follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > FT86CLUB Shared Forum > FR-S / BRZ vs....

FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING]


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2012, 07:15 PM   #2059
MTD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Hyundai
Location: Canada
Posts: 108
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Im on Genesis Coupe number 2. First was a '10 2.0, new one is a '13 3.8. No complaints at all. No problems with either mechanically, no unscheduled trips to the dealer, build quality is excellent too.

I love the way the FRS/BRZ handle and drive, but I love the nicer interior and power of the GC.
MTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2012, 07:38 PM   #2060
Rayme
The Answer
 
Rayme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: Mazda 2
Location: Moncton, NB
Posts: 1,233
Thanks: 488
Thanked 661 Times in 315 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burrcold View Post
The only parts that would be in question, are in-house drivetrain products (which are few and far between). Not saying that there is anything wrong with them at all though.

All the rest of the components are from the same suppliers that are making parts for our cars. I used to work for DENSO and we had tons of parts that went in to all Hyundai's (Genesis Coupe included). That includes starters, alternators, ECU's, sensors of all kinds, gauge cluster, HVAC components, etc. etc.

This is the reason why all manufacturers are stepping up quality, and the gap is closing. They are using global platforms, and global suppliers. The days of in-house part procurement is almost dead. Better that way.
Isn't Denso a Toyota company though? I always thought Denso makes top notch electronic components. That's good for Hyundai/Kia.
__________________
Rayme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2012, 11:20 PM   #2061
Burrcold
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Drives: Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,624
Thanks: 763
Thanked 1,586 Times in 776 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot View Post
Isn't Denso a Toyota company though? I always thought Denso makes top notch electronic components. That's good for Hyundai/Kia.
Denso makes components for every car manufacturer now. They still have their largest business from Toyota but they are not owned by them (they used to be Toyota's parts division many many years ago).
__________________
Burrcold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 12:09 AM   #2062
davidp
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: BRZ Limited
Location: Quebec
Posts: 54
Thanks: 18
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamVR4 View Post

The turbo 4-banger with Mitsu 4G63 roots and the extra 75 hp / 125 ft-lbs really pulled me toward the GC2T.
:happy0180:
there's absolutely nothing mitsubishi in those Hyundais ..
the "theta" engine is all hyundai designed/built and it's a much better engine than the old 4g63 .. which only made it's way in the sonata (in non turbo version)

on the other hand .. the "world engine" who was based on the theta engine is a hyundai based engine that mitsubishi and chrysler used in their 4 cylinder cars like the lancer and caliber .. the last mitsubishi engine that made it's way in a hyundai was the accent's engine .. the 1.8 and 2L engines were hyundai engines since the tiburon in 96
davidp is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to davidp For This Useful Post:
frsvr4 (12-17-2012)
Old 12-17-2012, 11:46 AM   #2063
frsvr4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS
Location: no spoiler club
Posts: 157
Thanks: 567
Thanked 53 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidp View Post
there's absolutely nothing mitsubishi in those Hyundais ..
the "theta" engine is all hyundai designed/built and it's a much better engine than the old 4g63 .. which only made it's way in the sonata (in non turbo version)

on the other hand .. the "world engine" who was based on the theta engine is a hyundai based engine that mitsubishi and chrysler used in their 4 cylinder cars like the lancer and caliber .. the last mitsubishi engine that made it's way in a hyundai was the accent's engine .. the 1.8 and 2L engines were hyundai engines since the tiburon in 96
Ah, thank you for the correction. I was just parroting what a buddy told me.
__________________
'13 Asphalt FR-S // 6 spd, 3M bra, BeSpoke, Sportsguy83 arm rest, YoSpeed sills & plaque, P3Cars Vent Gauge +oil P sensor; on shelf: SRP pedals
'93 Pearl White 3000GT VR-4 // 5 spd, stock block & 30+ psi: 10.5@135
frsvr4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 12:08 PM   #2064
davidp
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: BRZ Limited
Location: Quebec
Posts: 54
Thanks: 18
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamVR4 View Post
Ah, thank you for the correction. I was just parroting what a buddy told me.
No problem
davidp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 12:24 PM   #2065
shu5892001
Ontario's FT86
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2016 Lexus GS-F
Location: Toronto
Posts: 684
Thanks: 261
Thanked 165 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I test drove the r spec yesterday and it felt awful slow for a 274hp car, and the shifter has no feedback
shu5892001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 12:39 PM   #2066
gmookher
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: VortechSC,BorlaEL,Perrin,GCRace
Location: HighHeatHighAltitudeAZ,USA
Posts: 2,254
Thanks: 458
Thanked 669 Times in 394 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
They been making cars a long while now

It blows my mind how cheap some parts feel inside, how interior plastics, from teh showroom do not match color right, even the blacks.

