|
Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
04-22-2015, 12:34 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Why a balanced setup is better than a "understeery" setup.
This is a snapshot of data being taken from two different cars at the "Sweeper" at Buttonwillow Raceway Park, which is a flat, 180 degree turn. The lines are as follows:
- GPS Speed (Speed as determined by GPS, not by the car's ECU) - Steering angle in degrees - Gas pedal input (in percent from none to WOT) - Lateral acceleration as determined by GPS (Lateral G's) - Rate of yaw, as determined by GPS (yaw rate in degrees per second) - Lap time differential between the green and blue traces The first thing to note, is that the green car is slower through the entire corner (graph 1); the corner is identified by the red line at the top of the graph labeled "16". The second thing to note, is that the green car reaches peak cornering grip (graphs 4 and 5) at about 80 degrees of steering input (graph 3), whereas the blue car only requires about 60 degrees of steering input. Even with less steering input, the blue car actually maintains higher cornering grip (compare the green and blue lines on graphs 4 and 5)!! The time gained by the blue car is shown by the differential dropping in graph 6. Even though the Green car is on the throttle more through the second half of the corner, it actually makes the understeer worse, and the blue car is able to go faster! The Green car is representative of coilovers that utilize the same spring rates front and rear, or have a small stagger with the rear being larger. The Blue car is representative of cars that utilize coilovers that have a 20-25% higher spring rate in the rear. |
The Following 23 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | 8R6 (04-22-2015), BatStig (04-22-2015), bedabi (04-22-2015), Canehda (04-22-2015), car_roll (04-22-2015), D.Scrye (04-24-2015), Dimman (04-23-2015), Doozer (04-22-2015), JB86'd (04-22-2015), Jesse36m3 (04-23-2015), JohnJuan (04-23-2015), mkivsoopra (04-22-2015), mokinbird87 (07-01-2015), PWBRZ (04-23-2015), sittinSideways (04-28-2015), Sleepless (04-22-2015), solidONE (04-28-2015), srizzors25 (04-23-2015), Totality (05-26-2015), Ultramaroon (04-22-2015), Wayno (05-02-2015), whataboutbob (04-23-2015), wparsons (04-22-2015) |
04-22-2015, 12:58 AM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: gt86...among others
Location: edis rehto eht
Posts: 110
Thanks: 61
Thanked 176 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
racing gods live deep in corners
|
|
04-22-2015, 01:02 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 2014 BRZ
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 639
Thanks: 299
Thanked 392 Times in 229 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Nothing like braking with front tires while getting on the gas
__________________
|
04-22-2015, 02:12 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: Fairfield/San Bruno, CA
Posts: 131
Thanks: 25
Thanked 81 Times in 47 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Mike why are you so cool?! Lol
Great info man! |
04-22-2015, 02:20 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 1993 Impreza w/ WRX Swap + FWD!
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,071
Thanks: 217
Thanked 951 Times in 500 Posts
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'm becoming a firm believer of this.
Now, what are the best options that take advantage of this? |
04-22-2015, 02:38 AM | #6 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
For example, you can take ANY suspension, and literally "hack" the balance together by changing the spring rates. But, then the dampers wont match the springs. Or, you can change the sways to change the effective spring at the wheel, but again, dampers. The real problem, is that unless a 1 way system is very carefully designed to be balanced (and there's none that I'm aware of on the market for this car, or most cars for that matter), you need at least a two way damper, so that you can change springs to taste, and still be able to critically damp the springs. Also, most cars understeer from the factory. This is done intentionally by design, because the natural tendencies of the average driver suits understeer better than balance or oversteer. This is also why rates of 10k/12k were selected as our default for the CSG-Spec SRCs. Not only does it balance the car, it lets you use your tires and fuel more efficiently. However, we do also acknowledge that "balance" means that without a lot of experience, it's very easy to unintentionally make the car rotate (spin), so rates of 9k/10k are recommended with the CSG-SRCs, for the less hardcore drivers. Furthermore, some setups actually require MORE static rotation. @ImperiousRex's BRZ with JRZs for example, was set up by CSG to utilize 9k/11k spring rates, which would normally result in a car that wants to oversteer everywhere. However, the car's geometry, sway bar rates, and aero were all simultaneously tuned to work in conjunction, resulting in a beautifully balanced car that is still the fastest privately owned track FRS/BRZ in North America. This type of balance can be achieved with most mid-grade and higher 2 way dampers. |
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | 8R6 (04-22-2015), BatStig (04-22-2015), Dimman (04-23-2015), Kostamojen (04-22-2015), Scottemad123 (04-22-2015) |
04-22-2015, 07:50 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 DGM Subaru BRZ (Subie #9)
Location: ATL, US
Posts: 2,667
Thanks: 123
Thanked 860 Times in 552 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Are these cars using the exact same tires?
