Innovate Motorsports Twin Screw Supercharger Kit for FR-S/BRZ

[JoeBoxer]

Originally Posted by mines13

The car as has been tuned both on the dyno and the street. John has been working on a lot of drive ability tuning both last night and today. We want to make sure it is super polished, more to come.

Give these guys a ballpark before somebody has a seizure

[nonicname]

Originally Posted by fenton

Are you kidding me!

Okay you can keep your 200hp at 6000 rpm.... do you know how disappointing a massive torque dive feels in a car?? This car only makes HP because it can rev out nicely.

Try driving a 1.8t jetta for mazda speed3. Huge torque but at 5000 rpm they are all out of idea's.

You peak tq out at say 3000 rpm and its all downhill from there and it is just a miserable feeling reving it out.

I own an MK6 GTI and it has the same 200hp as the FRS but it puts you on your sit all day long, it feels amazing because of the torque delivery and I can pass mini vans all day long in almost any gear. the torque on the FRS is useless outside the track. if I could ask for a perfect car it would be the FRS with the GTI engine. yup 6k redline.

[xxscaxx]

By the time info is released, my blue balls are going to be the size of grapefruits

[d1ck]

Here's my guess for it. (Made from the hp chart posted earlier in this thread.) @Visconti how close am I?

[RedLeader]

Originally Posted by nonicname

I own an MK6 GTI and it has the same 200hp as the FRS but it puts you on your sit all day long, it feels amazing because of the torque delivery and I can pass mini vans all day long in almost any gear. the torque on the FRS is useless outside the track. if I could ask for a perfect car it would be the FRS with the GTI engine. yup 6k redline.

There is a noticeable loss of torque out of the 2.0TSI motor at around 5500rpm. While the stock motor is acceptable and produces about 50lb-ft more torque than the FRS/BRZ, the GTI really needs the bigger K04 turbo from the S3 or the new Golf R to be truly impressive. None of this engine stuff changes the fact that the GTI is 600 pounds heavier than the FRS, and handles like a minivan.

That being said, I want the DSG transmission from my old MKV GTI in the FRS. THAT would make my nether bits swell with pride and other feelings of joy


Back on topic: I can't wait to hear this wondrous whine from the front of my FRS.

[rice_classic]

Originally Posted by nonicname

I own an MK6 GTI and it has the same 200hp as the FRS but it puts you on your sit all day long, it feels amazing because of the torque delivery and I can pass mini vans all day long in almost any gear. the torque on the FRS is useless outside the track. if I could ask for a perfect car it would be the FRS with the GTI engine. yup 6k redline.

Huh, you went in the opposite direction of me. I'd like the F20C in my FRS. 240hp and 9000rpms... uh yes please.

[fenton]

Originally Posted by RedLeader

There is a noticeable loss of torque out of the 2.0TSI motor at around 5500rpm. While the stock motor is acceptable and produces about 50lb-ft more torque than the FRS/BRZ, the GTI really needs the bigger K04 turbo from the S3 or the new Golf R to be truly impressive. None of this engine stuff changes the fact that the GTI is 600 pounds heavier than the FRS, and handles like a minivan.

That being said, I want the DSG transmission from my old MKV GTI in the FRS. THAT would make my nether bits swell with pride and other feelings of joy


Back on topic: I can't wait to hear this wondrous whine from the front of my FRS.

Plus a million. Agree 100 percent. Its got nice torque for passing minivans in 6th gear but it drops off substantially after 5000 Rpm. The problem gets worse when you add more power without replacing the turbo. Huge torque lump and then nothing. Feels like you are going backwards at times.

I have lots of experience with the mk6 gti with stage 1....drove it on many occasions and the punch down low is impressive but it didn't like to be reved. Really like the golf r though. Different turbo really makes the top end fun.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

[2forme]

Originally Posted by rice_classic

Huh, you went in the opposite direction of me. I'd like the F20C in my FRS. 240hp and 9000rpms... uh yes please.

and the inability to get up a hill without vtec LOL.

[nonicname]

Originally Posted by RedLeader

There is a noticeable loss of torque out of the 2.0TSI motor at around 5500rpm. While the stock motor is acceptable and produces about 50lb-ft more torque than the FRS/BRZ, the GTI really needs the bigger K04 turbo from the S3 or the new Golf R to be truly impressive. None of this engine stuff changes the fact that the GTI is 600 pounds heavier than the FRS, and handles like a minivan.

That being said, I want the DSG transmission from my old MKV GTI in the FRS. THAT would make my nether bits swell with pride and other feelings of joy


Back on topic: I can't wait to hear this wondrous whine from the front of my FRS.

I enjoy my full boost at 1,800rpm. big turbo mean nasty lag. No thanks!

[sw20kosh]

Originally Posted by nonicname

I enjoy my full boost at 1,800rpm. big turbo mean nasty lag. No thanks!

To each their own. Have fun passing those mini vans!

[fenton]

Originally Posted by nonicname

I enjoy my full boost at 1,800rpm. big turbo mean nasty lag. No thanks!

Yes 14 psi at 2000rpm and only 8 at redline. Have fun with that. Its on the opposite end of the spectrum from the FRS. Its more akin to a lazy v8, handles like one too.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

[rice_classic]

Originally Posted by 2forme

and the inability to get up a hill without vtec LOL.

You're hyperbole is both bereft of venom and abundant with mediocrity.

I expect more from you 2forme!

[nonicname]

I prefer butt dyno over real dyno ANY DAY.
besides butt dyno is all you'll ever get with this SC cuz you'll NEVER see a dyno.

[mines13]

Originally Posted by nonicname

I prefer butt dyno over real dyno ANY DAY.
besides butt dyno is all you'll ever get with this SC cuz you'll NEVER see a dyno.

In other news, my car.