follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > FT86CLUB Shared Forum > FR-S / BRZ vs....

FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING]


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2012, 02:47 AM   #1
Phaedrus29
Senior Member
 
Phaedrus29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: PA
Posts: 683
Thanks: 106
Thanked 248 Times in 133 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
FRS faster than BRZ? Tell me why I should still get the BRZ.

I really have my heart set on the BRZ over the FRS. My wife has a Subaru and I generally like the brand...and I do slightly prefer the styling and the HIDs. But these reviews that have just been posted have me worried. The reviews from Inside Line, Automobile mag, Motor Trend, and Motor Authority all mention that the FRS is faster. It's mentioned somewhat in the articles, but any thoughts on why this is the case? I really want to get the BRZ over the FRS, but how do I justify that in light of the FRS being a bit cheaper and faster?

Oooops I meant to post this in the Subaru forum.
Phaedrus29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 02:49 AM   #2
Guff
Now w/ over 400 womprats!
 
Guff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: BRZ LZR
Location: Texas/Illinois
Posts: 4,785
Thanks: 10,452
Thanked 3,420 Times in 1,424 Posts
Mentioned: 301 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Garage
It's minutely faster due to a bit more oversteery suspension tune. In reality, they are the same. You are getting the BRZ because it comes with a lot more kit. Nav, HIDs, DRLs, etc. are standard.
__________________
"Sweet Subaru, sweet Subaru, send your BRZ unto me, for the roads of the unworthy must be baptized in speed and glory."
- The Ancient BRZ Sacrament
by Zaku
Guff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 02:51 AM   #3
vaporiz
Senior Member
 
vaporiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 350z
Location: CA
Posts: 141
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^ and BRZ's interior is superior.

FR-S is more rewarding to the better driver, though I doubt the difference can be told by just driving casually.
vaporiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 02:58 AM   #4
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,965
Thanks: 7,663
Thanked 19,051 Times in 8,326 Posts
Mentioned: 677 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaedrus29 View Post
I really have my heart set on the BRZ over the FRS. My wife has a Subaru and I generally like the brand...and I do slightly prefer the styling and the HIDs. But these reviews that have just been posted have me worried. The reviews from Inside Line, Automobile mag, Motor Trend, and Motor Authority all mention that the FRS is faster. It's mentioned somewhat in the articles, but any thoughts on why this is the case? I really want to get the BRZ over the FRS, but how do I justify that in light of the FRS being a bit cheaper and faster?

Oooops I meant to post this in the Subaru forum.
I gonna be honest. When I buy this car it's come down to this

MT = FR-S
AT = BRZ

Why? If I buy MT, which means I gonna use this car for track/autox more than DD, so I don't need all the accessoies. AT, I kinda want extra luxury stuff, which BRZ offers, so I'm going for BRZ.

Other than that, BRZ & FR-S, they're all same to me. Just happen to be FR-S got better time than BRZ. Road condition was different along with weather & temp. Again, just take all the info and review as grain of salt
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 03:01 AM   #5
Phaedrus29
Senior Member
 
Phaedrus29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: PA
Posts: 683
Thanks: 106
Thanked 248 Times in 133 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
Just happen to be FR-S got better time than BRZ. Road condition was different. Same with weather & temp. Again, just take all the info and review as grain of salt
Ya good point. Although I think we also saw videos recently of the same driver on the same course with the same conditions, and the FRS beat out the BRZ very slightly. So there might be some truth to what these reviewers are saying.
Phaedrus29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 03:04 AM   #6
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,965
Thanks: 7,663
Thanked 19,051 Times in 8,326 Posts
Mentioned: 677 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaedrus29 View Post
Ya good point. Although I think we also saw videos recently of the same driver on the same course with the same conditions, and the FRS beat out the BRZ very slightly. So there might be some truth to what these reviewers are saying.
Yes, that might be true... but which car was driven first? FRS or BRZ? Cuz if BRZ was driven first and then timed, afterward he drove FRS and then timed, of course FRS gonna have better time. Cuz he have more time getting used to the car.

