follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous


User Tag List

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-09-2013, 11:26 PM   #57
cmss2000
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ Premium 2012 Acura TSX
Location: NE PA
Posts: 126
Thanks: 246
Thanked 34 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses View Post
Anyone who doesn't know that much shouldn't be in the FI section.

Simmons this is your car? I'd never figure that given your affinity for autocross.
I think this is Mike's personal car. Look at the stock engine bay in the first pic. Even has stock strut bars, intake sound generator and battery.
cmss2000 is offline  
Old 07-09-2013, 11:35 PM   #58
OrbitalEllipses
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,889 Times in 2,902 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmss2000 View Post
I think this is Mike's personal car. Look at the stock engine bay in the first pic. Even has stock strut bars and noise generator.
Ah, no Raceseng camber plates or pulleys either. Good catch.
OrbitalEllipses is offline  
Old 07-09-2013, 11:52 PM   #59
1QWKBRZ
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Brz
Location: So.cal
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Nice numbers Mike, thanks for sharing the data. This kit is looking great for the price.
1QWKBRZ is offline  
Old 07-10-2013, 02:16 AM   #60
Drift-Office
Senior Member
 
Drift-Office's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: AE86 / FRS / FC3S / GC8 / S14 / R32
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 789
Thanks: 633
Thanked 1,431 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 169 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxscaxx View Post
I can't figure out if Bob @Drift-Office is for or against this kit.. lol.
Disclaimer : Not here to flame, but just to post my thoughts.

For the record, I'm FOR this kit generally speaking. The problem is, some people are making this out to be the magical unicorn that it's not. It's a great product with lots of promise ~ ease of installation, delivery of power.

However, that comes at a cost of heat, in which is an issue for 91 Octane users and anyone planning to do more than a couple of pulls on the street. So what do people do? Put together a WMI solution but that's really a band-aid at best (IMHO) and E85 is KEY here, but it's not readily available, nor is it economical / fuel efficient. I love it when people only look at the price, and not what they're getting or why because the entry cost to this kit isn't going to be the only thing you'll need, and that makes it less transparent compared to the likes of Vortech, AVO, etc. I appreciate people like Mike and Robbie coming up with competent solutions but by the time you've added all that in cost wise, you'll still be over what a Vortech kit would cost, and still come in higher than a basic turbo kit with just as good if not better performance...

It's one thing to do a couple of WOT runs on the dyno with adequate time for cooling down, another to be stuck in traffic and with marginal fuel in the summer heat and trying to get on it, and with the AC on. Time will tell though, and I'm not knocking the OP, Mike's doing a great job with what he's got but there are considerations I'm thinking of when looking at the dyno chart he and Innovate has posted...

Just my 2 cents, again.


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC
Drift-Office is offline  
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Drift-Office For This Useful Post:
Calum (07-10-2013), Hawaiian (07-10-2013), Ohbean (07-12-2013), Pete (07-10-2013), s2d4 (07-10-2013), Sonolin (08-28-2013), Sportsguy83 (07-10-2013), thebear21 (07-10-2013), Toyota86.ir (03-09-2016), xxscaxx (07-10-2013)
Old 07-10-2013, 07:25 AM   #61
swift996
Senior Member
 
swift996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Subaru BRZ Limited 6MT
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 2,432
Thanks: 712
Thanked 954 Times in 545 Posts
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drift-Office View Post
Disclaimer : Not here to flame, but just to post my thoughts.

For the record, I'm FOR this kit generally speaking. The problem is, some people are making this out to be the magical unicorn that it's not. It's a great product with lots of promise ~ ease of installation, delivery of power.

However, that comes at a cost of heat, in which is an issue for 91 Octane users and anyone planning to do more than a couple of pulls on the street. So what do people do? Put together a WMI solution but that's really a band-aid at best (IMHO) and E85 is KEY here, but it's not readily available, nor is it economical / fuel efficient. I love it when people only look at the price, and not what they're getting or why because the entry cost to this kit isn't going to be the only thing you'll need, and that makes it less transparent compared to the likes of Vortech, AVO, etc. I appreciate people like Mike and Robbie coming up with competent solutions but by the time you've added all that in cost wise, you'll still be over what a Vortech kit would cost, and still come in higher than a basic turbo kit with just as good if not better performance...

It's one thing to do a couple of WOT runs on the dyno with adequate time for cooling down, another to be stuck in traffic and with marginal fuel in the summer heat and trying to get on it, and with the AC on. Time will tell though, and I'm not knocking the OP, Mike's doing a great job with what he's got but there are considerations I'm thinking of when looking at the dyno chart he and Innovate has posted...

Just my 2 cents, again.


