Evolution of 86 build.

[sav]

Originally Posted by Fish Eagle

Interesting. I've heard nothing bad about Unichip, and my experience is all positive, but who knows - YMMV



Are you insinuating that I'm an old fart and that I resist change?

OK, you're right...

Haha sorry, no I was referring to the tuners actually.

[sav]

Originally Posted by African

Your ECU stores your data on an EPROM or EEPROM. Tweaking any data is modifying it. Flashing the ECU is the term used to load this modification to your ECU. So I do undertand the difference and it was used in correct context.


As for these gains, be so kind and supply a SABS calibration certificate on dyna in questions, less than 6 months old. That is engineering standard for measuring anything. You are measuring something ...... but you are not measuring actual kW output. The reason why the dyna ask for model and make of vehicle ...they have a base of what the output should be and they use that. The gain is relative to you original input.


As for volumetric efficiency ...... you cannot change that by anything but getting more air and fuel into the cylinder. FI is one option, gas flowing, better air filtration flow and xhaust with better scavenging and even cams ...can and will change volumetric efficiency at a specific rpm.


Volumetric efficiency is a physics term and is constrained by physic laws ...not some ECU code unless it affects air volume intake on each cycle with additional fuel ....... like turbo boost


Thump your chest all you want, get indignant ...bottom line no evidence of any claims apart from uncalibrated dyna graphs are given as fact

You know what they say - there are none as blind as those who refuse to see. Or something like that.

[Fish Eagle]

Originally Posted by sav

Haha sorry, no I was referring to the tuners actually.

And I was pulling your chain oom.

[African]

To put some clarity ...any of these tweaked NA 86's done 0-100 and 1/4 miles before and after ...... with those gains ...... the improvement should be significant. Nothing to gippo ...just cold hard timed results


And this is where the men are separated from the boys. I doubt any will step forward with the above.

[African]

Originally Posted by sav

You know what they say - there are none as blind as those who refuse to see. Or something like that.

Or in most cases ..ignorance is bliss


Funny how this lack of fact doesn't bother many. First sign you don't know what you are talking about when you don't quote/stop quoting fact and start personal comments

[Ryan86]

Originally Posted by African

Or in most cases ..ignorance is bliss


Funny how this lack of fact doesn't bother many. First sign you don't know what you are talking about when you don't quote/stop quoting fact and start personal comments

I cant understand why you finding it hard to believe the facts put forward to you.
there is no reason for any of us to publish figures.
here facts based on my personal car with dyno charts to back every mod.

base - 115wkw
add DIF - 119wkw
add BRZ zorst - 122wkw (this test i can say was not 100% as I did new sw upgrade from Toyota but the gains were noticed mid)
add Header - 126wkw no tune
add tune - 133wkw

all the above same dyno on 95 ron, tried to keep consistant temperatures on the coast.
you will be if you had to take on a 139wkw NA against your RGM SC, just cant get rid of it.

anyway, Im a noob....

[sav]

Originally Posted by Fish Eagle

And I was pulling your chain oom.

Dammit!!

[Dammod]

Originally Posted by Ryan86

I cant understand why you finding it hard to believe the facts put forward to you.
there is no reason for any of us to publish figures.
here facts based on my personal car with dyno charts to back every mod.

base - 115wkw
add DIF - 119wkw
add BRZ zorst - 122wkw (this test i can say was not 100% as I did new sw upgrade from Toyota but the gains were noticed mid)
add Header - 126wkw no tune
add tune - 133wkw

all the above same dyno on 95 ron, tried to keep consistant temperatures on the coast.
you will be if you had to take on a 139wkw NA against your RGM SC, just cant get rid of it.

anyway, Im a noob....

Agreed...we are all just here to help the community...not reason for us to post BS figures.

[Ryan86]

Originally Posted by African

To put some clarity ...any of these tweaked NA 86's done 0-100 and 1/4 miles before and after ...... with those gains ...... the improvement should be significant. Nothing to gippo ...just cold hard timed results


And this is where the men are separated from the boys. I doubt any will step forward with the above.

actually we have video footage as hard proof of a certain red NA tuned 86 in Durban out run
GTI
ST
MPs
RS

and yes we have hard timed results at the Empangeni Drags.

[sav]

[Fish Eagle]

Originally Posted by Ryan86

you will be if you had to take on a 139wkw NA against your RGM SC, just cant get rid of it.

Really???
Hey Ryan, I think you're smoking the wrong stuff mate.

How's that for non-vitor... non-vytri... non-vitrio... whatever the clever guy said we're good at

[FT_86_SM_GP]

Originally Posted by Ryan86

add BRZ zorst - 122wkw (this test i can say was not 100% as I did new sw upgrade from Toyota but the gains were noticed mid)

Is there a Software upgrade available at Toyota? Is there any spesific request we can make during our services to get this software added?

[Ryan86]

Originally Posted by Fish Eagle

Really???
Hey Ryan, I think you're smoking the wrong stuff mate.

How's that for non-vitor... non-vytri... non-vitrio... whatever the clever guy said we're good at

Hey Andy, I know I smoke Dirbin poison
This is no exageration, a certain Anban-ZN is scaring the local turbos. Im not refering to tuned turbos they kill an 86.

[Ryan86]

Originally Posted by FT_86_SM_GP

Is there a Software upgrade available at Toyota? Is there any spesific request we can make during our services to get this software added?

if you bought your car pre Feb 2013, Toyota issued a SW upgrade for the injector seal problems.