02-25-2012, 11:21 AM | #85 | |
Douchebag
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2014 Mustang GT
Location: NY
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 283
Thanked 403 Times in 214 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I have a strange feeling I'm going to be the only member of this board glued to my TV tomorrow for the Florida Bump-Draft Derby. However, that was inspired by some of the pro-street cars I've helped build. And the GTO.R.
__________________
Here - 2014 Mustang GT Track Package/Recaros - Koni Yellows, Boss 302 Springs, BMR SB041 Front Sway Bar, Boss 302 Rear Sway Bar, Boss 302 Wheels, GT500 Quad Tip Axleback, 2016 Legacy 2.5i Limited
Gone - 2010 RX350, 2006 GTO (2nd), 2007 RX350, 2008 IS250AWD, 2006 GTO, 2004 G35 6MT, 1992 SC400 Last edited by LSxJunkie; 02-25-2012 at 12:00 PM. |
|
02-25-2012, 11:23 AM | #86 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2013 DZE/01 (sold for MX5 ND1)
Location: western MA
Posts: 871
Thanks: 265
Thanked 269 Times in 133 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I just found and read through this thread. Thanks for the laughs everyone.
FYI this (sensationally titled and presumptuous, but mostly spot on) bmwblog article that was posted in the E30 thread applies to many of the arguments here. Quote:
Quote:
It's just a question of emphasis. Larger, heavier cars can be enjoyable, and it's understandable why many prioritize power and acceleration (more than low weight and feel). But every car is a compromise, and the FT86 doesn't make much sense for those people. Overall, I agree with ZDan, and for my preferences even the FT86 is a tad hefty. If that makes me a narrow-minded extremist in your view, then you should add me to your ignore list as well. |
||
02-25-2012, 11:53 AM | #87 | |
(ノಥ益ಥ)ノ
Join Date: Jul 2011
Drives: 2015 Series Blue BRZ
Location: Bronx
Posts: 1,393
Thanks: 930
Thanked 625 Times in 365 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Edit: Know what? I'm done with this thread, I dislike arguing especially when it's this pointless. I'm just going to agree to disagree.
__________________
"Sweet Subaru, sweet Subaru, send your BRZ unto me, for the roads of the unworthy must be baptized in speed and glory." ~Zaku Last edited by SVTSHC; 02-25-2012 at 12:17 PM. |
|
02-25-2012, 11:54 AM | #88 |
(ノಥ益ಥ)ノ
Join Date: Jul 2011
Drives: 2015 Series Blue BRZ
Location: Bronx
Posts: 1,393
Thanks: 930
Thanked 625 Times in 365 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Nope, I'll be infront of my TV beer in hand
__________________
"Sweet Subaru, sweet Subaru, send your BRZ unto me, for the roads of the unworthy must be baptized in speed and glory." ~Zaku |
02-25-2012, 12:43 PM | #89 | |
86 Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
02-25-2012, 01:04 PM | #90 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
I didn't say or even imply that "If you want to fit that many people buy a minivan"! For what it's worth, I think it's FINE for BMW to build cars that fit 4-5 people comfortably, provide excellent performance, and that aren't minivans. I think it's GREAT that cars like the 1 Series M (dumb name, though, shoulda gone with "M135i") and M3 exist, even if I find them to be overweight. For me, the M3 makes for a BRILLIANT M5, and the 1M makes for a great M4. I just think that they could also build one or two rwd cars that are much smaller and lighterweight like the FR-S/BRZ or E30 M3! Since the 1- and 3-series are already called for by bigger/heavier cars, I propose a 1/2- and a 2/3-series (or .5- and .7-series?) Call me crazy, but I also think it would be mega-awesome of them to build a small/lightweight 2-seater similar to the Miata (roadster) or 240Z (fixed-roof coupe). We'll see how the "2-series" comes out, hopefully smaller/lighter than what I'm expecting... Last edited by ZDan; 02-25-2012 at 01:17 PM. |
||
02-26-2012, 12:02 AM | #91 |
Douchebag
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2014 Mustang GT
Location: NY
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 283
Thanked 403 Times in 214 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
If they do ever build a small car, it'll be priced like an Elise, not an FR-S. Be prepared for that. Honestly, BMW has more invested in their brand image than your 25k is worth to them.
