|
Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-29-2018, 01:48 AM | #1 |
NotNewToImports
Join Date: Jun 2017
Drives: 2018 Subaru BRZ WRB PP
Location: Holly, MI
Posts: 115
Thanks: 74
Thanked 54 Times in 32 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Theoretical header selection mathematics
I’m working through some decisions for header selection. It looks like most headers have a primary tube diameter of 42.5mm or 45mm (interestingly the OEM exhaust manifold primary tubes are similar: 42.7 for ’13-’16 and 45mm for ‘17+). After some online reading, it seems that primary tube diameter has a strong influence on what RPM is targeted for torque improvement. The formula is: Peak torque rpm = Primary pipe area x 88,200 / displacement of one cylinder. I assumed a 16 ga wall thickness of 1/16” (1.5875mm). Using that formula, the RPMs where torque is improved appears to be 2300 for 42.5 and 2466 for 45mm. The torque dip starts at around 3,000. Perhaps I’m missing something here, but the primary sizing seems ill-matched to our application.
__________________
2023 GR86 Neptune M6 Premium (being built)
2014 Z51 Corvette, M7 heads/cams/headers/Corsa exhaust. 523WHP (Sold) 2018 Subaru BRZ Limited/WRB/PP: TRD Intake, JDL UEL/FP/OP, Perrrin Resonated 2.5" (SOLD) |
08-29-2018, 02:26 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Imho header runners length does more to optimization/best scavenging to certain rpm ranges then inner diameter of runners. Diameter .. i'd probably care (a very little) only in high power forced induction builds.
|
08-29-2018, 03:23 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
An increase in diameter plays an important role. Check the difference in torque of the OEM exhaust manifold before and after the revision:
Blue color: before the revision Red color: after the revision The difference in power is 7 PS (JDM cars had before the revision 200 PS and after the revision 207 PS). I never understood why the NA cars got 5 PS. The increase in torque has been measured also just by switching the exhaust manifold and get a tune. You don't need the red intake manifold or the other (internal) engine revisions. |
08-29-2018, 04:07 AM | #4 |
The Dictater
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: '13 Red Scion FRS
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 9,432
Thanks: 26,115
Thanked 12,433 Times in 6,148 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Question 1, what is the source of that formula? It seems overly simple to provide an rpm at which the headers are most efficient. A whole lot of assumptions went into that 88200 constant which may not be appropriate for the dimensions, etc of the twins.
I'm going to hazard a guess as to what that constant includes and say that RPM is, assuming all prior assumptions are correct, a primary frequency of the header. Meaning that the header scavenging is most efficient at 2300RPM and every 2300 RPM after that. Also keep in mind that the FA20 has vvt on the intake and exhaust cams, so the tune plays a factor as well. Edit: On second thought, my guess was incorrect. I should actually stop trying to think this late... Last edited by Spuds; 08-29-2018 at 04:28 AM. |
08-29-2018, 04:34 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,067 Times in 775 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
second you can t use that bad made/low resolution dyno graph to estabilish that those gains are because of the new header. It s header + manifold + tune, and i bet you could get even bigger numbers withouth the mods of the revised models, but just a well done tune you desperately want to justify the enormous amount of money you spent for that heavy and useless header you bought from japan, but the reality is the gain you had are just because of the cosworth tune and not from the header that still has the huge cat that blocks the gas flow and stops the timings at the same level as the older one |
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to tomm.brz For This Useful Post: | MrSkubi (08-29-2018), shu5892001 (08-29-2018), Subsonic (08-29-2018), Tristor (08-29-2018), Trueweltall (08-31-2018) |
08-29-2018, 05:04 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I might be wrong, but IIRC gains in MY2017 came more from better stock tune. As in there was less on plate to gain with aftermarket tune on later generation, vs tuning ecu on older cars. I wouldn't freely single out slight header changes as THE reason of gains and would be extra careful when there were several things changed at same time, eg. less resistance airfilter, slightly different intake manifold, slightly different exhaust header, different ecu tune. If anything, imho most MT kouki gains come from tune & airfilter (as AT kouki-s with old airfilterbox are still 200hp).