Faster yes.
In my driveway, no.
Will I eat them once I am supercharged? We'll see.
gmookher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2013, 03:33 PM   #2067
thill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2020 SS1LE (previous 13 BRZ owner)
Location: North Pole
Posts: 2,753
Thanks: 328
Thanked 1,463 Times in 802 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Having owned a base 2013 2.0T Gencoupe for 14+ months and getting rid of it for a 2013 BRZ Limited (for about 200 miles now), I wanted to share my thoughts on the two cars:

Having now put just under 200 miles on the BRZ, I feel I can give more detail on the Gencoupe vs BRZ:

- Exterior styling. I realize this is more of a personal opinion, but I have always preferred the look of the twins to the Gencoupe. The front end of the Gencoupe is quite polarizing, and while I did not hate it, I never loved it either. The BRZ is, IMHO, just a better looking car. That said, the BRZ exhaust is rather weaksauce looking compared to the Gencoupe, and the tires on the BRZ still look too narrow (that can be fixed). I would give the BRZ the nod here though. The car is much lower to the ground and looks more, to me, like a true sports car. I think the Gencoupe styling is more polarizing and will most likely not age as well long-term.

- Interior styling. This is probably a wash for me. Both cars have nice looking interiors and use good materials. I liked the stitiched leather look of the Gencoupe dash, but prefer the other plastics in the BRZ (for example plastics around the window and door locks is cheaper looking and feeling on the Gencoupe). The pretty much useless analog gauges (MPG, temperature, boost) in the center stack of the Gencoupe are a negative, but I also think the analog speedometer guage in the BRZ is equally useless (I always check the digital speedometer to verify my speed). The radio unit in the BRZ, for me, is not as good as the Gencoupe. I liked having some steering wheel controls, that said, I do not miss them as much as I thought I would as the BRZ head unit is right there at fingers edge. I just wish the touchscreen buttons were much larger (for example changing radio channels that have been preset). One of my complaints with the Gencoupe bluetooth was that it sometimes lost sync right in the middle of making/taking calls which was annoying. The BRZ has not lost sync once. The driver seat in the BRZ, for me, are superior. I am more comfortable in them, and the driving position is much better. There is definitely more room in the backseat of the Gencoupe and better legroom for backseat passengers. Although neither is comfortable for anyone over 5'5" I really don't think there is a winner here. Both have pros and cons. I would give it a tie. But if this were the FR-S I would have to give the nod to the Gencoupe for interior styling and finish. That said, for me, the driving position is really important and the FR-S and BRZ are superior here. So that may be enough to tip the scales for most people. Both cars offer nice features like push button star and perimeter keyless entry. The Gencoupe only offers Xenon headlights in the far more expensive 3.8 Track version.

- Driving characteristics: Here is where the cars are quite different (and where I want to spend the most time discussing the cars). The Gencoupe is based on the Genesis sedan platform. It is a larger and heavier car (roughly 700 pound difference) and you can feel it immediately. You sit up higher in the Gencoupe and the driving position is not as good. That said, the Gencoupe has a little better visibility and it took me awhile to get my blindposts covered in the BRZ. The Gencoupe has good handling. It is fairly responsive, but the Gencoupe has more understeer, and it relies a lot more on the tires to keep the car under control. Throttle response is not as good with the Gencoupe, and a big complaint I had about the Gencoupe was rev hang. The BRZ has far more feedback when driving the car and, for me, it instilled much more confidence when taking a tight turn quickly. It is not that the Gencoupe was hard to steer, it just requires you to think more, where the BRZ is so intuitive, and well, fun to drive around a tight turn. The gearbox is zero contest. In fact the more I drive the BRZ, the worse the gearbox in the Gencoupe seems. The throws in the BRZ are so much shorter. The shifter is notchier and it is hard to miss a gear. In the Gencoupe the throws are much longer and far more vague. 2nd to 3rd was sometimes easy to miss, and 6th gear is a huge long throw. There is simply no contest here. On a scale of 1-10 I would rate the BRZ gearbox a 9 and the Gencoupe a 5 (at best). Hyundai has to correct this for the next model. Subaru and Toyota should change nothing. It is that close to perfect. Like the gearbox, steering in the Gencoupe is just more vague. Less driver feedback, more electronic feeling. Again not close. BRZ all the way. The car simply feels much more balanced and intuitive to drive and is just so damn fun to drive through a tight corner. I find myself smiling driving the BRZ through a corner, whereas in the Gencoupe, I want to just get through the corner so I can punch it on the straightaway. And that is where the Gencoupe has the big advantage. The car has a lot more horsepower, and makes gobs more torque. Peak torque comes quickly withthe Gencoupe and I always loved it when the turbo was making full boost. It is a blast. That said, the rev hanging and somewhat noticeable turbo lag were annoying. But in a stop light race in a straight line there is really no contest here. But I will say the BRZ is not slow. It is a quick car, but the engine responds better with higher revs. Once you get used to the powerband and where the torque dip is, you can compensate. It just takes more work. I still think the BRZ needs more horsepower and torque. Not a ton more either, just a little more I don't want a 300hp 300 ft lbs of torque in this car for a daily driver. Honestly, 20-40 more hp and 20-30 more ft lbs of torque would do it for me. This said, there is no contest here for me. The BRZ is the better drivers car. It is just so much more fun to drive, especially on a curvy road. The Gencoupe, behind the wheel, just feels and drives more vague. It is not a bad car at all. It is just not as good as the BRZ. That said, if you want a stop light racer, the Gencoupe would be the better car.

