follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-31-2018, 07:36 PM   #15
finch1750
Undisputed El Presidente
 
finch1750's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Zenki 37J ZN6
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 11,571
Thanks: 9,382
Thanked 9,397 Times in 5,261 Posts
Mentioned: 374 Post(s)
Tagged: 33 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamestl View Post
I just checked my part numbers and I have two of the 81305 sets. Have had them for about a year with no issues. Where have you seen issues of slippage?
It has popped up on occasion on the forum, never ran two sets myself to have first hand experiance though. Not saying it will happen for sure but like @JSimon777 said just check them every so often.
__________________

"Just like how a strut bar somehow enables you to corner 20MPH faster around a cloverleaf on-ramp, when the reality is, you can do it already but you just don't have to balls to do it." - CSG David
finch1750 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2018, 11:11 PM   #16
Spacemane969
Senior Member
 
Spacemane969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: 2013 ARGENTO A/T
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia, US
Posts: 345
Thanks: 149
Thanked 136 Times in 68 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by finch1750 View Post
81305 is 14mm and would be too small for the top hole. It is meant for the bottom slot. While you could get more adjustment since it's got extra play there have been issues of slippage with slotted struts and eccentric bolts so not sure that would be a good idea.


Get the 16mm SPC bolt for the top if you want to run 2 eccentrics. Or get 81305 for the bottom and put the OEM bottom bolt in the top to get more adjustment.


I'll see if I can find the 16mm SPC part number and update my adjustable suspension FAQ and link back here later.


Edit: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=103609 has the part numbers for both the 14mm and 16mm SPC bolts in the first post now
I just did the 14mm lower and OEM bolt up top and have decided against having that much camber. Id like to use the 16mm up top instead before I get the alignment but I'm feeling lazy after all that tinkering. How much more risk is there running the bolt swap vs just using the 16mm upper camber bolt as intended?
Spacemane969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2018, 12:22 AM   #17
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Imho relocated oem vs 16mm camberbolt (which still is actually thinner bolt just with extra lobe) is of somewhat same "risk" of reduced sheering/torquing strength. If one minds increased risks that much, then just use one set of camberbolts (which will limit max dialable neg. camber to -1.5) with other bolt left stock. If more is needed, then one needs another camberbolt set or camberplates (which cost much more).
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2018, 07:22 AM   #18
Jamestl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Drives: None
Location: Chicago
Posts: 267
Thanks: 26
Thanked 62 Times in 49 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by churchx View Post
Imho relocated oem vs 16mm camberbolt (which still is actually thinner bolt just with extra lobe) is of somewhat same "risk" of reduced sheering/torquing strength. If one minds increased risks that much, then just use one set of camberbolts (which will limit max dialable neg. camber to -1.5) with other bolt left stock. If more is needed, then one needs another camberbolt set or camberplates (which cost much more).
This was my thought process as well, but of course an "off" or a pothole could throw off any alignment, regardless if the car has any camber bolts.

But candidly I'm surprised more people aren't using the two camber solution on the forums. It's a fraction of the cost of camber plates, and I'm getting close to 3 degrees (3.1 after lowered)!
Jamestl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2018, 09:32 AM   #19
tehShirt
Senior Member
 
tehShirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Drives: 2014 Subaru Forester
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 441
Thanks: 501
Thanked 338 Times in 178 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
It's worth mentioning, the camber bolt solution can cause issues depending on your tire and wheel setup.

I have RCE yellow springs and 17x9 et42, 245/40/17 wheels/tires and camber bolts only allowed about -0.3 degrees before interference with the springs.
tehShirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2018, 02:08 PM   #20
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,085 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Jamestl: probably due lowering it worked for you. I was limited on stock height to about -2.35 with camberbolts in both holes (KCA416+SPC 81305). Those that are set on track oriented alignment need -3 or slightly more, and camberbolts alone won't give that. "Normal" people daily driving only don't need that much camber, so usually single camberbolt set is sufficient for them. Most common option for track people are camberplates. I got -3 with two camberbolt sets and powerflex PFF69-801G bushings. There is also option of slotting bolt holes, but it has least trust in my eyes.
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2018, 02:14 PM   #21
Jamestl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Drives: None
Location: Chicago
Posts: 267
Thanks: 26
Thanked 62 Times in 49 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by churchx View Post
Jamestl: probably due lowering it worked for you. I was limited on stock height to about -2.35 with camberbolts in both holes (KCA416+SPC 81305). Those that are set on track oriented alignment need -3 or slightly more, and camberbolts alone won't give that. "Normal" people daily driving only don't need that much camber, so usually single camberbolt set is sufficient for them. Most common option for track people are camberplates. I got -3 with two camberbolt sets and powerflex PFF69-801G bushings. There is also option of slotting bolt holes, but it has least trust in my eyes.
Yeah I got 2.7 on stock suspension and an additional 0.4 when I got struts and springs
Jamestl is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OEM front camber bolts B-R-Z Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 4 04-30-2014 08:05 PM
WTB Front Camber bolts manualmotive Want-To-Buy Requests 2 04-17-2014 02:45 AM
Front Camber Bolts option hanabie Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 8 11-10-2013 12:28 AM
*FREE alignment* When you get Front Camber Bolts and Rear Camber Arms Installed! Corner3garage Mechanical Maintenance and Tools 6 10-31-2013 03:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.