But if we are look only when one component changes, eg. between different aftermarket headers, then main differences in curve looked not from ID of runners (most aftermarket ones had larger ID then stock), but rather from runner lengths (eg. short runner headers, UEL headers, long tube headers like ACE's or Nameless, or different overpipe part lengths (150/250/350) for misc. ACE's headers) |
The Following User Says Thank You to churchx For This Useful Post: | tomm.brz (08-29-2018) |
08-29-2018, 05:28 AM | #7 |
NotNewToImports
Join Date: Jun 2017
Drives: 2018 Subaru BRZ WRB PP
Location: Holly, MI
Posts: 115
Thanks: 74
Thanked 54 Times in 32 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Setting aside the dubious validity of the formula I used, there had to be a functional reason Subaru went from a primary tube diameter of 42.7 to 45mm. I agree that it's far too simplistic to attribute that single change to the power increase for the 2017's. But also, I am disinclined to merit the bulk of power increase to calibration changes. They changed the airbox, intake manifold, valves, exhaust, etc...To be honest, the number of things that they changed/tweaked is out of proportion to the actual power increase. Regardless, it seems that the increase in the primary tubing had a reason, and I'd like to learn about it before I buy a header (not that there are that many options. JDL is the only one with the larger diameter, 44.5 mm, the rest appear to be 42.7mm). At this point, I suppose it's just a case of academic curiosity.
__________________
2023 GR86 Neptune M6 Premium (being built)
2014 Z51 Corvette, M7 heads/cams/headers/Corsa exhaust. 523WHP (Sold) 2018 Subaru BRZ Limited/WRB/PP: TRD Intake, JDL UEL/FP/OP, Perrrin Resonated 2.5" (SOLD) |
08-29-2018, 06:12 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
If you look after "which aftermarket header provides most gains", then i'd look for diminishing ordered list by features by their importance like: 1) if header is catless or catted, 2) how good ecu tune is optimized for it, 3) header generic construction (UEL/EL) & runners length, 4) ID / runner merge angle / radius of bends / shape of collector / quality of welds. I moved ID to last as playing (relatively) little role in performance. First three bits are much more important.
|
08-29-2018, 06:27 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2002 VX Commodore SS LS1 Auto
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Correct header design for NA is the most "not thought through" modification out there, one size does not fit all applications.
ACE headers are on the ball with there designs, albeit a quite expensive venture. I am currenty trying to find a header to suit my daily driver duties with non competitive motorkhana thrown in. I'm thining long tube EL 4:1, maybe, I'm still trying to figure it out and find a seller that doesn't want my kidney. I also don't want 304, it needs to be either 321 or mild steel. I've never had luck eith 304 headers, they always ended up cracking. |
08-29-2018, 06:48 AM | #10 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And if you want some history of the revised exhaust manifold, a catless version was tested in the Nurburging 24h races back in 2014. The first car that got it afterwards was the GRMN 86. The difference is that it has perfectly equal length (the first one was close, but not exactly equal) and the diameter is increased further. The catless version gives for sure better results, but the cat converter does not cancel the better design. The cost was high to justify a new exhaust manifold for zero gains. I've seen the parts and apart from the manifold they had to create also an entirely new heat shield. |
|||
08-29-2018, 06:48 AM | #11 | |
Human
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2015 BRZ Black
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 207
Thanks: 105
Thanked 102 Times in 67 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Some other members have had headers crack and break because they use stock engine mounts on boosted applications.
__________________
"Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done, and why. Then do it." - The Notebooks of Lazarus Long
|
|
08-29-2018, 06:56 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nikitopo For This Useful Post: | Prodigalson (08-29-2018) |
08-29-2018, 07:04 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
08-29-2018, 07:22 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2013 frs red
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,517
Thanks: 2,520
Thanked 3,088 Times in 1,654 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Don't over think this. There are plenty of reviews here to base your decision on. It's a cheap sports car, not the space shuttle.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Theoretical Spring Rate Discussion | x808drifter | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 18 | 02-28-2017 11:29 PM |
Tire selection? | ChrisP | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 1 | 01-26-2016 12:47 PM |
Turbo selection | cdrazic93 | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 6 | 07-14-2014 09:40 AM |
Need help with wheel selection | Spencer Strayer | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 1 | 03-12-2013 03:15 PM |
Muffler selection... | jm1681 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 24 | 09-28-2012 08:16 PM |