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC
Twin screws tend to not create a lot of heat so I'm not sure why that's a huge concern for the average street driver. I agree with the total cost of ownership but I think that people like the entry-level base price on this. Just as with a turbo kit you can add on things for it to produce more power and add safety measures in. I think the bottom line is this is a new type of application for our platform that brings solid mid-range gains (the trouble spot stock) with a simplistic system. We have at least 5-6 legit turbo options now and 2 solid superchargers. I think it's a win for the community. It really comes down to use and I think most the people ordering these kits now, specifically want this kit. I'm sure there could be regrets over time.
__________________
Innovate Supercharged Black Limited BRZ 6-Speed MT(Build Thread)
2010 Cadillac CTS-V Sedan M6 w/550whp (Build Thread)

swift996 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to swift996 For This Useful Post:
ftc~brz (07-10-2013)
Old 07-10-2013, 08:13 AM   #62
xxscaxx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 SWP BRZ
Location: New York
Posts: 2,240
Thanks: 458
Thanked 878 Times in 556 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drift-Office View Post
Disclaimer : Not here to flame, but just to post my thoughts.

For the record, I'm FOR this kit generally speaking. The problem is, some people are making this out to be the magical unicorn that it's not. It's a great product with lots of promise ~ ease of installation, delivery of power.

However, that comes at a cost of heat, in which is an issue for 91 Octane users and anyone planning to do more than a couple of pulls on the street. So what do people do? Put together a WMI solution but that's really a band-aid at best (IMHO) and E85 is KEY here, but it's not readily available, nor is it economical / fuel efficient. I love it when people only look at the price, and not what they're getting or why because the entry cost to this kit isn't going to be the only thing you'll need, and that makes it less transparent compared to the likes of Vortech, AVO, etc. I appreciate people like Mike and Robbie coming up with competent solutions but by the time you've added all that in cost wise, you'll still be over what a Vortech kit would cost, and still come in higher than a basic turbo kit with just as good if not better performance...

It's one thing to do a couple of WOT runs on the dyno with adequate time for cooling down, another to be stuck in traffic and with marginal fuel in the summer heat and trying to get on it, and with the AC on. Time will tell though, and I'm not knocking the OP, Mike's doing a great job with what he's got but there are considerations I'm thinking of when looking at the dyno chart he and Innovate has posted...

Just my 2 cents, again.


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC

Thanks for the reply - I obviously am for this kit as well since I bought one, but your reply is something I do have in the back of my mind as well. I guess we will see what happens when myself along with others have some realtime everyday driving situations presented to us with this kit installed.

I chose this kit because of a price standpoint but it was not the main reason. I was very close on buying a ptuning turbo kit. This car is my daily driver and after owning a built STi that I literally touched every part on, I knew with this car I had to grow up a little and be a bit more subtle with mods as this is my only car for the moment haha.

I plan on running E85 since its readily available to me so I am lucky in a sense, but I can only run it when staying local as there aren't many stations in my area with it.

I wanted driveability & reliability, without my wallet exploding. Then again, I will be buying the intercooler kit when its available, probably upgrading the pulley, and who knows probably even upgrading the kit if they make a bigger blower. Which like you said, adds up fast, and more than a lot of other kits. This allows me to stay interested in the car and keep adding things as I go, and keep me excited about it all. At least thats what i'm trying to believe

A lot of my friends don't understand why i'd go with this thing seeing as it doesn't make a ton of power, and quite frankly isn't capable of making that much power. Its a compromise I made in order to have a bit more fun in the car yet not watch it be towed home because I blew it up (I hope at least). Maybe I will regret the purchase - but I think I made the right choice. If I wanted a 500whp brz i would have just gotten a turbo kit and boosted the balls off of it.
xxscaxx is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to xxscaxx For This Useful Post:
Drift-Office (07-10-2013), ftc~brz (07-10-2013)
Old 07-10-2013, 08:56 AM   #63
Subzero
Old...
 
Subzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: Subaru
Location: Invisible
Posts: 88
Thanks: 76
Thanked 40 Times in 27 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Has anyone tried a litttle thicker engine oil to bring down oil temps? Just curious.

The first person to flame me over losing 1.48376458hp gets a swift kick in the nuts...
__________________
Subzero is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Subzero For This Useful Post:
ftc~brz (07-10-2013)
Old 07-10-2013, 09:13 AM   #64
Benn0r
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 21
Thanks: 3
Thanked 40 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I bought the intercooled version of this kit in Australia and it is currently being installed, along with a full supersprint exhaust including headers.

When looking at forced induction options, i first looked at the objective of the car (apart from being a project). I chose supercharger, as it is going to be a daily driver and there are lots of hills roads really close to where i live. I think that both vortech\innovate systems are great, as are the turbo options out there (my brother has an avo brz).

As said above, i think another FI option is a win for this car and a win for the modding community. I also feel we dont know enough about the engine of this car, as its only been around for about a year now. We wont really know what its limitations are, nor what it is capable of without solid data that will take time (up to 5 years or so).