|
04-22-2015, 10:12 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: BRZ
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 845
Thanks: 677
Thanked 396 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to fika84 For This Useful Post: | Racecomp Engineering (04-22-2015) |
04-22-2015, 10:56 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: '13 BRZ Ltd
Location: PA
Posts: 458
Thanks: 265
Thanked 229 Times in 117 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Nice data, thank you. What is the rest of the setup like for the cars? Tires, bars, dampers, alignment/camber, absolute spring rates/stiffness, aero, ride height?
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wepeel For This Useful Post: | Racecomp Engineering (04-22-2015) |
04-22-2015, 11:46 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Tsk tsk. -alex |
|
04-22-2015, 01:02 PM | #11 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
- Tires don't change the static balance of the cars. However, having more grip than what the car itself can readily overcome can hide handling imbalances. In this case, both cars used comparable (but not identical) tires. - Both cars are on stock sway bars. - The balance is determined by spring rate at the wheels, not the dampers. You can FORCE a change in balance by *reducing* grip at an axle, by using incorrect dampers. While the damper models are different, both cars were critically damped. - Both cars had alignments to maximize on-track performance. Alignments were slightly different to accommodate spring rates, but are within a few tenths. Both cars have zero toe front and rear. - I unfortunately cannot disclose the absolute spring rates without potentially revealing the coilover models. This post is purely to demonstrate the difference between a balanced spring rate f/r versus a common "front spring heavy" car. - Both cars have zero aero. - Ride heights were set to manufacturer recommended heights. |
|
04-22-2015, 01:05 PM | #12 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Comparable, but not identical tires. I am the driver in both cars. Both cars are mildly modified, but none of those modifications, IMO, have any significant impact on the car's behavior in static corners. For example, one car could be turbo, but that extra power wouldn't change how the car takes a 180 degree, flat surface turn, unless you were drifting. Both cars are NA, and lack sufficient power to hold a drift at that speed. |
|
04-22-2015, 01:06 PM | #13 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,530
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I was supposed to take the BRZ as a support car... but budget issues... |
|
04-22-2015, 01:07 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: BRZ
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 845
Thanks: 677
Thanked 396 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Right on! Sounds like a great comparison. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Entire P&L Stage 1 Turbo Setup - Turn key Setup ready to make 400+whp | PrimeMotoring | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 8 | 10-30-2015 06:36 AM |
FS: Michelin X-Ice and Sport Design 17" Winter Setup | Jay H | Wheels and Tires | 5 | 10-31-2014 12:08 PM |
(Back up!) FS in FL: Drag DR-31 17x9" Square setup 5x100 (or 5x114.3) +38 | Kido1986 | Wheels and Tires | 5 | 01-10-2013 03:21 PM |
FS in FL: Drag DR-31 17x9" Square setup 5x100 (or 5x114.3) +38 | GTB/ZR-1 | Wheels and Tires | 1 | 12-06-2012 07:22 AM |
Thoughts on a "component" setup with a 3.5" dash and 6.5" door setup? | PatrickSAN | Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment | 22 | 11-14-2012 02:12 PM |