- MPG is close, but I am averaging about 2mpg better in the BRZ vs the Gencoupe when driving them comparatively. Over time, the BRZ might actually be up closer to 3mpg. But I doubt this is a deciding factor for anyone buying a RWD sports coupe. Pretty impressive the Gencoupe gets close gas mileage considering how much heavier the car is, and considering how much more hp it makes.

In the end, I liked the Gencoupe. It is really not a master of anything, but somewhat good at everything. I love the BRZ. It is just such a great drivers car. So much fun to take out in a twisty road. The loss of hp and torque is more than offset by the driving characteristics of the car (the driving position, the gearbox, the handling, the feedback).

For someone considering these cars, you really need to do an extensive test drive back to back. I think the Gencoupe has so much power, many people don't notice all the little quirks the car has vs the BRZ. Which feels slower right away, but is a car that shines on a twisty back road.

Last edited by thill; 06-03-2013 at 04:17 PM.
thill is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thill For This Useful Post:
mit_peid (06-04-2013), wootwoot (06-03-2013)
Old 06-03-2013, 04:10 PM   #2068
wootwoot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FRS
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,558
Thanks: 188
Thanked 461 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thanks for the review. I lurked over at the gen coupe forums once or twice to read what they had to say about this comparison. It was, for lack of a better word, ridiculous.

Again, thank you for your informed comparison.
wootwoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 01:19 PM   #2069
davidp
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: BRZ Limited
Location: Quebec
Posts: 54
Thanks: 18
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
just a little update but im at almost 20 000km's on the brz and i can say that im a bit disappointed .. car has squeaks and rattles just about everywhere.. taillight condensation.. feels like there is something loose in the back and on cold starts it drives like crap .. i also have a vibration problem in the shifter and power always seems inconsistent when accelerating.. and when stopping at a light sometimes the idle just falls till it almost stalls then comes back to normal ..
after having all these problems i just can't imagine this car standing up to my gencoupe in the long run .. i've traded the GC at 90 000km and the car had a lot of mods and took a lot of abuse and ive never had that much problems with it .. and mine was a first year model also.. i dont even beat on that car and it feels like its already giving up
davidp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 04:34 PM   #2070
DoomsdayJesus
In Autobahn withdrawl
 
DoomsdayJesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2015 BRZ Limited Man., WRB
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 718
Thanks: 286
Thanked 281 Times in 169 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidp View Post
just a little update but im at almost 20 000km's on the brz and i can say that im a bit disappointed .. car has squeaks and rattles just about everywhere.. taillight condensation.. feels like there is something loose in the back and on cold starts it drives like crap .. i also have a vibration problem in the shifter and power always seems inconsistent when accelerating.. and when stopping at a light sometimes the idle just falls till it almost stalls then comes back to normal ..
after having all these problems i just can't imagine this car standing up to my gencoupe in the long run .. i've traded the GC at 90 000km and the car had a lot of mods and took a lot of abuse and ive never had that much problems with it .. and mine was a first year model also.. i dont even beat on that car and it feels like its already giving up
An awful lot of this is in TSBs and is warrenty covered. I know it's not an excuse, but you may as well get it fixed.
DoomsdayJesus is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FT-86 / FR-S size dimensions compared to Genesis, Civic, Sction tC, etc JDMinc FR-S / BRZ vs.... 559 05-15-2014 07:50 PM
FR-S/Subie Coupe fantasy Maxim Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 23 06-10-2011 01:25 PM
new Kia coupe Ground N Pound Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 22 12-29-2009 02:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.