Header/Tune Decision

[jflogerzi]

There is no aruguing that an ace 350 setup and custom ecutek tune is the best NA combo but not everyone wants to spend 2100$ when there are combos that can net you 80-85% gains for 50% off the cost.. lots of good options. Let's leave at that..

Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk

[86TOYO2k17]

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2

Of course a lower baseline will make gains look better. 178 is high. Shouldve done the baseline in 4th like everyone else does

Pretty sure all the before dynos where done in same gear as the after dynos, so not sure what your saying.

But as myself and others already mentioned. The actual peak dyno number or numerical increase is irrelevant for comparisons as all dynos read differently. But the percentage difference should be relatively static from one dyno to another and that is why you should only ever compare the percentage increases of one before and after dyno to another.

[Lantanafrs2]

Bullshit. These cars make 200ish wheel horsepower when tuned. Will an ace header show a 20 percent increase from 178 whp?

[jflogerzi]

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2

Bullshit. These cars make 200ish wheel horsepower when tuned. Will an ace header show a 20 percent increase from 178 whp?

Not on a mustang Dyno... just depends on how the Dyno is calibrated.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk

[Lantanafrs2]

No argument with quality of ace but I've yet to see a 214whp dyno especially on 10 percent ethanol

[Lantanafrs2]

Ve is 200 even with the "restrictive" intake manifold. Percentage gains look better with low baselines

[Lantanafrs2]

You guys need to see through the bullshit

[Pat]

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2

You guys need to see through the bullshit

Help us

[Lantanafrs2]

178 is a fluke baseline. Probably before the ecu turned the fun off and started dumping fuel. He should've pulled it a couple more times. It probably would drop to 170 imo. Then the gains would look better.