Hopefully in that time, we can create more constructive threads like this one (mostly) where we discuss them objectively and help contribute to each others purchasing decisions.

I look forward to sharing my cars results with all of you soon!
__________________
Benn0r is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Benn0r For This Useful Post:
Ohbean (07-12-2013), Xero-Limit (07-10-2013)
Old 07-10-2013, 11:23 AM   #65
Xero-Limit
 
Xero-Limit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: JDL Turbo FRS, 335SC BRZ (ret)
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 932
Thanks: 368
Thanked 1,547 Times in 525 Posts
Mentioned: 380 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
Be interested to see how this plays out with the IC and the dyno. Whether you cool it with an IC, h2o/meth, or e85 downstream matters little, except cost, reliability, and ease of install.

On the MX-5 I run an intercooled turbo, WMI, and E85. The intercooler is a given, the WMI helped run 14 psi on the street and 325 tq, the E85 allowed 380+tq with the WMI. Whether the WMI is even needed at this point is the question that was poised, and frankly with running this BRZ on e85 having no issues doing 250whp with no intercooler and no WMI I'm not so sure it even needs it. Perhaps just an oil cooler and/or bigger radiator should take care of the heat, with the e85 doing the antiknock.

If it is not available I'd almost rather use WMI than the liquid IC heat exchangers. The meth is fairly easy to put in and you can run cheap washer fluid. The liquid ICs are somewhat cumbersome and complicated in comparison. Reliability is about equal since both use electric pumps. With meth you can monitor though with the AEM failsafe.

Lots of choices...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benn0r View Post
I bought the intercooled version of this kit in Australia and it is currently being installed, along with a full supersprint exhaust including headers.

...............

I look forward to sharing my cars results with all of you soon!
Xero-Limit is offline  
Old 07-10-2013, 12:05 PM   #66
AkaJabari
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S, Scion tC
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 13 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by swift996 View Post
Twin screws tend to not create a lot of heat so I'm not sure why that's a huge concern for the average street driver.
Doesn't matter what sort of system you're using to cram more air into the engine. They're all going to generate heat at the same rate. Gay-Lussac's Law, part of the combined gas law. It's like physics and shyt.

With this engine being so sensitive to temperature, any form of forced induction should be coupled with a way to reduce intake temperatures or risk premature engine failure (DI seals being the weak link and prolly the first things to go). ie running w/m, E85, intercooling. Prefferably some combination of the three.

After I re-read that last paragraph, I realized that it didnt make much sense. Basically we need to figure out what temp this engine can reliably operate at and then try not go above that. Reducing intake temps allows you to cram more o2 at a given temperature than you would otherwise be able to. Adding power in the form of volume over pressure. Does that make sense? It did in my head

Last edited by AkaJabari; 07-10-2013 at 12:20 PM. Reason: for clarification
AkaJabari is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to AkaJabari For This Useful Post:
Drift-Office (07-10-2013)
Old 07-10-2013, 12:17 PM   #67
Drift-Office
Senior Member
 
Drift-Office's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: AE86 / FRS / FC3S / GC8 / S14 / R32
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 789
Thanks: 633
Thanked 1,431 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 169 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxscaxx View Post
I plan on running E85 since its readily available to me so I am lucky in a sense, but I can only run it when staying local as there aren't many stations in my area with it.

I wanted driveability & reliability, without my wallet exploding. Then again, I will be buying the intercooler kit when its available, probably upgrading the pulley, and who knows probably even upgrading the kit if they make a bigger blower. Which like you said, adds up fast, and more than a lot of other kits. This allows me to stay interested in the car and keep adding things as I go, and keep me excited about it all. At least thats what i'm trying to believe

Maybe I will regret the purchase - but I think I made the right choice.
Indeed, you're one of the "lucky" ones to be able to have an E85 station service your locale - so that part of the equation makes sense. Mine is about 22 miles away, so it doesn't make sense for me to keep a 2 gallon reserve and 8 gallons of operational service with an already reduced fuel economy backed by even more consumption in a FI environment...

And there is no 'wrong' choice - there's only choice. Everyone's motivation to purchase (or not) is backed by what they want to and don't want to see. As a calibrator & shop though, my objectivity is different in that I have to see this from all points of the compass so that when my clients consult me for an opinion, I get them an educated one that makes sense to them and thus be able to manage their expectations. I think that's the reason why many people who came into my shop wanting to purchase a Vortech ended up buying an AVO setup instead. The last thing I want to be accused of is to sell them something off the shelf just to make a margin, which I clearly see some of the other vendors doing, just because.

