|
Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
02-05-2014, 07:26 AM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: AE86, 2x GT86, TE27
Location: Christchurch NZ
Posts: 1,478
Thanks: 826
Thanked 1,179 Times in 522 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
02-05-2014, 07:31 AM | #30 |
I Love custom Turbo kits
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,343 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Tagged: 12 Thread(s)
|
No problem, I know where you are coming from
Boost plot here: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...postcount=1707 Dyno here (it's a work in progress, but we ran out of time on the Dyno, DISREGARD AFR, was off by more than a point): http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...postcount=1701
__________________
|
02-05-2014, 07:45 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: AE86, 2x GT86, TE27
Location: Christchurch NZ
Posts: 1,478
Thanks: 826
Thanked 1,179 Times in 522 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Hmm interesting.
Based on the dyno, I'd say you're not making full boost till 4800, as that's when peak torque is basically reached. Say max boost was reached at 4300, then I can't see why torque would continue to climb between 4300-4800, if boost stayed constant. |
02-05-2014, 07:50 AM | #32 | |
I Love custom Turbo kits
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,343 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Tagged: 12 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
But still, even if it were 4800, it is not 5500 either. I will look at the log again and see if I can point out why 4300 not 4800. Edit: @diss7 I will also add that the moment where you reach max torque does not automatically means it hits full boost there. There are different tuning strategies and one of them is to ease the torque hit via cam timing, and ignition timing and that peak torque can be phased to a different point than the first hit of full boost.
__________________
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sportsguy83 For This Useful Post: | diss7 (02-05-2014) |
02-05-2014, 07:55 AM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: AE86, 2x GT86, TE27
Location: Christchurch NZ
Posts: 1,478
Thanks: 826
Thanked 1,179 Times in 522 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Agree 4800 is better than the 5500 I was stating. Can't recall who's dyno I saw around 5500, must have been ptuning, but I think they're gt3076r, not gtx. Which would account for the difference between 4800 and 5500
|
02-05-2014, 08:01 AM | #34 |
I Love custom Turbo kits
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,343 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Tagged: 12 Thread(s)
|
Full boost is reached at 43XX and 44XX in both. I believe the matter of reaching full torque later is a matter of tuning. I've seen JR tunes with a GTX28 where torque peak is at over 5K, where he explained specifically he delayed the torque hit to make it a smooth progression and being easier on the motor.
.82 Backhousing Looking at Log one 4085 7.34 4117 7.92 4163 8.355 4213 8.79 4277 9.66 4319 9.66 4322 10.095 4424 9.805 4442 10.385 4512 10.24 4585 10.095 4614 9.66 4712 9.805 4734 10.095 4870 10.385 4868 10.53 4970 10.53 Second log: 4109 6.76 4119 7.195 4135 7.195 4193 7.63 4231 8.5 4314 9.08 4354 9.66 4436 9.805 4444 10.385 4471 10.095 4540 10.095 4622 10.095 4640 9.805 4672 9.95 4765 10.24 4819 10.53 4874 10.24
__________________
Last edited by Sportsguy83; 02-05-2014 at 06:46 PM. |
02-05-2014, 08:39 AM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: R32 GTR, AW11 MR2 SC, GTS86 R
Location: OZ
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 603
Thanked 1,223 Times in 708 Posts
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
It really depends what your full/target boost is.
|
02-05-2014, 08:45 AM | #36 |
I Love custom Turbo kits
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,343 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Tagged: 12 Thread(s)
|
Very true. full boost targeting 10 psi will be reached at a different RPM than 20 psi.
__________________
|
02-05-2014, 03:39 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 DGM Subaru BRZ (Subie #9)
Location: ATL, US
Posts: 2,667
Thanks: 123
Thanked 860 Times in 552 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Yep that's where it's hard to compare numbers as well. People running these turbos on EJs and SR20s, etc. are generally running at least 18psi or so on a GT30 series turbo, most times more than that because they are looking to make 400+ WHP. Those looking to make 300-350WHP are usually using the GT28 series stuff since it accomplishes their goals with the least amount of lag.
It's difficult on this motor with the 12.5:1 CR. It can help mask some of the lag and if you are willing to deal with a little more lag you can make the power on a GT30 with a lot less heat than the smaller turbos by running less boost. |
02-05-2014, 05:39 PM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: AE86, 2x GT86, TE27
Location: Christchurch NZ
Posts: 1,478
Thanks: 826
Thanked 1,179 Times in 522 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I can't wait to get my gtx2863r on and get some comparisons. From the performance above of a gtx30, my turbo is going to be awesome as a daily / track hack.
Edit - I'm hoping for ~250ft/lbs from 10psi, from 3500 (or less ) to 7000rpm. If it starts to taper at 7000rpm, then I can live with that. Although I think the gtx2867r graphs I am seeing this on, are more a reflection of the gtx28 0.63 turbine housing becoming restrictive. I am hoping my 0.86 with 3" exhaust (with no cats or mufflers) will help/solve this issue. Its got to be the turbine, the compressor (even the 63r) can provide the airflow, somewhat efficiently at 7500rpm. Its certainly very efficient up untill 7000rpm. Last edited by diss7; 02-05-2014 at 05:55 PM. |
02-05-2014, 06:45 PM | #39 | |
I Love custom Turbo kits
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,343 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Tagged: 12 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
02-05-2014, 07:17 PM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: AE86, 2x GT86, TE27
Location: Christchurch NZ
Posts: 1,478
Thanks: 826
Thanked 1,179 Times in 522 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Much impress. wow.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to diss7 For This Useful Post: | Sportsguy83 (02-05-2014) |
02-05-2014, 07:20 PM | #41 |
Boosted
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: Not a supra....yet
Location: Riverside,CA/ Abu Dhabi,UAE
Posts: 2,925
Thanks: 487
Thanked 1,203 Times in 812 Posts
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SmsAlSuwaidi For This Useful Post: | Sportsguy83 (02-05-2014) |
02-05-2014, 07:52 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 1
Thanked 623 Times in 378 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Im pretty sure I have the GTX2867R with methanol injection, full 3" catless exhaust and my car is being tuned presently. I hope by next week sometime for it to be done.
I'm hoping over time to get it fine tuned and show some good numbers. I'll post graphs when I get them. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which turbine size for gtx3071r? | diss7 | Forced Induction | 67 | 02-02-2014 08:19 PM |
EFR6258 vs GTx2863R | diss7 | Forced Induction | 25 | 12-01-2013 10:15 PM |
Garrett GTX2863R turbo, TiAL v-band wastegate | Turbowned | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 10 | 11-27-2013 02:07 PM |