follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Xero Limit
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Scion FR-S Forum | Subaru BRZ Forum | Toyota 86 GT 86 Forum | AS1 Forum - FT86CLUB > FT86CLUB Shared Forum > FR-S / BRZ vs....

FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING]


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-02-2019, 12:58 PM   #1
Xerexyz
Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 860 in Supernova
Location: Chicago
Posts: 35
Thanks: 6
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Wink 2017 86 Vs. 2019 Civic Si Coupe

My wife and I now have two somewhat impractical family cars. We used to have two really impractical cars (mazda rx7 and mx5). I can now give a somewhat decent impression of how these two cars stack up.

Our 17 86 is the "Special Edition", we bought it because we love wild paint jobs and this one had an orange paint that was even nicer (in our opinion) than our old Hot Lava. We have had it for a year and a half at the time of this post and it has been a great car, even nicer than our old Hot Lava FR-S. Mostly things that we enjoy are the changes to the final drive ratio and the suspension setup. The old FR-S seemed like it was geared more to hit 60 "faster" and the suspension was a bit too harsh. Sure there's still a torque dip, but we don't care, it's a fun engine to run out to its redline and it has all the power we enjoy in a manner that we enjoy driving it. The LSD is great and being RWD makes it a very predictable car in the winter for us, we even bought some winter tires to make it more fun.

In comparison, the new 19 Si Coupe we just bought about a month ago is a different type of animal, though fun in it's own right. We got it in the somewhat horrid Yellow Tonic Pearl, a color that I believe that is only liked by us. We love it, very easy to find... anywhere. The engine and the power delivery are totally different, being a turbo'ed 1.5, most of its power is setup around 3k and it kind of gives up right at 6k. Almost the opposite of a torque dip, kind of a torque hump. While not everyone enjoys FWD, it is much more enjoyable with a LSD. The car kind of grabs through turns instead of being pushed like the 86, once again being a kind of opposite to the 86. There is also a totally different type of balance here, no more 50:50 distribution, all of your weight is over the front wheels.

So for both having 205hp, being around the same curb weight, and both having polarizing looks (especially in bright colors). They are both very unique, fun, and engaging cars.

The Honda does get better gas mileage though... No idea how it pulls of 40+ mpg on the highway, but it does. But as someone who once drove around an rx7 as a daily... who cares about gas mileage??
Xerexyz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Xerexyz For This Useful Post:
alphasaur (04-02-2019)
Old 04-02-2019, 03:16 PM   #2
NARFALICIOUS
Senior Member
 
NARFALICIOUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 7MGE & FA20
Location: Johto Region
Posts: 359
Thanks: 41
Thanked 211 Times in 125 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
probably being a smaller displacement + turbo, and not driving in boost contributes to the higher mpgs
__________________
NARFALICIOUS
Noob Poster
1988 | 2016

NARFALICIOUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2019, 03:33 PM   #3
Xerexyz
Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 860 in Supernova
Location: Chicago
Posts: 35
Thanks: 6
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NARFALICIOUS View Post
probably being a smaller displacement + turbo, and not driving in boost contributes to the higher mpgs
Yeah, I get that, just wasn't expecting it. It's good for my wife since she drives it to work everyday.

I'd still pick the 86 over the Si if I had to choose one.
Xerexyz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Xerexyz For This Useful Post:
HKz (04-02-2019)
Old 04-02-2019, 04:30 PM   #4
Sasquachulator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2016 Scion iM, 2017 BMW X1
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,075
Thanks: 0
Thanked 291 Times in 186 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NARFALICIOUS View Post
probably being a smaller displacement + turbo, and not driving in boost contributes to the higher mpgs
its definitely how it works.

Low displacement engine + new technologies + modest driving (don't go heavy into boost) = great gas mileage.

Those Earth Dream motors are quite frugal. I had a Honda fit with the 1.5L N/A Earth Dreams motor, and I was getting high 30's/low 40's depending on how I drive.


But once you get that turbo working the MPG is going to nosedive.