Again, whenever air is being compressed, heat will be generated. Heat is heat - "less heat" doesn't negate the fact that it's still heat and that is still my biggest contention of this kit, just saying. For those without E85, the reliability mod list is going to add quite a bit to it. My other question is that while this kit has been in dev for a year and rolled out in the rest of the world for months now, how is it that an IC kit hasn't been forthcoming as of yet?

Anyways, enjoy your purchase - we look forward to seeing long term info on this!

Cheers!


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC
Drift-Office is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Drift-Office For This Useful Post:
xxscaxx (07-10-2013)
Old 07-10-2013, 12:45 PM   #68
xxscaxx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 SWP BRZ
Location: New York
Posts: 2,240
Thanks: 458
Thanked 878 Times in 556 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drift-Office View Post
Indeed, you're one of the "lucky" ones to be able to have an E85 station service your locale - so that part of the equation makes sense. Mine is about 22 miles away, so it doesn't make sense for me to keep a 2 gallon reserve and 8 gallons of operational service with an already reduced fuel economy backed by even more consumption in a FI environment...

And there is no 'wrong' choice - there's only choice. Everyone's motivation to purchase (or not) is backed by what they want to and don't want to see. As a calibrator & shop though, my objectivity is different in that I have to see this from all points of the compass so that when my clients consult me for an opinion, I get them an educated one that makes sense to them and thus be able to manage their expectations. I think that's the reason why many people who came into my shop wanting to purchase a Vortech ended up buying an AVO setup instead. The last thing I want to be accused of is to sell them something off the shelf just to make a margin, which I clearly see some of the other vendors doing, just because.

Again, whenever air is being compressed, heat will be generated. Heat is heat - "less heat" doesn't negate the fact that it's still heat and that is still my biggest contention of this kit, just saying. For those without E85, the reliability mod list is going to add quite a bit to it. My other question is that while this kit has been in dev for a year and rolled out in the rest of the world for months now, how is it that an IC kit hasn't been forthcoming as of yet?

Anyways, enjoy your purchase - we look forward to seeing long term info on this!

Cheers!


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC
Right on - my E85 station is on my way home for work so its perfect for me. BUT, if I have to go somewhere far, I need the ability to switch to a 93 map, only because I am not going to chance running out of E85 and being stuck somewhere lol. Luckily I don't venture very far from home most of the time, so this works out. This is also why I will end up with some other form of cooling solution as I won't be on E85 100% of the time.

Your transparency is appreciated. If you were closer I'd definitely consider your services.
xxscaxx is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to xxscaxx For This Useful Post:
Drift-Office (07-10-2013)
Old 07-10-2013, 12:57 PM   #69
Dezoris
Senior Member
 
Dezoris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: FR-S
Location: IL
Posts: 2,857
Thanks: 519
Thanked 2,997 Times in 1,095 Posts
Mentioned: 159 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drift-Office View Post

Again, whenever air is being compressed, heat will be generated. Heat is heat - "less heat" doesn't negate the fact that it's still heat and that is still my biggest contention of this kit, just saying. For those without E85, the reliability mod list is going to add quite a bit to it. My other question is that while this kit has been in dev for a year and rolled out in the rest of the world for months now, how is it that an IC kit hasn't been forthcoming as of yet?

Anyways, enjoy your purchase - we look forward to seeing long term info on this!

Cheers!


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC

I really hate to be an ass, but seriously where are the data logs?
How many people and times do we have to ask for it?

Yeah its great, dynos look good, its fast easy to install.

marketing marketing...

We have seen all this before, and a million dyno sheets.

Post the real world data, enough with the marketing.
IAT post, oil temps, knock, timing, coolant etc. Just post up the data on the back to back.

After this long its clear you guys are either afraid to do so or tip toeing around the manufacturer I don't know but it's getting old.
__________________
Dezoris is offline  
Old 07-10-2013, 01:03 PM   #70
Drift-Office
Senior Member
 
Drift-Office's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: AE86 / FRS / FC3S / GC8 / S14 / R32
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 789
Thanks: 633
Thanked 1,431 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 169 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezoris View Post
I really hate to be an ass, but seriously where are the data logs? How many people and times do we have to ask for it?

Post the real world data, enough with the marketing.
IAT post, oil temps, knock, timing, coolant etc. Just post up the data on the back to back.
Surely you're not referring to me yeah? You're just projecting what I'm saying between the lines?

@swift996 : Nice ninja edit!


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC
Drift-Office is offline  
 
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Innovate Supercharger!!! Titanmotorsports Forced Induction 62 08-24-2014 10:25 PM
Innovate questions Fast_Freddy Forced Induction 12 07-02-2013 02:27 PM
Visconti Tuning - Latest Forced Induction Tuning Info Visconti Forced Induction 340 04-30-2013 06:33 PM
innovate SC for sale kioton32 Forced Induction 4 04-08-2013 11:42 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.