__________________
Here - 2014 Mustang GT Track Package/Recaros - Koni Yellows, Boss 302 Springs, BMR SB041 Front Sway Bar, Boss 302 Rear Sway Bar, Boss 302 Wheels, GT500 Quad Tip Axleback, 2016 Legacy 2.5i Limited
Gone - 2010 RX350, 2006 GTO (2nd), 2007 RX350, 2008 IS250AWD, 2006 GTO, 2004 G35 6MT, 1992 SC400 |
02-26-2012, 08:54 AM | #92 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
There is no reason that they couldn't build a car that's smaller and lighter-weight than the 128i priced in the high20s/low30s and make money on it. Smaller chassis = lighter-weight and cheaper. Smaller, less powerful engine = lighter-weight and cheaper. Smaller wheels/tires = lighter-weight and cheaper. Smaller brakes = lighter-weight and cheaper. etc. If they want to continue in the Cadillac/Mercedes direction, of course that's their prerogative. As a fan of smaller/lighter-weight rwd sports/sporty cars, the kind that BMW *used* to build, I am free to think that they kinda suck for it. |
|
02-26-2012, 09:12 AM | #93 | |
Douchebag
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2014 Mustang GT
Location: NY
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 283
Thanked 403 Times in 214 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I'm not saying that it will be an Elise. I'm saying it'll be priced in that range because cheap is not something that BMW does. They'll sell an enthusiast's car for someone who make 90k a year, not 40k just out of college, even if, fundamentally, that's all that car is worth. Additionally, this assertion that building a smaller car that is lighter will be cheaper isn't actually true. The cost to bring a brand new car to market depends less on the size of the vehicle and more on the part's sharing. Designing a new Z1 chassis is just as expensive as designing a new 7er chassis. Tooling for mass production of a new Z1 is just as expensive as tooling for mass production of the new 5er. Yes, there will be savings on sourcing smaller brakes, and possibly a smaller engine, probably from the lower end European market 1er. However, if they choose to develop a new engine, powerplant development costs for an I4 is no less than any other motor. Additionally, if BMW chooses, and they will, to include things like power heated leather seats and knee, side, curtain, frontal, and rollover airbags, they might have to use expensive materials to keep the weight down. BMW has standards for interior trim and safety feature to maintain, and will not lower them to sell to recent college grads. On the other hand, if they developed and sold the car under the Mini marque, that'd be a completely different story. That large market 25-30k buyers is exactly WHY they bought the rights to and rereleased Mini. That market, and that brand, is exactly where such a car would make perfect sense for BMW. It just won't say BMW.
__________________
Here - 2014 Mustang GT Track Package/Recaros - Koni Yellows, Boss 302 Springs, BMR SB041 Front Sway Bar, Boss 302 Rear Sway Bar, Boss 302 Wheels, GT500 Quad Tip Axleback, 2016 Legacy 2.5i Limited
Gone - 2010 RX350, 2006 GTO (2nd), 2007 RX350, 2008 IS250AWD, 2006 GTO, 2004 G35 6MT, 1992 SC400 Last edited by LSxJunkie; 02-26-2012 at 09:29 AM. |
|
02-26-2012, 09:19 AM | #94 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I make WAY more than 90k a year, and BMW does not build a car that I want to buy.
It's good that they literally don't want my money (seems odd, but if you said it I'm sure it must be true), because they're literally not going to get it! I find it curious that so many people worship automakers enough to think that they can DO NO WRONG, and that, whatever they do, it MUST be the best/rightest/most profitable path. You may be right, they may make more money this way. But I think they'd make more by appealing to a larger audience and selling more cars. Hell, why not make a rwd Mini line, that'd be fine with me, and then they can keep their precious cultivated snooty image for the spinning propeller badge. |
02-26-2012, 09:31 AM | #95 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Another point: OK, so let's say they *won't* build a car that stickers for less than $30k. Fine. Build some freaking smaller/lighterweight sports/sporty cars and price them in the 30s. I'd buy the hell out of a 30k+ BMW FR-S with a few more hp.
|
02-26-2012, 09:41 AM | #96 | |
Douchebag
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2014 Mustang GT
Location: NY
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 283
Thanked 403 Times in 214 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
And you are also clearly not the kind of person who wants a car with creature comforts. Which is fine. BMW is just not the brand for you then. They are big on creature comforts. In terms of marketing, it'd have to be more expensive than a base 128i, because the market assumption is that if you are buying a sports car, it's already a luxury, so you should pay more for it. However, it can't be more expensive than a 335i coupe, because the 335i coupe is just flat out faster, even if it's less compelling. I'd price such a car around 38k, but well equipped from the factory with limited options. Slot it in under the Z4 line. The current Z4 sDrive28i (with its 2.0T DI 240hp I4) starts at 48k. Which is just obscene.
__________________
Here - 2014 Mustang GT Track Package/Recaros - Koni Yellows, Boss 302 Springs, BMR SB041 Front Sway Bar, Boss 302 Rear Sway Bar, Boss 302 Wheels, GT500 Quad Tip Axleback, 2016 Legacy 2.5i Limited
Gone - 2010 RX350, 2006 GTO (2nd), 2007 RX350, 2008 IS250AWD, 2006 GTO, 2004 G35 6MT, 1992 SC400 |
|
02-26-2012, 10:42 AM | #97 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
IMO, the 1-series should have been 4-cylinder only and *significantly* smaller and lighter than the 3 instead of 95% of a 3 with the same engines. Quote:
Ah well, we shall see what the 2-series winds up being. My bet: oversized and overweight! |
||||
02-26-2012, 07:08 PM | #98 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
If I'm not mistaken, BMW wants to be the "sporty" luxury car maker. They pander to rich people who want a slightly harder suspension and "lightweight chassis" (compared to 2 ton Mercedes) so they can feel like they have a sporty car, not people who actually want a sports car.
At least that's how it looks now. It makes good money! Building a serious sports car for people who could care less about actual capability of their car would be a waste. |
|
|
|
|