I'm not saying FRS is faster and BRZ is slower or vice versa. I'm tell you, drive both of em and see which one you like more.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 05:24 AM   #7
Dark
Elite Padawan
 
Dark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: '15 WRX, 15 GLA250, and 2 feet
Location: Shoreline, WA
Posts: 3,498
Thanks: 197
Thanked 250 Times in 159 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I wouldn't call FR-S is faster because same driver drives both car at the same day. He can't drive the same car to match the exact time he did. It can be slightly better or worse.
__________________
Dark
Dark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 05:35 AM   #8
Enemies
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 SWP Sport-Tech (Limited)
Location: Okanagan Valley, Canada
Posts: 1,093
Thanks: 11
Thanked 86 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I wouldn't be surprised if the FR-S was a little faster but if people optimally tune their cars I bet you the number difference will be pretty insignificant.

Both cars are so very good. They each have their own benefits and their drawbacks. At the end of the day the biggest factor in how this car drives will be you. I'm not saying speed doesn't matter but I'm not exactly worried about fractions of a second. :P

What we need here is... The Stig!
Enemies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 05:51 AM   #9
KeepGuessing
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: e30 150 deville etc etc
Location: Arizona
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
How is the FRS faster ? really? I'm wondering..Thus far the reviews have said 1 thing conclusively..

The car with the assists OFF is faster than the car with the assists ON...

Reviews have reported times in the FRS in similar sluggishness to the brz yet reported the FRS had the assists on....Yet no report as to the status of the assits in the brz car...so it's pretty safe to assume the "slow times" in the brz were achieved using the same things that lead to slow times in the FRS...

One might be SLIGHTLY faster due to nature of handling itself in the corner...but overall that's COMPLETELY compensatable(word?lol)

A BRZ that has a slight tendency to understeer can still outperform a FRS..why? because the driver of the FRS is an idiot...simple answer..

The cars are too close/similar in performance for you to choose one based on performance, seriously that's the WORSE deciding factor at this point.
KeepGuessing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 06:10 AM   #10
Bristecom
Senior Member
 
Bristecom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ PP
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,525
Thanks: 1,702
Thanked 646 Times in 317 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Yeah, I find some of the reviewers comments about it being much faster than the BRZ amusing. As far as we know, the only difference between the two is the suspension setup. The FR-S should not have a power advantage or a better transmission. It would have to be down to discrepancies between the parts or maybe even the fuel or oil or conditions.

But there is a real difference in suspension setup. If you don't plan to modify the suspension, the BRZ will be more stable and the FR-S will be more lively.
__________________
Toyota + Subaru =
Bristecom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 11:54 AM   #11
Moto-P
Senior Member
 
Moto-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: Many types of cars in R&D.
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 902
Thanks: 585
Thanked 3,058 Times in 568 Posts
Mentioned: 101 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Guys, its a 200hp lightweight car, and like the old AE86, 90% of the speed around a racetrack is determined by the driver abilities. Therefore, the slight difference in suspension tuning is mostly irrelevant, as skills for almost all of us are not nearly enough to tap out the highest potential of this car without years of experience and competition. If one makes a turbocharged version or something, that is when things change slightly, but in a car like this, even that may be offset by the inabilities of the driver behind the wheel...
__________________
Moto Miwa
www.club4ag.com
R&D Driving Engineer, Product Planning Consultant
Consulting Member at Cusco, OEM+, RS-R.
www.club4ag.com
Moto-P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 12:29 PM   #12
Spaceywilly
ZC6A2B82KC7J
 
Spaceywilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2002 WRX
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,632
Thanks: 361
Thanked 727 Times in 236 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The cars are mechanically identical...

Also, what he said^
__________________

Straights are for fast cars. Turns are for fast drivers.

Last edited by Spaceywilly; 04-25-2012 at 01:22 PM.
Spaceywilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 12:32 PM   #13
Xdragonxb0i
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: ex500r
Location: AR
Posts: 859
Thanks: 13
Thanked 105 Times in 77 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
what he said^^^

the FRS may be faster in the hands of a pro. But the average joe, not really. I think in perfect conditions/perfect lap the FRS will beat the Brz by < .5seconds

if you want the extra accessory and can afford it go for the BRZ.
Xdragonxb0i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2012, 12:39 PM   #14
Kimsey47
Senior Member
 
Kimsey47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2016 STI DGM
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 1,875
Thanks: 1,189
Thanked 1,460 Times in 662 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Agreed: BRZ = More daily driver comfort
FR-S = More cost effective solution to BRZ with less comforts
__________________
Subaru STI :
Kimsey47 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.