Most power Normally Aspirated?

[weederr33]

Originally Posted by Tcoat

Point taken and accepted. I just used one of the many possible bodies that could sanction such a record. There are of course many more and that is why making the claim of being the best at ANYTHING is so difficult. The main thing I was trying to get across is that just because nobody here has posted higher it does not mean they don't exist. This forum probably represents around 5% of the owners. That leaves 95% that could be higher. Without a third party to review and confirm such claims there can be no "best" at anything.


Sort of like:
This is the biggest salmon ever caught in the world. I know because I caught it and here is it's picture. Nobody has posted a bigger one so it is the world record.






In reality that is a very tiny salmon.

Oh cow you actually look like Flanders!

[weederr33]

Originally Posted by FRSBRZGT86FAN

You are continually posting the videos in older threads!!!! Do you not get it Mike?!

MAKE YOUR OWN THREAD!!! AND RECORD AND WRITE YOUR STUFF LEGIBLY!!!!

Woah simmer down there partner. Remember the rules of The Internet: if you get angry, the troll will win. This guy is obviously trying to get a buzz out of everyone. Besides, in my books, his shitty grammar alone makes him invalid.

[FRSBRZGT86FAN]

Originally Posted by weederr33

Woah simmer down there partner. Remember the rules of The Internet: if you get angry, the troll will win. This guy is obviously trying to get a buzz out of everyone. Besides, in my books, his shitty grammar alone makes him invalid.

Understood.

[riboyster]

This is the guy with the taped on ram air right? Haha this shit is still active I totally forgot about it. I'm finally at 200hp on virtual dyno after numerous exhaust changes and nearly a year of self tuning my car.
And I still have a knocky spot in the 4k range. This guy is clearly mad genius with his precision machining cardboard ram intake that boasts +75hp.
Dude, the internet is vastly full of people who know more than you and have called your bluff. Go get it dynoed if you don't believe me

[fumanchu1]

Originally Posted by FRS Justin

To be the fastest in the USA N/A you will need the following to start. EDIT: To be the unofficial, non sanctioned, fastest that anyone has posted about, as pointed out by TCOAT


1. At least a 1.78 60ft


2. A run that is 13.46 or faster


3. A Dyno pull that looks like this.

Shaving .43 off a 1/4 mile pass is no easy feat on this platform good luck I hope you do get their, that would give me a reason to come back and go again. I might use my auto car tho just to make it a challenge...

You can probably chime in, Just saw his supposed dyno results on the mustang dyno.


his stated weight is:4250
his wcf is a factor of 0.6 (normal correction is .9-1.1 is it not?)


I'm no dyno expert but would that invalidate the numbers to say the least

[riboyster]

He didn't mention that the ram air adds 1500 lbs. At about 10hp per 100lbs, he's losing 150 hp, which means his kit is actually producing all 225hp.
My math might be wrong here but who cares because ram air and blue tape makes cars go fast like when teenagers get drunk off of non alcoholic beer.

[fumanchu1]

Originally Posted by riboyster

He didn't mention that the ram air adds 1500 lbs. At about 10hp per 100lbs, he's losing 150 hp, which means his kit is actually producing all 225hp.
My math might be wrong here but who cares because ram air and blue tape makes cars go fast like when teenagers get drunk off of non alcoholic beer.

The added weight should reduce the hp output but the .6 wcf should more than make up for it (data manipulation to get to the desired hp number)

[FRS Justin]

Originally Posted by Tcoat

Point taken and accepted. I just used one of the many possible bodies that could sanction such a record. There are of course many more and that is why making the claim of being the best at ANYTHING is so difficult. The main thing I was trying to get across is that just because nobody here has posted higher it does not mean they don't exist. This forum probably represents around 5% of the owners. That leaves 95% that could be higher. Without a third party to review and confirm such claims there can be no "best" at anything.


Sort of like:
This is the biggest salmon ever caught in the world. I know because I caught it and here is it's picture. Nobody has posted a bigger one so it is the world record.






In reality that is a very tiny salmon.

Most excellent post, point well taken

[Riftur]

Question, I think I read somewhere someone claim that turning off the traction control will get you a faster 0-60 time. Anyone find this to be true?

[fumanchu1]

Originally Posted by Riftur

Question, I think I read somewhere someone claim that turning off the traction control will get you a faster 0-60 time. Anyone find this to be true?

Only if you put stickers

[FRS Justin]

Originally Posted by fumanchu1

The added weight should reduce the hp output but the .6 wcf should more than make up for it (data manipulation to get to the desired hp number)

Your ET / MPH computed from your vehicle weight of 2900 pounds and HP of 221 is 13.74 seconds and MPH of 98.37 MPH.


Your ET / MPH computed from your vehicle weight of 4250 pounds and HP of 221 is 15.60 seconds and MPH of 86.60 MPH.


SO if you tell the dyno you weigh x amount it will figure how much power is needed to move x amount of weight over x amount of time to x amount of speed.


So it would take more power to move 4000lbs than 2900lbs at a given speed over a given length.


Lots of factors come into play here but this is the simple version

[go_a_way1]

Originally Posted by Riftur

Question, I think I read somewhere someone claim that turning off the traction control will get you a faster 0-60 time. Anyone find this to be true?

yeah if your tires are slipping haha. If you are skilled and can control wheel spin you will be much faster then letting the factory ECU do its thing

[go_a_way1]

Originally Posted by fumanchu1

Only if you put stickers

[FRS Justin]

Originally Posted by Riftur

Question, I think I read somewhere someone claim that turning off the traction control will get you a faster 0-60 time. Anyone find this to be true?

A lot of factors come into play with that statement but yes it's true if your car is setup correctly


I do not use traction control