04-18-2018, 01:20 AM | #127 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
And about the 6% accleration increase, it was related to a lightweight flywheel and not a pulley. You are suposed to work for years in the automotive industry and you should know better. The factory flywheel is designed to be heavy for storing kinetic energy and absorb vibrations in low speeds. If your car is not a daily driver and you don't drive much in town, then you can go for a lighter one without any compromises. |
|
04-18-2018, 01:48 AM | #128 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: Crapcan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11,172
Thanks: 18,174
Thanked 16,334 Times in 7,386 Posts
Mentioned: 108 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Why couldn't you have a two door and a four door that had the same rear sub frame, suspension and drive components. Front sub frame, suspension and steering components. Same transmission, same engine? If the main component attachment points are of similar dimensions, the cars become Lego's. The term "platform" is kind of a broad term. |
|
04-18-2018, 03:23 AM | #129 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Yes, but this has been done by Subaru for decades. For example you could swap without issue components between a Forester and a WRX STI and in fact the factory has done this quite often in their limited editions. It is not something really new. If what they realy mean now as a "global" platform is to have for example a single CVT and place it in all the models , when in the past you had a 5-MT, a 6-MT, a 4-AT, a 5-AT and a CVT then I don't really see it as a progress. It is as you said trying to play Lego, but now with fewer pieces and much less diversity. |
|
04-18-2018, 06:43 AM | #130 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,285 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
|
|
04-18-2018, 07:26 AM | #131 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
04-18-2018, 07:48 AM | #132 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,285 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
|
There are several thousand articles about the change on the internet. Go read them.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
|
04-18-2018, 08:20 AM | #133 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '15 BRZ RA
Location: Greece
Posts: 3,787
Thanks: 2,416
Thanked 1,944 Times in 1,261 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The only real thing I can see is the statement that Subaru’s two plants in Japan and the one plant in the U.S. will be able to build all their vehicles on one assembly line. Anything else is not really related with the "global" platform and it is more relevant with the next generation platform. What I can see by doing this is just giving more resources to the U.S. plant since this is their biggest market currently, but with the expense of less diversity. Before this, I don't believe there was any issue with the two plants in Japan. Don't compare Subaru with other automakers. They were quite small and very localised and they knew already about scale economy. |
|
04-19-2018, 08:35 AM | #134 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '12 C63 P31, '23 GRC
Location: NC
Posts: 3,200
Thanks: 2,935
Thanked 2,072 Times in 1,185 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Can we please get back on topic?
1) This is wonderful news if true. 2) I really hope they stay true to the original mission statement, and the 2nd gen doesn't suffer from bloat and focus group requests (i.e. more room! bigger rear seat! etc etc) 3) If Subaru plans to use the new corporate 2.4 liter maybe there's hope, the 2nd time around, for an NA and turbo option. Would be strange, as for a lot of people I think the extra power of the 2.4 would be enough to satisfy them, thus maybe removing some demand for a turbo model. Then again, that's the kind of backward logic we see all the time from automakers.
__________________
Current: 2023 GRC Circuit Edition, 2012 C63 AMG P31
Past: (2) 2000 MR2 Spyder, 2017 GTI Sport, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, Supercharged 2013 BRZ-L, 2007 Honda S2000, 1992 Integra GS-R |
04-19-2018, 11:38 AM | #135 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,285 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
|
|
04-19-2018, 12:35 PM | #136 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '12 C63 P31, '23 GRC
Location: NC
Posts: 3,200
Thanks: 2,935
Thanked 2,072 Times in 1,185 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I feel like 20-30 hp via a larger naturally aspirated engine would not necessitate large changes or weight gain.
50+ hp from a turbocharged engine, and it's obligatory torque, yeah I could see "bloat" happening.
__________________
Current: 2023 GRC Circuit Edition, 2012 C63 AMG P31
Past: (2) 2000 MR2 Spyder, 2017 GTI Sport, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, Supercharged 2013 BRZ-L, 2007 Honda S2000, 1992 Integra GS-R |
04-20-2018, 10:30 PM | #137 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: 2022 BRZ
Location: Where the Woodbine Twineth...
Posts: 30
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The FA20 currently has a power ratio of 100HP per liter. With any luck, it will also mean the new chosen engine will make 240HP. Most likely no need for a turbo.
|
04-21-2018, 07:59 AM | #138 | |
Drive From Home
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: BRZ STI Performance
Location: Filth City
Posts: 4,914
Thanks: 2,368
Thanked 3,111 Times in 2,007 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I think this talk all stemmed from VW's MQB platform, where they hyped up things like how certain dimensions are fixed for example the pedal box, while other dimensions can be adjusted as needed, and with more part sharing than ever before (meaning a defect can literally mean fucking total recall). Before the BRZ, the modern Subaru (from 1989 onwards) was mainly the Legacy platform (which bankrupted them) and later on the Impreza platform (the Forester is actually based on the Impreza), in which the latter was derived from the former. All the innovations came about on the Legacy first, then trickled down to the Impreza. You can also argue the BRZ is basically another derivative from the Impreza. I haven't read enough to understand how the Alcyone SVX was developed, probably based on the Legacy. Last edited by krayzie; 04-21-2018 at 08:13 AM. |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to krayzie For This Useful Post: | nikitopo (04-21-2018), Yoshoobaroo (04-21-2018) |
04-21-2018, 11:14 AM | #139 |
Drive From Home
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: BRZ STI Performance
Location: Filth City
Posts: 4,914
Thanks: 2,368
Thanked 3,111 Times in 2,007 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
@nikitopo
Okay I finally found the diagram which I saw many years ago on the web: Well you can call it progress in terms of a supposedly cost savings exercise, but not progress in the traditional sense (I mean come'on let's face it; the dude at Das Auto who actually came up with this got canned soon after it was implemented lmao). |
The Following User Says Thank You to krayzie For This Useful Post: | NoHaveMSG (04-21-2018) |
04-23-2018, 01:09 PM | #140 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Drives: 2018 BRZ Limited, 2017 Sportage
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 394
Thanks: 231
Thanked 167 Times in 120 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Looks a lot like the 370z!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Although it looks more modern, I think the current body captures the flavor of a minimalist sports car better. The 370z does not sell well. Why would they want to copy it? It's mixing metaphors. Now if they want to raise the price by 10 grand, then you are talking about a different buyer -- the 370z buyer....
|
|
|
|
|