I think that's why the FA20 boxer motor doesn't get great gas mileage. You don't really "cruise" at a low RPM on that motor, and all its power is high up so you're really working the engine a lot of the times. Plus boxers are inherently less fuel efficient to begin with than straight 4's as far as I know.
Sasquachulator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2019, 12:42 PM   #5
WolfpackS2k
Senior Member
 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '06 Cayman S, '92 DB2 GS-R
Location: NC
Posts: 2,110
Thanks: 1,761
Thanked 1,050 Times in 613 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Talking

In your comparison you left out something important. That would be, how the cars look.

I feel like this was done intentionally
__________________
'06 Porsche Cayman S
'13 SWP BRZ-L - Innovate Stage 1, Nameless over & down pipes, RevWorks UEL Header - RIP, claimed by VIR T10

'07 S2000 - DD & track rat - sold
'92 GS-R - 300k club member
WolfpackS2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2019, 02:49 PM   #6
BigTuna
Senior Member
 
BigTuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ
Location: Ohio
Posts: 383
Thanks: 80
Thanked 226 Times in 133 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I've been doing a lot of reading on the new Si recently. I think if I was in a position to get a new Si or a new BRZ, I'd go for the Si.




But I'm not, and I love my BRZ to death.
__________________
BigTuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2019, 03:29 PM   #7
Xerexyz
Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 860 in Supernova
Location: Chicago
Posts: 35
Thanks: 6
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k View Post
In your comparison you left out something important. That would be, how the cars look.

I feel like this was done intentionally
Oh, I just didn't want to be writing too much. But it's true, the Toyota 86 is much better looking in our opinion. The Honda isn't bad though, as a coupe. We didn't like the sedan very much, looks too large and seems too much like a family sedan. We really like the wrap around tail light and while polarizing, we find the overall funkiness of the Honda to be fun, especially as yellow.

One other thing that I didn't mention is their interiors. I would consider them equal but different. The seats in the Honda are surprisingly good! I still wish the 86 had a 60/40 split in the back so that we could put down half of the seat when my kid sits in the back.
Xerexyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2019, 04:50 PM   #8
Bluefire98
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Drives: 2015 Scion FRS
Location: Oregon
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I drove both before I got the frs. The 10th gen si is a nice car. Great handling. And the power band is nice for dd'ing. But is just me or does the si have a laggy throttle or dead spot? It made the car hard to rev match when I drove it. Also the engine is too quiet imo. Anyone who has driven an older vtec honda won't agree with the new engine, but man, the mpg is nice. Also turbo cause racecar lol. I definitely would consider an si and tuning it if I need a 4 door car in the future. Liked it more than the wrx honestly.
Bluefire98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2019, 02:23 PM   #9
WolfpackS2k
Senior Member
 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '06 Cayman S, '92 DB2 GS-R
Location: NC
Posts: 2,110
Thanks: 1,761
Thanked 1,050 Times in 613 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
You can thank emission ratings and the turbo for the throttle lag.
__________________
'06 Porsche Cayman S
'13 SWP BRZ-L - Innovate Stage 1, Nameless over & down pipes, RevWorks UEL Header - RIP, claimed by VIR T10

'07 S2000 - DD & track rat - sold
'92 GS-R - 300k club member
WolfpackS2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2019, 07:42 PM   #10
Bluefire98
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Drives: 2015 Scion FRS
Location: Oregon
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Darn environment
Bluefire98 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
does 2019 BRZ head unit fit 2017 BRZ? stlgrym3 Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 2 03-30-2019 11:01 PM
2017 civic Si vs.... RedGlare FR-S / BRZ vs.... 104 02-13-2018 04:40 PM
2016 Civic coupe spy pics Godzpeed Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 16 04-21-2015 01:43 PM
FS: 2004 Civic Coupe (Winter beater?) mrdanyo Canada Classifieds 0 10-20-2013 06:29 PM
2007 Civic DX-G Coupe - Excellent Cond, Dealer Serviced! that_guy Canada Classifieds 2 10-19-2013 10:57 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.