3900 RPM range and I'm still very rich.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jprice130 For This Useful Post: | steve99 (12-19-2015) |
12-19-2015, 01:36 AM | #91 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wayno For This Useful Post: | jprice130 (12-19-2015) |
12-19-2015, 01:41 AM | #92 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MI
Posts: 229
Thanks: 140
Thanked 78 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
12-19-2015, 04:10 AM | #93 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
The logged load will always read the true calculated value and does not cap at the load limits. Simple solution, if you're still rich, calculate by how much and reduce the limit by that amount.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post: | jprice130 (12-19-2015) |
12-19-2015, 04:27 AM | #94 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Not in general, only in late model cars.
And it's a real bitch because the value of the final LTFT bracket seems to start at 50g/s but is determined at exactly 60g/s. OTS 98 on AU/EU A01I:: http://www.datazap.me/u/wayne/stg2-u...81-16818-16851 OTS E85 on AU/EU A01I:: http://datazap.me/u/wayne/206-stg2-u...&zoom=893-1084 93 OTS on a US A01D http://datazap.me/u/jbilsky3/cruise-...zoom=6282-6754 Yes, have seen it on MT too, though not in US market. Guide will be updated soon with new LL and some new things.
__________________
Last edited by Wayno; 12-20-2015 at 06:06 AM. |
12-19-2015, 08:33 AM | #95 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MI
Posts: 229
Thanks: 140
Thanked 78 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I see so we can either bump up the 3.2V area and create a negative LTFT at that point or raise up the area of MAF (where the engine runs OL) which would be the tail end of it or alternatively do what @KOdemname47 says which is play with load limits at certain rpms?
|
12-19-2015, 08:38 AM | #96 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MI
Posts: 229
Thanks: 140
Thanked 78 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I dont know how rich and lean folks are seeing out in the field in general. I see this on mine. http://www.datazap.me/u/thambu19/12-...5-16&mark=1230
|
12-19-2015, 04:15 PM | #97 |
AutoX Nut
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2022 BRZ
Location: Harrisburg, NC
Posts: 265
Thanks: 75
Thanked 74 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Thanks for the help gentlemen. Over the course of a few tweaks and reflashes this afternoon, I finally got actual AFR to more closely follow the commanded AFR. I ended up dropping the load limit at 3800 RPMs to 0.93 and also made a few MAF scale adjustments in the 3.2 - 4.30 MAFv range.
|
12-28-2015, 04:08 PM | #98 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 53
Thanks: 15
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Hello all, I'm running Shiv's v2.07 Stg 2 UEL e85 tune and my mods are Gruppe-S UEL and K&N high flow filter. Everything else is stock. Below is my data log. Does it seem to be running rich? It goes down to 11.5 or so. Any tweaks I should do?
I use Propel e85 found in Socal which is pretty consistent year round I've heard and is usually above e80. Thanks! http://datazap.me/u/brzf/log-1451202...12&zoom=67-229 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Maximum weight in the trunk? | djmm | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 20 | 08-13-2015 11:40 AM |
“Maximum Attack” Scion FR-S | stugray | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 13 | 02-01-2015 08:45 PM |
PA: Rays Gram Light 57 Maximum 5x100, 17x8, +43 (Price Reduced!) | Needs more cowbell | Wheels and Tires | 20 | 02-22-2013 10:03 AM |
MAXIMUM you would pay for a TRD Supercharger installed? | FRiSson | Forced Induction | 24 | 11-04-2012 01:08 AM |
MR-S Effect... | Dimman | CANADA | 11 | 09-06-2011 11:49 AM |