|
Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting What these cars were built for! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
12-07-2012, 10:35 PM | #29 | |
Site Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
My RWD experience is more limited to stock, or lightly modified setups (coilovers/swaybars) and I've never had to spend the time really sorting it out.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback DD: 2005 Acura TSX Tow: 2022 F-450 Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles |
|
12-10-2012, 12:32 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Asphalt
Location: Brookville PA
Posts: 345
Thanks: 1
Thanked 223 Times in 108 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
FWD and RWD are not the same. You can drive a loose FWD fast because it turns in better, but you can literally pull is straight with throttle (especially if you have a limited slip).
If the rear of a RWD moves around too much, that option is not there. Now I'll happily admit that you can get away with one of these cars looser than say a Corvette. Not as much power to get you in trouble. However by the same token that lack of power means if you get sideways it's speed scrubbed you can never get back. What you want is balance, pure balance. This is something that has been a problem getting the "subaru" guys to understand. While the car is a Subaru mostly, it's not like a WRX or an STi, or what have you. It's not super nose heavy, it's not AWD.. no front wheel drive to help fix things. |
12-10-2012, 01:12 PM | #31 |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
We successfully tested 10/12 springs this weekend. We're going to test 12/14 next weekend, but we're worried that it may overload our skinny street tires...
Car was very neutral after the dampers were dialed in; I can cause under/oversteer with purely steering and/or throttle input, with zero power adders. |
12-10-2012, 03:07 PM | #32 |
Dodging cones
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ Limited, 93 Z28
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,202
Thanks: 264
Thanked 278 Times in 176 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
What do you guys feel the limit of the stock dampers, performance wise, is with springrates? Most aggressive I've found is 250/250 from RCE. Debating between that Swift's springs but they have stiffer rear and softer front than the RCEs...
__________________
|
12-10-2012, 03:34 PM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Asphalt
Location: Brookville PA
Posts: 345
Thanks: 1
Thanked 223 Times in 108 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I am a pretty firm believer in not making the springs any stiffer than necessary. The best mechanical grip comes from having the car softer... until you run into issues with a poor contact patch, etc. Once I get where I've got a really good loaded contact patch that spreads the load across the entire tire, I don't want the car any stiffer in spring rate. I'm sure what I find tolerable is different here in Western PA than what you might in SoCal given the climate and the roads. To each his own. I know that I've run against cars with double my rates and sometimes more, and came out the winner. They clearly thought they needed more rate, I didn't. YMMV. |
|
12-10-2012, 03:37 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Asphalt
Location: Brookville PA
Posts: 345
Thanks: 1
Thanked 223 Times in 108 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Nobody will have a for sure answer. Lots will tell you that the stock stuff is fine to X, but not have anything to back that up other than "it drives fine". And being honest, that's the trouble here. I think a lot of stock cars had dampers that were severely lacking too, even brand new (this isn't *that* bad mind you), but the OE thought they were fine. What a shock can "handle" is largely a matter of when you the owner considers it to be out of whack. Trouble is most folks don't know a lack of damping when they feel it... until they feel what something better is, then it's very clear. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sam Strano For This Useful Post: | seven (01-09-2013) |
12-10-2012, 04:39 PM | #35 | |
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Different environment, different recommendations. Perhaps we should split the discussion into a AutoX and Track thread, as the setups will diverge more and more as cars are developed. |
|
12-10-2012, 04:59 PM | #36 | |
Quote:
For an OE shock they aren't bad. With Subaru we're used to complete crap, so we can tell when they put even a little more effort in which they have done for this car and to a lesser extent the most recent STI. To be clear there is tons of room for improvement from a Koni or maybe a Bilstein sport later. But with just our springs and shortened bumpstops, it's a good match to the valving. Not bouncy or harsh, and around 65-70% critically damped. A little more low-speed damping would be nice, but with our springs vs. stock on OE dampers you'll come out ahead with our springs. - Andrew |
||
The Following User Says Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post: | seven (01-09-2013) |
12-10-2012, 05:08 PM | #37 |
Site Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
|
RCE: Most tried to stick with the stock softer front/stiffer rear setup would be my guess. I found stiffer than 250lb/in rear springs to work fine, no damper issues at all and the dampers handled the rate well enough (as well as I'd expect them to).
I'll be done with my stock dampers soon
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback DD: 2005 Acura TSX Tow: 2022 F-450 Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles |
12-10-2012, 05:18 PM | #38 |
12-10-2012, 05:22 PM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: VortechSC,BorlaEL,Perrin,GCRace
Location: HighHeatHighAltitudeAZ,USA
Posts: 2,254
Thanks: 458
Thanked 669 Times in 394 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
250/250 is fine with stock tires. What are they 500+ treadwear? Sure stock dampers work.
Even as you go to a 200TW tire, you start to really lean into things with stock coils. Dampers get worked harder. They work fine, tho. Just by going to a stiffer coil theres lots to be gained, especially if you keep the same exact bias front to rear, as was the case with my BRZ and H&R. Fine for DD. But in HPDE< you can feel the under dampening with stiffer coils and realize there is more to be gained by modding past the stock point, it means committing to the next class up, but oh well. If you must stay with stock dampers, I see RCE as a no brainer, if coils are what you want for track use. If you want a DD, you may consider the HR option, the supersports are fun, and handle great. As you add FI power, I think brakes, and stuff like squat and dive need to be addressed a bit differently. Hard to compete with a well designed coilover solution if you ask me, spring versatility is key for me. Once I go to something like a stickier R-DOT tires, I will take a whirl at 440 front 430 rear for driveable track setup. I am sure there may be benefit stiffer still, but I wanna keep try my fillings in my mouth before going any stiffer, should not really be required at my recreational level. My earlier post is a great departure point for most folks, 375/430 allows for DD more comfortably, where youre not standing on the brakes just before going into a hairpin corner at full speed all day. Stiffer front sway bar, rear sway set on softest setting or may even need to redrill a hole.. Welcome feedback from the vendors posting above |
12-10-2012, 05:30 PM | #40 |
Site Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
|
Yeah I think I'm going to test 350/400 on Multi Pro R2's as a first attempt. ERS coils are cheap so I can test more options as needed
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback DD: 2005 Acura TSX Tow: 2022 F-450 Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles |
12-10-2012, 06:27 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Subaru BRZ Limited 6MT
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 2,432
Thanks: 712
Thanked 954 Times in 545 Posts
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I know we are both waiting on these. Do you know if they have released info on the default spring rates? I know last I heard they were still determining what that was going to be.
__________________
Innovate Supercharged Black Limited BRZ 6-Speed MT(Build Thread)
2010 Cadillac CTS-V Sedan M6 w/550whp (Build Thread) |
12-10-2012, 06:37 PM | #42 |
Site Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
|
I know them and pricing (msrp, not map/street pricing) but I'm not sure if they've been released. I'll check my emails and see if I can post them up.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback DD: 2005 Acura TSX Tow: 2022 F-450 Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Basic tech info: spring rates, rear suspension, motion ratios, and you. | Racecomp Engineering | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 77 | 07-08-2022 02:56 PM |
Finance Rates on the FR-S? | mickey177 | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 33 | 05-10-2012 01:18 AM |
Rates are out !!! | FR | CANADA | 24 | 05-04-2012 04:15 AM |
Finance Rates | Enemies | CANADA | 16 | 05-02-2012 07:01 PM |
Weird GT 86 factory spring rates in GT5? | Spec-Al | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 36 | 03-27-2012 02:30 PM |